MySQL vs Oracle Multitenant comparison

MySQL and Oracle Multitenant are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. MySQL is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.3, while Oracle Multitenant is ranked #11 with an average rating of 9.0. MySQL holds a 5.8% mindshare in SQL, compared to Oracle Multitenant’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of MySQL users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Oracle Multitenant users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 153 MySQL reviews

8,855 Views
3,985 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Oracle Multitenant

Read 21 Oracle Multitenant reviews

871 Views
862 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MySQL

Oracle Multitenant

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

MySQL and Oracle Multitenant are competitive database solutions with distinct strengths. MySQL, with its open-source nature and affordability, has the upper hand in cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, particularly for small to medium-sized businesses. Oracle Multitenant, however, excels in providing advanced enterprise features and resource management, making it preferable for larger organizations seeking high scalability.

Features: MySQL is highly valued for its multi-threaded architecture, strong integration capabilities with LAMP/WAMP stacks, and support for a broad range of programming languages. Oracle Multitenant, on the other hand, provides unparalleled database consolidation features, efficient resource management via pluggable databases, and top-notch security and data recovery options.

Room for Improvement: MySQL could benefit from enhancements in complex data handling capabilities, advanced database management features, and integration approaches. Oracle Multitenant, while offering robust features, faces challenges with high licensing costs and the need for better backward compatibility to ease migration concerns.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MySQL offers simplicity in deployment across various environments, contributing to its cost advantages, though its support relies heavily on community efforts. Oracle Multitenant typically involves more structured deployments with higher initial costs but provides strong, enterprise-level customer support at a premium.

Pricing and ROI: MySQL is often viewed as a cost-effective choice with significant ROI, ideal for businesses looking to minimize investment. In contrast, Oracle Multitenant, despite its higher costs, is justified by its performance and robustness, serving larger enterprises focused on long-term benefits and reliability.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,707 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

153

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

Oracle Multitenant

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

11th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 5.8%, down from 8.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Multitenant is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
MySQL	5.8%
Oracle Multitenant	1.0%
Other	93.2%

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Pranay Jain

Senior software developer at Simplifyvms

Robust relational data foundation has supported rapid growth and improved user data management

MySQL can be improved in several ways. It has connectivity errors and administration troubles that sometimes occur, though not consistently. MySQL has slow queries; sometimes when I run a query, it scans the whole table, and if the data is very large, it takes too much time to retrieve the data. There can be resource bottlenecks with RAM and CPU usage being a little lower than ideal. Monitoring system metrics is crucial because we need to identify and address these types of issues. Schema designing is another area for improvement, as a poorly designed schema can lead to data redundancy in the future. If I haven't initially planned for a 20 lakh user database and am only working with a 1,000 user case, it will be very problematic because in the future, it will affect the whole table structure, and we will need to change everything. Thorough thinking is necessary before even creating the table. MySQL documentation could be better. Sometimes when I need to find something related to MySQL, the documentation is not very comprehensive. If I have a problem with it, I have to go to Stack Overflow or something similar to get the full detail. Additionally, sometimes when we are connecting to local MySQL, it says we cannot connect to SQL, and I don't know the reason. The error messages are not very helpful, so we have to investigate those cases manually. There are multiple instances of this occurring. Documentation can be better overall. The integration capabilities could be improved slightly. Whatever I have used is working fine for me currently, but it could be a little better. The UI of MySQL Workbench, which I use, is not appealing to me, so it could be improved. MySQL overall is very good, and the foundation is very strong. We can develop features around it and different types of things inside it, which will make it better in the future.

Read full review

Saikat Nag

Oracle Application Database Administrator at RP Sanjiv Goenka Group

Manages extensive utility billing applications efficiently with trusted performance and robust support

Currently, I have a very good experience with Oracle Multitenant. The pluggable database is easy to handle and manage, sharing resources efficiently. However, Oracle license pricing is an issue due to its high cost. Our organization is compelled to reduce CPU usage by seventy CPUs because the Oracle license cost depends on it.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"When comparing MySQL to other solutions it is easier to use and boots up faster. Additionally, when you want to query a lot of data, MySQL is better in performance."

"Apart from the features that are in the enterprise part, we find the database to be valuable. The connectors and the backup features are valuable as well. We use the basic database. We don't really use the extra features. Our clients like the security features in the database."

"MySQL is a light database. It's not very complex. It's easy to develop, easy to maintain, and easy to back up and restore."

"MySQL is the best option for the Laravel PHP framework."

"However, it is easy to scale MySQL using the functions provided with the product."

"The relations in the database, the dynamic workflow, and the ability to connect with all columns. It's useful for e-commerce."

"Setup is easy. MySQL of various flavours has community editions to easily test, deploy, and run."

"It is a scalable solution."

More MySQL pros

"The stability of Oracle Multitenant is excellent, and I would rate it a nine out of ten."

"The modernization aspect of Oracle Multitenant is significant; it wasn't available previously in database technology, but now it is, enhancing database consolidation."

"The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine."

"The database becomes pluggable. Inside this container is called a pluggable database and each application contains this pluggable database inside Multitenant. We can then share resources like control files, memory, etc. This lets you stop and start each application without impacting the others. This resource sharing is the most valuable feature"

"You can scale the solution as needed."

"The feature that I like on Multitenant is the ease - it is very easy for my team to run the database."

"Multitenant has a container database with many pluggable databases."

"I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten. Our clients are mostly medium and enterprise businesses."

More Oracle Multitenant pros

Cons

"There are some issues with compatibility with Java environments that need to be improved. When Oracle bought this solution there were some driver changes that caused some issues with operations."

"When I run into issues, I really have to research how to fix them."

"The data masking functionality should be improved as well as the native encryption functionality in the MySQL database."

"In an upcoming release, there should be something added similar to EPL. For example, when using the flow diagram, we can create a schema. We have two useful features to add or create the table, but there should be some UI features to allow us to drag and drop to create other schemas. This would be very helpful."

"Its performance should be better. When we use big data, it is slow in performance. We should be able to use mirroring for improved performance."

"Oracle should start putting in some of the enterprise features in the standard feature. There are some key features that should be part of the standard."

"Documentation is definitely required when running multiple databases on a cluster system."

"This solution needs to be improved when it comes to working with desktop applications on the developer side."

More MySQL cons

"The solution lacks a GUI for commands."

"This solution is a bit complicated when collecting from containers - that feature should be a bit better."

"Technical support could be faster."

"Oracle license pricing is an issue due to its high cost. Our organization is compelled to reduce CPU usage by seventy CPUs because the Oracle license cost depends on it."

"The solution is partially extendable. It is not very easy to scale. If we want to grow, we need additional servers, which is why we are considering the cloud."

"That said, Oracle in general doesn't invest in their UI for any of their applications. If we're talking about the dashboard or other user experience, there is room for improvement. I'm talking about on premises. The cloud version has started to improve."

"The user interface for this solution can be made better."

"It would be beneficial to include this solution with Oracle Enterprise, but Oracle charges additional fees for it."

More Oracle Multitenant cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would rate the solution’s pricing a six out of ten. The solution is not cheap but it’s a fair value. The pricing depends on the use cases of our customers. Some of our customers use the community edition which is license free and a good fit for their use cases. However, we encourage our bigger customers to sign up because of the scalability issues. The paid versions get direct technical support from Oracle."

"MySQL Enterprise Support is not cheap, though might still be cheaper than Oracle or SQL Server. They may not have local support depending on where you’re based, but there are many smaller agencies out there that will readily provide support. You’ll need to spend some time looking around."

"The solution does not come with a licensing fee."

"The solution’s pricing depends on customer requirements. A license is not required for the community edition."

"When you know the setup will continue to grow, make sure you have the paid support."

"I use the open-source free community version."

"Can range from free to quite expensive, depending on the environments and requirements, so better to really set goals ahead of setting it up."

"It is an open source platform."

More MySQL pricing and cost advice

"This solution is a little bit pricey."

"For me, I will go with it if I have the budget. Some features are nicer than before, but at the end of the day, you always have a limited budget. I prefer to upgrade and get a specific hardware when possible. At the end, you will have to make a compromise. You will not get everything you would have liked to have."

"The price is worth the quality."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

17%

Comms Service Provider

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	75
Midsize Enterprise	32
Large Enterprise	62

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	9

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What do you like most about Oracle Multitenant?

The best thing about Oracle Multitenant is its ability to consolidate multiple databases into one engine.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Multitenant?

I am only involved in the development part and not familiar with the pricing details.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Oracle Multitenant?

There are no improvements needed in Oracle Multitenant, but improvements could be made in the AI part. We feel that the server, OAS, the analytics server, is missing an AI component which exists in...

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 23% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 9% of the time

SQL Server vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 5% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 4% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

SQL Server vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 31% of the time

Citus Data vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 20% of the time

IBM Db2 Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 18% of the time

Oracle Database vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 17% of the time

SAP HANA vs Oracle Multitenant

Compared 13% of the time

More Oracle Multitenant Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

January 2026

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Multitenant

January 2026

Download Oracle Multitenant product report

Also Known As

No data available

Oracle Pluggable Database

Overview

MySQL is an open-source database known for its ease of use and high performance. It offers features like replication and clustering, making it ideal for diverse applications. Its cost-effectiveness and LAMP integration are key advantages for businesses.

MySQL supports a variety of languages and platforms, providing reliable, scalable data management. Its graphical interface and LAMP architecture integration enhance its usability, while community support further strengthens its appeal. Challenges include scalability issues with large databases, lack of advanced clustering, and limited high-availability features. Complex queries may affect performance, and integration can pose difficulties. The outdated interface and insufficient documentation are also concerns, along with replication and backup reliability issues.

What are MySQL's key features?

Open-source nature: Freely available and customizable.
Cross-platform compatibility: Supports multiple operating systems.
Scalability: Capable of handling large volumes of data.
Replication and clustering: Ensure data redundancy and load balancing.
Full-text search: Provides powerful search capabilities.
LAMP integration: Seamlessly integrates with Linux, Apache, and PHP.

What benefits should users consider?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces expenses due to its open-source nature.
High performance: Efficiently processes large volumes of data.
Active community support: Access to a wide range of resources and expertise.
Versatile use cases: Suitable for varied applications including web development and IoT.

MySQL is widely implemented in industries such as web development, e-commerce, and finance. It's used for managing dynamic websites, powering e-commerce platforms, and supporting financial applications. Its compatibility with PHP and cost-effectiveness make it suitable for CMS platforms like WordPress. With cloud services integration, MySQL is a backend choice for scalable applications in various sectors.

Oracle

Oracle Multitenant - an Oracle Database 12c Enterprise Edition option – introduces a new architecture that enables customers to easily consolidate multiple databases, without changing their applications. This new architecture delivers all the benefits of managing many databases as one, yet retains the isolation and resource prioritization of separate databases. In addition, Oracle Multitenant enables rapid provisioning and upgrades, and fully complements other options including Oracle Real Application Clusters and Active Data Guard.

For more information on Oracle Multitenant, visit Oracle.com

Oracle

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

An Post, National Oilwell Varco, SAS Institute, Sportmaster, Y-Telecom

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

February 2026

Free Report: MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,707 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. Oracle Multitenant report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.