Jitterbit Harmony vs Tidal by Redwood comparison

Jitterbit and Tidal Software by Redwood are both solutions in the Workload Automation category. Jitterbit is ranked #31, while Tidal Software by Redwood is ranked #20. Jitterbit holds a 0.9% mindshare in WA, compared to Tidal Software by Redwood’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Jitterbit users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Tidal Software by Redwood users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

Jitterbit Harmony and Tidal by Redwood are both integration and automation platforms. Jitterbit Harmony has the upper hand in pricing and customer support, while Tidal by Redwood is notable for its robust feature set, which can offer a worthwhile investment.

Features: Jitterbit Harmony stands out with advanced data connectivity, transformation capabilities, and cloud data processing, making it ideal for complex environments. Its API integrations enhance its data handling capabilities significantly. Tidal by Redwood focuses on comprehensive automation and job scheduling, offering highly configurable workflows and extensive enterprise system integration, highlighting its strength in automation-focused tasks.

Room for Improvement: Jitterbit Harmony could benefit from more extensive deployment architecture to support larger systems and improve specialized configuration handling. Tidal by Redwood might enhance its pricing structure to be more accessible to businesses of varying sizes and improve general service availability. Streamlining its onboarding process could further aid in user adoption and satisfaction.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Jitterbit Harmony offers straightforward deployment with strong support networks, simplifying onboarding. Tidal by Redwood excels in handling complex deployments, providing specialized support tailored for larger systems but may require more initial setup time due to its extensive architecture.

Pricing and ROI: Jitterbit Harmony offers competitive pricing with an emphasis on affordability, ensuring quick ROI due to simplified implementation and a minimal learning curve. Tidal by Redwood may start with higher initial costs but promises long-term ROI with its high efficiency in automation and system integration, leading to substantial operational savings and improved process accuracy over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Jitterbit Harmony vs. Tidal by Redwood Report (Updated: January 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Harmony vs. Tidal by Redwood

January 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

JAMS

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Workload Automation category, the mindshare of JAMS is 2.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Jitterbit Harmony is 0.9%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tidal by Redwood is 4.6%, up from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Workload Automation Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
JAMS	2.6%
Tidal by Redwood	4.6%
Jitterbit Harmony	0.9%
Other	91.9%

Workload Automation

Featured Reviews

reviewer2770605

Cloud Engineer at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Has streamlined complex job scheduling across scripting languages while reducing manual effort

JAMS could be improved with a web client that is accessible and as fast as a normal website, eliminating the need to RDP to the servers to access the JAMS client. A functionality running on the JAMS server to continuously check the JAMS agents would ensure they are working properly. If an agent is not responding, a feature to restart the service from the job server machine would be beneficial. The upgrade process, particularly when switching from V6 to V7, could be clearer in terms of documentation, ideally with screenshots showing exactly what needs to be done on each screen.

Read full review

Mohamed Abd Kader

Head of Enterprise Architecture at Mantrac Group

An easy-to-setup solution with good stability

We use Jitterbit to connect cloud solutions with our on-premises ERP system We connect cloud solutions to our on-premise ERP system easily using Jitterbit. It is its most valuable feature. The solution's API management capabilities need improvement. We have been using the solution for almost…

Read full review

Jim Gillingham

Batch Production Manager at a consultancy with 201-500 employees

Its versatility, ease of use, scalability, and cost-effectiveness make it a 10/10 and the best of the breed

The company is not really big. One of the areas that they are working on is improving the process of migrating jobs from the lower environment to the upper environment. They had used a tool called Transporter, which was a little difficult to use, but they've now released a new tool in August, which I've not yet used, to do that. It's probably called Repository or something like that, but it's a tool for migrating jobs from the lower environment to the upper environment. That's where they needed to improve, and it looks like they may have, but I haven't tried the tool yet. They can do better reporting in terms of production statistics reporting.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I didn't know about JAMS because I don't have a person with any challenges with the purchase administration. The feature or the user interface is user-friendly because of the readable icons or very descriptive icons. Though I'm a beginning user of JAMS, I had no issues using it."

"The fact that we no longer need to use Excel spreadsheets is huge. Before JAMS, every group was keeping track of their own batch jobs. Nobody really knew what the other jobs were. So, if jobs failed, other groups wouldn't necessarily know. With JAMS, everything is done through a single scheduler. You can choose who to notify."

"The user-friendly and adaptable scheduler allows us to manage various scheduling scenarios."

"The most valuable feature for us is that it's DR-ready. With respect to disaster recovery, it has the built-in capability for failover to our DR site. If all of the required ports are open, it can be done seamlessly."

"The feature or capability to import a job is most valuable. We can import an existing job from different platforms, and all the configurations get migrated as well without modifying the code, job schedule, etc."

"It makes everything that we want to do so much easier. We have had a number of instances in the past where we have had developers who have been working on a project, and even though we have had JAMS for all these years, they will create some SQL Server Agent job, or something like that, to run a task. When it is in code review and development is complete, the question always comes around, "Can JAMS do this?" The answer has always been, "Yes." Pretty much anything we have ever developed could be run by JAMS."

"Being able to create a series of chained jobs, which are basically linked jobs is valuable."

"I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events."

More JAMS pros

"The fluid user interface (probably the most user friendly interface, when compared to its competitors)."

"It is very easy to build integrations and processes to pull and push data."

"Jitterbit provides the ability to quickly map data between files and databases."

"The Cloud Console for monitoring and troubleshooting data operations."

"Easy integration with Salesforce"

"We only use small parts of the solution, however, the parts that we use are quite adequate."

"It runs like an appliance and has tremendous throughput."

"Jitterbit handles the most lines of data in a .csv and loads the quickest of any data loader I have tried."

More Jitterbit Harmony pros

"The first, big thing that we got out of using Tidal Workload Automation was having a centralized view of the status of all of our batch processes across all these systems... We can look into the schedule at any given time and see if things are running on track or if they are falling behind. We can also see if something failed."

"We have to run about 12,000 jobs every day and the majority of them need to be launched from our ERP, JD Edwards. The native compatibility of the Tidal platform with JD Edwards dovetails with our greatest need. It's directly connected to the heart of our IT system. We couldn't work without it."

"Thinking of all the people involved in checking jobs on a daily basis, manually running jobs or auditing them through standalone tools, and trying to connect them. We have saved hundreds of hours weekly, which is substantial."

"Tidal helps administrators and users to see the information that is relevant to them in that single pane of glass. They can see jobs running, they can see job history, and they can see job progression. If you look at alternatives like Airflow and clouds, you'd have to design your own UI to monitor the progress of the different jobs that you've created in Airflow. So Tidal is huge for us."

"Tidal Automation offers extensive monitoring and reporting features that let users keep track of the status of their workflows and quickly spot any problems."

"One of the most useful features is being able to set up a schedule and create dependencies. The calendar can kick off processes at certain times, based on dependencies that you specify, like time, or whether another process has finished. Dependencies are the most useful thing."

"It's the most efficient tool in doing repetitive tasks and saves a lot of time with minimum possibility of error."

"From a management standpoint, when using the solution for cross-platform, cross-application workloads, I've never had a problem with the application. It's very interactive, especially with the different security levels that they offer."

More Tidal by Redwood pros

Cons

"If around 5,000 or more jobs run at a time, JAMS slows down, and we have to wait around five to 10 minutes or restart JAMS scheduler services."

"Sometimes the UI is not the most responsive I've ever used. But because it does its job, I don't complain."

"We have had a lot of people working from home who can't always connect to the JAMS server. We use VPN, as most companies do, and we have it set up so that everybody can access the JAMS server. But many times, our people cannot access it... JAMS could do a better job of telling you what the problem is when you try to log in to the server."

"I'm not sure if they have fixed it in a newer version, but there is no global search in the version I have. If I have multiple sub-folders that are named for business units, like HR or IT, and I have to search for a job, I cannot search from the top. I have to go to the HR folder to search for a particular job, or to the IT folder."

"JAMS doesn't allow us to implement SOC controls. We are a company that trades stocks on the New York Stock Exchange, so all our transactions are audited. It has a feature that saves the file for only a month but doesn't segregate the data between finance and SOC-related compliance."

"The UI could be better. There were some things that were not quite intuitive, such as the search tool. When we tried to search for jobs, we had to clear the entire search and then go in and enter the new search query. That's something that wasn't intuitive for a new user."

"When looking at a folder in JAMS with many jobs, it would be good to have better information in the list display of what's inside those jobs. We get some information, but other important details are missing."

"As an admin, I would like to have a web-based GUI instead of a client application that we have to install on our PCs."

More JAMS cons

"I know with Salesforce updating the UI like they did, it slowed it down a lot."

"Its API management capabilities need improvement."

"I would like the ability to offer a dedicated cloud version for security."

"There were some bugs in the product. For example if you run a delete query and test, it deletes the actual data."

"You need to have some development skills or hire a Jitterbit engineer to make changes."

"Sometimes additional connectors are needed."

"Looping through complex data structures can be difficult."

"Sometimes we experience disconnections and I have to close all Jitterbit programs."

More Jitterbit Harmony cons

"Tidal Automation could be further integrated with other systems used in the operation of tidal energy systems, such as weather forecasting tools, energy management systems, or asset management software."

"I don't know if Tidal wants to get into the business of monitoring long-running jobs, but that could be a feature for the future: a job launching and monitoring tool. Using Tidal for monitoring doesn't seem like a good fit, but if they could offer something that did that as an add-on or include it, it might be helpful."

"The current user interface of Tidal Software is functional. However, it can be improved to make it more intuitive and user-friendly."

"Initially, it is complicated to understand the functionalities as there is limited product documentation."

"The software's performance and scalability could be improved, particularly when dealing with large-scale workloads or complex business processes."

"There are several improvement points that our team has provided to the vendor."

"The user interface is the place that needs the most work. If and when we find issues with the product, they are usually in that area. If I had to choose, that's where I'd want issues, as opposed to in the engine. But the UI is average. It's a little sluggish at times and there are some bugs in it."

"When we patch to the next version, there is often a little thing that breaks. It has rarely been a big deal, but I always seem to have to follow up on one tiny issue. It would help if they had some better QA testing of their patches."

More Tidal by Redwood cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Fortra's JAMS pricing structure has deteriorated significantly since its acquisition by Fortra."

"Our licensing is pretty cheap because we have a state solution. So, we pay only $1,000 a year."

"Definitely check how many single processes you want to run and count them as jobs. That is how you would work out your pricing on JAMS. For example, if you're running a number of commands and you can put them all into one script and run that script, you can count that as one job."

"For what it does, the product is priced very well."

"The pricing is very fair. We have seen very minimal to no price increases over the years. We are not banging down the door of support all the time either. I would imagine if we were a company that submitted a dozen support tickets a week for the last nine years, then it might be a little different because we would be eating up everybody's time. However, for what we get out of it, the pricing is extremely fair. Back when we were originally looking and brought in JAMS, we were looking at a couple of the other competitive products that were in this space, but the pricing from JAMS was far and away better than what the other competitors could offer for the same functionality."

"There are no additional costs other than the license for Fortra's JAMS which is affordable."

"JAMS is close to the lower end of the pricing models for enterprise scheduling solutions. They are much cheaper than Control-M, as well as some other products that I've used. I also don't know of another solution where you can actually get true, unlimited licensing, where you can have as many instances and as many agents as you want."

"I haven't been involved in the financial side for several years, but we buy one host and unlimited agents, and we get a reasonable price for that. We're happy with the amount we pay and the scalability it provides."

More JAMS pricing and cost advice

"Each business needs to determine if it is a mission critical aspect."

"The added bonus is that Jitterbit doesn't charge for any data volume/traffic."

"The Jitterbit price is based upon endpoints. They also offer ERP connectors with their Enterprise edition"

"The solution's cost is mid-ranged compared to other vendors."

"Jitterbit was extremely cost effective for us compared to other options."

"I do believe Jitterbit has one of the better pricing and licensing options out there compared to its competitors."

"The price is reasonable in terms of the product’s functionality."

"We are satisfied with the pricing of Tidal. It's in the moderate range and it feels very achievable for us."

"The solution enables admins and users to see the information relevant to them, but this is bundled as an add-on that we would have to pay for."

"The solution’s licensing model in terms of its flexibility and transparency regarding costs is pretty good. A person can buy the license, and if you decide to stop support, you can do that but still have the product. So, it's not like you're paying constantly to keep that license alive. Certainly, you want to keep support going too. Once you buy it, you own it. It's not like I have to keep paying somebody to keep using it."

"Our yearly licensing costs are between $10,000 to $20,000. They have always been reasonable with us. I like that non-production licensing is about half the cost of production licensing. Licensing is by adapter typically. We have had scenarios where we have had to take an adapter from one environment to another, and they've allowed us to do that. They have made it a very reasonable process. There's definitely a feeling that they will work with you."

"We've been able to purchase more adapters because the cost of the product has been very reasonable."

"The solution has no hidden costs. It helps me to plan forward into the future. I know that I can add another 100 or a thousand jobs, and that's how much it will cost me today."

"BMC is really expensive. The other solutions are about the same price. I think Tidal is even cheaper than the others, such as CA, Stonebranch, and JAMS."

More Tidal by Redwood pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Workload Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	18

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	1

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	6
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about JAMS?

I find the historical tracking feature of JAMS invaluable for reviewing past events.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JAMS?

They recently switched to subscription-based pricing, which increased. The price is fair considering the functionalit...

See all answers

What needs improvement with JAMS?

As far as we are using JAMS version 6, it looks good and there is nothing major to add about it. Everything is functi...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Control-M vs JAMS

Compared 18% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs JAMS

Compared 10% of the time

AutoSys Workload Automation vs JAMS

Compared 9% of the time

Stonebranch vs JAMS

Compared 9% of the time

ActiveBatch by Redwood vs JAMS

Compared 4% of the time

More JAMS Competitors

Azure Data Factory vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 7% of the time

Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 6% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 5% of the time

DBSync Cloud Workflow vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 5% of the time

Dataloader.io vs Jitterbit Harmony

Compared 5% of the time

More Jitterbit Harmony Competitors

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 23% of the time

Control-M vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 13% of the time

Automic Automation vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 8% of the time

Redwood RunMyJobs vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 7% of the time

OpCon vs Tidal by Redwood

Compared 2% of the time

More Tidal by Redwood Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

JAMS

January 2026

Download JAMS product report

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

January 2026

Download Jitterbit Harmony product report

Buyer's Guide

Tidal by Redwood

January 2026

Download Tidal by Redwood product report

Also Known As

No data available

Jitterbit, Jitterbit Harmony

Tidal Workload Automation, Cisco Workload Automation, Tidal Enterprise Scheduler

Interactive Demo

JAMS Software

Demo not available

Jitterbit

Demo not available

Tidal Software by Redwood

Overview

JAMS is an automation and job scheduling solution designed for workflow optimization, catering to businesses large and small with flexible licensing and integration options.

Offering both Core and Advanced packages, JAMS supports a range of environments from small teams to large-scale operations. Its standout features include integration with platforms like PowerShell, SQL, and SAP, coupled with capabilities such as dependency management and natural language scheduling. JAMS simplifies job management, centralizes workflows, and boosts productivity with its robust automation features. Customizable workflows and insightful logging make it adaptable for diverse needs, supported by responsive customer service ensuring seamless operations.

What are JAMS's key features?

Automation & Scheduling: Flexible automation helps manage complex job schedules efficiently.
Integration: Connects seamlessly with platforms like SQL Server, SAP, and Python for diverse applications.
Centralized Job Management: A unified interface for handling thousands of jobs daily.
Dependency Management: Supports complex workflows with efficient dependency tracking.
Insightful Logging: Provides detailed logs and notifications for precise task execution.

What benefits should users look for in JAMS reviews?

Enhanced Productivity: Automates repetitive tasks, freeing up resources for strategic initiatives.
Scalability: Flexible licensing models grow with business size and needs.
Efficient Workflow Automation: Streamlines job orchestration across environments.
Responsive Support: Helps ensure smooth operations with quick troubleshooting.

In industries, JAMS is employed for automating workflows and managing batch jobs. Organizations utilize it for SSIS, SQL Server tasks, file transfers, and integrating with vendor systems, achieving efficient file automation and data management. Scheduler enables precise execution of thousands of tasks daily, enhancing operational efficiency.

JAMS Software

Jitterbit Harmony offers an advanced integration platform that simplifies data transformation, helps users quickly connect apps, and automates workflows, streamlining complex business processes efficiently.

Designed to meet the high demands of modern businesses, Jitterbit Harmony enables seamless integration across cloud and on-premise environments. By leveraging its powerful tools and user-friendly design, users can accelerate innovation, reduce operational costs, and enhance productivity. It bridges the gap between traditional and emerging technologies, ensuring organizations can adapt quickly to market changes and remain competitive.

What are the key features of Jitterbit Harmony?

Intuitive Design Studio: Offers a drag-and-drop interface that simplifies integration design.
Connectivity: Provides a comprehensive library of pre-built connectors for popular apps and databases.
Real-time Integration: Ensures seamless data flow across systems in real-time.
API Management: Facilitates robust API creation, management, and enhancement.
Automated Workflows: Enables automation of multiple processes with minimal coding.

What benefits can users expect from Jitterbit Harmony?

Increased Efficiency: Streamlines business processes, reducing labor-intensive tasks.
Cost Savings: Eliminates the need for additional software investments, cutting expenses.
Scalability: Supports growth by easily adapting to increased data and application demands.
Improved Decision Making: Provides real-time data access for strategic insights.

Jitterbit Harmony finds its application across numerous industries, from enhancing data integration in the healthcare sector to optimizing supply chain logistics in manufacturing. It supports financial institutions by improving transaction processing and facilitates real-time data connectivity in retail environments, making it a versatile choice for diverse industries looking to innovate rapidly.

Jitterbit

Tidal Software is a leading provider of enterprise workload automation solutions that orchestrate the execution of complex workflows across systems, applications and IT environments. With a comprehensive portfolio of products and services, Tidal optimizes mission-critical business processes, increases IT cost efficiencies and satisfies legal and regulatory compliance requirements. Hundreds of customers around the world count on Tidal for modernizing their workload automation and driving their digital transformation. Tidal Software is headquartered in Chicago with offices in Houston, London, Minsk, Belarus and Chennai, India. For more information, visit tidalsoftware.com.

Tidal Software by Redwood

Sample Customers

Teradata, Arconic, General Dynamics, Yum!, CVS Health, Comcast, Ghiradelli, & Boston’s Children’s Hospital

LA Metro, Mophie, Club Auto, University of Miami, Exostar, Dialog Direct, Avero, Greenpoint Technologies, Berklee Online, Odyssey, KeyedIn Solutions, Swish Maintenance, SPP Pumps Limited, Talent Plus, Ricoh Canada, Televerde, Reed Construction Data, Sika US, Sunkist Growers

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Jitterbit Harmony vs. Tidal by Redwood

January 2026

Free Report: Jitterbit Harmony vs. Tidal by Redwood

Find out what your peers are saying about Jitterbit Harmony vs. Tidal by Redwood and other solutions. Updated: January 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Jitterbit Harmony vs. Tidal by Redwood report.

See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.

We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.