

PRTG Network Monitor and New Relic compete in network and application monitoring. PRTG seems to have an upper hand with cost-effectiveness and infrastructure monitoring, while New Relic is favored for real-time analytics and application insights.
Features: PRTG Network Monitor is notable for rapid deployment, scalability, ease of use, and affordability. It provides strong infrastructure monitoring features with customizable sensors and great vendor support. New Relic is known for its detailed application monitoring and comprehensive dashboard, providing insights into application performance, error detection, and real-time analytics.
Room for Improvement: PRTG users suggest enhancing templates, graphical interfaces, and cloud features. Greater flexibility in configuration is desired. New Relic users want better data privacy, cost, and complexity management with alerts and dashboard customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is primarily on-premises, praised for easy installation, with good documentation and email-based support. New Relic deploys in public and hybrid clouds, offering quick deployment but with noted customer support and documentation issues.
Pricing and ROI: PRTG is affordable and offers good ROI, especially for smaller deployments, with cost rising with scale. It is cost-effective for infrastructure monitoring. New Relic faces scalability costs, but delivers high ROI via its robust features, aiding in preventing application failures and optimizing performance.
There is return on investment because since we reduced the downtime, we can definitely save a lot of money within that period.
There is a definite return on investment for New Relic, as we would not have invested in building its infrastructure if there were no returns.
One of the metrics that helped as a return on investment was the ability to detect issues faster and troubleshoot more quickly, which in turn helped to achieve a much better service level agreement with customers.
It provides accurate data for utilization, allowing us to monitor and optimize our investments in WAN connection capacity.
After introducing PRTG Network Monitor, we have saved time, and it's easy for everybody to monitor everything.
The implementation reduced our employee resources from 20-25 to 5-6 employees.
If I drop an email to them, they will respond quickly to my email.
Customer support from New Relic is very good, and we rarely need to create support tickets.
They are very polite and helped him out.
They resolve our queries 24/7.
The setup process is well-documented, making it easy to deploy.
Tutorials are available so I can manage any issue with PRTG Network Monitor easily.
We currently use New Relic for tens of thousands of developers and hundreds of teams within our organization, and we have not encountered any scalability issues.
It is also suitable for cloud native architectures, SaaS, or software as a service, and for high volume data ingestion also.
New Relic's scalability is good based on my experience, and it can handle my organization's needs as they grow.
On a scale of one to ten, scalability is rated as 9.5.
PRTG Network Monitor has the ability to scale and add new devices.
You can install them in each network, even if they are not connected, and it works.
New Relic lags sometimes.
New Relic is stable based on my experience, as I have not seen any problems with the UI.
We haven't needed vendor support for the last three years, which demonstrates the product's stability.
PRTG Network Monitor is stable in my experience, and I have not encountered issues with crashes or downtime.
PRTG Network Monitor is very stable and requires low maintenance.
If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful.
Using real-time data, if there are any malicious patterns or something happening, they can identify those.
Because of the pricing model, organizations have experienced uncontrolled costs and were not able to afford New Relic.
The initial auto-discovery added too many unnecessary sensors, so auto-discovery should only take the necessary sensors into consideration.
They need to improve application performance monitoring, error tracing mechanisms, and log management.
PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time.
Considering the features New Relic offers, the pricing or cost setup has not been a blocker for our budget.
The licensing part is a recurring license for every year, which is very affordable, making PRTG Network Monitor budget-friendly.
Pricing is by the number of devices, not by sensor.
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor.
Using New Relic speeds up troubleshooting and resolution, giving us a clearer picture of where issues are, thus saving time and effort.
New Relic is very useful for teams that don't have much of a dedicated DevOps team but want to have observability for their platform, and it's an easy way to get started.
New Relic has positively impacted our organization by reducing errors, improving performance, and saving time.
PRTG Network Monitor already provided me with 100 free sensors, which is enough for my network monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor has a good dashboard that shows each and every piece of information, so we can easily find out what is happening with the systems.
These reports help me in my day-to-day work, and I rely on them because they provide proof during escalation, with exact downtime logs and related information.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| PRTG Network Monitor | 3.3% |
| New Relic | 1.5% |
| Other | 95.2% |


| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 65 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 50 |
| Large Enterprise | 71 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 59 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 19 |
| Large Enterprise | 47 |
New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.
New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.
What are New Relic's most important features?In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.
To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.