BrowserStack vs LambdaTest comparison

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. BrowserStack is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0, while LambdaTest is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.7. BrowserStack holds a 10.7% mindshare in FT, compared to LambdaTest’s 5.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of BrowserStack users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of LambdaTest users who would recommend it.

BrowserStack

Read 26 BrowserStack reviews

5,517 Views
5,131 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Read 27 LambdaTest reviews

3,057 Views
2,782 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

BrowserStack

LambdaTest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 27, 2025

BrowserStack and LambdaTest are competing in the cross-browser testing domain. BrowserStack seems to have the upper hand with its feature richness and ease of deployment, while LambdaTest offers competitive pricing and favorable ROI.

Features:BrowserStack is recognized for its extensive device coverage, real-time testing, and integration capabilities with a wide range of browsers and operating systems. It provides cross-browser compatibility testing with access to numerous devices for manual and automated testing. LambdaTest offers seamless integration with popular development tools, geolocation testing, and supports parallel testing, making it appealing to developers focused on efficient test cycles.

Room for Improvement:BrowserStack could enhance support for more diverse browser versions and improve the user interface for complex configuration scenarios. Additionally, expanding automation documentation might help users maximize functionality. LambdaTest might consider extending the range of supported native devices and simplifying its deployment complexity. Increasing device availability and providing more in-depth usage tutorials could also be beneficial.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:BrowserStack offers a streamlined deployment process, allowing for rapid setup and intuitive use. Its customer service is well-regarded. LambdaTest, while having a more complex deployment process, provides robust technical support and extensive onboarding resources. Both solutions deliver excellent customer service, although LambdaTest emphasizes strong support structure and responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI:BrowserStack comes with a higher cost due to its sophisticated capabilities and feature set, making it suited for large-scale projects. LambdaTest offers a cost-effective model providing a quick return on investment, ideal for small to medium-sized projects. Its competitive pricing makes it attractive for budget-conscious buyers seeking comprehensive testing abilities.

To learn more, read our detailed BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

BrowserStack

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

AI-Augmented Software-Testing Tools (1st)

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Test Automation Tools (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of BrowserStack is 10.7%, down from 11.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.7%, up from 5.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

ANand Kale

Sr Practice Lead - Business and Experience Transformation at Peristent Systems

Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users

I integrated BrowserStack into our company's web and application test workflows because it has plugins that work with browsers and applications, allowing for cross-browser testing. BrowserStack was really helpful for cross-browser testing in areas involving mobiles, web applications, or tablets. The tool can help with the testing across all applications. I have not experienced any time-saving feature from the use of the tool. My company uses the product for real-device testing since it has a bunch of devices in our library. My company has a repository where we do manual testing. BrowserStack improved the quality of our company's applications. Improvements I have seen with the testing part revolve around the fact that it is able to do testing at a fast pace. The quality of the product is better since it can go through all the parts of the applications, meaning it can provide high test coverage. The tool is also good in the area of automation. The test coverage is higher, and the time taken during the testing phase is less due to automation. I have not used the product's integration capabilities since my company doesn't have the option to look at other QA testing tools like Selenium, which can be used for the automation capabilities provided. The product should offer more support for cross-browser testing, device testing, and testing across multiple devices. I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

Read full review

Dinesh Saharan

Presales at Net Solutions

The tool reduces the manual effort needed and helps automate certain tasks for users

I won't be able to comment on what could be improved in the solution since I am not the one who handles LambdaTest. It is our company's IT team that takes care of LambdaTest. Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis. If something is perfect, it doesn't mean that it doesn't need to improvise or improve, like in terms of adding new features. There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's helpful for me to test on different devices."

"We like the model device factory for iOS and Android devices."

"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."

"It is a stable solution. There's no lagging and jittering."

"I've worked on testing integrations with BrowserStack, particularly with a platform called IT. This involves testing the registration process, including receiving verification codes on devices and phones. BrowserStack has been excellent for testing these integrations, providing a seamless workflow development experience."

"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."

"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."

"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."

More BrowserStack pros

"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."

"The UI is pretty clean and easy to navigate, and we were able to figure it out very quickly."

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The real devices feature is the most valuable feature for us."

"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"

"The technical support services are excellent."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

More LambdaTest pros

Cons

"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."

"I haven't seen AI in BrowserStack, making it in an area where improvements are required in the product."

"The solution is slow."

"Customer support could be better. We tried to implement and explore this product with the vendor or reseller's help, but we haven't had any good response about the product."

"BrowserStack is very expensive and they keep increasing their cost, which is absolutely ridiculous, especially when someone like LambdaTest is coming through for literal thousands of dollars less, with the same services."

"I would like for there to be more integration with BrowserStack and other platforms."

"BrowserStack should work on its Internet connectivity although issues only occur occasionally."

"Sometimes BrowserStack is really slow and devices are not loading. it is really annoying and that's why we bought several newer devices because sometimes it's affecting us a lot."

More BrowserStack cons

"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."

"The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"If possible to simulate the finger pinch, it would make it more realistic."

"The tool can improve its testing speed. Changing or switching to another mobile phone can be very slow on a real device."

"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

"You cannot perform native-app testing, as they offer simulation for web testing only."

More LambdaTest cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"There are different licenses available that can be customized. You can select the features that you want only to use which can be a cost-benefit."

"The price is fine."

"This solution costs less than competing products."

"Compared to other solutions, BrowserStack is one of the cheapest."

"BrowserStack could have a better price, but good things have a price."

"The price of BrowserStack is high."

"My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses."

"As for pricing, I can't provide a clear evaluation as I'm not directly involved in those discussions."

"This is an affordable product."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"The product can be described as an averagely-priced solution."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

University

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Retailer

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about BrowserStack?

The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for BrowserStack?

My company found the product's license to be very compatible with our budget, and we pay 5,000 to 10,000 per year for licenses.

See all answers

What needs improvement with BrowserStack?

In terms of improvements, they can make it snappier. Everything kind of works. They have locked down the phones, which is problematic because there are some test cases that require access to things...

See all answers

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

The pricing of LambdaTest depends on the deal negotiated. It is cost-effective compared to competitors like BrowserStack ( /products/browserstack-reviews ) and Sauce Labs ( /products/sauce-labs-rev...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

The execution reporting can be improved for better integration between automation execution and accessibility platform reporting. There are specific use cases related to authentication and authoriz...

See all answers

Comparisons

Sauce Labs vs BrowserStack

Compared 23% of the time

Perfecto vs BrowserStack

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

CrossBrowserTesting vs BrowserStack

Compared 4% of the time

Selenium HQ vs BrowserStack

Compared 3% of the time

More BrowserStack Competitors

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 13% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 3% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack

August 2025

Download BrowserStack product report

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

August 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Overview

BrowserStack is a cloud-based cross-browser testing tool that enables developers to test their websites across various browserson different operating systems and mobile devices, without requiring users to install virtual machines, devices or emulators.

BrowserStack

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Sample Customers

Microsoft, RBS, jQuery, Expedia, Citrix, AIG

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

Buyer's Guide

BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

July 2025

Free Report: BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest

Find out what your peers are saying about BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.