Lumen MPLS IP VPN vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks comparison

Lumen Technologies and Palo Alto Networks are both solutions in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category. Lumen Technologies is ranked #36, while Palo Alto Networks is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.5. Lumen Technologies holds a 0.6% mindshare in EIV, compared to Palo Alto Networks’s 6.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Lumen Technologies users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Palo Alto Networks users who would recommend it.

Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Read 1 Lumen MPLS IP VPN review

613 Views
601 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Read 65 Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks reviews

25,584 Views
5,117 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Lumen MPLS IP VPN and Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Tailscale, Fortinet and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,858 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

36th

Average Rating

10.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Prisma Access by Palo Alto ...

Ranking in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Secure Web Gateways (SWG) (5th), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (1st), ZTNA as a Service (4th), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Enterprise Infrastructure VPN category, the mindshare of Lumen MPLS IP VPN is 0.6%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is 6.4%, down from 6.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks	6.4%
Lumen MPLS IP VPN	0.6%
Other	93.0%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

Featured Reviews

reviewer1474251

Vice President at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

A robust, scalable, stable, and evolved product

It depends on multiple factors. If your building is already connected, then it is very easy to install. When the building is connected, we can set it up within three to four days. When the order gets triggered, we can do the implementation. We don't have to do much, but if the building is not connected, then there is a challenge. We need to pull out fiber or connect to RF, and we have to try some devices to provide internet. Depending on the distance out and the length of the fiber that needs to be deployed, it could take weeks and months because there are multiple factors. We also have to take permission from the local authorities, dig the roads, and do all that stuff. After we have the approvals in place, we can start the deployment. It can take a week or three months.

Read full review

IgorPinter

Director at PULSEC

Zero-trust access has improved remote security and now simplifies cloud-based firewall management

Regarding the integration part for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks, the integration with identity providers is pretty much good. It is basically firewall as a service, so it performs well. I completed the integration without any issues. What Palo Alto Networks can do better for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is probably to have the point of presence available in more locations. The point of presence from the Serbia region has the nearest POP in Frankfurt, which is an issue since it is your gateway—when you start browsing the internet, you go through a commercial connection in Germany. They definitely need to spread the service in other countries.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We offer the best of times, so we commit 99.8% of the time on fiber and 98.5% on RF."

"It is a robust solution. You can scale it up as per your requirement."

"The solution's most valuable features were the model's reduced complexity on the client side and its capability to provide security."

"We have an application called ADEM that helps us troubleshoot network-related issues. It helps us to isolate an issue whether it is on the ISP level, endpoint level, or system access level."

"The always-on feature is fantastic for the users. They don't have to think about it. When they go to a coffee shop to do work, there's no need to remember to toggle the VPN on. We'll protect them. URL filtering is the same at home as it is in the office."

"The overall rating for GlobalProtect is nine out of ten."

"GlobalProtect has been beneficial for its cloud security capabilities, which are vital as businesses seek hybrid options and need to support remote workers while addressing latency issues."

"The stacked policies, event policies, and routing policies are easy to understand for someone with general knowledge."

"Ultimately, Palo Alto is a very advanced firewall."

"A feature I've found very helpful is run time security because most of the products on the market will look at security during the build time, and they don't really look at what happens once you're going into production."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks pros

Cons

"It should have better integration with other platforms."

"It should have better integration with other platforms. With the internet, very few innovations can be there, but there are some solutions that can be integrated into the solutions that we provide"

"It is a managed firewall. When you run into issues and have to troubleshoot, there is a fair amount of restriction."

"Technical support could be a lot better."

"There can be some latency issues with the solution that should be improved."

"When we deploy firewall rules via Panorama, we find it's a little bit slow. We have a global environment and might have 100 gateways or VPNs in the cloud. When we deploy something, it tries to deploy it one-by-one, and that can be slow."

"Lacks a hybrid model which has API plus in-line security."

"The one point I have deducted is because it is very hard to get support sometimes."

"In general, it is good, but everything could be a little bit better. For example, they are working on including more data to catch or trying to reduce the gaps between the matches."

"Its security is good. Everything is good, but the way the dashboard responds can be improved. It takes time to implement a policy. If you change only two or three lines and push the policy to make the change work, it takes 20 to 30 minutes even for a small change. That is something very irritating from the implementation perspective."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"As a provider, we need to have licenses from the regulatory authorities. Once we have those licenses in place, we can provide connections to our customers. So, getting licenses is a challenge. It is a time-consuming process. Other than that, there is no massive challenge."

"In terms of pricing, considering that it is a two or three years old solution, they should apply big discounts for the next two or three years. This approach will be better for them to capture the market."

"The licensing cost is about 18,000 euros."

"The solution requires a license and the technical support has extra costs. The licensing model could improve."

"Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution, especially when compared to other solutions like Cisco. There are no additional charges apart from the standard licensing costs attached to the solution."

"It is not cheap. It is expensive. The good thing is that you are able to pay for what you need, but overall, it is not cheap. The pricing is not based on packages. You pay based on the features. If you want DLP, you only pay for DLP. They are very flexible. It is not cheap, but the licensing is flexible. There are no additional costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"The solution is expensive."

"They price their products using credit modules."

"As compared to other solutions, Prisma Access is much cheaper. It is probably 30% to 40% cheaper than other solutions, but I do not know the exact cost."

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	26
Midsize Enterprise	20
Large Enterprise	27

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?

From my experience, Palo Alto is more expensive compared to solutions like Netskope and Triscale.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks?

See all answers

Comparisons

AWS Direct Connect vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Compared 28% of the time

CloudConnexa vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Compared 28% of the time

AWS PrivateLink vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Compared 12% of the time

AT&T VPN vs Lumen MPLS IP VPN

Compared 9% of the time

More Lumen MPLS IP VPN Competitors

Netskope vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 11% of the time

FortiSASE vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Harmony SASE (formerly Perimeter 81) vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Zscaler Internet Access vs Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

More Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

July 2026

Download Lumen MPLS IP VPN product report

Buyer's Guide

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks

July 2026

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks report

Download Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks product report

Also Known As

CenturyLink MPLS/IP VPN, CenturyLink MPLS IP VPN

Palo Alto Networks Prisma Access, Prisma Access, GlobalProtect, Palo Alto GlobalProtect Mobile Security Manager, Prisma SaaS by Palo Alto Networks, Prisma Access

Overview

Lumen MPLS IP VPN provides enterprises with a secure and reliable network solution tailored to meet complex communication needs while maintaining performance and flexibility.

Designed for organizations that demand efficient data transfer, Lumen MPLS IP VPN enables seamless connectivity across multiple locations with enhanced security. It supports diverse network infrastructures, ensuring streamlined communication and effective resource management. Its advanced encryption protocols at every transmission point protect data integrity.

What are the key features offered by Lumen MPLS IP VPN?

Secure Connectivity: Facilitates encrypted data transfer, safeguarding sensitive information.
Scalability: Adapts to different organizational sizes ensuring efficient network management.
Quality of Service: Prioritizes critical business applications to enhance performance.

What benefits should users evaluate in Lumen MPLS IP VPN reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Potential reduction in networking expenses through optimized bandwidth usage.
Reliability: Consistent and stable network performance for critical operations.
Enhanced Security: Robust data protection measures reducing threats and vulnerabilities.

Lumen MPLS IP VPN is implemented effectively in industries like finance, healthcare, and manufacturing where data protection and efficient multi-site connectivity are crucial. These sectors leverage its robust security and manageability to support daily operations while ensuring compliance with industry standards.

Lumen Technologies

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks delivers robust security features including secure remote access across apps and traffic monitoring. It integrates smoothly with cloud environments to provide advanced threat protection and visibility into network traffic.

Prisma Access offers a comprehensive suite of security tools designed to protect cloud environments and remote workforces. With its focus on real-time risk identification and threat prevention, Prisma Access provides encrypted tunnels and centralized management for seamless connectivity and enhanced data security. Designed to scale across platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP, it optimizes traffic and connectivity while offering extensive visibility into vulnerabilities. However, integration with third-party products, usability, and support services are areas for development, as users report interface challenges and desire improved scalability and geographic coverage, especially in regions like China and South America.

What are the key features of Prisma Access?

Real-Time Risk Identification: Detects and manages potential threats instantly.
Secure Remote Access: Ensures secure connectivity to applications from anywhere.
Traffic Monitoring: Provides comprehensive oversight of network traffic.
Seamless Integration: Works well with platforms like AWS, Azure, and GCP.
Firewall Capabilities: Blocks unauthorized access and threats.
Scalability: Adapts to various cloud environments to meet growing demands.

What benefits should users expect when evaluating Prisma Access?

Reduced Data Breach Risk: Protects sensitive information through encrypted connections.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management and configuration tasks.
Centralized Management: Offers a single view for managing all security policies.
Advanced Threat Protection: Regular updates guard against new threats.

Prisma Access is effectively used in industries requiring secure remote access and stringent data protection, such as finance and healthcare. Organizations leverage it to enforce Zero Trust policies, optimize network performance with SD-WAN, and ensure security compliance across multiple platforms.

Palo Alto Networks

Sample Customers

Mammoet, En Masse

Concord Hospital, State of Colorado, Essilor International, RheinLand Versicherungsgruppe, University of Westminster, Universidade Nove de Julho, SPAR Austria, CAME Group, ZipRealty, Greenhill & Co., IKT Agder, Aviva Stadium, Animal Logic, Management & Training Corporation, Brigham Young University Hawaii, School District of Chilliwack

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenVPN, Tailscale, Fortinet and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,858 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Enterprise Infrastructure VPN vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.