No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

MID Innovator vs Umbrella comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

MID Innovator
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Architecture Management (30th), Business Process Design (28th), Business Process Management (BPM) (73rd), SOA Governance (8th), IT Governance (18th)
Umbrella
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.1
Number of Reviews
22
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Cost Management (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

MID Innovator and Umbrella aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. MID Innovator is designed for Enterprise Architecture Management and holds a mindshare of 1.2%, up 0.3% compared to last year.
Umbrella, on the other hand, focuses on Cloud Cost Management, holds 0.8% mindshare, up 0.2% since last year.
Enterprise Architecture Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
MID Innovator1.2%
Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect8.7%
SAP PowerDesigner8.3%
Other81.8%
Enterprise Architecture Management
Cloud Cost Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Umbrella0.8%
IBM Turbonomic5.7%
Apptio Cloudability5.7%
Other87.8%
Cloud Cost Management
 

Featured Reviews

Use MID Innovator?
Leave a review
Srivathsanr R. - PeerSpot reviewer
Head Of Business Finance at Zensar Technologies
Gained clearer financial governance and have improved cloud cost visibility and forecasting
I do not feel that anything needs to be changed. Umbrella is solving the purpose and is on point. The UI is intuitive and user-friendly. The learning curve is very easy. The features provided are on point. There is no downtime or challenges, and it is easy to learn and easy to use. In total, I do not feel that improvement is needed as per our organizational use case. Maybe for other organizations, they might have some suggestions, but for our organization specifically, I do not feel that they are lacking somewhere. It is already providing us the best thing. Almost everything is working as we expect. Small things we do not always point out. I feel that it works well and we do not have such problems with them specifically.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Architecture Management solutions are best for your needs.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
15%
Construction Company
12%
Outsourcing Company
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise14
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Umbrella?
The cost aspect is not something I focus on because security is something that cannot be equated to money when it comes to security. Time saved is significant. With a firewall, the slowness of site...
What needs improvement with Umbrella?
To improve Umbrella, I think that every application needs ongoing improvements over time because technology continuously updates; sometimes, Umbrella disconnects automatically without any notificat...
What is your primary use case for Umbrella?
My main use case for Umbrella is for VPN purposes, and we are also using Cisco Meraki for our network. One specific example of how I use Umbrella for VPN purposes in my daily work is that we have r...
 

Also Known As

No data available
Anodot
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Computer Sciences Corporation
Rubicon, Microsoft, Credit Karma, LivePerson, AOL, Vroom, Outfit7, Telit, NetSeer, Wix, Inneractive, EyeView, Etoro
Find out what your peers are saying about Quest Software, SAP, SAP LeanIX and others in Enterprise Architecture Management. Updated: August 2026.
908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.