LambdaTest vs ReadyAPI Test comparison

LambdaTest and SmartBear are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.7, while SmartBear is ranked #25. LambdaTest holds a 4.5% mindshare in FT, compared to SmartBear’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of SmartBear users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 28 LambdaTest reviews

2,889 Views
2,485 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

ReadyAPI Test

Read 31 ReadyAPI Test reviews

1,959 Views
764 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

ReadyAPI Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 27, 2025

ReadyAPI Test and LambdaTest are both popular tools in the testing category. ReadyAPI Test seems to have the upper hand in API testing flexibility, while LambdaTest leads in cross-browser and device testing capabilities with cloud integration.

Features: ReadyAPI Test is known for its flexibility, robust Groovy scripting, and comprehensive test automation, which facilitates extensive API test coverage and easy project setup. It's particularly adept at handling data-driven tests and supports a wide range of integrations. LambdaTest stands out for its geolocation testing capabilities, integration with CI/CD tools, and efficient cross-browser testing, especially noted for its speed and reliability in parallel testing environments.

Room for Improvement: ReadyAPI Test could enhance its tool integration, reporting options, and overall stability. Users would appreciate more seamless integration with test management systems and more adaptable licensing options. LambdaTest could improve by offering real device and mobile application testing, as well as increasing execution speeds. There's potential for better performance analytics and fostering a more engaged support community.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test requires more initial setup due to its primarily on-premises deployment but is supported by a responsive and helpful support team. LambdaTest offers the advantage of easy cloud-based deployment with comprehensive documentation and community resources, which often reduce the need for direct support intervention.

Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test is perceived as expensive, potentially deterring smaller users, although it offers significant ROI when its full capabilities are utilized. Flexibility in licensing remains a concern. LambdaTest is seen as affordable and cost-effective, particularly for larger organizations, providing substantial value through competitive pricing compared to other market solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. ReadyAPI Test Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. ReadyAPI Test

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

6th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (8th)

ReadyAPI Test

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

25th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (14th), API Testing Tools (12th)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReadyAPI Test is 1.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
LambdaTest	4.5%
ReadyAPI Test	1.9%
Other	93.6%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Karine Kirche

Practice Specialist at a government with 1-10 employees

Cloud-based testing has simplified remote mobile validation and provides flexible device coverage

I was not impressed with how detailed their analytics and logs are from LambdaTest. The solution we were testing is being used because many of us are working from home. It was easy to implement because with a real phone, we have to bring a real phone to each person. Since three years ago, many employees have been working from home, so we were trying to find a solution for this challenge. We had no need to exploit the information for the analytics generated in the background. The purpose was simply to make it easy for our employees to access a phone. The downsides I noticed include that the pricing was very good, but the visual quality of the image sometimes suffers. The contrast on a real iPhone provides better contrast than with the cloud solution. The only aspect that was less favorable than on a real phone was the contrast of the color.

Read full review

Luis Sanchez

Senior Quality Assurance Test Engineer at Dormakaba

Helps in data, regression, performance, security, and functional testing

ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The primary feature that has significantly improved our test execution times is automation."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"I was really surprised by LambdaTest; it was a very good service and for the price, I think it is a very good solution."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"The slow nature of a cloud platform was compensated with parallel testing, and now we are able to finish our testing job faster than it was before COVID."

"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."

More LambdaTest pros

"One good feature is SoapUI's URL check, which allows you to check among the applications. I'm not just talking about the ones for Android. It has all kinds of multi-world tests that are really helpful."

"ReadyAPI has the power to enrich all the technical work. You can achieve any complex task using ReadyAPI. I can also do UI automation with ReadyAPI. In a few test cases, we want to check the API and the equivalent UI. I download a job and write a piece of Groovy or Java code. It's almost the same in ReadyAPI. I can do that in a single test case. ReadyAPI is a powerful tool because you can do anything you want, but only you need to download the right set of jobs and produce the right set of code."

"We used to write our own solutions, from small scripts to task web services, so this saves us thousands of hours."

"The Pro and free version of SoapUI Pro has good technical support."

"The solution has some good scanning features."

"The interface is user-friendly."

"The out-of-the-box support for the database is a valuable feature."

"SoapUI Pro is a good tool when it comes to API design and orchestration. Additionally, it is beneficial for functional and for performance testing."

Cons

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."

"The downsides I noticed include that the pricing was very good, but the visual quality of the image sometimes suffers."

"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"I feel that the automated screenshot testing takes a little longer on MacOS sometimes."

"Sometimes, when multiple users use the tool simultaneously, it can slow down, affecting efficiency."

More LambdaTest cons

"We tried automation but it's not easy to integrate with the synching and some of the mission tools that we use for automated testing of APIs."

"The current interface is unsatisfactory."

"There are no bugs or glitches, but a few features available only in the Pro version could be made available in the open-source version. Some of the features do not necessarily need to be only available to Pro users. The data generator would be really useful for the open-source version users."

"The UI could be a bit more flexible."

"Grouping of the cases is not possible in SoapUI, to my knowledge. When working with critical cases or the, we were not able to group them properly. We can definitely create a suite and add them there, but within a whole suite, we have to identify them, which was not easy."

"The UI should be improved."

"There aren't any plugins for UI automation. You need to make a custom code and download a job to put into the libraries. If it were panelized, then it would be straightforward. It should be in a panel of the tools, so you can add those tools as your test step in your test cases."

"ReadyAPI Test needs to improve its reporting. While reports provide essential information when issues arise, or tests fail, having more graphical representations directly within the reports would be beneficial. It needs to improve stability and scalability as well. The tool's support is slow, and takes months to reach a solution."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an affordable product."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"LambdaTest is priced well, which is why we migrated to it."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"I think the number of users is also limited, considering how much we pay."

"ReadyAPI Test is expensive, and I rate its pricing a four out of ten."

"SoapUI Pro is open source but it has a subscription-based model which involves some more features. At the moment we are using the free version. The Pro version requires a license, and it is an annual license to use it."

"It is free of charge."

"My understanding is that the pricing is okay, however, that's taken care of by our procurement team. It's around $5,000 for three years."

"We have team members who are working in shifts, and it is not possible for us to utilize a single license on a single piece of hardware so that multiple team members can use it. We have to take out multiple licenses for each team member."

"The Pro version can be expensive for some companies. There are no costs in addition to the licensing fees."

"ReadyAPI Test is about $680 per user, per year."

More ReadyAPI Test pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Financial Services Firm

17%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	10
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	19

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 42% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 14% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

QA Wolf vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Postman Enterprise vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 20% of the time

Broadcom Service Virtualization vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 10% of the time

Parasoft SOAtest vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 7% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 5% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs ReadyAPI Test

Compared 3% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

January 2026

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

ReadyAPI Test

January 2026

Download ReadyAPI Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

SoapUI NG Pro

Overview

LambdaTest offers real-time and automated testing across extensive browser and OS combinations with integrations like Jenkins and GitLab. It combines legacy and real device access for diverse compatibility, enhancing functionality and execution speed with HyperExecute and Docker tunneling.

Geared for businesses requiring robust browser compatibility, LambdaTest simplifies large-scale testing needs with seamless integration into CI/CD pipelines. Its automation features and parallel testing capabilities help detect UI misalignments quickly while reducing manual efforts. LambdaTest supports cross-browser functionality with comprehensive documentation and platform fusions like AWS for enhanced utility.

What key features make LambdaTest indispensable?

Intuitive Interface: Streamlines user experience.
Real-Time Testing: Thousands of browser and OS combinations available.
Tool Integration: Compatible with Jenkins and GitLab.
Automation and Parallel Testing: Efficient test cycles and process streamlining.
Legacy and Real Device Access: Ensures broad compatibility.
HyperExecute: Boosts execution speed significantly.
Docker Tunnel: Enables local testing with ease.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Comprehensive Documentation: Ensures ease of use and knowledge sharing.
Enhanced Performance: Fusions with platforms like AWS offer improved efficiency.
Global User Compatibility: Reduces manual testing, boosts customer experience.
CI/CD Integration: Consistent performance across teams.
Efficient Resource Utilization: Lowered manual testing efforts and cost efficiency.

In industries demanding high browser compatibility and web responsiveness, teams integrate LambdaTest for automation, real-time testing, and maintaining global user experience standards. Its use in parallel testing cycles alongside industry-driven integrations minimizes timelines and optimizes workflows effectively.

LambdaTest

For REST, SOAP and other popular API and IoT protocols, SoapUI NG Pro provides the industry's most comprehensive and easy-to-learn functional testing capabilities. Based on open core technology proven by millions of community members, SoapUI NG Pro helps you ensure that your APIs perform as intended, meet your business requirements, timeframes, and team skill sets right from day one.

SmartBear

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Apple, Cisco, FedEx, eBay, Microsoft, MasterCard, Pfizer, Nike, Oracle, Volvo, Lufthansa, Disney, HP, Intel, U.S. Air Force, Schindler

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. ReadyAPI Test

December 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. ReadyAPI Test

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. ReadyAPI Test and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. ReadyAPI Test report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.