Oracle Service Bus and Mule ESB are leading players in the enterprise service bus market. Mule ESB has the upper hand due to its ease of use, flexible deployment options, and a strong community support system.
Features: Oracle Service Bus integrates a variety of adapters for seamless connectivity and offers solid monitoring features crucial for defining business processes. Its capabilities in orchestrating and composing services, along with robust visual reporting, aid in stable operations. Mule ESB stands out with its extensive connectors, DataWeave, which simplifies data transformation, and support for various protocols, making it a versatile tool for rapid integration and deployment.
Room for Improvement: Oracle Service Bus could improve in logging capabilities, cloud-based adapter support, and scalability while needing more intuitive documentation and support for modern protocols. Mule ESB would benefit from enhanced stability, improved API gateway features, and comprehensive logging frameworks, alongside innovations in multi-file transfer and AI integration for better self-service.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Service Bus allows for diverse deployment configurations, including hybrid setups, although customer service has mixed reviews due to long issue resolution times. Mule ESB excels in flexible deployment options across cloud environments, bolstered by a robust community and support, though there is room for improvement in direct support and documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Oracle Service Bus tends to be expensive for smaller enterprises with a complex licensing structure, yet offers long-term savings through efficiencies. In contrast, Mule ESB is more affordable, available in both commercial and community editions. While licensing can be costly, its open-source version provides flexibility and potentially better ROI due to lower initial costs.
We have a good relationship with our vendor, and they are ready to help us with any technical issues.
The technical support of Mule ESB can be rated from nine to ten.
I rate the technical support from Oracle a nine out of ten.
Mule ESB is a scalable solution.
There are dependencies on the Java version and application being used.
I rate the stability of the product as eight out of ten.
More information is needed from MuleSoft.
From my perspective, Mule ESB is lightweight, but it can be improved when it comes to the agility of the system.
This can happen due to legacy systems that might not allow the use of microservices.
I view both Oracle and IBM products as expensive.
They have their own language called DataWeave, which helps transform data and is efficient enough to handle any kind of transformation.
The best features of Mule ESB are that it's very robust and solid; I find that even our legacy systems go well with ESB.
The main advantage of Oracle Service Bus is the possibility to integrate different systems using workflows and different architectures in the same product.
Oracle Service Bus transforms complex and brittle architectures into agile integration networks by connecting, virtualizing, and managing interactions between services and applications. Oracle Service Bus delivers low-cost, standards-based integration for mission critical SOA environments where extreme performance, scalability and reliability are critical requirements.
Oracle Service Bus enables companies to use the values of their enterprise applications portfolio. From on-premise, to the cloud to mobile devices, Service Bus allows companies to leverage their existing investments in new ways by extending the performance and scalability leadership of Oracle SOA and API Management.
We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
