Klocwork vs Parasoft SOAtest comparison

Perforce and Parasoft are both solutions in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category. Perforce is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.4, while Parasoft is ranked #28 with an average rating of 8.0. Perforce holds a 1.8% mindshare in SAST, compared to Parasoft’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 92% of Perforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Parasoft users who would recommend it.

Klocwork

Read 22 Klocwork reviews

3,397 Views
2,037 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Read 30 Parasoft SOAtest reviews

929 Views
571 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Klocwork

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Klocwork compete in the software testing and static analysis space. Parasoft SOAtest appears to have the upper hand due to its pricing and customer support, although Klocwork is favored for its code analysis abilities.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers robust API testing, integration with development environments, and comprehensive test automation features. Klocwork provides precise static code analysis, efficient vulnerability detection, and specialized features for large, complex codebases.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest users suggest enhancing reporting functionalities, improving performance for large datasets, and expanding API test configurations. Klocwork users recommend improving error documentation, adding support for more programming languages, and optimizing user interface flexibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is noted for its straightforward deployment and supportive customer service. Klocwork's deployment is more complex but well-documented, though its customer service is perceived as needing improvement compared to Parasoft.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest offers competitive pricing options, which is attractive for smaller teams. Klocwork, although more expensive, provides higher ROI for larger organizations dealing with complex coding environments due to its extensive analysis capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Klocwork

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

13th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Security Tools (16th), Static Code Analysis (5th)

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

28th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (20th), API Testing Tools (11th), Test Automation Tools (21st)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Static Application Security Testing (SAST) category, the mindshare of Klocwork is 1.8%, down from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 0.5%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Static Application Security Testing (SAST)

Featured Reviews

AnirbanSarkar

Head - Solution Management Group at Meteonic Innovation Pvt. Ltd.

Lets you find defects during the development phase, so you don't have to wait till the development is over to find and address flaws

What needs improvement in Klocwork, compared to other products in the market, is the dashboard or reporting mechanisms that need to be a bit more flexible. The Klocwork dashboard could be improved. Though it's good, it's not as good as some of the other products in the market, which is a problem. The reporting could be more detailed and easier to sort out because sorting in Klocwork could be a bit more time-consuming, mainly when sorting defects based on filters, compared to how it's done on other tools such as Coverity. What I'd like added in the next release of Klocwork is the peer code review Cahoots which used to be a part of Klocwork, and the architecture analysis and both have been taken out of Klocwork. I found the two critical for specific deployments, so if those can be brought back to Klocwork, that would be very good.

Read full review

Ajit Kumar Rout

Sr Quality Assurance Engineer at Wabtec Industrial

Good API testing and RIT feature; clarity could be improved

In general, this is a hassle free, user friendly tool and it doesn't require much knowledge if you're using the manual testing. Automated testing is also good but requires some knowledge in that field. It has some great features. It's a good tool compared to some of the other paid tools; input and output can be stored before extension and there is also a verification assessment that can be implemented by using some different methodologies inside the tool. If the licensing cost is suitable then I recommend this solution. If you have automation people with in-depth knowledge in coding that will be helpful. I rate this solution a seven out of 10.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is the Incremental analysis."

"The best advantage of Klocwork is the reduced setup time."

"The ability to create custom checkers is a plus."

"Technical support is quite good."

"There is a central Klocwork server at our headquarter in France so we connect the client directly to the server on-premises remotely."

"The most valuable feature of Klocwork is its reduced setup time."

"Klocwork's most valuable feature is the static code analysis feature. It detects the potential problem earlier to allow the developer to receive feedback quickly and then address it before it becomes a problem."

"I like not having to dig through false positives. Chasing down a false positive can take anywhere from five minutes for a small easy one, then something that is complicated and goes through a whole bunch of different class cases, and it can take up to 45 minutes to an hour to find out if it is a false positive or not."

More Klocwork pros

"The solution is scalable."

"Every imaginable source in the entire world of information technology can be accessed and used."

"Technical support is helpful."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

Cons

"Modern languages, such as Angular and .NET, should be included as a part of Klocwork. They have recently added Kotlin as a part of their project, but we would like to see more languages in Klocwork. That's the reason we are using Coverity as a backup for some of the other languages."

"Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage."

"The main problem is that since it only parses the code, the warnings or the problems that are given as a result of the report can sometimes require a lot of effort to analyze."

"There are too many warnings, and it requires expertise to determine the correct category for them."

"Every update that we receive requires of us a lengthy and involved process."

"I believe it should support more languages, such as Python and JavaScript."

"We'd like to see integration with Agile DevOps and Agile methodologies."

"I hope that in each new release they add new features relating to the addition of checkers, improving their analysis engines etc."

More Klocwork cons

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"Parasoft SOAtest has an internal refresh function where you can refresh the software to show the changes you’ve made in your projects. Unfortunately this function does not work properly, because it often does not show the changes after you’ve hit te refresh button a few times."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"When it comes to licensing, the solution has two packages, one for a fixed and the other for a floating server, with the former being more cost effective than the latter."

"Klocwork should not to be quite so heavy handed on the licensing for very specific programs."

"There are other solutions on the market such as Microsoft Visual Studio. They have been adding more static code analysis features that come for free. It is getting better all the time. That is one of the possibilities is that we've been considering that we may stop using the Klocwork because it doesn't give us any added value."

"Licensing fees are paid annually, but they also have a perpetual license."

"This solution offers competitive pricing."

"The pricing for Klocwork is very competitive if you compare it from apple to apple. It has competitive pricing regarding the licensing model and the per-license cost. Klocwork isn't a high-end investment for anyone deploying it; even SMBs can afford it. The Klocwork cost per user would depend on the license type, so I'm unable to mention a ballpark figure because it would depend on the type of installation and how the deployment will be, and the nodes to give an accurate calculation or figure. The total price depends on the package, so my company could never publish pricing for Klocwork on the website. My team first collects information from potential clients on the deployment scenario, project environment, etc., before suggesting a package for Klocwork. My rating for Klocwork in terms of pricing is a five because of its flexible license models. There's a license model for every type of organization, whether small, midsize, or enterprise, so it's a five out of five for me."

"Klocwork is still tight on their licensing. If Klocwork would loosen up on the licensing, and where the license could be used, and how many different programs could be run on it, then we have several development programs that I would love to be able to use it for going forward."

"The limitation that we have is that Klocwork is licensed to certain programs, and if you want to license them to other programs, you have to pay more money."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Static Application Security Testing (SAST) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

38%

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

24%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Klocwork?

It's integrated into our CI, continuous integration.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Klocwork?

Klocwork is not expensive, but neither is it very cheap. It is less expensive than Coverity.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Klocwork?

Every product has room for improvement. Klocwork sometimes provides too many additional warnings which require expertise to manage. Follow-ups are often needed. The support for plugins also needs t...

See all answers

What do you like most about Parasoft SOAtest?

Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings. Going through that is a challenge. It only happens in the initial stage when we are setting up the tool, but it can be imp...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for automotive compliance and sanity-checking scores.

See all answers

Comparisons

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Klocwork

Compared 37% of the time

Coverity vs Klocwork

Compared 29% of the time

Polyspace Code Prover vs Klocwork

Compared 14% of the time

Checkmarx One vs Klocwork

Compared 3% of the time

PVS‑Studio vs Klocwork

Compared 2% of the time

More Klocwork Competitors

Postman vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 22% of the time

SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 20% of the time

Coverity vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 14% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Fortify on Demand vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork

March 2025

Download Klocwork product report

Buyer's Guide

Parasoft SOAtest

March 2025

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Also Known As

No data available

SOAtest

Overview

Klocwork detects security, safety, and reliability issues in real-time by using this static code analysis toolkit that works alongside developers, finding issues as early as possible, and integrates with teams, supporting continuous integration and actionable reporting.

Perforce

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Sample Customers

ACCESS Co Ltd, Risk-AI, Winbond Electronics, Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceutical Research Institute, University of Southern California, Alebra Technologies, SIMULIA, Risk Management Solutions, Brigham Young University, SRD, HRL

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Buyer's Guide

Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest

March 2025

Free Report: Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest

Find out what your peers are saying about Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Klocwork vs. Parasoft SOAtest report.

See our list of best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Static Application Security Testing (SAST) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.