Malwarebytes Teams vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection comparison

Malwarebytes and WithSecure are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.5, while WithSecure is ranked #42 with an average rating of 8.0. Malwarebytes holds a 2.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to WithSecure’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of WithSecure users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes Teams

Read 37 Malwarebytes Teams reviews

4,202 Views
3,530 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Read 8 WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection reviews

1,580 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes Teams

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Malwarebytes Teams and WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection compete in the endpoint protection category. Based on user reviews and feature evaluations, WithSecure Elements seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and better integration capabilities.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams provides exceptional malware scanning efficiency, a user-friendly interface, and cloud manageability. It excels in threat detection with unique signature writing capabilities but lacks extensive EDR functions. WithSecure Elements focuses on tamper and advanced exploit protection with tools like DeepGuard and AMSI, offering a clear portal for enterprise-level management and network security.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams could enhance its deployment flexibility, false positive management, and detailed reporting. Its advanced integration capabilities need strengthening. WithSecure Elements would benefit from reduced resource consumption and improved patch management support, with users citing RAM usage issues and real-time response limitations.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both products support on-premises and cloud deployments. Malwarebytes offers hybrid options and generally receives positive support feedback, though some issues remain unresolved. WithSecure Elements is praised for strong customer service and effective problem resolution but gets mixed reviews for initial deployment support.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams is viewed as cost-effective compared to traditional AV solutions, offering lower setup costs but perceived ROI through security insurance. WithSecure Elements provides scalable pricing ideal for larger bulk purchases, particularly in education sectors, offering substantial ROI in terms of productivity and security assurances.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes Teams vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes Teams

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WithSecure Elements Endpoin...

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

42nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Malwarebytes Teams	2.1%
WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection	1.0%
Other	96.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Davina Becker

Senior Content Strategist at PeerSpot

Provides protection against malware but needs improved billing transparency

I can only speak to it on a personal level. If someone is considering it, they should test it on their own systems. I can't personally recommend it because each person has their own needs. While it may work for me as a malware antivirus solution, I can't recommend it to someone else who may have a different system or use case. I rate the overall solution 7.5 out of 10. Malwarebytes protects me against malware. If they fix the pricing model so it's not automatically charging me, the rating could improve. Until then, I can't give it an 8.

Read full review

Mark Feldman

IT-Manager at MKF-Schimanski-ERGIS GmbH

Central console streamlines patch monitoring and device management effortlessly

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up. I provide an installation file for every client through my domain controller and GPO, and it works properly. We have faced no incidents with viruses or network breaches, and it's easy to monitor patches. I can use remote desktop from the central console. The solution also saves my time because, being the only one handling it, I can monitor all devices easily.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product keeps our company safe."

"The solution has a good management interface."

"We don't have to spend any time remediating bad things happening: Not viruses nor ransomware."

"I like the solution's ability to detect potentially unwanted programs. For some reason, it seems superior to other solutions, or at least in comparison to McAfee."

"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that I can use it wherever I want, be it at the office, at home, or even outside."

"The endpoint protection and response that allows us to restore a machine back to a pre-infected state are the most valuable features."

"The central management of devices from different sites is a very good feature; this has made them much easier to manage."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

"WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is good and easy to set up."

"F-Secure is useful for keeping user machines up-to-date by pushing out security and critical updates."

"There is a layer of security to prevent a malicious agent (malware) from interrupting or stopping services, deleting or modifying registry entries or even stopping the antivirus from acting, ensuring that there will be no interruption of protection."

"The notifications and patch management features are valuable."

"The most valuable features of WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection are the clear useful portal and overall company protection."

"On the cloud management page, the solution scales up very highly."

"We use the product for detecting network vulnerabilities and for software update purposes."

"Both incoming and outgoing traffic is protected."

Cons

"A solution must be installed in the main gateway to give an overview of the incoming and outgoing traffic. The technical support team's response time should be faster."

"I really hate the automatic rebuilding without even asking. It's just an annoyance that they should at least ask me, like a month before they bill me."

"Malwarebytes is not there in the reports from Gartner or IDC...If we look at the market trends and the industry, most customers look at Gartner's reports to identify whether a product is a leader, challenger, or a big product, depending on which they choose."

"The product's stability needs improvement."

"I would like to see a little more detail in the log. So, when an event occurs, I'd like to know not just when it happened and on what device, but what activity was taking place on the machine at the time so that we can drill down. If we get a false positive, we have to do a lot of research and go back and forth with our end-users to know why it was a false positive. So, having a little more detail around detections and events would probably be my most asked feature."

"It's not good in search hunting."

"The product is a little bit more expensive than the other brands."

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

"I would like the part of Hash Analysis by external sources to be improved."

"But the biggest one for us is patch management because this has been our top priority when looking at alternatives. Every solution needs to have patch management, if that's possible. It would cut costs on our side if that feature were included, so we don't need to pay for two separate pieces of software."

"Resource consumption is suboptimal and could be improved."

"The program and cloud service management is in English. It's not a problem for me, however, it might be for users who don't speak English or use it regularly."

"There is no technical support available in the Middle East."

"There could be a dedicated security partner with essential knowledge."

"One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client."

"The solution could improve by having more real-time responses. For example, when a license gets removed from a computer it does not update the records of the change. Additionally, when I installed Microsoft Windows Defender I was not able to send licenses through email to our tenants. The integration with other solutions could improve."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is a low price and ten is a high price, I rate the product's pricing a seven."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

"The cost of the solution depends on the size of the company and where the licenses are being ordered from."

"The product has average pricing."

"If you purchase licenses in bulk the price of the licenses can decrease."

"The price is comparable."

"We pay a yearly licensing fee of about €20 per computer."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

21%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Large Enterprise	1

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

The pricing is scalable. We can purchase more licenses if needed. It's a more cost-effective solution compared to Darktrace, which requires a special device purchase.

See all answers

What needs improvement with F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

One problem is that the solution takes too much RAM from the client. It would help if it used less RAM in future versions.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for F-Secure Protection Service for Business?

Our primary use case for WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection ( /products/withsecure-elements-endpoint-protection-reviews ) is to secure our computers. We have a yearly license for it and use it...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 4% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 15% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 8% of the time

Sophos Endpoint vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 7% of the time

Seqrite Endpoint Security vs WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

January 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Buyer's Guide

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

January 2026

WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report

Download WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection product report

Also Known As

No data available

F-Secure Elements Endpoint Protection, F-Secure Protection Service for Business

Overview

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

WithSecure (formerly F-Secure) Elements Endpoint Protection is cloud-native, AI-powered endpoint protection that you can deploy instantly from your browser and manage easily from a single console. It integrates across all your endpoints, keeping your organization fenced in from attacks. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection is a module of the Elements cyber security platform. The cloud-based platform provides effective protection against ransomware and advanced attacks. Elements brings together vulnerability management, automated patch management, dynamic threat intelligence and continuous behavioral analytics. Use individual solutions for specific needs or combine them all seamlessly for maximum defense.

WithSecure

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

December 2025

Free Report: Malwarebytes Teams vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes Teams vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes Teams vs. WithSecure Elements Endpoint Protection report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.