Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure File Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service comparison

Microsoft and Oracle are both solutions in the Public Cloud Storage Services category. Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while Oracle is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.1. Microsoft holds a 10.8% mindshare in PCSS, compared to Oracle’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle users who would recommend it.
Microsoft Azure File Storage
Read 48 Microsoft Azure File Storage reviews
  • 3,050 Views
  • 2,577 Comparison Views
97% willing to recommend
Oracle Database Backup Service
Read 10 Oracle Database Backup Service reviews
  • 361 Views
  • 254 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 1, 2024

Microsoft Azure File Storage and Oracle Database Backup Service compete in data storage and backup solutions. Microsoft Azure File Storage has the upper hand in pricing and support, while Oracle Database Backup Service stands out for its feature richness.

Features: Microsoft Azure File Storage users highlight easy integration, scalability, and robust security features as valuable. Oracle Database Backup Service users appreciate its advanced backup options, high data integrity, and comprehensive data management tools.

Room for Improvement: Reviewers of Microsoft Azure File Storage suggest improvements in performance speed and more granular backup options. Oracle Database Backup Service users point out the complexity of the setup process and desire better scalability options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Microsoft Azure File Storage is reported to have a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Oracle Database Backup Service users mention a steeper learning curve and slower customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure File Storage is noted for its competitive pricing, delivering a strong return on investment due to lower setup costs. Oracle Database Backup Service, although pricier, provides substantial ROI if advanced feature sets are fully leveraged.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,040 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure File Storage
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Database Backup Service
Ranking in Public Cloud Storage Services
14th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Public Cloud Storage Services category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure File Storage is 10.8%, down from 13.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Database Backup Service is 1.0%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Public Cloud Storage Services
 

Featured Reviews

PrashanthR - PeerSpot reviewer
Seamlessly streamlines document processing with advanced file storage and OCR integration
We need to store data over there. We process documents through Kofax Time is a major benefit, as well as ease of processing. With configuration, it happens quite easily, and we can finish tasks early. File storage is complemented by OCR with Azure Cognitive Service. This enhances the processing…
Read full review
Hossein Nezamabadi - PeerSpot reviewer
Has an easy setup process and good technical support services
We use Oracle Database Backup Service to manage incremental, differential, and cumulative backups The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality. We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups. We have been using Oracle…
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to use."
"The initial setup is fairly easy."
"The initial setup is very seamless."
"We have not explored the desktop performance analysis of the file storage, but the user interface, API, and the response that we receive over the file storage are very good. We have a lot of customers that connect to the client-side, click the images, and upload them. The beauty of the solution is that we can mount the file storage into a critical server as well as an external drive. The speed that we receive with the images is pretty good."
"This solution supports all file formats."
"Azure File Storage gives us easy access to cloud solutions at the storage level."
"The initial setup is straightforward and takes approximately twenty minutes."
"The solution is user-friendly and integrates easily with web apps."
More Microsoft Azure File Storage pros
"It's a scalable product."
"From the database perspective, Oracle is the best."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to perform encrypted backups after any learning."
"The backup is reliable and intuitive."
"The product works very fast. It automates a lot of operations in the background."
"The interface is good."
"Replication and performance tuning are valuable features."
"The product's most valuable features are differential and cumulative backup functionality."
More Oracle Database Backup Service pros
 

Cons

"The product must provide better security functions."
"Considering the enterprise licensing required for the solution, the cost of the solution is an area where the product needs improvement."
"It should allow better methods for handling large files."
"It's not very intuitive."
"The support could improve."
"The pricing and technical support could be better."
"In our use cases, we see the weakness in mobile internet connectivity."
"Lacks integration with other platforms."
More Microsoft Azure File Storage cons
"The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it."
"The solution needs to add an archive function."
"We encounter issues while restoring differential and cumulative backups."
"It's already fast, but still, they could improve the speed."
"Oracle Database Backup Service is not a cheap solution."
"We cannot use the product with other brands."
"They should base their strategy according to the country and the regulations there, and focus more on the on-premises deployment."
"Deployment is overly complex and could be streamlined."
More Oracle Database Backup Service cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is usually dependent on your storage requirements. Overall, I believe Microsoft Azure File Storage's price is reasonable."
"The price of Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive, we do not know exactly how the price is calculated."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage is expensive."
"The price of the solution is reasonable. The pricing model is based on usage."
"The pricing could be more flexible."
"The solution is a bit pricey compared to AWS and Google."
"Microsoft Azure File Storage has a reasonable price."
"One of the major benefits for AWS is that they have a very large customer representative base where clients can be picked from, they offer large discounts and credit. We were not able to receive the same kind of offers from Microsoft Azure File Storage. We tried to approach Azure while hiring for our disaster recovery discussion, but we didn't receive anything from Azure."
More Microsoft Azure File Storage pricing and cost advice
"Price is always an area that could be made better, as it is quite expensive."
"It's an expensive solution and is an area that needs improvement."
"The platform is expensive."
"The platform is expensive."
"The only problem with Oracle is its pricing."
"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive, I rate Oracle Database Backup Service a seven or eight out of ten."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Public Cloud Storage Services solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
21%
Computer Software Company
11%
Energy/Utilities Company
9%
University
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Which file storage system is better - Amazon EFS (elastic file storage) or Azure File Storage?
Amazon EFS is easy to set up: you can use the AWS management console, API, or command-line. Amazon EFS can grow to petabytes and deliver consistent low latencies and high levels of throughput. This...
See all answers
What do you like most about Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The product is a reliable cloud solution.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure File Storage?
The price is almost the same as the competition. I would rate it three or three and a half out of ten on the pricing scale.
See all answers
What do you like most about Oracle Database Backup Service?
From the database perspective, Oracle is the best.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Database Backup Service?
The pricing must be improved. The only problem with Oracle is its pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Oracle Database Backup Service?
The product can protect from external data penetration, but the in-house IT team can access it. One simple update can mess up the entire system.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 48% of the time
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Azure NetApp Files vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 19% of the time
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Wasabi vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 15% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon S3 vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 7% of the time
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage Logo
Amazon S3 Glacier vs Microsoft Azure File Storage
Compared 6% of the time
More Microsoft Azure File Storage Competitors
Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Oracle Cloud Object Storage vs Oracle Database Backup Service
Compared 61% of the time
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service Logo
Amazon S3 vs Oracle Database Backup Service
Compared 39% of the time
More Oracle Database Backup Service Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage
March 2025
Microsoft Azure File Storage reportDownload Microsoft Azure File Storage product report
Buyer's Guide
Public Cloud Storage Services
March 2025
Oracle Database Backup Service reportDownload Oracle Database Backup Service product report
 

Also Known As

MS Azure File Storage
No data available
 

Overview

Fully managed file shares that use the standard SMB 3.0 protocol

Key scenarios:

  • Share data across on-premises and cloud servers
  • Migrate file share-based applications to the cloud with no code changes
  • Integrate modern applications with File storage
  • Simplify hosting for high availability workload data
Microsoft

Oracle Database Backup Service is a secure, scalable, on-demand solution for storing Oracle Database backups in Oracle Cloud.

Oracle databases are backed up to Oracle Database Backup Service using the Oracle Database Cloud Backup Module. The module is available from Oracle Technology Network (OTN) and is tightly integrated with Recovery Manager (RMAN), so you can continue to use familiar RMAN commands for backup and restore operations.

Oracle
 

Sample Customers

Talon, Camden
Omnis, JP Autoceste FBIH, Drive Software Solutions
Buyer's Guide
Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
March 2025
Free Report: Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,040 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Microsoft Azure File Storage vs. Oracle Database Backup Service report.
See our list of best Public Cloud Storage Services vendors.

We monitor all Public Cloud Storage Services reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.