Logpoint vs syslog-ng by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Logpoint and One Identity are both solutions in the Log Management category. Logpoint is ranked #32 with an average rating of 8.3, while One Identity is ranked #16 with an average rating of 10.0. Logpoint holds a 1.1% mindshare in Log Management, compared to One Identity’s 1.4% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Logpoint users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Logpoint

Read 24 Logpoint reviews

6,724 Views
2,690 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

syslog-ng by One Identity

Read 7 syslog-ng by One Identity reviews

4,310 Views
4,310 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Logpoint

syslog-ng by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

Logpoint and syslog-ng by One Identity are prominent in log management and analysis. Logpoint is often preferred for its affordability and strong support, while syslog-ng stands out for its extensive features catering to larger enterprises.

Features: Logpoint offers user-friendly configuration, strong analytics, and cost-effective reporting. syslog-ng boasts advanced filtering capabilities, high scalability, and integration support for real-time monitoring, making it ideal for complex environments.

Room for Improvement: Logpoint could enhance its scalability and extend its third-party integrations. It also needs to improve its customization options to match larger deployments. syslog-ng requires a simpler setup process, improved user interface, and a more comprehensive SIEM functionality to better compete in broader markets.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint simplifies deployment with extensive support, ensuring quick implementation and troubleshooting. In contrast, syslog-ng has a complex setup, suited for large scale but supported by detailed documentation and resources for strategic deployment.

Pricing and ROI: Logpoint is priced competitively with low setup costs, making it accessible for small to mid-sized enterprises. syslog-ng aligns its pricing with its rich feature set, leading to higher initial costs but potentially delivering significant ROI for large enterprises.

To learn more, read our detailed Logpoint vs. syslog-ng by One Identity Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 913,076 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Logpoint

Ranking in Log Management

32nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (30th), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (14th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (40th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (20th)

syslog-ng by One Identity

Ranking in Log Management

16th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

3.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Logpoint is 1.1%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of syslog-ng by One Identity is 1.4%, down from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
syslog-ng by One Identity	1.4%
Logpoint	1.1%
Other	97.5%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Rifat Hasan

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Has lacked proper integration and consistent support communication

I selected Logpoint for the pricing as it is reasonable. I am located in Bangladesh, South Asia, Dhaka. I have tried to contact Exabeam by mail repeatedly, but there has been no response. My company, Corporate Projukti Limited, including my Bangladesh area head, technical director, and team manager, have sent emails to contact Exabeam solution, but there is no response. There is already a distributor in Bangladesh. The weakness with Logpoint is UEBA. UEBA is recommended, but not extra. Exabeam's UEBA is an extra feature. SOAR is extra, but Logpoint's product measurement is 40 or 50. There is a 10% difference with the UEBA and SOAR, so Logpoint is weak there. I would appreciate extra features in Logpoint such as SOAR. SOAR and UEBA are included features in Logpoint. Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation. Exabeam has a license included, and the extra license is an add-on. In Logpoint, it is included, which makes it a weak point.

Read full review

Oliver Castellucchio

IT Infrastructure & Cloud Security Manager at Thux

Has ensured compliance by centralizing log data and supporting secure connections

We currently do not use that feature. We currently have just an open-source release, not a premium release. My boss has indicated that he wants to buy a premium syslog-ng version next month. I think we can use other features of this tool in the future. In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution is user-friendly."

"The main advantage of Logpoint is the support service. They reply within ten minutes to an hour to our queries."

"The most valuable feature, which is endpoint security, is included in Logpoint, and an extra feature is the integration."

"The UEBA component, as well as the SOAR component, are some of the most valuable features of Logpoint."

"The solution offers excellent reporting features, and our customers have been satisfied that they have been able to meet their compliance needs by giving them a standard report."

"We like the user and entity behaviour analytics (UEBA) and find it valuable."

"Log collection, dashboards and reporting are good."

"The most valuable features are the ones that we use the most, which are the search and report facilities."

More Logpoint pros

"Syslog-ng has a separate config file in addition to the core configuration."

"Syslog-ng provides easy access to all my logs. It helps me show managers and other clients precisely where an incident occurred. I also like it because you can integrate syslog-ng with multiple solutions to allow real-time monitoring."

"For us, the most valuable feature is the use of compound search for searching logs at a specific time, by a specific user, or specific behavior."

"The ability to extract and store the logs is the most valuable feature of syslog-ng."

"What I appreciate most about syslog-ng is its configuration; its C-style config is much easier to understand, read, and write than other popular solutions such as syslog or rsyslog."

"We chose syslog-ng because it is easy to install, easy to maintain, easy to update, and due to the fact that all data arrive in raw format, we can manipulate it as we want."

"Syslog-ng has built-in features that we can use to create alerts for a SIEM solution. It isn't a true SIEM solution, but it's sufficient for the time being."

Cons

"It is complicated to collect daily logs from other systems."

"Log management could be better because transporting the log from a password to the client system takes time."

"One of the downsides is it is not a SaaS solution. It must be on-premises."

"The thing that makes it a little bit challenging is when you run into a situation where you have logs that are not easily parsable. If a log has a very specific structure, it is very easy to parse and create a parser for it, but if a log has a free form, meaning that it is of any length or it can change at any time, handling such a log is very challenging, not just in LogPoint but also in everything else. Everybody struggles with that scenario, and LogPoint is also in the same boat. One-third of logs are of free form or not of a specific length, and you can run into situations where it is almost impossible to parse the log, even if they try to help you. It is just the nature of the beast."

"LogPoint is complex and we don't have the skills to maintain use cases or even to extend the use cases."

"One of the things we faced last year was that we had some memory issues with the server running. We were running them as virtual services, and we were facing some performance issues. Back then, there were some things that had already been solved at the end, but one of the small issues we had was that it was quite memory-consuming. After one upgrade that we did, we faced some performance issues."

"The documentation part is something that needs to be improved, as well as the threat intelligence investigation part."

"Logpoint's UEBA is a weak point, while Exabeam's UEBA has extra AI through automation."

More Logpoint cons

"In syslog-ng, I think a GUI would be beneficial. I am unsure if the premium module has a GUI to administer it."

"It's hard to find people who know how to use syslog-ng. I often find problems with configurations, and solutions aren't integrated correctly with syslog-ng. For example, there might be data with extra decimals, or the collector agents are incorrectly named. It isn't a problem with the solution; it's a lack of professionals."

"There is room for improvement in terms of observability."

"There is always the potential for additional integration and protocol extensions."

"The filtering has room for improvement."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's getting more expensive, which is one of the reasons we're looking around just to see if there's anything better value."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I would rate LogPoint's pricing a seven. It is not very expensive compared to some of the more costly products, and it is not very cheap compared to some of the cheaper products in the SIEM market."

"Our licensing fees are about $10,000 USD per month, which I think is fair."

"Logpoint's pricing is mid-ranged and depends on the number of devices."

"It was on a yearly basis at about $100K. It was not a huge environment. We were running it on our own virtual server environment, which, of course, had a cost. There was hardware and some energy cost, and then there were Microsoft Windows licenses for servers. That's all, but there was nothing in comparison to the licensing costs."

"LogPoint seemed like it was a good product, but it was expensive and there wasn't any room to move the pricing when customers needed a lower-costing solution."

"For a hundred user deployment the cost is about $10,000. The next year it would be the same because it's a subscription-based license. There are separate costs as well, for example, if a customer asks for training for their staff."

"It has a fixed price, which is what I like about LogPoint. I bought the system and paid for it, and I pay maintenance. It is not a consumption model. Most SIEMs or most of the log management systems are consumption-based, which means that you pay for how many logs you have in the system. That's a real problem because logs can grow very quickly in different circumstances, and when you have a variable price model, you never know what you're going to pay. Splunk is notoriously expensive for that reason. If you use Splunk or QRadar, it becomes expensive because there are not just the logs; you also have to parse the logs and create indexes. Those indexes can be very expensive in terms of space. Therefore, if they charge you by this space, you can end up paying a significant amount of money. It can be more than what you expect to pay. I like the fact that LogPoint has a fixed cost. I know what I'm going to pay on a yearly basis. I pay that, and I pay the maintenance, and I just make it work."

More Logpoint pricing and cost advice

"Syslog-ng is a free open-source solution."

"Syslog-ng is open-source."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	3

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogPoint?

I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogPoint?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogPoint?

I had experience with Logpoint before, and I contacted the Exabeam solution, but there was no response; they did not contact me. Bangladesh already has a Logpoint distributor. In terms of complianc...

See all answers

What needs improvement with syslog-ng?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for syslog-ng?

In Italy, we have to be compliant with the Garante for privacy. We have to log every login, logout, or login failure made by a system administrator. We store all syslog data of the infrastructure. ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering syslog-ng?

When it comes to parsing, I can parse both structured and unstructured data, though our data are only structured. Currently, we collect all data we receive as raw data. Each file is stored for each...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM Security QRadar vs Logpoint

Compared 8% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Logpoint

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Security vs Logpoint

Compared 5% of the time

Graylog Security vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

USM Anywhere vs Logpoint

Compared 3% of the time

More Logpoint Competitors

Graylog Enterprise vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 8% of the time

SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 7% of the time

Logstash vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

Grafana Loki vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Cribl vs syslog-ng by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More syslog-ng by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint

September 2026

Download Logpoint product report

Buyer's Guide

syslog-ng by One Identity

August 2026

Download syslog-ng by One Identity product report

Overview

Logpoint offers a robust SIEM system tailored for compliance with regulations like PCI DSS and GDPR, enhancing security monitoring and enabling efficient incident response.

Logpoint strengthens cybersecurity by offering essential tools for log collection, security monitoring, and forensic analysis. Its features include an intuitive dashboard, a powerful correlation engine, and extensive third-party integrations, making it a versatile asset for security operations centers. Despite its advantages, areas for improvement include ransomware protection, cloud-native deployment, and more flexible pricing. Improvements in features like SOAR and UEBA functionality can boost its competitiveness.

What are the most important features of Logpoint?

Easy-to-use dashboard: Simplifies interaction with intuitive design.
Correlation engine: Connects data for in-depth security insights.
Comprehensive log collection: Facilitates extensive data gathering.
Third-party integrations: Connects seamlessly with other tools.
UEBA and SOAR components: Enhance threat response and automation.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Provides significant value for its pricing.
User-friendly interface: Enhances usability with straightforward design.
Compliance navigation: Eases PCI DSS and GDPR compliance.
Quick support service: Provides responsive customer assistance.

Many organizations utilize Logpoint across industries as part of their security infrastructure. It supports standard compliance, orchestrating incident responses and security threat monitoring. Logpoint empowers businesses by integrating and correlating security data, improving cybersecurity posture in varied environments.

Logpoint

Syslog-ng is recognized for its proficiency in log extraction, storage, and secure TLS connections. Its efficient configuration and real-time monitoring integration make it a preferred option for large-scale log processing, ensuring compliance with regulatory standards.

Syslog-ng offers powerful log management capabilities, accommodating complex search needs while maintaining simplicity with user-friendly documentation and real-time monitoring features. The C-style configuration enhances readability, allowing users to easily comprehend and implement changes. Designed for high performance, Syslog-ng scales effectively to handle extensive logging demands. Despite its strengths, areas for improvement include integration with protocols and filtering methods. Users advocate for better Kafka integration and a graphical configuration interface to simplify setup. While historical dissatisfaction led to custom patches, subsequent updates have addressed these concerns. Currently, users seek an advanced version to access premium functionalities.

What are the most important features of syslog-ng?

Log Extraction and Storage: Streamlined processes for efficient data handling.
TLS-Supported Secure Connections: Ensures secure data transmission over networks.
Real-Time Monitoring Integration: Enhances proactive decision-making capabilities.
"C-Style" Configuration: Improves readability and simplifies setup for users.
High-Performance Log Processing: Supports large-scale environments with ease.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating syslog-ng?

Easy Configuration: Reduces time and complexity for initial setup and adjustments.
Compliance Assurance: Facilitates adherence to data regulations in Brazil and Italy.
Intuitive Examples and Documentation: Simplifies user training and onboarding.
Smooth Multi-Server Setups: Enables efficient deployment across multiple servers.

Organizations frequently use syslog-ng for log aggregation, filtering, and regulatory compliance, serving as a crucial component in enterprise security audits and data regulation adherence in Brazil and Italy. By allowing logs to be stored in raw format, syslog-ng provides versatility in data manipulation and user activity tracking, making it user-friendly for installation, maintenance, and updates. Logs can be transmitted over TLS or plain text to central servers, supporting varied transmission needs.

One Identity

Sample Customers

AP Pension, Copenhagen Airports, KMD, Terma, DISA, Danish Crown, Durham City Council, Game, TopDanmark, Lahti Energia, Energi Midt, Synoptik, Eissmann Group Automotive, Aligro, CG50...

Tecnocom, University of Victoria, University of Exeter, Datapath

Buyer's Guide

Logpoint vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

September 2026

Free Report: Logpoint vs. syslog-ng by One Identity

Find out what your peers are saying about Logpoint vs. syslog-ng by One Identity and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

913,076 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Logpoint vs. syslog-ng by One Identity report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.