Mule ESB and webMethods.io are two leading integration platforms in the integration category. Mule ESB seems to have the upper hand with its extensive array of connectors and support for Java, making it ideal for developers familiar with that language.
Features: Mule ESB features flexibility and high performance with numerous connectors and DataWeave capabilities, supporting integration across diverse environments. It offers excellent data transformation and easy integration patterns. webMethods.io excels with robust debugging capabilities, an intuitive GUI-based approach, and a wide array of pre-built integration tools, simplifying complex integration tasks.
Room for Improvement: Mule ESB needs better SOAP web services support, improved scalability, and more comprehensive documentation. Platform navigation could be streamlined and the user experience enhanced. webMethods.io requires better legacy system support and simpler documentation. Costs and complexity in version upgrades remain a challenge.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Mule ESB allows flexible deployments across on-premises and cloud, although support response can be slow. Its community edition is praised for resource availability. webMethods.io supports hybrid environments but faces criticism for high costs and a challenging initial setup. Its customer service, although generally supportive, is noted for expensive and complex licensing.
Pricing and ROI: Mule ESB offers a community edition, making it accessible, but enterprise costs are high with restrictive licensing. ROI depends heavily on design and governance. webMethods.io is known for a high-cost pricing model with transactional considerations that can complicate ROI for smaller enterprises.
We have a good relationship with our vendor, and they are ready to help us with any technical issues.
The technical support of Mule ESB can be rated from nine to ten.
Mule ESB is a scalable solution.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
More information is needed from MuleSoft.
From my perspective, Mule ESB is lightweight, but it can be improved when it comes to the agility of the system.
Another enhancement would be in OCR; currently, there is a huge demand for OCR capabilities. It would be perfect if webMethods.io had a built-in component for OCR, as this would be tested and allow customers to use it better than a third-party OCR application.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
They have their own language called DataWeave, which helps transform data and is efficient enough to handle any kind of transformation.
The best features of Mule ESB are that it's very robust and solid; I find that even our legacy systems go well with ESB.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
