No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Microsoft Security Exposure Management vs TrendAI Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Seemplicity
Sponsored
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
6th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
9
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (31st), Cloud Security Remediation (2nd)
Microsoft Security Exposure...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TrendAI Vision One – Cyber ...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
14th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.8
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of Seemplicity is 2.6%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Microsoft Security Exposure Management is 3.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TrendAI Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) is 2.5%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Seemplicity2.6%
Microsoft Security Exposure Management3.7%
TrendAI Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM)2.5%
Other91.2%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

JL
Vice President Of Security Architecture And Engineering at a hospitality company with 10,001+ employees
Unified vulnerability data has reduced risk and currently cuts duplicate tools and license costs
Seemplicity can be improved by adding additional graphs and charts that make it easier to do trending over time. I had to do some of that manually via manual reports, but Seemplicity already has a feature request for this. Seemplicity has done a pretty good job of keeping up with integrations. One gap that I identified and that Seemplicity is trying to fill now is having a complete end-to-end mapping. Seemplicity currently looks at the external attack surface using tools like Censys, and then looks at the internal side, examining what is in AWS and other clouds using CSPM. However, there is not anything that currently ties a property on the outside to a system on the inside, especially when you have additional security layers like web application firewalls that actually mitigate the risk.
Kim Haroun - PeerSpot reviewer
Associate IT Analyst at Walton Arts Center
Automate phishing simulations and reduce third-party security costs through AI integration
I consider integrating AI into our system to be one of the most valuable features of Microsoft Security Exposure Management because, as I mentioned, humans get tired and cannot work 24/7. AI can store more knowledge than a human brain. Therefore, using and integrating AI into our system is going to help us become more secure and improve our scores faster, in my opinion.My impression of Microsoft Security Exposure Management's ability to provide unified security insights across multi-cloud, SaaS, identity, OT, IoT, and non-Microsoft tools is quite positive. I was very impressed with the keynotes and the session about the new Security Copilot and cloud agents. I feel this will change the IT perspective significantly. People will start thinking about how to use AI and integrate it to make our environment more secure and work more efficiently, allowing us to focus on more innovative tasks. You do not have to sit down all the time; you can let the agent run automatically and follow a more secure path. I believe this is going to be a really great innovation. I evaluate the impact of Microsoft Security Exposure Management on our SOC operations efficiency from pre- to post-breach protection positively. We utilize a third-party security platform named Recon, which helps us monitor external attacks. However, we also have Microsoft Defender as a secondary secure layer. We receive notifications when users access untrusted websites or download large amounts of data from untrusted apps. As soon as we receive a notification, we contact our third party, Recon. With the changes I learned, I feel we no longer need a third-party tool. We can build an agent just like Recon did, and integrate it into our system to handle all the work, which means saving tons of money for the company, making everyone happy. The critical asset management feature of Microsoft Security Exposure Management helps in tagging and prioritizing high-value assets significantly. We also use a third-party organization for managing critical vulnerabilities and utilize the HPS dashboard. They provide us with monthly patches since Microsoft has a monthly update cycle. They show us pending updates or indicate if there are updates several months behind, highlighting critical vulnerabilities we must address. However, integrating Microsoft vulnerability management with the agent will be very beneficial. We can eliminate third-party tools and utilize the agent correctly, inputting the necessary knowledge that will save us a lot of money.
reviewer2793894 - PeerSpot reviewer
Platform Engineer Ii at a outsourcing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Centralized risk scoring has prioritized real-time vulnerability remediation across our assets
Since we have Trend Micro's other solution on the endpoint, we are using the same endpoint agent with Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) to discover all the vulnerabilities we have in the endpoints and the servers, and it helps discover them and also suggest the remediation action that can be performed. What stood out with Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) was the vulnerability discovery as well as prioritization that it does by suggesting the top vulnerabilities to focus on, and it also shows the accounts that have been leaked in the dark web, which provides really useful visibility. The best feature of Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) in my experience is its integrated capabilities, so if you are a Trend Micro customer for other sensors that you have already deployed, it makes a really good add-on without having to deploy much. This results in an easy onboarding experience. The integrated experience of Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) saved a lot of time because we did not have to explicitly do any sort of deployment, and it also helped us to speed up the ROI that we were looking for from the solution. Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) has helped impact our organization in a positive way by helping to detect the risk that exists within the organization and bring them out before they actually become an incident for us. Proactive risk scoring and detection is a valuable feature. We have seen with Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) that vulnerability detection has become much easier than earlier because we used to follow a three-month cycle for detecting vulnerabilities and then patching things. However, here it is more real-time, which is helping us to save a lot of time. Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) has helped us to focus on those vulnerabilities and patch them first rather than go all-in and focus on all the vulnerabilities to be patched. Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) is scalable, and I do not see that as a challenge.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The biggest impact Seemplicity has had on my organization is turning what used to be a fragmented, manual process into something structured and accountable."
"I was also able to pay for the tool twice over by using it for tool rationalization."
"Before we really struggled with meeting SLAs that were in place because we did not have the information we needed and there was too much back and forth, now we nearly have a perfect SLA meeting time."
"I think of Seemplicity as a fantastic company and a fantastic partner to work with."
"Seemplicity is helping us generate immense ROI in terms of helping secure our infrastructure, applications, endpoints, and understanding vulnerabilities that we really did not have a good process of understanding before."
"Seemplicity has positively impacted my organization by helping reduce the overhead for our SecOps team to manually create vulnerability tickets."
"When we started with Seemplicity, we saw an 85% reduction in the number of tickets through deduplication, and that is significant for our teams who are swamped with issues."
"We have seen improvements in remediation rates, as initially a lot of our metrics were in the red, but now all are in the green or yellow."
"With the new agent deal, we are set to eliminate all third-party tools once we are ready, which will save us at least $100,000 per year."
"Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) is an excellent solution from Trend Micro that uses AI to predict attack paths before they become an incident in your environment."
 

Cons

"Seemplicity can be improved by adding additional graphs and charts that make it easier to do trending over time."
"For Seemplicity, I would say two things for improvement. First, reporting customization could go further because this industry is evolving; the CEO tries to get much information that they are looking for."
"Seemplicity could use more improvement around the user interface."
"Every tool, including Seemplicity, can improve, and I think it needs to further enhance its deduplication capabilities and understand how to integrate with more security tools, especially as new AI security tools emerge."
"Seemplicity could be improved with some of the aggregation accessibility. Currently, it is a bit of a black box and can be a bit of a bottleneck."
"The capability out of the box today is decent, but over time, if we can allow users and organizations to build their own view and how they want to report on things, that would be a great value add."
"I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Microsoft Security Exposure Management a bit confusing because they do not clearly communicate what licenses are needed to access all features."
"Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) can improve the number of report templates that it has within the solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
35%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Hospitality Company
9%
Government
9%
No data available
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise7
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Seemplicity?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Seemplicity was great. They gave us unlimited licensing for...
What needs improvement with Seemplicity?
Seemplicity could be improved with some of the aggregation accessibility. Currently, it is a bit of a black box and c...
What is your primary use case for Seemplicity?
My main use case for Seemplicity is ticketing all of our security findings to the service teams for remediation and p...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Security Exposure Management?
I find the pricing, setup costs, and licensing for Microsoft Security Exposure Management a bit confusing because the...
What needs improvement with Microsoft Security Exposure Management?
I see potential for improvement in Microsoft Security Exposure Management, specifically in how they present their age...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Security Exposure Management?
My main use cases for Microsoft Security Exposure Management involve using a third-party tool called Infosec for all ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM)?
The pricing for Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) was straightforward, and with the help of cr...
What needs improvement with Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM)?
Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) can improve the number of report templates that it has withi...
What is your primary use case for Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM)?
One of the main use cases for Trend Vision One – Cyber Risk Exposure Management (CREM) was to discover the risk acros...
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
Demo not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Pentera, Zafran Security, Wiz and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: August 2026.
908,800 professionals have used our research since 2012.