Jenkins vs Travis CI comparison

Jenkins and Travis CI are both solutions in the Build Automation category. Jenkins is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1, while Travis CI is ranked #21 with an average rating of 6.0. Jenkins holds a 10.5% mindshare in BA, compared to Travis CI’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of Jenkins users are willing to recommend the solution.

Jenkins

Read 93 Jenkins reviews

3,625 Views
2,329 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Travis CI

Read 2 Travis CI reviews

391 Views
276 Comparison Views

0% willing to recommend

Jenkins

Travis CI

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Apr 27, 2025

Jenkins and Travis CI are two leading continuous integration tools in the software development sector. Jenkins is favored for complex projects due to its extensive customization options, while Travis CI offers advantages in straightforward implementations with its ease of setup.

Features: Jenkins is known for offering a vast array of plugins, flexible configuration options, and a strong community for support. Travis CI offers benefits such as seamless GitHub integration, automated testing, and simple configuration, making it easily accessible for developers. Each tool provides unique advantages tailored to specific project needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jenkins requires a robust setup process that may involve dedicated infrastructure, whereas Travis CI's cloud-based solution simplifies deployment and reduces the need for infrastructure resources. Community support is a highlight for Jenkins, contrasting with Travis CI's managed customer service, which can provide a smoother experience for newcomers.

Pricing and ROI: Jenkins, being open-source, allows for adoption without initial costs, yet operational expenses may arise from maintenance needs. Travis CI's subscription fees can be higher but offset by reduced infrastructure costs due to its cloud model. Jenkins suits long-term projects with available technical resources, while Travis CI offers potential financial returns through its streamlined operation and lower operational demands.

To learn more, read our detailed Build Automation Report (Updated: June 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

June 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 860,592 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Jenkins

Ranking in Build Automation

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Travis CI

Ranking in Build Automation

21st

Average Rating

6.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Build Automation category, the mindshare of Jenkins is 10.5%, down from 12.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Travis CI is 0.9%, down from 1.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Build Automation

Featured Reviews

Mahdi Mallaki

Senior Devops Engineer at Rakuten

Has a community of plugin providers but needs improvement in Kubernetes integration

Integrating Jenkins with other tools or solutions has presented some challenges. For instance, when attempting to integrate Jenkins with Kubernetes, I encountered numerous errors, which took several days to resolve. In Jenkins, adding a feature typically involves incorporating the repository feature separately. Jenkins lacks built-in Git repository functionality, necessitating an external Git repository to store Jenkins manifests. In contrast, GitLab offers an integrated Git repository and pipeline runner, streamlining the process. One improvement for Jenkins could be integrating a Git server, simplifying the management of CI/CD pipelines. Currently, with Jenkins, modifying pipeline manifests requires navigating to a separate Git repository. In GitLab, however, manifest changes can be made directly within the repository.

Read full review

Pravar Agrawal

Senior SRE at IBM

YAML-based configuration and simple deployment but user interface needs modernizing

Travis CI is an okay tool, and I am forced to use it as part of my job. I don't maintain it; it is running somewhere else, and I don't have control over it. The interface is very basic and not user-friendly; it feels like it was stuck in 2010. It is very basic and designed for lightweight CI work, and it cannot handle heavy CI. You cannot do branched flows, and you will have to write shell scripts to send calls here and there. The pipelines are not as detailed as some other CI/CD tools. If Travis is down, you don't have any control over it and need to reach out to their customer support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Jenkins's automation and orchestration features have significantly improved workflows by automating various processes. Initially, it did not support YAML manifesting or GitOps, but recent versions have introduced these capabilities. Now, the tool supports importing manifest files from Git repositories, enabling the implementation of GitOps pipelines. Compared to other tools like GitLab, it has become a mature tool for running CI/CD pipelines."

"The most valuable features are Jenkins Pipelines for ALM and full Deploy Cycle."

"Jenkins is the most widely used development tool, so there are many plugins and it's easy to integrate. There is a large user base to provide community support, which I find very valuable. If I need to find a better way to do something, I can always get help from the community. Automation is about thinking outside of the box, and other users are constantly adding new plugins."

"It can scale easily."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to connect with different tools and technologies."

"A lot of support material exists via a single web search of exactly what you're looking for."

"Jenkins's open-based framework is very valuable."

"It offers continuous deployment and continuous testing. It enables us to figure out anything."

More Jenkins pros

"The only thing I like about Travis CI is that you have a YAML file to define a Travis flow."

Cons

"It would be better if there were an option to remove its Java dependency. This would make it more compatible with other software, and it could be much better. At present, we have to depend on Java whenever we want to deploy agents."

"Developer documentation for plugins, plugin development, integrations: Sometimes it’s tricky to do pretty obvious things."

"We cannot change the ownership of any directory or file or any kind of directory."

"The UI of Jenkins could improve."

"Sometimes, random errors of metadata are not there, which causes delays. These are essentially gaps in the information being passed to the job."

"The scriptwriting process could be improved in this solution in the future."

"The user interface could be improved, and its reporting capabilities need enhancement. The plugins could be more effective."

"Improvement-wise, I would want the solution's user interface to be changed for the better. In short, the solution can be made more user-friendly."

More Jenkins cons

"The interface is very basic and not user-friendly; it feels like it was stuck in 2010."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Jenkins is an open-source tool."

"The solution is one of the lowest costs compared to competitors."

"Jenkins is an open-source platform."

"Jenkins is a free open-source server."

"The open-source version is free, but small companies would not be able to afford the cloud-based version."

"It is a free product."

"In our company, we do pay for the licensing of the solution."

"We use the tool's open-source version which is free. There is an enterprise version which is expensive but comes with better support."

More Jenkins pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Build Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user184734

Systems Administrator at Facebook

Jan 22, 2015

I generally find TeamCity a lot more intuitive than Jenkins.

Moving to TeamCity from Jenkins At work, we’re slowly migrating from Jenkins to TeamCity in the hope of ending some of our recurring problems with continuous integration. My use of Jenkins prior to this job has been almost strictly on a personal basis, although I pretty much only use Travis…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

21%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

12%

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

How does Tekton compare with Jenkins?

When you are evaluating tools for automating your own GitOps-based CI/CD workflow, it is important to keep your requirements and use cases in mind. Tekton deployment is complex and it is not very e...

See all answers

What do you like most about Jenkins?

Jenkins has been instrumental in automating our build and deployment processes.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Jenkins?

Jenkins is used in many companies to save money, especially within R&D divisions, by avoiding the expenses of proprietary tools.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Travis CI?

I'm not too sure about the pricing of Travis or how the agreement works.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Travis CI?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Travis CI?

Travis CI is mainly used to run integration tests as part of the deployment, which I do on Kubernetes. The Travis workflows are integrated with any changes in my code. It will have different jobs, ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Harness vs Jenkins

Compared 17% of the time

GitLab vs Jenkins

Compared 14% of the time

Bazel vs Jenkins

Compared 9% of the time

Tekton vs Jenkins

Compared 8% of the time

Bamboo vs Jenkins

Compared 7% of the time

More Jenkins Competitors

Tekton vs Travis CI

Compared 100% of the time

More Travis CI Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Jenkins

June 2025

Download Jenkins product report

Buyer's Guide

Build Automation

June 2025

Download Travis CI product report

Overview

Jenkins is an award-winning application that monitors executions of repeated jobs, such as building a software project or jobs run by cron.

Jenkins

Easily sync your GitHub projects with Travis CI and you'll be testing your code in minutes. Travis CI for private repositories has plans for every size project. With Travis CI testing your open source project is 100% free.

Travis CI

Sample Customers

Airial, Clarus Financial Technology, cubetutor, Metawidget, mysocio, namma, silverpeas, Sokkva, So Rave, tagzbox

Facebook, Heroku, Mozilla, Zendesk, twitter, Rails

Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Google, Jenkins and others in Build Automation. Updated: June 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

860,592 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Build Automation vendors.

We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.