

McAfee Total Protection and Symantec Data Loss Prevention compete in the data protection category. Symantec holds the upper hand due to superior features, despite its higher price.
Features: McAfee Total Protection is recognized for ease of use, simple management, and integration with other McAfee products. It offers essential DLP capabilities, USB control features, and protection for virtual machines. Symantec excels with advanced network DLP components and data insight, providing comprehensive security, especially in network monitoring and incident response.
Room for Improvement: McAfee could enhance performance with lighter agents, better user interface, and expanded support options. Challenges include resource consumption and technical support issues. Symantec requires a simplified installation process, less dependence on Oracle databases, and improved cloud integration and scalability. Technical support could be improved, particularly in response times and documentation accuracy.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Both McAfee and Symantec primarily offer on-premises solutions, with Symantec also enabling hybrid cloud setups. Symantec's deployment is more complex but benefits from broader integration capabilities. Both vendors need technical support improvement, with McAfee noted for responsiveness and Symantec for delays and accessibility challenges.
Pricing and ROI: McAfee Total Protection is viewed as cost-effective with competitive pricing that offers favorable ROI. Symantec is often deemed expensive due to Oracle database requirements, deterring smaller firms. Its broad detection capabilities, however, justify the cost for larger enterprises, with ROI varying depending on organization size and deployment scale.
Improvements could be made in response time or quality as all of them can be rated a seven.
The support provided from both Symantec Turkey and distributor companies enables us to support customers and partners effectively.
The support team changed from MTechPro to a different partner, affecting our experience.
When using native proxy solutions, scalability issues are minimized, and the solution remains stable.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
Sometimes there are some issues in the product itself; whenever they release a new version, vulnerabilities come into the picture, and we need to update the product to mitigate such issues.
I see enhancement in reporting for McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention as a potential area of improvement to think from a data asset perspective, not from a policy perspective, and do more analysis regarding the user's perspective rather than the policy's perspective.
They can improve their product and the features mainly to focus on how we can prevent that data within the organization, over the cloud, whatever it is, as that is important.
Symantec responded by creating an OCR module, enabling the capability to search within images.
A main disadvantage of Symantec DLP is its reliance on Oracle.
I rate the pricing for McAfee as competitive compared to other companies; they are in the same range, not a cheap product and not an expensive product.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention is more expensive compared to competing solutions.
If it is a low target, then of course your cost will be low.
We are just restricting data to be uploaded, which is the best option that allows us to control organizational data, making it the biggest benefit for us in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention.
I find unique value in McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention specifically in controlling the application from a DLP perspective; when a computer downloads a package, you can understand where it downloaded this package from, and you can create a policy regarding the source of the download.
Symantec's OCR module enhances image analysis, crucial for detecting data loss via screenshots, improving the overall security posture against data breaches.
The solution helps enhance security operations when integrated with ServiceNow and offers robust incident response capabilities.
The centralized management console in Symantec Data Loss Prevention helps me understand the data flow analysis part from each and every department.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Symantec Data Loss Prevention | 4.3% |
| McAfee Total Protection for Data Loss Prevention | 0.9% |
| Other | 94.8% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
| Large Enterprise | 8 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 23 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 12 |
| Large Enterprise | 28 |
Keeping sensitive corporate information safe and compliant has never been easy. But today, you’re faced with a totally new set of data protection challenges. Sensitive information is leaving the safety of your corporate network as more employees share files over consumer cloud storage services and access those files on their own mobile devices. The number of targeted cyber attacks continues to grow, as cybercriminals develop effective new methods for defeating traditional security measures and stealing corporate information. And as all of these factors converge, it becomes increasingly difficult to manage corporate information and protect it against loss and theft.
Symantec Data Loss Prevention (DLP) provides a comprehensive approach to information protection that embraces today’s cloud- and mobile-centered realities. With DLP, you can:
• Discover where data is stored across all of your cloud, mobile, network, endpoint, and storage systems
• Monitor how data is being used, whether your employees are on or off the network
• Protect data from being leaked or stolen—no matter where it’s stored or how it’s used
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.