LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] vs Microsoft Defender XDR comparison

Exabeam and Microsoft are both solutions in the Extended Detection and Response (XDR) category. Additionally, 60% of Exabeam users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Microsoft Defender XDR and LogRhythm UEBA compete in the cybersecurity category. Microsoft Defender XDR takes the upper hand with its comprehensive ecosystem integration, although LogRhythm UEBA excels in user behavior analysis.

Features: Microsoft Defender XDR provides comprehensive threat protection, integrates seamlessly within the Microsoft ecosystem, and offers advanced threat hunting. LogRhythm UEBA is notable for detailed threat detection, user behavior analysis, and server threat hunting capabilities.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Defender XDR requires better third-party tool integration, more streamlined dashboards, and improved AI and machine learning. LogRhythm UEBA could enhance dashboard design, improve user-friendliness, and expand machine-learning capabilities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Defender XDR supports various cloud environments, offering seamless updates but experiencing variable technical support. LogRhythm UEBA is easy to deploy on-premises, with reliable 24-hour customer service.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Defender XDR is pricier but offers cost-effectiveness within the Microsoft stack, despite complex licensing. LogRhythm UEBA, while expensive, remains budget-friendly for small to medium businesses with modular pricing.

To learn more, read our detailed Extended Detection and Response (XDR) Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Venda E

Cloud Option Engineer at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Behavior analytics has improved insider threat detection and reduces false positives for our team

The best features LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers are its behavioral balancing, baselining, risk scoring, and correlation with SIEM events, and what stands out most is risk scoring, which gives clear visibility into which user behaviors are genuinely risky and helps our team to focus on the highest priority threats without drowning in noise. Risk scoring helps us to quickly identify which users' activity needs immediate attention by clearly ranking threats based on impact and likelihood; it changes our day-to-day operations by reducing time spent on low-risk alerts and allowing the team to prioritize investigations and response actions more effectively and consistently. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence. I observed a noticeable reduction in false positive alert volume, which shortened the investigation time per incident, improving the mean time to detect and respond, and helping identify high-risk user activities earlier, which prevented potential security incidents from escalating.

Read full review

reviewer2812758

Infosec at a government with 10,001+ employees

Integrated defenses have unified threat hunting, phishing simulations, and identity investigations

I appreciate Microsoft Defender XDR's MDE, Microsoft Defender tool, which has Attack Simulator. Instead of doing a phishing campaign and getting a separate tool, Microsoft Defender XDR does it all. These features of Microsoft Defender XDR have helped us conduct a phishing campaign quarterly, which has been beneficial. I also appreciate the fact that it has Defender for Office integrated, Defender for Identity, and everything integrated together. I would describe the process of using Microsoft Defender XDR to prioritize incidents in my security operations as quite decent. I appreciate the automatic alerting system where any incidents or alerts we receive come directly to our email. From there, we can open the email, go directly to Microsoft Defender XDR, and start our investigations and remediations. I perceive the integration of security and identity access management in Microsoft Defender XDR as affecting my identity protection strategies very well because it is well integrated with Purview, integrated well with Entra ID, and integrated well with Exchange. I especially appreciate MDO, the Office product. If anything happens and I want to conduct an investigation, it takes me directly to Exchange, where I can also investigate any emails or phishing incidents. Instead of going to different portals, everything can be done from Microsoft Defender XDR. If necessary for further investigation, Microsoft Defender XDR then directs me to that environment. I would assess the integration of AI in guiding security actions within Microsoft Defender XDR as quite positive. Recently, Security Copilot went big, and it is beneficial that I can use that, especially to write KQL. I can do threat hunting features and intelligence all within using Microsoft's Security Copilot. It also has a nice AI feature for threat hunting. I know that all the Defender logs go to Sentinel, and I can pull it up from Microsoft Defender XDR or from Sentinel. The fact that I can actually do all that within Microsoft Defender XDR is a nice feature. In the top module, I can do threat lookups, and I can actually type KQLs in Microsoft Defender XDR and look up incidents. Predictive shielding has had a nice impact on my proactive security measures. It is beneficial that it has, similar to Entra ID, a secure score. For me to improve the product, the secure score helps me out. If I rate it from highest to lowest, I can see what things I can improve. Secure score helps me see what areas I can improve in Microsoft Defender XDR to increase my score and bring it to 80 or more. Knowing Microsoft Defender XDR from using it since 2019, before COVID days, I know that they have improved significantly. It is much more user-friendly and has a very nice vulnerability feature that I find handy and useful. The fact that this feature integrates into Intune is also very decent.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."

"The scalability of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is very good."

"I recognize that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is one of the best products in its category regarding capabilities."

"The good thing about the product is that it's always scanning."

"But overall, when we speak about security and protection, they are one of the top providers."

"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is the low consumption of system resources. The solution uses a lot of AI and machine learning."

"Its ability to react to cyber data attacks is awesome."

"This software helps us understand any issues that may arise when someone is not at work."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"It is easy to monitor users and that is how the solution is adding value to our firm."

"Overall, this is a really good product and I recommend it."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis, and it's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learning tools."

"What I like most about LogRhythm UEBA is that it allows you to identify and analyze end-user behaviors and suspicious activities within the systems."

"The most valuable features are file activity monitoring and registry activity monitoring."

"LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has positively impacted our organization by improving our ability to detect insider threats and compromised accounts earlier, resulting in better security visibility, reduced false positives, and faster investigations and response times, which helped the team operate more effectively with greater confidence."

"I definitely think that it's good at finding things automatically, versus trying to define it."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] pros

"The most valuable features of Microsoft 365 Defender are the combination of all the capabilities and centralized management."

"I like Defender XDR's automation capabilities. XDR isn't automated by default, but you can automate it to respond. If an attack is performed anywhere within the organization, you can isolate that instance from the network. This is what I can figure out for it. When integrated with Sentinel, you can set up playbooks to automate all the alerts gathered on Sentinel from different Microsoft solutions. Sentinel has a wider range of capabilities than XDR."

"Microsoft Defender XDR is very comprehensive, covering a lot of the services, tools, and applications that we use, so it's very efficient, and it works out of the box."

"Its most significant advantage lies in its affordability."

"Defender XDR enables you to scan a system remotely and get a complete inventory of its assets. You can gather more information from the asset inventory and apply threat intelligence using Office 365 or something."

"The product integrates security into one tool instead of having third-party security tools."

"The biggest return on investment when using Microsoft Defender XDR for me is saving time for the most part."

"It provides a single pane of glass within the 365 admin interface, streamlining our experience by consolidating information in one place and eliminating the need to navigate through multiple interfaces."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pros

Cons

"The encryption is not up to the mark."

"The connection to the internet has not performed as expected."

"It is not very strong in terms of endpoint management. It should have additional features like DLP, encryption, or advanced device control. Currently, Cortex is good in terms of the security of the endpoints, but it is not as good as other vendors in terms of the management of the endpoint."

"Cortex XDR should have a lightweight agent, and the agent size should not be heavy."

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"The only issues that we have are, one the cost, two the dashboard is not very intuitive, even though you can drill down within the dashboard, we usually have to gather information from other sources to determine locations and if its a false positive."

"It would be good if they could make an exception for applications. Sometimes, it can be a bit of a challenge to make exceptions for certain applications that have been used as rogue."

"Currently, if you use Palo Alto endpoint protection as the only solution it's very complicated to remove pre-existing threats."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"The on-premises LogRhythm is not very scalable. When considering packets per second or the MPS needed for additional logs such as web application logs, scalability is usually found in cloud products."

"The only problem is that the agents consume too much memory and system resources; the memory and resource consumption is high."

"The UI could be improved a little bit."

"The cloud version is lacking and not up to par."

"It should have better mitigation with other solutions and be tightly integrated with other solutions. It has to be improved."

"In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards."

"We're now exploring the cloud version but unfortunately we've found that they are lagging in that space."

"The search feature needs to be improved."

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] cons

"The management and automation of the cloud apps have room for improvement."

"There's still some more work to be done there. Additionally, the limited terminal live access an analyst has is very restricted."

"The tool gives inconsistent answers and crashes a lot."

"The improvements to Microsoft Defender XDR would probably go on the Linux side. There's still some more work to be done there."

"The support could be more knowledgable to improve their offering."

"Defender also lacks automated detection and response. You need to resolve issues manually. You can manage multiple Microsoft security products from a single portal, and all your security recommendations are in one place. It's easy to understand and manage. However, I wouldn't say Defender is a single pane of glass. You still need to switch between all of the available Microsoft tools. You can see all the alerts in one panel, but you can't automate remediation."

"The design of the user interface could use some work. Sometimes it's hard to find the exact information you need."

"The console is missing some features that would be helpful for a managed services provider, like device and user management."

More Microsoft Defender XDR cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It's way too expensive, but security is expensive. You pay for your licensing, and then you pay for someone to monitor the stuff."

"It has a higher cost than other solutions, like CrowdStrike or Microsoft’s EDR tools, but it reduces the cost of our operations because it’s a new generation antivirus tool."

"Traps pays for itself within the first 16 months of a three-year subscription. This is attributed to OPEX savings, as security teams spent less time trying to identify and isolate malware for analysis as a result of a reduction in malware incidents, false positives, and breach avoidance."

"It's the most expensive solution, but features-wise, it's quite strong. It's very good for protection, so the results are very good in the case of protection. I would rate it a two out of ten in terms of pricing."

"The pricing is a little high. It is per user per year."

"The cost of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is $55 to $90 USD per endpoint per month."

"When we first bought it, it was a bit expensive, but it was worth it. The licensing was straightforward."

"Cortex XDR’s pricing is very reasonable."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is nice when compared to other products in the industry."

"LogRhythm UEBA's pricing is affordable for small and medium businesses."

"Licensing is on a yearly basis. It's not expensive compared to its competitors."

"As LogRhythm UEBA is pretty expensive, I'd give its pricing a seven out of ten."

"It is quite a budget-friendly product."

"I rate the product's pricing a three out of ten. However, the cloud version is expensive. You need to hire professional services for deployment and migrations, which can be expensive."

"Its licensing and pricing are handled by someone else. My role is limited to incidents or issues with the portal, but you get what you pay for. It is worth the cost."

"Microsoft 365 Defender offers competitive pricing."

"The solution is too expensive."

"While Microsoft Defender XDR carries a higher cost, its ease of use compared to Defender may justify the investment."

"The bundling of software makes it easier to manage our setup, but Microsoft purposefully obfuscates this through marketing ploys to hide costs."

"Microsoft Defender XDR is priced high."

"There are no issues with pricing, but sometimes, the clarity in licensing is a concern."

"The pricing of Microsoft 365 Defender is definitely on the costly side, but with the features and services that Microsoft provides, such as the seamless integration of all the Defender tools, while the price is on the higher side, there is no alternative."

More Microsoft Defender XDR pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Extended Detection and Response (XDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Retailer

10%

Construction Company

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	52

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	4

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	46
Midsize Enterprise	28
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm UserXDR?

In general, if something needs to be improved in the algorithm, it would be the dashboards. The dashboards with solut...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for LogRhythm UserXDR?

I typically use the product for reducing cyber risk, and I can investigate attacks more quickly using machine learnin...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering LogRhythm UserXDR?

I would not necessarily recommend LogRhythm due to its complexity and lack of modularity. I would always recommend Sp...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My experience with the pricing, setup costs, and licensing of Microsoft Defender XDR is that we are on an E5 license,...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft 365 Defender?

From my perspective, Microsoft Defender XDR can be improved with better visibility in certain areas where I can trigg...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Microsoft 365 Defender?

My main use cases for Microsoft Defender XDR are telemetry, advanced hunting, and the ability to perform host isolati...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 10% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Veriato User Activity Monitoring (UAM) vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Wazuh vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Aruba IntroSpect vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Darktrace vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Vectra AI vs LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 9% of the time

Wazuh vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 4% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Cloud vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 4% of the time

ESET EDR/XDR vs Microsoft Defender XDR

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Defender XDR Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

June 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]

June 2026

Download LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Defender XDR

June 2026

Download Microsoft Defender XDR product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

LogRhythm UserXDR, LogRhythm Enterprise UEBA

Microsoft 365 Defender, Microsoft Threat Protection, MS 365 Defender

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers advanced threat detection with an intuitive interface, utilizing correlation, behavior analysis, and machine learning to monitor server threats and privileged accounts effectively.

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] provides comprehensive user behavior analytics and threat hunting capabilities, making use of customizable dashboards, reporting tools, file and registry monitoring. CloudAI adds depth by identifying unknown activities, enhancing network visibility and cyber risk reduction through constant monitoring. Users in Sri Lanka find it valuable for network stability, while other users leverage it for improved user monitoring and quick attack investigation. Despite its strong features, enhancements in integration, pricing in Asia, and documentation could improve its adoption.

What are the key features of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Intuitive Graphical Interface: Provides a user-friendly experience tailored to cybersecurity needs.
Customizable Dashboards: Offers personalized monitoring views and reporting capabilities.
Effective Reporting Tools: Enhances incident analysis and decision-making with detailed insights.
Machine Learning: Identifies patterns in user behavior, detecting anomalies efficiently.
CloudAI: Detects unknown activities, improving threat identification accuracy.

What benefits can users expect from LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]?

Enhanced Threat Detection: Increases network safety through comprehensive monitoring.
Improved Network Visibility: Facilitates better management of cybersecurity resources.
Quick Attack Investigation: Reduces time to detect and respond to threats.
Cyber Risk Reduction: Employs machine learning to address potential security gaps proactively.

In the financial sector, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is implemented to monitor privileged accounts and identify suspicious transactions swiftly. Healthcare organizations use it to safeguard sensitive patient data through behavior analysis. Manufacturing firms apply it to protect intellectual property and ensure compliance with industry regulations. Across these industries, the adaptability and analytics of LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offer a strategic approach to cybersecurity management.

Exabeam

Microsoft Defender XDR is a comprehensive security solution designed to protect against threats in the Microsoft 365 environment.

It offers robust security measures, comprehensive threat detection capabilities, and an efficient incident response system. With seamless integration with other Microsoft products and a user-friendly interface, it simplifies security management tasks.

Users have found it effective in detecting and preventing various types of attacks, such as phishing attempts, malware infections, and data breaches.

Watch the Microsoft demo video here: Microsoft Defender XDR demo video.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Information Not Available

Accenture, Deloitte, ExxonMobil, General Electric, IBM, Johnson & Johnson and many others.

Buyer's Guide

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

June 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, TrendAI and others in Extended Detection and Response (XDR). Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Extended Detection and Response (XDR) vendors.

We monitor all Extended Detection and Response (XDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.