SentinelOne Singularity Complete and Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert both compete in advanced threat detection and response. SentinelOne appears to have the upper hand due to its more extensive features and higher user satisfaction.
Features: SentinelOne is praised for its autonomous detection, rollback capabilities, and advanced AI-driven threat hunting. Kaspersky is valued for its comprehensive threat intelligence, root cause analysis, and extensive integration options.
Room for Improvement: Users of SentinelOne note the need for enhanced reporting and occasional performance hitches during intensive operations. Kaspersky users seek improvements in remediation functionalities and more intuitive navigation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SentinelOne is commended for straightforward deployment and responsive customer service. Kaspersky's deployment is seen as more complex, with mixed reviews on support responsiveness.
Pricing and ROI: SentinelOne's setup costs are often deemed higher, but users cite reduced incident response time as substantial ROI. Kaspersky offers competitive pricing with noticeable ROI, especially in malware protection.
Since then, I have not faced any intrusions, which is one reason I chose SentinelOne over ESET.
We have not faced any attacks since we implemented it.
It has absolutely helped reduce our organizational risk.
Kaspersky supports us; when we and the analyst with Kaspersky grade it, we are almost prepared to respond to our questions with my team.
They do a great job of figuring out the problem and pointing you to generic documentation or working with you to fine-tune a solution.
We are using the automated email process for support, and they respond within an hour or two hours sometimes.
A chat service would be beneficial.
It's all auto-scale and auto-categorized, configuring automatically.
The tool's built-in automation for deploying the agents works well for large infrastructures like mine.
My deployment is relatively small, and SentinelOne Singularity Complete works within those constraints.
I haven't found any issues with this particular solution, and there's no room for improvement for Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert.
Stability issues are not complex due to the easy Quadrigia method in the console.
It has caused problems with interoperability between third-party tools, which could lead to entire servers crashing or specific tools failing.
This indicates room for improvement in stability when interacting with other solutions.
Initially, there were issues, particularly on the management side, but now the console is much more stable.
Deployment with the console directly, without depending on other workers to deploy the agents, would be beneficial.
The only thing that prevented the attack from succeeding was a free version of Malwarebytes.
Providing a single pane of visibility for the end user would be beneficial.
It's challenging to prevent a user from manipulating their privileges or someone else's of others, and it's difficult to control what users can access at the organizational level.
The pricing is nominal when we compare it with other solutions.
If you want protection, you have to pay the price.
There are other products that are less expensive, but I tell my clients that in security, they cannot cut corners or look for the cheapest solution.
They counted many of the instances and licenses as duplicates despite them only being alive once, which was frustrating.
Almost all our clients use the Patch Management, vulnerability, and integration feature.
I have an advanced app providing visibility of all my endpoints, which was not the case before.
SentinelOne has a feature to decommission automatically, which has been fantastic.
There's also automation that gives my team free time, preventing them from having to look for every alert.
Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution designed to detect and respond to advanced threats in real time. It combines advanced threat intelligence, machine learning algorithms, and behavioral analysis to provide proactive protection against sophisticated attacks.
With its centralized management console, security teams can easily monitor and investigate incidents, while automated response capabilities enable quick remediation. This solution offers deep visibility into endpoint activities, allowing organizations to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Expert is a powerful tool for enhancing the overall security posture of businesses, ensuring the protection of critical assets and sensitive data.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete provides AI-driven threat detection and response with features like ransomware protection and rollback, offering endpoint protection with minimal system impact and deep forensic analysis.
SentinelOne Singularity Complete combines machine learning and artificial intelligence to offer robust endpoint protection. It delivers real-time insights and advanced threat detection through seamless integration with third-party tools, allowing for efficient endpoint management. With an emphasis on user-friendliness, it ensures reduced false positives. Room for improvement includes better integration options, enhanced reporting, and more precise analytics to tackle false positives. Users seek improved interoperability with systems and comprehensive support for legacy systems.
What are the key features of SentinelOne Singularity Complete?Organizations from industries like finance, healthcare, and technology deploy SentinelOne Singularity Complete to safeguard endpoints such as PCs, servers, and virtual machines. Equipped with EDR, it effectively replaces traditional antivirus systems and integrates with cloud technology for real-time security insights.
We monitor all Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
