

McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention and Symantec Data Loss Prevention compete in the data security domain. While both have strong offerings, Symantec holds an edge in network DLP capabilities and sophisticated data matching, making it favored for complex environments.
Features: McAfee Total Protection emphasizes user experience with its straightforward interface, Tamper Protection, and a unified agent platform. Symantec's strengths lie in its comprehensive network DLP, Data Insight features, and Document Indexer, which provide granular control and detailed data analysis capabilities.
Room for Improvement: McAfee can improve with a lighter agent for VMs and a more intuitive interface. Better support and pricing strategies are needed in specific regions. Symantec struggles with complex installation and Oracle DB reliance, alongside a need for better cloud service integration and improved technical documentation.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: McAfee offers a balance of on-premises and cloud deployment options, relatively easy for simple installations. Symantec primarily focuses on on-premises and hybrid solutions, catering to large enterprises. Both McAfee and Symantec need improvements in technical support, especially in accessibility and promptness.
Pricing and ROI: McAfee is more affordable yet viewed as expensive, with mixed ROI opinions. Symantec is costly due to Oracle DB reliance, affecting smaller firms. However, its comprehensive features can provide substantial ROI for larger organizations.
Improvements could be made in response time or quality as all of them can be rated a seven.
The support provided from both Symantec Turkey and distributor companies enables us to support customers and partners effectively.
The support team changed from MTechPro to a different partner, affecting our experience.
When using native proxy solutions, scalability issues are minimized, and the solution remains stable.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
I see enhancement in reporting for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention as a potential area of improvement to think from a data asset perspective, not from a policy perspective, and do more analysis regarding the user's perspective rather than the policy's perspective.
They can improve their product and the features mainly to focus on how we can prevent that data within the organization, over the cloud, whatever it is, as that is important.
Symantec responded by creating an OCR module, enabling the capability to search within images.
A main disadvantage of Symantec DLP is its reliance on Oracle.
I rate the pricing for McAfee as competitive compared to other companies; they are in the same range, not a cheap product and not an expensive product.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention is more expensive compared to competing solutions.
If it is a low target, then of course your cost will be low.
We are just restricting data to be uploaded, which is the best option that allows us to control organizational data, making it the biggest benefit for us in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention.
I find unique value in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention specifically in controlling the application from a DLP perspective; when a computer downloads a package, you can understand where it downloaded this package from, and you can create a policy regarding the source of the download.
Symantec's OCR module enhances image analysis, crucial for detecting data loss via screenshots, improving the overall security posture against data breaches.
The solution helps enhance security operations when integrated with ServiceNow and offers robust incident response capabilities.
The centralized management console in Symantec Data Loss Prevention helps me understand the data flow analysis part from each and every department.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Symantec Data Loss Prevention | 4.2% |
| McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention | 1.0% |
| Other | 94.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:
• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems
• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network
• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.