LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] vs Microsoft Defender XDR comparison

Exabeam and Microsoft are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Additionally, 60% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Microsoft Defender XDR and LogRhythm UEBA compete in the cybersecurity category. Microsoft Defender XDR takes the upper hand with its comprehensive ecosystem integration, although LogRhythm UEBA excels in user behavior analysis.

Features: Microsoft Defender XDR provides comprehensive threat protection, integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, and offers advanced threat hunting. LogRhythm UEBA is notable for detailed threat detection, user behavior analysis, and server threat hunting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender XDR requires better third-party tool integration, more streamlined dashboards, and improved AI and machine learning. LogRhythm UEBA could enhance dashboard design, improve user-friendliness, and expand machine-learning capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender XDR supports various cloud environments, offering seamless updates but experiencing variable technical support. LogRhythm UEBA is easy to deploy on-premises, with reliable 24-hour customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender XDR is pricier but offers cost-effectiveness within the Microsoft stack, despite complex licensing. LogRhythm UEBA, while expensive, remains budget-friendly for small to medium businesses with modular pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Behavior analytics has improved insider threat detection and reduces false positives for our team

The best features LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers are its behavioral balancing, baselining, risk scoring, and correlation with SIEM events, and what stands out most is risk scoring, which gives clear visibility into which user behaviors are genuinely risky and helps our team to focus on the highest priority threats without drowning in noise. Risk scoring helps us to quickly identify which users' activity needs immediate attention by clearly ranking threats based on impact and likelihood; it changes our day-to-day operations by reducing time spent on low-risk alerts and allowing the team to prioritize investigations and response actions more effectively and consistently. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence. I observed a noticeable reduction in false positive alert volume, which shortened the investigation time per incident, improving the mean time to detect and respond, and helping identify high-risk user activities earlier, which prevented potential security incidents from escalating.

Read full review

reviewer2812758

Infosec at a government with 10,001+ employees

Integrated defenses have unified threat hunting, phishing simulations, and identity investigations

I appreciate Microsoft Defender XDR's MDE, Microsoft Defender tool, which has Attack Simulator. Instead of doing a phishing campaign and getting a separate tool, Microsoft Defender XDR does it all. These features of Microsoft Defender XDR have helped us conduct a phishing campaign quarterly, which has been beneficial. I also appreciate the fact that it has Defender for Office integrated, Defender for Identity, and everything integrated together. I would describe the process of using Microsoft Defender XDR to prioritize incidents in my security operations as quite decent. I appreciate the automatic alerting system where any incidents or alerts we receive come directly to our email. From there, we can open the email, go directly to Microsoft Defender XDR, and start our investigations and remediations. I perceive the integration of security and identity access management in Microsoft Defender XDR as affecting my identity protection strategies very well because it is well integrated with Purview, integrated well with Entra ID, and integrated well with Exchange. I especially appreciate MDO, the Office product. If anything happens and I want to conduct an investigation, it takes me directly to Exchange, where I can also investigate any emails or phishing incidents. Instead of going to different portals, everything can be done from Microsoft Defender XDR. If necessary for further investigation, Microsoft Defender XDR then directs me to that environment. I would assess the integration of AI in guiding security actions within Microsoft Defender XDR as quite positive. Recently, Security Copilot went big, and it is beneficial that I can use that, especially to write KQL. I can do threat hunting features and intelligence all within using Microsoft's Security Copilot. It also has a nice AI feature for threat hunting. I know that all the Defender logs go to Sentinel, and I can pull it up from Microsoft Defender XDR or from Sentinel. The fact that I can actually do all that within Microsoft Defender XDR is a nice feature. In the top module, I can do threat lookups, and I can actually type KQLs in Microsoft Defender XDR and look up incidents. Predictive shielding has had a nice impact on my proactive security measures. It is beneficial that it has, similar to Entra ID, a secure score. For me to improve the product, the secure score helps me out. If I rate it from highest to lowest, I can see what things I can improve. Secure score helps me see what areas I can improve in Microsoft Defender XDR to increase my score and bring it to 80 or more. Knowing Microsoft Defender XDR from using it since 2019, before COVID days, I know that they have improved significantly. It is much more user-friendly and has a very nice vulnerability feature that I find handy and useful. The fact that this feature integrates into Intune is also very decent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is very good, it has caught a lot of exploits that most products would not."

"Previously, we had to install endpoint protection per machine and then scan and update, but Cortex XDR basically does that centrally and predictably, so we have more time to do day-to-day work rather than spend time chasing those endpoints."

"Cortex XDR features advanced threat detection capabilities."

"After installing this solution, it identified, blocked, and provided the complete attack chain, which was very helpful."

"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the low consumption of system resources. The solution uses a lot of AI and machine learning."

"The policy configuration is great, the granularity of policies that are available is very helpful, it is straightforward to set up, and it has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

"Traps has drastically reduced our endpoint attack surface via advanced detection capabilities, sandboxing of never before seen programs, and by drastically limiting where executables can launch in the first place."

"It's a nice product that's stable and scalable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring."

"The solution is useful for privilege accounts and super admin accounts. It is beneficial from a security perspective. The tool uses machine learning rather than threshold-based alerts. For instance, it can detect unusual user logins, such as a user logging in from a new browser or location."

"It has a lot of features. It has file integration monitoring."

"The tool's most valuable feature is server threat hunting."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm."

"LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence."

"What I like most about LogRhythm UEBA is that it allows you to identify and analyze end-user behaviors and suspicious activities within the systems."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] pros

"Vulnerability assessment and just-in-time access are some valuable features of Defender for server plans."

"We are able to consolidate licences and make use of many Microsoft products using this solution, and if we have any Microsoft customers, we encourage them to use this solution for enterprise defence."

"The ability to integrate and observe a more cohesive narrative across the products is crucial."

"Based on what I've seen with Microsoft Defender XDR and the large amount of threat data Microsoft has access to, I'm confident I would trust Microsoft Security to handle the majority of all our threats from any threat actor who's essentially putting our company at risk."

"What I appreciate most about Microsoft Defender XDR is the visibility it provides through a breakdown of incidents that come through."

"Setting up Microsoft 365 Defender is easy. It's a user-friendly solution that provides threat protection. It has good stability and scalability."

"The most valuable feature is probably the aggregation and correlation of the different telemetry points with Defender for Identity, Defender for Endpoint, and Defender for Cloud Apps. All of these various things are part of that portal. We've wanted that single pane of glass for years."

"Microsoft Defender is stable."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pros

Cons

"We would also like to have advanced tech protection and email scanning."

"There is a severe gap in functionality between Windows, Linux, and Mac versions. For example all folder restriction settings are Windows only. Traps 5.0+ does not have SAML / LDAP integration."

"In reporting they should have a customizable dashboard due to the fact that C-level people don't like reporting to the IT department. They prefer to have a real-time dashboard. That kind of dashboard needs to have various customizations."

"While using Cortex, I noticed some aspects that could be improved, such as increasing the synchronization speed between XDR and Xnor."

"We have found that there are times Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks does not detect some of the viruses, we have to use another protection solution called Kaspersky."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses. For example, if users select a license, they think they will have all the platforms they need to improve their network or security. But after some time, Palo Alto Networks changed their licensing, and some of the features that, for example, were free at the beginning now have a cost. I think the integration can be improved. For example, a lot of tools are just integrated through APIs."

"Although I would say this product is highly-rated, it could probably do more because nothing does everything that you want."

"The solution could improve by providing better integration with their own products and others."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The solution is very expensive. There are also costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The on-premises LogRhythm is not very scalable. When considering packets per second or the MPS needed for additional logs such as web application logs, scalability is usually found in cloud products."

"LogRhythm UEBA's data aggregation needs to be improved. Open-source users do not have much documentation available. Documentation is available only for enterprise users."

"The cloud version is lacking and not up to par."

"What needs improvement in LogRhythm UEBA is the pricing. Here in Asia, for example, in Sri Lanka, pricing is the primary concern, and this is the only area for improvement I see in the product."

"The search feature needs to be improved."

"We're now exploring the cloud version but unfortunately we've found that they are lagging in that space."

"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] cons

"The technical support from Microsoft Defender XDR has been disappointingly slow, to the point that I am considering not renewing my unified support contract."

"The logs could be better."

"The onboarding and offboarding need improvement. I work with other vendors as well, and they have an option to add a device or remove a device from the portal, whereas with Microsoft 365 Defender, we need to do that manually. However, once you do that, everything can be controlled through the portal, but getting the device onboarded and offboarded is currently manual. If we have an option to simply remove a device from the portal or get a device added from the portal, it would be more convenient. The rest of the features are similar. This is the only area where I found it different from others. I would also like to be able to simply filter with a few of the queries that are already there."

"The management features could be improved, particularly in terms of better integration with Intune, Microsoft's cloud-based management solution."

"Microsoft frequently changes the names of its products, sometimes even renaming entire portals or features."

"The only problem I find is that the use cases are built-in. There is no template available that you can modify according to your organization's standards. What they give is very generic, the market standard, but that might not be applicable to every organization."

"What could be improved in Microsoft 365 Defender is its licensing, e.g. it should be more consolidated and would be good if it has some optimizations. Improving the alerts and notifications, in terms of adding more details, would also be good for this solution."

"For Microsoft Defender XDR, there is currently no ability to reset passwords for on-premises accounts, which is a key challenge."

More Microsoft Defender XDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"The cost depends on your chosen license type, like Pro or other licenses."

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"I feel it is fairly priced."

"The pricing is a little bit on the expensive side."

"The price is on the higher side, but it's okay."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"It is quite a budget-friendly product."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."

"As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."

"LogRhythm UEBA's pricing is affordable for small and medium businesses."

"I believe the pricing is fair and acceptable. I consider it to be reasonable and satisfactory."

"The bundling of software makes it easier to manage our setup, but Microsoft purposefully obfuscates this through marketing ploys to hide costs."

"The price of the solution is high compared to others and we have lost some customers because of it."

"I believe that the pricing of the licensing is fair."

"I find the pricing to be quite competitive, especially considering its inclusion in our E5 subscription, which provides a comprehensive set of functionalities."

"All I can say again is the E5 gives you all the capabilities that it offers. It also gives Office 365 and one terabyte of storage. All in all, the E5 license model makes sense. There are some people who say it's quite costly, but rather than paying different vendors, it makes sense to go all in with Microsoft if you've got that licensing. From that perspective, it's cost-effective, but I can't comment much on that."

"Purchasing Microsoft Defender XDR as part of a Microsoft 365 bundle can be cost-effective, but acquiring it as a standalone product may be more expensive."

"Microsoft Defender XDR is expensive."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

10%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm UserXDR?

In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards. The dashboards with solut...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm UserXDR?

I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learnin...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LogRhythm UserXDR?

I would not necessarily recommend LogRhythm due to its complexity and lack of modularity. I would always recommend Sp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Defender XDR is that we are on an E5 license,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Defender?

From my perspective, Microsoft Defender XDR can be improved with better visibility in certain areas where I can trigg...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My main use cases for Microsoft Defender XDR are telemetry, advanced hunting, and the ability to perform host isolati...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Veriato User Activity Monitoring (UAM) vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Wazuh vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba IntroSpect vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Vectra AI vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 4% of the time

ESET EDR/XDR vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Defender XDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

June 2026

Download LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender XDR

June 2026

Download Microsoft Defender XDR product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA

Microsoft 365 Defender, Microsoft Threat Protection, MS 365 Defender

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers advanced threat detection with an intuitive interface, utilizing correlation, behavior analysis, and machine learning to monitor server threats and privileged accounts effectively.

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] provides comprehensive user behavior analytics and threat hunting capabilities, making use of customizable dashboards, reporting tools, file and registry monitoring. CloudAI adds depth by identifying unknown activities, enhancing network visibility and cyber risk reduction through constant monitoring. Users in Sri Lanka find it valuable for network stability, while other users leverage it for improved user monitoring and quick attack investigation. Despite its strong features, enhancements in integration, pricing in Asia, and documentation could improve its adoption.

What are the key features of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Intuitive Graphical Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience tailored to cybersecurity needs.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized monitoring views and reporting capabilities.
Effective Reporting Tools: Enhances incident analysis and decision-making with detailed insights.
Machine Learning: Identifies patterns in user behavior, detecting anomalies efficiently.
CloudAI: Detects unknown activities, improving threat identification accuracy.

What benefits can users expect from LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Increases network safety through comprehensive monitoring.
Improved Network Visibility: Facilitates better management of cybersecurity resources.
Quick Attack Investigation: Reduces time to detect and respond to threats.
Cyber Risk Reduction: Employs machine learning to address potential security gaps proactively.

In the financial sector, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is implemented to monitor privileged accounts and identify suspicious transactions swiftly. Healthcare organizations use it to safeguard sensitive patient data through behavior analysis. Manufacturing firms apply it to protect intellectual property and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Across these industries, the adaptability and analytics of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offer a strategic approach to cybersecurity management.

Exabeam

Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.

It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.

Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.

Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Accenture, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, TrendAI and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.