No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

MetaDefender vs SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Data Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 15, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MetaDefender
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (12th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (4th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (5th)
SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
67th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of MetaDefender is 2.1%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Data Security is 0.5%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MetaDefender2.1%
SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Data Security0.5%
Other97.4%
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Ravi Raushan Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Infra Architect at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
File protection has improved and now keeps millions of daily transfers secure and compliant
In my organization, while using this tool, we found that there were a few files flagged as suspicious; however, those were not suspicious and it was a false positive, so that can be improved. False positive results were an issue, and it took time to scan files if the file size was greater than 1 GB. For larger files greater than 1 GB, it needs to be improved. In some cases, the reconstruction of the file led to a failure of code deployment and it flagged a valid file as malicious, which was not effective; however, in other types of files, it was very effective and could scan files properly. We have already covered all the main suggestions; however, it can be improved to reduce false positive results, and scanning could be faster to process more files in a day.
reviewer1099521 - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
Has an initial setup phase that is pretty straightforward
The product's initial setup phase is pretty straightforward since it is policy-driven and group-driven, making it pretty much easy for users to work with. The product can be deployed by leveraging the cloud console to deploy the right policies to specific groups based on their downtime preferences. Once you define the group structures of the infrastructure and accommodate them downtime-wise, then it is easy to deploy the right policy to those groups.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"MetaDefender Endpoint has provided benefit from its use, as the company's resources are fully protected and secured and no unauthorized access can reach the protected resources."
"The effectiveness of the solution in blocking or sanitizing any content based on our policies is excellent."
"MetaDefender is a useful tool for scanning all incoming and outgoing files and keeping our applications and servers in compliance, and I found it useful because we can integrate it with multiple file transfer tools such as Globalscape EFT, GoAnywhere, or Sterling, which is the best feature as it integrates with multiple tools."
"MetaDefender is a useful tool for scanning all incoming and outgoing files and keeping our applications and servers in compliance, and I found it useful because we can integrate it with multiple file transfer tools such as Globalscape EFT, GoAnywhere, or Sterling, which is the best feature as it integrates with multiple tools."
"The best feature MetaDefender offers is Content Disarm and Reconstruction because if there is malware in a particular file and the agent is sitting on it with Content Disarm and Reconstruction enabled, it is going to remove the malware and give you the exact file you need without you even being aware, which is a very good technology."
"Combining multiscanning with CDR strengthens my data security operations by providing deeper detection and safer file outputs before files enter the environment."
"I assess the effectiveness of MetaDefender in blocking or sanitizing content based on policy as very good."
"MetaDefender prevents malicious or weaponized files from reaching users while reducing the risk associated with unknown, zero-day file-based threats."
"The solution's technical support is knowledgeable and straightforward."
 

Cons

"The full scan takes considerable time; a complete Windows full scan takes almost 12 hours because it has billions of files."
"While MetaDefender's mail gateway already gives fewer false positives, there is still room for improvement in reducing those even further."
"I hope that MetaDefender could improve by integrating more advanced features that are not currently available."
"MetaDefender can be improved by upgrading the Linux version, which is using many free tools such as MongoDB, Postgres, and OpenSSL."
"In some cases, the reconstruction of the file led to a failure of code deployment and it flagged a valid file as malicious, which was not effective."
"The main improvement needed is pricing because, as an enterprise solution, smaller partners do not often receive the attention they deserve."
"I would rate it an eight because its interface can be improved and it can improve their integrations as well, so there is room for improvement."
"Some capabilities are lacking in reporting because we do not have full statistics that are easy for users to understand."
"SentinelOne Storyline Active Response is an area with certain concerns where improvements are required."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We bought a three-year license, and that was pretty expensive. We agreed that it was really worth buying. It could be cheaper, but we understand that quality comes at a price."
"I rate the product price as seven to eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
14%
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business18
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise18
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MetaDefender?
The setup and pricing are managed at the organization level, and the security department or the infrastructure department would have better knowledge of costing and pricing.
What needs improvement with MetaDefender?
If there is any major vulnerability, then it is understood that it should not allow access to the protected resource. However, if the vulnerabilities are not serious and are at the information or w...
What is your primary use case for MetaDefender?
Before accessing the company's protected resources, it is being scanned through MetaDefender Endpoint, which scans the local operating system and machine before the request actually hits the compan...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

OPSWAT MetaDefender, MetaDefender Core
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, SentinelOne, OPSWAT and others in Anti-Malware Tools. Updated: October 2026.
920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.