No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Milvus vs Supabase comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 22, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Milvus
Ranking in Vector Databases
13th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.5
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Open Source Databases (14th)
Supabase
Ranking in Vector Databases
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.6
Number of Reviews
14
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Vector Databases category, the mindshare of Milvus is 7.0%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Supabase is 5.1%, down from 9.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vector Databases Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Supabase5.1%
Milvus7.0%
Other87.9%
Vector Databases
 

Featured Reviews

Sameer Bhangale - PeerSpot reviewer
Leader, Data Science Practice at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Provides quick and easy containerization, but documentation is not very user-friendly
Milvus' documentation is not very user-friendly and doesn't help me get started quickly. Chroma DB provides super user-friendly documentation, enabling new users to get started quickly. Chroma DB's setup doesn't have many dependencies, whereas Milvus usually comes with some dependencies because of the way it needs to be deployed. Unlike Milvus, it's very easy to do POCs with Chroma DB.
Boya Uday Kumar - PeerSpot reviewer
Ai Research Enthusiast And Developer at ADP
Semantic search has transformed client sites and drives faster projects with higher conversions
Adapting to Supabase Vector was relatively smooth, but there was definitely a moderate learning curve at the start. The SQL foundation, REST API, documentation, and integration with all the AI tools made it easier. However, understanding embeddings, index types, similarity metrics, and how SQL and vector hybrid queries work, as well as the RLS policies for vectors, required some time to learn. I do not have many things to point out, but a couple of areas for improvement come to mind. For index optimization guidance, clearer instructions on when to use IVFFlat versus HNSW indexes would be helpful. Additionally, having a built-in embedding generation capability would simplify the workflow, as currently, I use external services such as OpenAI or Hugging Face for that purpose.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Milvus has good accuracy and performance."
"The best feature of Milvus was finding the closest chunk from a huge amount of data."
"I like the accuracy and usability."
"Milvus offers multiple methods for calculating similarities or distances between vectors, such as L2 norm and cosine similarity. These methods help in comparing different vectors based on specific use cases. For instance, in our use case, we find that the L2 distance works best, but you can experiment with different methods to find the most suitable one for your needs."
"The solution is well containerized, and since containerization is quick and easy for me, I can scale it up quickly."
"The most valuable part using Supabase Vector is how complex things I was able to build and deploy in a short period of time."
"The platform's role-level security feature is quite effective for spatial data management."
"Supabase Vector has positively impacted our organization as it is very convenient since our business databases are already hosted in Supabase, making integration easy."
"Supabase enables us to lower the skill floor while keeping the ceiling high."
"Supabase Vector positively impacts my organization through major improvements in search relevance, faster development speed, a simpler architecture, and reduced engineering overhead, with better performance in real queries due to the hybrid SQL plus vector search."
"When I got to know about Supabase Vector, I fell in love with it since it worked for what I was using it for, and I just stuck to it."
"Supabase Vector is easy to set up and cost-effective because the alternative is Firebase, which requires a credit card."
"We completed what we initially estimated as a fifteen-day job in just three days, thanks to the Supabase dashboards and triggers."
 

Cons

"I've heard that when we store too much data in Milvus, it becomes slow and does not work properly."
"Milvus could make it simpler. Simplifying the requirements and making it more accessible. It could be more user-friendly."
"Milvus' documentation is not very user-friendly and doesn't help me get started quickly."
"Milvus has higher resource consumption, which introduces complexity in implementation."
"One area for the solution improvement is the inclusion of more sample code in various programming languages, particularly PHP."
"My experience with Supabase Vector's performance at scale indicates that it operates excellently at small scales, but as we move toward larger scales, such as multi-million vectors, it requires careful engineering to maintain predictable performance, with challenges such as query plan complexity and latency variance."
"I feel Supabase Vector can be improved by venturing further into adding more backend features and maybe working with fast API frameworks like Python languages; they could improve and widen their capabilities."
"I think there are still many Postgres features that can be developed further by the Supabase team."
"When setting up a database, a PostgreSQL instance, which is the most popular use of Supabase, instead of having to go and write and run an SQL line to create a pgvector on Supabase, it would be nice if the person creating the database for the project could just be asked with maybe a checkbox whether they want a vector database or not."
"I think the support system can be better because after Supabase Vector stopped working in India, there is no support."
"Adapting to Supabase Vector was relatively smooth, but there was definitely a moderate learning curve at the start."
"When the website goes down, the lagging part needs to be resolved. When you have attached a front-end app and your users are using it and then the back-end is not in sync or lagging at the moment, it usually affects the front end of the app because the app will not be able to function to its maximum expectation."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Milvus is an open-source solution."
"Milvus is an open-source solution."
"The solution's cost is reasonable compared to other solutions."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vector Databases solutions are best for your needs.
912,930 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Comms Service Provider
9%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Outsourcing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise8
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Supabase Vector?
In this basic implementation or proof of concept project, I use the basic Supabase project available in the free trial. I am not sure which one of those options it falls under, but I use the free S...
What needs improvement with Supabase Vector?
When setting up a database, a PostgreSQL instance, which is the most popular use of Supabase, instead of having to go and write and run an SQL line to create a pgvector on Supabase, it would be nic...
What is your primary use case for Supabase Vector?
As an AI Engineer, my primary use case of Supabase Vector is for storing vector databases that I use at retrieval and inference in my AI agent and RAG pipelines. I have been working with RAG soluti...
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Alibaba Group 2. Tencent 3. Baidu 4. JD.com 5. Meituan 6. Xiaomi 7. Didi Chuxing 8. ByteDance 9. Huawei 10. ZTE 11. Lenovo 12. Haier 13. China Mobile 14. China Telecom 15. China Unicom 16. Ping An Insurance 17. China Life Insurance 18. Industrial and Commercial Bank of China 19. Bank of China 20. Agricultural Bank of China 21. China Construction Bank 22. PetroChina 23. Sinopec 24. China National Offshore Oil Corporation 25. China Southern Airlines 26. Air China 27. China Eastern Airlines 28. China Railway Group 29. China Railway Construction Corporation 30. China Communications Construction Company 31. China Merchants Group 32. China Evergrande Group
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Milvus vs. Supabase and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
912,930 professionals have used our research since 2012.