Netskope Advanced Analytics vs Safeguard by One Identity comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Netskope and One Identity are both solutions in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category. Netskope is ranked #30, while One Identity is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.6. Netskope holds a 1.2% mindshare in UBA, compared to One Identity’s 3.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Netskope users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of One Identity users who would recommend it.

Netskope Advanced Analytics

Read 1 Netskope Advanced Analytics review

1,000 Views
660 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Safeguard by One Identity

Read 91 Safeguard by One Identity reviews

12,758 Views
3,062 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Netskope Advanced Analytics

Safeguard by One Identity

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 20, 2026

One Identity Safeguard and Netskope Advanced Analytics are competing products in identity management and cloud security, respectively. Users benefit from One Identity Safeguard's superior support and price satisfaction, whereas Netskope Advanced Analytics is recognized for its comprehensive feature set, justifying its price.

Features: One Identity Safeguard includes strong access control, efficient threat detection, and reliable identity governance. Netskope Advanced Analytics offers extensive visibility, control over cloud activities, and prioritizes real-time data protection.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: One Identity Safeguard features a straightforward deployment process with dependable customer service. Netskope Advanced Analytics enhances scalability with its cloud-based solutions, though initial deployment can be complex. Its customer relationship management is extensive.

Pricing and ROI: One Identity Safeguard often presents a more favorable setup cost with consistent ROI on identity-related investments. Netskope Advanced Analytics, though potentially higher in setup costs, delivers ROI through long-term benefits in cloud security and analytical insights.

To learn more, read our detailed User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,769 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Netskope Advanced Analytics

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

30th

Average Rating

7.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Safeguard by One Identity

Ranking in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Privileged Access Management (PAM) (2nd), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) category, the mindshare of Netskope Advanced Analytics is 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Safeguard by One Identity is 3.0%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Safeguard by One Identity	3.0%
Netskope Advanced Analytics	1.2%
Other	95.8%

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

Featured Reviews

Shiv Ram

Senior Manager at Bharti Airtel Limited

User-friendly experience and customization of workflow with certain scripting challenges

Netskope could benefit from enhancements in its scripting capabilities. While they offer numerous predefined templates, there are instances where customers may require customized templates to meet specific requirements. Creating these templates often involves scripting, which can include algorithms and logical expressions. Many end-users and customers may not possess the necessary knowledge to develop these scripts, making it challenging. Netskope could consider implementing a user-friendly interface with a 'pick and choose' option that allows users to select and configure components from existing templates, making the customization process more accessible.

Read full review

Mahesh Malve

Senior Business Development Associate at DigitalTrack Solutions ind pvt ltd

Centralized control has strengthened privileged security and simplified audit investigations

While One Identity Safeguard is a strong and reliable PAM solution, there are a few areas where it can be further improved to enhance user experience and scalability. Regarding the user interface and experience, the UI, while functional, can be a bit complex for new users. A more intuitive and modern dashboard with simplified navigation would improve adoption, especially for non-technical stakeholders. Regarding integration flexibility, although it supports major integrations, expanding out-of-the-box connectors for more cloud-native apps, DevOps tools, and SaaS platforms would be beneficial. Faster and simpler API-based integrations could reduce deployment efforts. Regarding scalability and performance in large enterprise environments, performance tuning and scaling can require additional efforts. Enhancing seamless scalability and high availability configuration would improve enterprise readiness.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It provides comprehensive reports, including predefined templates tailored for compliance requirements, making it easier to present detailed information to customers."

"We use the Approval Anywhere, or cloud assistant feature and it is great. It enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time to the approval process."

"I give it an eight because of its robust security features, its splendid automated password management, and real-time activity monitoring that stood out to me."

"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."

"In terms of the user experience, it is a pretty useful product. It works in a good way."

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted our organization by contributing to a significant drop in compliance and audit overhead, aiding in the preparation of security audits that were previously chaotic, making the process much simpler now, and improving operational efficiency and admin satisfaction."

"The auditing and approval mechanisms are features we did not have before and are greatly appreciated."

"One Identity Safeguard has positively impacted my organization by improving our security posture, eliminating shared privileged credentials, increasing visibility into admin activity, and making compliance audits faster and more reliable."

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

More Safeguard by One Identity pros

Cons

"Netskope could consider implementing a user-friendly interface with a 'pick and choose' option that allows users to select and configure components from existing templates, making the customization process more accessible."

"When we compare One Identity Safeguard with Cyberark, we know CyberArk has other tools or other features that are more complex and more useful for the customers. For example, I have one customer that wants to elevate the permission that is available in CyberArk."

"The multilanguage functionality does not support the Arabic language, even though this solution is deployed in an Arabic region."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"The main thing that needs improvement is the slowness. Apart from that, the change password check-in feature also needs improvement because it is not working perfectly accurately."

"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."

"From a management point of view, it would be beneficial if One Identity Safeguard Privilege Password and One Identity Safeguard Privilege Session had a more similar interface."

"Reporting and dashboard customization with One Identity Safeguard should be better improved."

"I find it complicated to implement HTTPS monitoring because the documentation is unclear."

More Safeguard by One Identity cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing largely depends on the specific customer."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"It is cheaper than CyberArk. Its price is fair."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"We have a yearly license. The cost depends on how much a company wants to invest in technology. In our organization, we believe in modern digitization and automation processes so we found it affordable. One Identity was not that much less than other solutions and it is not a cheap solution. There were number of cheaper solutions. However, it's the most effective, according to our evaluation."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

More Safeguard by One Identity pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Outsourcing Company

14%

Retailer

10%

Financial Services Firm

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	27
Large Enterprise	40

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing of Safeguard by One Identity is moderate.

See all answers

What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?

Safeguard by One Identity could be improved by making the interface even easier to use, expanding reporting and analytics, and providing more customization options for access policies. It would be ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for One Identity Safeguard?

My main use case for Safeguard by One Identity is securing and managing user identities and access across the application with a focus on improving authentication, enforcing access control, and red...

See all answers

Comparisons

Exabeam vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 33% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 27% of the time

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 9% of the time

Dtex Systems vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

Adlumin Security Operations vs Netskope Advanced Analytics

Compared 5% of the time

More Netskope Advanced Analytics Competitors

Idira Privileged Access Manager vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 9% of the time

Delinea Secret Server vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 5% of the time

BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

Delinea Privileged Access Service vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 4% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Safeguard by One Identity

Compared 3% of the time

More Safeguard by One Identity Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

October 2026

Download Netskope Advanced Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

Safeguard by One Identity

October 2026

Download Safeguard by One Identity product report

Overview

Netskope Advanced Analytics provides deep visibility and insights into cloud activities and security for businesses. It enables organizations to monitor and act upon data intelligently, enhancing security measures.

By leveraging advanced data analytics, Netskope Advanced Analytics delivers comprehensive visibility into cloud, web, and private application activities. It supports data-driven decision-making, allowing for proactive security measures and efficient response strategies. The intuitive interface simplifies data interpretation, enhancing the ability to act on insights quickly.

What are the key features of Netskope Advanced Analytics?

Comprehensive Dashboard: Offers a centralized view of cloud and web activity.
Data Correlation: Integrates data from multiple sources for cohesive analysis.
Customizable Reporting: Allows users to tailor reports to specific needs.
Real-Time Alerts: Instant notifications for suspicious activities.

What benefits should users expect?

Improved Security Posture: Provides insights to strengthen security frameworks.
Enhanced Decision Making: Data-driven insights facilitate strategic decisions.
Cost Efficiency: Optimizes resource allocation reducing operational costs.
Scalability: Adapts to evolving business environments easily.

Netskope Advanced Analytics is implemented across industries such as healthcare, finance, and retail, offering sector-specific insights. It helps healthcare providers protect patient data, finance institutions secure transactions, and retailers safeguard customer information, adapting to each industry's unique challenges.

Netskope

One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.

One Identity

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cavium

Buyer's Guide

User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA)

October 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity, IBM, Exabeam and others in User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA). Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,769 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) vendors.

We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.