Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server vs OpenText Dimensions CM comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure DevOps Server
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
19
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Dimensions CM
Ranking in Software Configuration Management
11th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Software Configuration Management category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure DevOps Server is 3.7%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Dimensions CM is 1.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Configuration Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Microsoft Azure DevOps Server3.7%
OpenText Dimensions CM1.7%
Other94.6%
Software Configuration Management
 

Featured Reviews

Sam Atkinc - PeerSpot reviewer
Has supported basic application hosting but lacks depth in planning and analytics features
I work for a pensions company and use Microsoft Azure DevOps Server as a user. I work with Azure Pipelines, though they are very minimal. When pushing out to production, my experience includes basic Terraform scripts, which I use for versioning. I am using Azure Boards for project management. My experience with Azure Boards is not helpful for planning or tracking. In comparison to the boards on GitHub and GitLab, they are quite minimal. It seems really stripped back, and the capabilities seem much weaker. We host models in Azure, which can sometimes have issues, but it is relatively good. The biggest problem is models being in the right domain for us - EU servers - it is a real lack of them. On a scale of 1-10, I would rate this solution a 7.
Use OpenText Dimensions CM?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Software Configuration Management solutions are best for your needs.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise8
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Visual Studio Team System?
Since I haven't used another solution, my ability to suggest improvements for Microsoft Azure DevOps Server is limited. From my experience, the operating and server handling aspects are very easy, ...
What is your primary use case for Visual Studio Team System?
As a technical person in our company, we use Microsoft Azure DevOps Server to manage all work-related data for the end users in the office.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

No data available
Micro Focus Dimensions CM, Serena Dimensions CM, Dimensions CM
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bluegarden A/S, Tracasa, Rabobank Group, Borusan Otomotiv, Arelik, Alfa Bank
Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. (BBH), Generali France, Raiffeisen Software, Space and Naval Warfare Information Technology Center (SPAWAR ITC), SPTS Technologies, Teamstreet
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Broadcom, Microsoft and others in Software Configuration Management. Updated: September 2025.
868,787 professionals have used our research since 2012.