No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Azure Data Box vs Palantir Foundry comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 11, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Data Box
Ranking in Data Migration Appliances
2nd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.1
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Palantir Foundry
Ranking in Data Migration Appliances
3rd
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (13th), IT Operations Analytics (8th), Supply Chain Analytics (1st), Cloud Data Integration (10th), Data Management Platforms (DMP) (1st), Data and Analytics Service Providers (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Data Migration Appliances category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Data Box is 15.1%, down from 28.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Palantir Foundry is 7.0%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Migration Appliances Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure Data Box15.1%
Palantir Foundry7.0%
Other77.9%
Data Migration Appliances
 

Featured Reviews

AP
IT Manager at NTT DATA
Faced challenges with configuration and support but have successfully managed migration and backups
I had a negative experience with Microsoft support. Microsoft Azure Data Box helped with streamlining my migration processes, but I was very disappointed in the initial phase because the support team was weak. They should focus and learn end-to-end because when I reach out to Microsoft, that means it is the end, and post that, nobody is there to support me. It is also quite difficult for me to get in line with the product owner, which is one big challenge I faced. Although I mentioned many good things about the product, there is an area for improvement in Microsoft Azure Data Box. They should mention the quick steps for how we are supposed to do it. Once we receive Microsoft Azure Data Box, there should be some support person who reaches out to us with guidance. If they guide us, then I will get to know whether I am in the right direction or wrong direction, rather than searching for support everywhere. It is just unnecessary wastage of time. Post that, they give at least one to two months free of cost. However, post that, if I am unable to migrate my data, then there will be charges.
BA
Associate Vice President at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees
Unified data workflows have empowered collaborative analytics and streamlined AI development
Regarding points for improvement for Palantir Foundry, I see that they are improving day by day. In the last one to two years, I have seen many improvements compared to the two years that I have worked on Palantir Foundry. There are many things that come up, but a few things are not intuitive enough. Now that we are in this AI phase, Palantir Foundry has created some wrappers around the models, allowing us to create using a no-code application, chatbots, and LLM functions. The problem is that interaction with outside applications can be difficult with the current setup that Palantir Foundry has. There are ways to do that, but it is not that intuitive, which is what I feel.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use the solution for integration purposes."
"It provides secure transfer of large amounts of data."
"The Azure Data Box saves us a great deal of time when migrating data to Azure."
"The Azure Data Box saves us a great deal of time when migrating data to Azure."
"We are looking for a solution with better integration and easier management with the admin console, and so far, this solution is what we were hoping for."
"One valuable aspect is the support we receive from Microsoft Azure vendors."
"Microsoft Azure Data Box has much more usability than other tools like it. It is very intuitive."
"Microsoft Azure Data Box has an encryption practice feature that I have found to be valuable; it is very good, and there are no challenges."
"I like the data onboarding to Palantir Foundry and ETL creation."
"The AI engine that comes with Palantir Foundry is quite interesting."
"It is easy to map out a workflow and run trigger-based scripts without having to deploy to another server."
"The solution provides an end-to-end integrated tech stack that takes care of all utility/infrastructure topics for you."
"The data lineage is great."
"The solution offers very good end-to-end capabilities."
"The ease of use is my favorite feature. We're able to build different models and projects or combine different projects to build one use case."
"The predictive analytics capability within Palantir Foundry impacts financial forecasting strategies through its AIP functionality, which includes numerous pre-built models, LLMs, and data science application libraries."
 

Cons

"For me it doesn't work well, so I work in Microsoft and non-Microsoft shops."
"I am not confident in this device's ability to perform a network backup in our data center."
"I think it's a single node solution. If it can be spread out across more of the enterprise and have more segregation in its virtual environment, that would be good."
"On an enterprise level, a per-user license for more than 1,000 users is very costly."
"For me it doesn't work well. ... If you are a non-Microsoft shop, to use Microsoft Azure Data Box, you would need to integrate it with your other vendors, and whether or not that will be possible will depend on the platform or platforms that host them."
"When it comes to old applications, they may not be the most suitable environment for Microsoft's current focus on Azure and the latest technologies. It would be helpful if Microsoft could provide some guidelines or recommendations for transitioning from old to new."
"The device must be transported off-site before the data is uploaded into the Microsoft Azure Cloud."
"Based on my observation, the technical support from Microsoft has drastically gone down in quality compared to the past, which is disappointing as it now takes too long to resolve issues that used to be handled quickly."
"The workflow could be improved. Although it works rather seamlessly, the workflow is too complicated sometimes."
"They do not have a data center in Europe, and we have lots of personally identifiable information in our dataset that needs to be hosted by a third-party data center like Amazon or Microsoft Azure."
"There are some issues with scalability because when we are using a really large dataset, the system is rather slow."
"The workflow could be improved."
"It would be helpful to build applications based on Azure functions or web apps in Palantir Foundry."
"The frontend capabilities of Palantir Foundry could be improved."
"I rate Palantir Foundry five out of 10. I'm ambivalent."
"There is not a wide user base for the solution's online documentation so it is sometimes difficult to find answers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is a pay-as-you-go solution, where you pay for the amount of storage space that you are using."
"The product’s pricing is normal for enterprises but higher for SMBs."
"On a scale of one to five, with one being not good and five being competitive, I would rate this solution as a four."
"The pricing is based on the size of the appliance needed to store the data."
"It's expensive."
"Palantir Foundry is an expensive solution."
"The solution’s pricing is high."
"Palantir Foundry has different pricing models that can be negotiated."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Migration Appliances solutions are best for your needs.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
10%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
8%
University
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise5
Large Enterprise9
 

Questions from the Community

Which is better - Microsoft Azure Data Box or AWS Snowball?
Microsoft Azure Databox is a 45-pound, super rugged, tamper-resistant, human-managed hardware appliance that can transfer up to 100TB of data capacity to copy, store, then send to the Azure cloud. ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Data Box?
I would rate the price for Microsoft Azure Data Box as medium; it's neither low nor high.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Data Box?
I suggest Azure improve Microsoft Azure Data Box for better and faster transportation capabilities.
What needs improvement with Palantir Foundry?
Regarding points for improvement for Palantir Foundry, I see that they are improving day by day. In the last one to two years, I have seen many improvements compared to the two years that I have wo...
What is your primary use case for Palantir Foundry?
There are several use cases that we are working on with Palantir Foundry. The first thing is for data model creation for all our data engineering pipelines. That is one use case. Palantir Foundry a...
What advice do you have for others considering Palantir Foundry?
The visualization part in Palantir Foundry works for me at least if I want to see how the data is structured and for an initial analysis, but I would say it is not as matured as Power BI or Tableau...
 

Also Known As

Azure Data Box, MS Azure Data Box
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Oceaneering
Merck KGaA, Airbus, Ferrari,United States Intelligence Community, United States Department of Defense
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Data Box vs. Palantir Foundry and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.
893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.