Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 9.8% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 1.1% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Read 50 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews

5,223 Views
2,403 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Oracle Database Backup Service

Read 10 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews

354 Views
322 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Oracle Database Backup Service

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service compete in data storage and backup solutions. Microsoft Azure File Storage has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its feature richness.

Features: Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight easy integration, scalability, and robust security features as valuable. Oracle Database Backup Service users appreciate its advanced backup options, high data integrity, and comprehensive data management tools.

Room for Improvement: Reviewers of Microsoft Azure File Storage suggest improvements in performance speed and more granular backup options. Oracle Database Backup Service users point out the complexity of the setup process and desire better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure File Storage is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Database Backup Service users mention a steeper learning curve and slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for its competitive pricing, delivering a strong return on investment due to lower setup costs. Oracle Database Backup Service, although pricier, provides substantial ROI if advanced feature sets are fully leveraged.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 865,295 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Database Backup Service

Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 9.8%, down from 13.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 1.1%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Public Cloud Storage Services

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR

Lead Software Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration

We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…

Read full review

Hossein Nezamabadi

Oracle Database Administrator | Linux system Administrator at Pooya Co. Inc.

Has an easy setup process and good technical support services

We use Oracle Database Backup Service to manage incremental, differential, and cumulative backups The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality. We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups. We have been using Oracle…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like that we can copy and download data using Azure. It's not just for file storage; we can also use it for large data sets or to host static web applications."

"This solution supports all file formats."

"It's a stable product."

"File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service."

"Implementations with other products are easy."

"Its simplicity of use is most valuable. It's easy to start working with it and understand it. It's easier to transfer files between different users. I'm able to move files from my device to my manager's device without any issues or without facing any problems in between."

"First of all, the solution is very secure. Secondly, the solution is very fast. It is reliable and available all the time."

"It is a good service for file storage."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pros

"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."

"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."

"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."

"The backup is reliable and intuitive."

"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."

"The interface is good."

"It's a scalable product."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."

More Oracle Database Backup Service pros

Cons

"The tool needs to add more controls and enhance Power BI. For instance, I'm just suggesting the visualization layer. Power BI can increase visualization as much as possible, and the product can add more controls to the data flows."

"The security could always be modernized."

"The storage account key could be a security issue."

"There is room for improvement in helping customers understand and integrate Azure File Storage into their operations."

"The product’s pricing could be better."

"The provider needs to collect more information about the products."

"The product name keeps changing. It can be confusing when product names change frequently, especially with Microsoft. Sometimes, if you refer to a product by a certain name last year, it might have a different name six months later."

"Based on our use case, I think maybe that cost is actually more. That's the main challenge; when going to Microsoft, that cost tends to be greater."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage cons

"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."

"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."

"The product's technical support services need improvement in terms of response time."

"We cannot use the product with other brands."

"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."

"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."

"The solution needs to add an archive function."

"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."

More Oracle Database Backup Service cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"One needs to pay according to the storage they plan to use in the solution. The payments are to be made yearly. It is usually monthly, but we opted for yearly subscriptions in our company."

"Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."

"We pay for both yearly and monthly licenses. The yearly one is cheaper than the monthly one."

"For one terabyte of data, we are spending about 150 Euro every month."

"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, with ten being the most expensive. It's not cheap."

"The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google."

"The licensing cost for Microsoft Azure File Storage comes with an agreement from Microsoft."

"Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."

More Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing and cost advice

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."

"The platform is expensive."

"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."

"The platform is expensive."

"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."

"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Government

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?

Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...

See all answers

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The product is a reliable cloud solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?

The pricing for Microsoft Azure File Storage is five out of ten, not so expensive and not so low.

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?

From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?

The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?

The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.

See all answers

Comparisons

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 56% of the time

Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 16% of the time

Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage

Compared 5% of the time

More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors

Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 52% of the time

Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service

Compared 48% of the time

More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage

August 2025

Download Microsoft Azure File Storage product report

Buyer's Guide

Public Cloud Storage Services

August 2025

Download Oracle Database Backup Service product report

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage

No data available

Overview

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
Integrate modern applications with File storage
Simplify hosting for high availability workload data

Microsoft

Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden

Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

July 2025

Free Report: Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.

See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.