ManageEngine Log360 vs Security Onion comparison

ManageEngine and Security Onion Solutions, LLC are both solutions in the Log Management category. ManageEngine is ranked #25 with an average rating of 8.8, while Security Onion Solutions, LLC is ranked #22 with an average rating of 7.0. ManageEngine holds a 1.2% mindshare in Log Management, compared to Security Onion Solutions, LLC’s 3.4% mindshare. Additionally, 75% of ManageEngine users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Security Onion Solutions, LLC users who would recommend it.

ManageEngine Log360

Read 19 ManageEngine Log360 reviews

3,377 Views
1,959 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

Security Onion

Read 3 Security Onion reviews

8,067 Views
6,776 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

ManageEngine Log360

Security Onion

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

ManageEngine Log360 and Security Onion are both competitors in the security and log management space. ManageEngine Log360 is often preferred for support and pricing, while Security Onion is favored for its feature set and value.

Features: ManageEngine Log360 offers extensive integration capabilities, real-time alerting, and operational efficiency enhancements. Security Onion provides open-source tools, deep insights, and flexible configurations to users who value open-source functionality.

Room for Improvement: ManageEngine Log360 users mention scalability, report customization, and enhanced user interface as areas to be improved. Security Onion users indicate the setup process, comprehensive documentation, and user training need enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ManageEngine Log360 provides streamlined deployment and a responsive support team to assist users. Security Onion's deployment is more complex, offering limited guidance initially, but results in high functionality once successfully implemented.

Pricing and ROI: ManageEngine Log360 is competitive in pricing, enabling quick ROI through effective features. Security Onion, as an open-source solution, offers cost benefits, yet might incur higher indirect costs related to configuration and the learning curve.

To learn more, read our detailed ManageEngine Log360 vs. Security Onion Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360 vs. Security Onion

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,821 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ManageEngine Log360

Ranking in Log Management

25th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (22nd), User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (13th)

Security Onion

Ranking in Log Management

22nd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of ManageEngine Log360 is 1.2%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Security Onion is 3.4%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Log Management Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Security Onion	3.4%
ManageEngine Log360	1.2%
Other	95.4%

Log Management

Featured Reviews

Md Abdul Hakim

System Engineer at Corporate Projukti Limited

Integration capabilities impress while room for improvement exists in cloud compatibility

1. Enhanced Cloud Integration Current Gap: Log360 lacks native integration with Microsoft Intune and cloud-based Active Directory (Azure AD), limiting visibility for organizations transitioning to hybrid or fully cloud environments. Requested Improvements: Direct Intune Log Collection: Ability to ingest and correlate logs from Intune-managed devices to monitor compliance, device health, and security policies. Azure AD Deep Integration: Support for Azure AD audit logs, conditional access events, and identity protection alerts to provide end-to-end visibility. Cloud Workload Monitoring: Extend coverage to SaaS applications (e.g., Microsoft 365, AWS, GCP) for unified threat detection. Why It Matters: Many clients have migrated from on-prem AD to cloud-first setups this year. Without cloud-native log collection, critical security events (e.g., rogue Intune policies or Azure AD breaches) go unmonitored. 2. Improved Automation and Response Current Gap: Limited automated remediation (e.g., auto-isolating compromised devices) forces manual intervention. Requested Features: Playbook Automation: Pre-built workflows to auto-resolve common issues (e.g., disabling users after brute-force attacks). SOAR Integration: APIs to connect with SIEM/SOAR platforms (e.g., Splunk, Palo Alto Cortex) for escalated threat response.

Read full review

Anish Bajracharya

Postgraduate at a educational organization with 1,001-5,000 employees

Provides good threat hunting by finding infected ports, but its initial setup is difficult

The most valuable feature of Security Onion for security monitoring is its ability to find infected ports. I have used the Squert tool within Security Onion the most for threat hunting The initial setup of the solution is a little bit difficult. I have been using Security Onion for one year.…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The reporting is great. Everything you need is in the report for you already."

"You can have all of the logs from servers to network and it gets sent out to the correct owners. This is very helpful."

"ManageEngine Log360 is a comprehensive solution, including event log analysis for Microsoft 365."

"It is nice to be able to monitor and to have notifications."

"It basically helps us. We have to stay in compliance with certain issues with some of our customers. We have to have these types of tools in place for protecting our network and our data. We're in the aerospace industry, so we have a lot of defense contracts. So, all those guys will make sure that we're protecting their information, and it does a good job in that aspect."

"ManageEngine Log360 is not difficult to deploy."

"The support provided is fantastic, and ManageEngine Log360 provides the same capabilities that were being enjoyed with AlienVault while suiting the budget and providing what is needed."

"The most valuable feature is that this solution is more secure than others, and there are more applications and features as well."

More ManageEngine Log360 pros

"Security Onion is the most mature solution in the market."

"We use Security Onion for internal vulnerability assessment."

"The most valuable feature of Security Onion for security monitoring is its ability to find infected ports."

Cons

"It is not expensive compared to other solutions."

"On the logging system, there's a local on-client side that is encrypted, and there's one that is not encrypted. It is only for diagnostical purposes. However, both being encrypted would be very valuable for some audits."

"There is room for improvement, especially in the reporting aspect. The reports are not as good as those in Splunk."

"On the PostgreSQL side, it was not parsing much, which required a lot of manual work."

"The matter of the data retention needs to be addressed."

"Log360 currently cannot gather information from Intune logs or cloud-integrated systems."

"It takes a little bit of time for Log360 to actually learn your environment."

"The graphical interface could be made easier to use when you are connecting to different network equipment."

More ManageEngine Log360 cons

"Security Onion's user interface could be improved."

"The initial setup of the solution is a little bit difficult."

"The product is not easy to learn."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Affordable pricing is provided by the solution."

"My client has a yearly license. I think the cost is not expensive compared to that of other SIEMs, given the service it is providing."

"Its pricing is definitely huge compared to some of the other SIEMs. Its price should be improved."

"ManageEngine Log360 is expensive compared to other products."

"There is a cost for each feature used."

"It is an open-source solution."

"Security Onion is an open-source solution."

"Security Onion is a free solution."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

University

12%

Government

11%

Comms Service Provider

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	14
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	2

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ManageEngine Log360?

The price is suitable from a perspective of different pricing options. We already have an ongoing project where some features analytics can be escaped, and companies can manage their budgets carefu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 could provide more in-depth insights, particularly in reporting. Some other solutions provide deeper insights into issues, especially when generating reports. More detailed insi...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for ManageEngine Log360?

ManageEngine Log360 is being used for database monitoring and as a SIEM solution.

See all answers

What do you like most about Security Onion?

The most valuable feature of Security Onion for security monitoring is its ability to find infected ports.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Security Onion?

Security Onion is an open-source solution. On a scale from one to ten, where ten is expensive and one is cheap, I rate the solution's pricing a six out of ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Security Onion?

The initial setup of the solution is a little bit difficult.

See all answers

Comparisons

ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 18% of the time

Fortinet FortiSIEM vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 10% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 7% of the time

SIEMStorm vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

Sentinel vs ManageEngine Log360

Compared 5% of the time

More ManageEngine Log360 Competitors

Wazuh vs Security Onion

Compared 43% of the time

Elastic Stack vs Security Onion

Compared 12% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Security Onion

Compared 10% of the time

Graylog Enterprise vs Security Onion

Compared 7% of the time

Kali Linux vs Security Onion

Compared 3% of the time

More Security Onion Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360

January 2026

Download ManageEngine Log360 product report

Buyer's Guide

Log Management

January 2026

Download Security Onion product report

Overview

Log360 is your one-stop solution for all log management and network security challenges. It is an integrated solution that combines EventLog Analyzer and ADAudit Plus into a single console to help you manage your Active Directory auditing and network security easily.

ManageEngine

Security Onion is an open-source Linux distribution for intrusion detection, network security monitoring, and log management. It offers comprehensive solutions for enterprises seeking to enhance their cybersecurity infrastructure.

Security Onion provides a full suite of tools to detect and respond to cybersecurity threats efficiently. As a robust and versatile distribution, it includes capabilities for real-time analysis, network visibility, and threat detection, making it indispensable for security operations centers. Users value this tool for its integration of open-source software with advanced analytics, affording professionals a detailed overview of network traffic and potential intrusions.

What are Security Onion’s most important features?

Intrusion Detection: Utilizes Suricata or Zeek for effective threat monitoring.
Network Security Monitoring: Offers powerful visualization tools for network analysis.
Log Management: Centralizes log collection and analysis.
Comprehensive Dashboards: Provides integrated dashboards for threat visibility.

What benefits or ROI should you look for in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Reduced cybersecurity costs due to its open-source nature.
Improved Threat Detection: Enhanced ability to identify and respond to threats quickly.
Integration Capability: Seamless integration with existing security infrastructures.
Scalability: Support for scaling network security operations as needed.

Security Onion finds extensive application in industries such as finance, healthcare, and government sectors, where robust network monitoring is critical. Its ability to integrate with existing security tools makes it a preferred choice for organizations looking to strengthen their cybersecurity posture.

Security Onion Solutions, LLC

Sample Customers

First Mountain Bank, TRA, Citadel Group, OnPoint Financial Corp, Florida Dept. of Transportation

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

ManageEngine Log360 vs. Security Onion

February 2026

Free Report: ManageEngine Log360 vs. Security Onion

Find out what your peers are saying about ManageEngine Log360 vs. Security Onion and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,821 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ManageEngine Log360 vs. Security Onion report.

See our list of best Log Management vendors.

We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.