LinkRunner vs LinkSprinter comparison

LinkRunner and LinkSprinter are both solutions in the Network Troubleshooting category. LinkRunner is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.0, while LinkSprinter is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.0. LinkRunner holds a 16.1% mindshare in NT, compared to LinkSprinter’s 6.6% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of LinkRunner users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of LinkSprinter users who would recommend it.

LinkRunner

Read 20 LinkRunner reviews

2,303 Views
2,303 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

LinkSprinter

Read 3 LinkSprinter reviews

749 Views
719 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LinkRunner

LinkSprinter

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

LinkSprinter and LinkRunner are both network testing tools, competing in the network diagnostics category. Based on user feedback, LinkRunner holds the upper hand due to its comprehensive features despite being more complex and expensive.

Features: LinkSprinter offers basic testing functionalities, quick diagnostics, and ease of use, making it ideal for simple tasks. It emphasizes affordability, simplicity, and speed. LinkRunner provides advanced diagnostic tools, detailed network insights, and robust features appealing to users needing in-depth analysis. LinkRunner's extensive capabilities and comprehensive features make it a powerful tool for complex network issues.

Room for Improvement: LinkSprinter could benefit from enhanced durability, expanded testing capabilities, and improved ruggedness. Its users have noted that it tends to lack in long-term resilience under heavy usage. LinkRunner, while feature-rich, needs a more intuitive setup process, improved portability, and better user interfaces. Users find its complexity can be a drawback, particularly for those not deeply experienced in network diagnostics.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LinkSprinter is praised for its straightforward deployment and user-friendly instructions, making it accessible to non-technical users. It garners positive feedback for its ease of use and effective customer service. LinkRunner, though more complex to set up, offers extensive deployment options and comprehensive customer support. Users value its thorough support despite the initial complexity in deployment.

Pricing and ROI: LinkSprinter is considered cost-effective, with faster ROI due to its lower initial setup costs. Users see it as a balanced offering regarding features and price. LinkRunner, while more expensive, is viewed as a worthwhile investment for its extensive capabilities and long-term benefits. The higher cost is justified by its expansive features and reliability, making it appealing for users seeking robust diagnostic tools.

To learn more, read our detailed LinkRunner vs. LinkSprinter Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner vs. LinkSprinter

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,164 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LinkRunner

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

LinkSprinter

Ranking in Network Troubleshooting

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Diagnostics (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Network Troubleshooting category, the mindshare of LinkRunner is 16.1%, down from 23.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of LinkSprinter is 6.6%, down from 9.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Troubleshooting

Featured Reviews

Jesse_B

Manager of networks and infrastructure at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees

Impressive ease of use, gives comprehensive results in seconds, and saves a lot of time and resources

I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources. Its ease of use is very impressive. LinkRunner allows me to have my technicians run tests that are normally too complex and require a network specialist. AutoTest works with just one click. AutoTest does a lot of testing that would normally require a network specialist to log in to a switch and check out VLAN based on a port. My technicians don't have to log in to the switch anymore. They can just do AutoTest and information is provided online. So, I no longer have to send a specialist. I can have my technician run these very complex tests. It saves me on resources, time, and site visits. When it comes to troubleshooting, based on my experience, it has given very useful and very helpful information, especially for my field technicians. It has reduced my visits and the amount of presence because it gives a very comprehensive report on your network tests. It tests multiple variables and multiple parameters and gives a very informative report that makes it easy to pinpoint what is the root cause. There are many tools in this one solution. It's basically a bunch of toolkits or tool sets in one device, which makes it very powerful testing equipment.

Read full review

JamesStout

IT Director at JVS Consulting

A small, convenient tool that is very stable, but needs to have a longer battery life

They could make it easier to set up originally, because the initial setup can be quite hit and miss. It is also quite battery intensive, so it might last a bit longer if it had a lithium battery. You're always having to replace the batteries, so it would be good if it could be USB-charged or something like that.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The auto-test feature is vital and does 90 percent of what I need on its own. It's fast and I can get there in just a few clicks. It does a good job and tells me everything I need to know. LinkRunner works pretty quickly and always seems to be accurate."

"I like the fact that I can tell the equipment to stop at a certain point during the test of a cable, to see whether or not there is basic connectivity. I can stop it before it starts pinging the outside world, such as Google or, perhaps, our core network switch. Those basic results—do I have a basic connection and power—finish up fast and I can move on."

"I've found the VLAN test feature to be most valuable. That's because not many devices do VLAN tests. Normally, I have to send a center technician to check a line and see if it's alive. If it's working, then I have to send a network technician out to log into a switch and see which port it's on and on which VLAN that port is. That's two persons and two separate visits. This device does all of this in a matter of seconds, and that has saved me a lot of time, troubleshooting, and resources."

"The solution's ability to simplify network validation and configuration of copper and fiber Ethernet networks is very useful to me. Otherwise, I’m guessing. Having a tool that I can trust doesn't solve all problems, but for the problems it solves, I can trust that it has told me “yes” or “no.” I would rate it highly for that."

"AutoTest is very helpful. It's very streamlined and it's very easy to set up and very easy to identify what we want to achieve. It's probably the feature we use the most. It provides us with LLTD, which is very useful."

"The most valuable feature is the end-to-end testing with the "dart," as they call it, where you can test for faults in the cable or if they've been terminated properly."

"In terms of documenting ad hoc additions and other changes to wired ethernet connections, this product is very good. It keeps the information in the cloud and I have the ability to name it. This makes it very nice and easy to see."

"It is fast in providing results. It is pretty accurate."

Cons

"It is very stable. That being said, there is one feature that is not quite as stable as the rest of the product. You can leave it plugged into a location where you're doing some work and connect to it remotely by a program called VNC... sometimes that function breaks down, if you've been running for a couple of days... if you're remotely controlling it, you're probably not right next to it. That can be modestly annoying."

"It runs tests quickly, but it takes a while to boot up. It's somewhat disappointing that LinkRunner takes some time to turn on. When I arrive in the space, I usually spend the first two minutes waiting."

"If it weren't for the battery, it would probably get an eight out of 10. But because of the battery, it's infuriating and it's not reliable."

"Being really nitpicky about the LinkRunner G2, I wish the form factor was a little bit smaller. However, I'm sure that the size of the unit is compromised by the fact that the battery is large. If that were to mean having less battery life, I would not change it."

"It's a bit bulky. It would be nicer if it were a little bit smaller and packed with all its features. I would also like it if the screen were a bit bigger."

"One of the things I'd like to see in future versions of LinkRunner is a wireless dongle embedded into the product so that I don't need to have a separate wireless dongle. It should be built into that."

"A feature that I would like to see is the ability to send a tone down the cable. That would be great. I have to use a separate tool for that. If I'm trying to troubleshoot a cable that is not plugged into a network switch, I need the ability to tone."

"It's a little bit tough getting used to at first, but once you get the hang of it, and once you start using it more, like anything, it gets easier. The difficult part, at first, is knowing where to find each test and how to use the tests."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's expensive but you definitely get what you pay for. I would buy another one if I had to."

"It was difficult to sell this to my management because the price is really high compared to other testing tools. However, we've seen a pretty good return on investment considering our outcomes and the time we have saved. The first year has been great."

"We... decided to go with NetAlly for the price and the bang for the buck."

"The price was fine. You pay for the unit, and there are no licensing or maintenance fees."

"I didn't have to buy it, but if I was going to have my choice, I wouldn't buy it just because of the price point. It works pretty well to do one thing. For the cost, it is definitely not worth it. There are other products out there that can do the same thing for probably 70% less. I am not aware of any additional costs."

"The 10Gig ones are quite expensive, and we have only two of them, but I know that this option was cheaper than the other 10Gig option we looked at, and we're very happy with it."

"The area where the product could be improved is by having a lower cost so that I could have more than one. The price is competitive, but everybody would always like to see the price go down. I'd buy another one if it were cheaper."

"It's reasonably priced in my market. It provides good value for money. The device is competitively priced as compared to other solutions. It gives you a lot of functionality and saves you a lot of time and resources. I see it as a good buy and good value for money. I stand for it."

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

University

Government

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

18%

University

Hospitality Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Comparisons

NetAlly EtherScope nXG vs LinkRunner

Compared 31% of the time

IxChariot vs LinkRunner

Compared 30% of the time

AirCheck G3 vs LinkRunner

Compared 15% of the time

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner

August 2025

Download LinkRunner product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Diagnostics

August 2025

Download LinkSprinter product report

Overview

LinkRunner AT 3000 & 4000. Next Generation Copper and Fiber Ethernet AutoTester. Fast and comprehensive validation of network links and powerful copper and fiber network connectivity troubleshooting. Tests from 10Mbps to 10Gbps, PoE, VLAN, switch port, path analysis, packet capture, topology mapping and so much more!

NetAlly

The LinkSprinter Pocket Network Tester verifies the functionality of copper Ethernet links and identifies errors in less than 10 seconds. The tester reveals network connectivity status and port information while ensuring documentation for every link. The comprehensive AutoTester measures PoE voltage, performs a switch test, and confirms the DHCP server is running and responsive. The tester also verifies gateway/router, internal IP service, and cloud reachability. When paired with the secure Link-Live Cloud Service, the Network Tester automatically uploads results and allows annotation of results enabling job supervisors to easily manage the progress of deployment and troubleshooting tasks assigned to their team.

NetAlly

Sample Customers

Philips Healthcare, HCA Healthcare, University of South Dakota, Memorial Hermann, Baltimore County Public Schools, Aaramrak.

Cisco, Marriott, Sands Expo, Valparaiso University, Memorial Hermann Health Care System, Mount Sinai, Cox Enterprises, George Washington University, University of Iowa.

Buyer's Guide

LinkRunner vs. LinkSprinter

July 2025

Free Report: LinkRunner vs. LinkSprinter

Find out what your peers are saying about LinkRunner vs. LinkSprinter and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,164 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LinkRunner vs. LinkSprinter report.

See our list of best Network Troubleshooting vendors.

We monitor all Network Troubleshooting reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.