Top 10 LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] Alternatives

Name: LogRhythm UEBA [EOL]
Brand: Exabeam
Rating: 3.6 (12 reviews)

Vendor: Exabeam

3.6 out of 5

12 reviews
60% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Top LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks, and Wazuh. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] surpasses its competitors by integrating advanced analytics and machine learning to deliver unparalleled threat detection and intuitive anomaly identification, ensuring robust protection and seamless investigation capabilities.

Exabeam Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Exabeam, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon

4.3 out of 5

CrowdStrike Falcon excels in threat detection and incident response with cloud-native infrastructure, appealing to enterprises seeking operational agility. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] focuses on behavioral analytics and insider threat detection, ideal for companies prioritizing user behavior insights for enhanced security visibility.

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to LogRhythm UEBA [EOL], highlighting an advantage in initial expense.

View comparison

Pricing

CrowdStrike Falcon has a lower setup cost compared to LogRhythm UEBA [EOL], highlighting an advantage in initial expense.

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Cortex XDR excels in advanced threat detection, endpoint protection, and analytics integration, ideal for comprehensive security needs. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA focuses on user behavior analytics and server threat hunting, suited for insights-driven environments requiring precise monitoring of user activities.

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a competitive setup cost while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] may incur higher expenses, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks offers a competitive setup cost while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] may incur higher expenses, highlighting a significant pricing difference between the two solutions.

Wazuh

3.7 out of 5

Wazuh

3.7 out of 5

Wazuh offers a cost-effective, open-source solution with comprehensive compliance and cloud integration. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] provides advanced user behavior analytics, suitable for detailed insights, though with higher costs. Both cater to different business needs and budget considerations.

Pricing

Wazuh offers low setup costs, making it accessible for smaller teams, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has a higher setup investment, suitable for organizations with larger budgets.

View comparison

Pricing

Wazuh offers low setup costs, making it accessible for smaller teams, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has a higher setup investment, suitable for organizations with larger budgets.

Darktrace

4.1 out of 5

Darktrace

4.1 out of 5

Darktrace excels in AI-driven threat detection and autonomous response for rapid threat identification. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] focuses on comprehensive user behavior analytics and insightful dashboards, appealing to those prioritizing manual customization and detailed user insights.

Pricing

Darktrace presents lower setup costs compared to LogRhythm UEBA, highlighting a more accessible entry point, whereas LogRhythm's greater initial investment may reflect its comprehensive feature set.

View comparison

Pricing

Darktrace presents lower setup costs compared to LogRhythm UEBA, highlighting a more accessible entry point, whereas LogRhythm's greater initial investment may reflect its comprehensive feature set.

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar

4.0 out of 5

IBM Security QRadar offers extensive threat detection with user behavior analytics and diverse integration, appealing to organizations seeking robust security capabilities. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA, favored for its budget-friendly nature, suits smaller businesses despite limited integration features and a need for improved dashboards.

Pricing

IBM Security QRadar has an initial setup cost, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers a lower entry point. The upfront investment for QRadar contrasts with LogRhythm's accessible pricing, highlighting different budget priorities.

View comparison

Pricing

Varonis Platform

4.2 out of 5

Varonis Platform

4.2 out of 5

LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] offers strong behavioral analytics and competitive pricing appealing to budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Varonis Platform provides comprehensive data protection and advanced features, justifying its higher investment for those seeking deeper insights and sophisticated threat detection capabilities.

Pricing

The setup cost for LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is significantly higher, while Varonis Platform offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

The setup cost for LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] is significantly higher, while Varonis Platform offers a more budget-friendly setup cost.

Elastic Security

3.9 out of 5

Elastic Security

3.9 out of 5

Elastic Security offers an open-source, flexible solution with strong analytics and customization, ideal for log analytics and threat hunting. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL], known for its user-behavior analysis, may appeal to those prioritizing dashboard insights, despite its end-of-life status.

Pricing

Elastic Security offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] involves a more complex setup that could lead to higher initial expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Elastic Security offers a straightforward setup process with minimal costs, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] involves a more complex setup that could lead to higher initial expenses.

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform

4.0 out of 5

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform excels in comprehensive endpoint protection with centralized management and integrated solutions. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA, despite being EOL, offers valuable user behavior insights, appealing to tech buyers prioritizing detailed analysis of user activities and threat detection.

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with lower initial cost, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has a more complex installation process, leading to higher setup expenses.

View comparison

Pricing

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform offers a straightforward setup with lower initial cost, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] has a more complex installation process, leading to higher setup expenses.

TrendAI Vision One

4.3 out of 5

TrendAI Vision One

4.3 out of 5

TrendAI Vision One offers extensive detection, response, and risk management features, enhancing security with centralized visibility. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] excels in behavioral analytics for insider threat detection but needs better integration and automation compared to TrendAI Vision One.

Pricing

TrendAI Vision One's setup cost is competitive, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a notable distinction in their pricing strategies.

View comparison

Pricing

TrendAI Vision One's setup cost is competitive, while LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] incurs higher initial expenses, highlighting a notable distinction in their pricing strategies.

Microsoft Defender XDR

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender XDR

4.2 out of 5

Microsoft Defender XDR excels in integration with Microsoft products, offering comprehensive security features and ease of use. In comparison, LogRhythm UEBA [EOL] focuses on server threat hunting and user behavior analysis but lacks Microsoft Defender XDR's integration and feature breadth.

Pricing

Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower setup cost with more inclusive features, while LogRhythm UEBA's setup cost is higher but offers advanced UEBA capabilities.

View comparison

Pricing

Microsoft Defender XDR has a lower setup cost with more inclusive features, while LogRhythm UEBA's setup cost is higher but offers advanced UEBA capabilities.

Show 17 more products

Related categories

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Extended Detection and Response (XDR)

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)