Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
PRTG Network Monitor Logo

Top 10 PRTG Network Monitor Alternatives

Vendor: Paessler GmbH
4.1 out of 5
Leave a review

Top PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to PRTG Network Monitor based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Veeam Data Platform, Zabbix, and Datadog. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. PRTG Network Monitor surpasses its competitors by offering an intuitive interface, customizable alerts, and comprehensive reporting capabilities, ensuring seamless network performance management and real-time monitoring to meet diverse IT infrastructure needs efficiently.

Paessler GmbH Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Paessler GmbH, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Veeam Data Platform
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels with ready-to-use sensors and efficient deployment for cost-effective budgets. In comparison, Veeam Data Platform offers superior backup features and robust recovery options, appealing to larger enterprises seeking comprehensive solutions with significant long-term savings.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Veeam Data Platform Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Veeam Data Platform requires a higher initial investment. This difference impacts organizations considering upfront expenses in their decision to implement network monitoring tools.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a low setup cost, making it budget-friendly, while Veeam Data Platform requires a higher initial investment. This difference impacts organizations considering upfront expenses in their decision to implement network monitoring tools.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix, being open-source, attracts budget-conscious buyers with its versatility and integration options. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor appeals to those prioritizing ease of installation and structured support. Zabbix emphasizes customization, while PRTG focuses on simplicity and comprehensive support.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix has minimal setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while PRTG Network Monitor may involve higher initial expenses due to its licensing model.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix has minimal setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while PRTG Network Monitor may involve higher initial expenses due to its licensing model.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is valued for rapid deployment and resource efficiency, ideal for smaller infrastructures. In comparison, Datadog offers extensive integrations and real-time analytics, suited for cloud-based environments. PRTG's clear pricing suits small setups, while Datadog's flexibility meets advanced, scalable needs.
Download Datadog vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a one-time payment setup, making it cost-effective for long-term use, while Datadog requires monthly or yearly subscriptions, which might escalate costs over time.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a one-time payment setup, making it cost-effective for long-term use, while Datadog requires monthly or yearly subscriptions, which might escalate costs over time.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor suits those seeking rapid deployment and flexibility in network monitoring with various sensors. In comparison, New Relic offers extensive application performance insights ideal for developers focusing on transaction analysis and customizable dashboards for real-time monitoring of applications.
Download New Relic vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a one-time setup cost, while New Relic requires an ongoing subscription, highlighting a key pricing difference.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a one-time setup cost, while New Relic requires an ongoing subscription, highlighting a key pricing difference.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk AppDynamics
4.1 out of 5
Splunk AppDynamics provides deep application insights, enhancing performance monitoring with features like JVM memory tracking. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor focuses on infrastructure monitoring with proactive alerting. Splunk AppDynamics suits complex applications, while PRTG is ideal for budget-conscious infrastructure monitoring.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost with extensive feature offerings, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup, making it suitable for smaller budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
Splunk AppDynamics has a higher setup cost with extensive feature offerings, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup, making it suitable for smaller budgets.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and scalability with robust network monitoring and proactive alerting features. In comparison, Azure Monitor excels in integration across Azure services and provides detailed insights with customizable alerts, though it presents challenges with complexity and data ingestion costs.
Download Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Azure Monitor involves higher setup expenses but offers more cloud-native integrations.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while Azure Monitor involves higher setup expenses but offers more cloud-native integrations.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM excels in scalability and robust alerting features, making it ideal for environments needing customized real-time analysis. In comparison, PRTG offers comprehensive sensor coverage without additional modules, appealing to buyers seeking straightforward deployment but ready to manage scaling costs.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM typically requires a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup process, highlighting a crucial difference in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM typically requires a higher initial setup cost, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup process, highlighting a crucial difference in their pricing strategies.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor's robust device monitoring and real-time alerting appeal to those needing easy setup. In comparison, Elastic Observability attracts users requiring cross-platform visibility with powerful search and visualization. Buyers appreciate PRTG's cost-effectiveness, while Elastic suits large enterprises with flexible deployment.
Download Elastic Observability vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Elastic Observability entails a more complex pricing structure. The differences in their setup costs highlight the distinct pricing approaches of PRTG's simplicity and Elastic's scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, whereas Elastic Observability entails a more complex pricing structure. The differences in their setup costs highlight the distinct pricing approaches of PRTG's simplicity and Elastic's scalability.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NinjaOne
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor enables rapid deployment with minimal customization, appealing to users needing broad monitoring capabilities and scalability. In comparison, NinjaOne excels in automation and remote management, ideal for cloud environments needing integration and scripting features for IT management tasks.
Download NinjaOne vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, while NinjaOne incurs a setup fee that may affect small businesses' budgets.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has no setup cost, while NinjaOne incurs a setup fee that may affect small businesses' budgets.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers affordability and ease of use, ideal for simpler setups. In comparison, Splunk Observability Cloud delivers robust features and extensive customization, suitable for complex environments. PRTG's rapid deployment enhances accessibility, while Splunk's comprehensive capabilities provide long-term value despite higher costs.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
PRTG Network Monitor is recognized for its low setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud has higher initial pricing. The contrast in setup expenses highlights PRTG's budget-friendly approach compared to Splunk's premium positioning.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor is recognized for its low setup cost, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud has higher initial pricing. The contrast in setup expenses highlights PRTG's budget-friendly approach compared to Splunk's premium positioning.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ThousandEyes
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for its cost-effectiveness and ease of use, offering a comprehensive set of features for straightforward deployment. In comparison, ThousandEyes offers advanced analytics and cloud service monitoring, appealing to businesses requiring deep insights and superior external network performance.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ThousandEyes Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward initial setup with minimal costs, while ThousandEyes comes with potentially higher setup expenses, highlighting a notable difference in affordability and initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward initial setup with minimal costs, while ThousandEyes comes with potentially higher setup expenses, highlighting a notable difference in affordability and initial investment between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco DNA Center
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers integrated features and rapid deployment, appealing to budget-conscious buyers seeking simplicity. In comparison, Cisco DNA Center provides comprehensive security and operational features, attracting larger enterprises needing advanced capabilities despite higher costs and complexity.
Download Cisco DNA Center vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco DNA Center, making it a more budget-friendly option. Cisco DNA Center's higher setup cost reflects its comprehensive features and capabilities suitable for larger enterprises.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a lower setup cost compared to Cisco DNA Center, making it a more budget-friendly option. Cisco DNA Center's higher setup cost reflects its comprehensive features and capabilities suitable for larger enterprises.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI is valued for its extensive customization and plug-in support but requires significant manual setup and technical expertise. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers ease of deployment and low complexity, making it appealing for quick, adaptable solutions with favorable ROI.
Download Nagios XI vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Nagios XI has a high setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable initial implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI has a high setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable initial implementation.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LibreNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers comprehensive monitoring and customizable alerts, appealing to those seeking robust support and predictable costs. In comparison, LibreNMS attracts tech buyers with its flexible open-source framework and community-backed support, offering extensive adaptability and minimized initial expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor offers efficient setup with straightforward costs, while LibreNMS stands out for its low initial investment appealing to cost-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers efficient setup with straightforward costs, while LibreNMS stands out for its low initial investment appealing to cost-conscious users.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers quick deployment and a user-friendly setup, ideal for various infrastructure needs. In comparison, LogicMonitor excels with its customizable dashboards and detailed data monitoring, appealing to those needing dynamic reporting and advanced alerting in large environments.
Download LogicMonitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a simpler setup with upfront cost transparency, while LogicMonitor's initial setup may involve higher complexity and costs. Differences in installation efforts highlight PRTG's user-friendliness against LogicMonitor's extensive configuration requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a simpler setup with upfront cost transparency, while LogicMonitor's initial setup may involve higher complexity and costs. Differences in installation efforts highlight PRTG's user-friendliness against LogicMonitor's extensive configuration requirements.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
PRTG offers customizable sensors and easy integration, making it ideal for rapid deployment. In comparison, Auvik excels in automated mapping and visualization, simplifying network management for frequent changes. PRTG's flexibility suits various environments, while Auvik's device-based billing fits medium-sized businesses.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process at minimal cost, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) typically involves a higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process at minimal cost, while Auvik Network Management (ANM) typically involves a higher setup expense.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Secure Network Analytics
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers cost-effective, scalable network monitoring ideal for small to mid-sized businesses focusing on ease of use. In comparison, Cisco Secure Network Analytics provides advanced security features and integration suited for larger enterprises requiring sophisticated threat detection and comprehensive data insights.
Download Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process with low initial costs, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves a more complex setup with higher expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup process with low initial costs, while Cisco Secure Network Analytics involves a more complex setup with higher expenses.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is chosen for comprehensive features and scalability, suitable for diverse infrastructures. In comparison, Checkmk appeals to smaller enterprises for affordability and flexibility, excelling in resource monitoring and integration with cloud environments, making it ideal for budget-conscious organizations.
Download Checkmk vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor involves an upfront setup cost, whereas Checkmk offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor involves an upfront setup cost, whereas Checkmk offers a more affordable initial setup, highlighting a key difference in pricing strategy.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
SCOM
3.9 out of 5
SCOM offers deep integration and comprehensive monitoring within Microsoft environments, excelling in alerting and reporting. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides scalability and straightforward deployment, appealing for organizations seeking out-of-the-box infrastructure monitoring with minimal customization and straightforward pricing.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. SCOM Report
SCOM requires a significant upfront investment for setup, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial cost.
View comparison
Pricing
SCOM requires a significant upfront investment for setup, while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial cost.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
WhatsUp Gold
3.9 out of 5
WhatsUp Gold's cost-effectiveness and intuitive monitoring attract budget-conscious buyers seeking flexibility. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides extensive features such as advanced traffic analysis and versatile sensors, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive insights. PRTG's robust scalability also supports larger, more complex environments.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. WhatsUp Gold Report
WhatsUp Gold has lower setup costs but offers limited scalability, whereas PRTG Network Monitor incurs a higher initial expense but provides extensive scalability options.
View comparison
Pricing
WhatsUp Gold has lower setup costs but offers limited scalability, whereas PRTG Network Monitor incurs a higher initial expense but provides extensive scalability options.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Nagios Core
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for its user-friendly interface and rapid deployment with extensive sensor coverage. In comparison, Nagios Core offers deep customization options, making it ideal for tech buyers needing tailored configurations despite its complex setup requirements.
Download Nagios Core vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Nagios Core presents a more complex initial cost. The distinct pricing approaches highlight their differences in user experience and deployment flexibility.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost structure, while Nagios Core presents a more complex initial cost. The distinct pricing approaches highlight their differences in user experience and deployment flexibility.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
PRTG offers rapid deployment and extensive sensor options appealing to flexible monitoring needs. In comparison, Icinga excels in customization and extensive plugin support, attracting users seeking tailored solutions. PRTG is versatile across environments, while Icinga suits cost-sensitive setups with more manual effort.
Download Icinga vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive setup costs, capturing budget-conscious users, while Icinga requires more investment upfront, appealing to users seeking robust, customizable features.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers competitive setup costs, capturing budget-conscious users, while Icinga requires more investment upfront, appealing to users seeking robust, customizable features.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers enterprise-level dashboard capabilities and predictive analytics, making it ideal for complex deployments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor's ease of setup and affordability attract smaller setups seeking straightforward monitoring. ScienceLogic's flexibility suits larger environments, while PRTG is efficient for simpler networks.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic requires a higher initial setup cost compared to the relatively affordable PRTG Network Monitor.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic requires a higher initial setup cost compared to the relatively affordable PRTG Network Monitor.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and scalability with minimal customization. In comparison, Centreon excels in flexibility and customization. PRTG's cost-effectiveness suits smaller setups, while Centreon's open-source pricing is attractive though larger configurations can be pricey.
Download Centreon vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has an initial setup cost considered reasonable, whereas Centreon tends to have a higher setup cost, potentially impacting budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has an initial setup cost considered reasonable, whereas Centreon tends to have a higher setup cost, potentially impacting budget-conscious users.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for swift deployment, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management suits complex environments with its comprehensive features. Tech buyers choose PRTG for ease of use, while those with intricate needs prefer ServiceNow's advanced capabilities.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management may involve higher initial expenses. The setup cost for PRTG is typically more predictable, contrasting with ServiceNow's potential for greater variability.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management may involve higher initial expenses. The setup cost for PRTG is typically more predictable, contrasting with ServiceNow's potential for greater variability.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpsRamp
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers ease of setup with rapid deployment and scalability, appealing to those seeking straightforward monitoring. In comparison, OpsRamp provides AI-powered insights and advanced analysis, appealing to tech buyers needing detailed insights and cost-effective comprehensive platform access.
Download OpsRamp vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while OpsRamp involves a more complex installation process with higher setup expenses. This contrast highlights the differences in ease of implementation and upfront financial commitment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with low initial costs, while OpsRamp involves a more complex installation process with higher setup expenses. This contrast highlights the differences in ease of implementation and upfront financial commitment between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness suitable for diverse environments. In comparison, IBM SevOne NPM excels with advanced performance metrics for enterprises needing detailed insights. Buyers benefit from PRTG's affordability while IBM SevOne supports complex infrastructures.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor is praised for its straightforward setup and minimal initial costs, making it budget-friendly, while IBM SevOne NPM involves more complex setup and higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features and enterprise-level capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor is praised for its straightforward setup and minimal initial costs, making it budget-friendly, while IBM SevOne NPM involves more complex setup and higher initial expenses, reflecting its advanced features and enterprise-level capabilities.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for small to medium-sized networks with cost-effective, sensor-based pricing and rapid deployment. In comparison, ITRS Geneos is ideal for complex environments, offering deep integration and customization at a higher cost. Both cater to different organizational needs effectively.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a simple setup with minimal costs compared to ITRS Geneos, which involves more complex setup costs.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a simple setup with minimal costs compared to ITRS Geneos, which involves more complex setup costs.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and scalability with cost-effective monitoring attributes, ideal for technical teams in diverse environments. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations for Applications excels with robust hybrid cloud management and telemetry integration, suited for complex setups requiring comprehensive optimization features.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
PRTG Network Monitor has minimal setup costs, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications involves a higher initial investment. PRTG is budget-friendly, contrasting with VMware's comprehensive offerings that justify its higher setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has minimal setup costs, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications involves a higher initial investment. PRTG is budget-friendly, contrasting with VMware's comprehensive offerings that justify its higher setup expense.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Intersight
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is favored for cost-effectiveness and easy deployment, ideal for small environments. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in cloud integration and comprehensive management, suited for enterprises. Each solution offers distinct features for diverse tech needs.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers flexible setup costs, whereas Cisco Intersight has a more structured pricing model. PRTG's adaptability provides a customizable entry point, while Intersight's clear pricing helps in budgeting and cost management.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers flexible setup costs, whereas Cisco Intersight has a more structured pricing model. PRTG's adaptability provides a customizable entry point, while Intersight's clear pricing helps in budgeting and cost management.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
BMC TrueSight
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight provides robust event management with extensive integrations, ideal for complex IT environments requiring comprehensive monitoring and proactive management. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers affordability and intuitive network monitoring, suitable for straightforward environments with its rapid deployment and numerous sensors.
Download BMC TrueSight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
BMC TrueSight necessitates a significant initial investment, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup cost. The substantial cost difference highlights the distinct pricing strategies of each network monitoring solution.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight necessitates a significant initial investment, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly setup cost. The substantial cost difference highlights the distinct pricing strategies of each network monitoring solution.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE
4.1 out of 5
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE excels in detailed traffic analysis, suitable for complex network environments, while PRTG Network Monitor, with its extensive sensor variety, is ideal for comprehensive network monitoring solutions. In comparison, PRTG offers intuitive deployment making it favorable for diverse network setups.
Download NETSCOUT nGeniusONE vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE requires a significant initial setup cost while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
NETSCOUT nGeniusONE requires a significant initial setup cost while PRTG Network Monitor offers a more affordable setup, highlighting a key pricing difference between the two solutions.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ManageEngine OpManager
4.0 out of 5
ManageEngine OpManager offers affordability with features like file integrity monitoring, while PRTG Network Monitor excels in NetFlow analysis and hybrid environment support. In comparison, PRTG provides scalable monitoring, whereas OpManager is appealing for budget-conscious businesses with competitive pricing.
Download ManageEngine OpManager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
ManageEngine OpManager offers a straightforward setup cost, focusing on flexible pricing; PRTG Network Monitor requires a comprehensive initial setup with scalable licensing, highlighting distinct strategies in cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine OpManager offers a straightforward setup cost, focusing on flexible pricing; PRTG Network Monitor requires a comprehensive initial setup with scalable licensing, highlighting distinct strategies in cost structure.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
InfluxDB
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers user-friendly deployment and flexibility with a comprehensive feature set suitable for various infrastructures. In comparison, InfluxDB excels in time-series data integration and aggregation, making it ideal for environments requiring real-time insights and high-volume data handling.
Download InfluxDB vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor involves a higher setup cost than InfluxDB, highlighting a significant pricing difference. InfluxDB's lower initial cost can appeal to cost-sensitive users, contrasting with PRTG's potentially more feature-rich offering.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor involves a higher setup cost than InfluxDB, highlighting a significant pricing difference. InfluxDB's lower initial cost can appeal to cost-sensitive users, contrasting with PRTG's potentially more feature-rich offering.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Spectrum
4.2 out of 5
DX Spectrum excels in robust scalability and fault management for large, complex infrastructures. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers ease of use and rapid deployment for small to medium enterprises. DX Spectrum suits environments needing comprehensive insights, while PRTG provides real-time monitoring and flexibility.
Download DX Spectrum vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
DX Spectrum has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, making PRTG a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious organizations.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Spectrum has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor, making PRTG a more cost-effective option for budget-conscious organizations.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Atera
4.7 out of 5

Atera offers a comprehensive solution for MSPs and IT Professionals. The platform provides in one integrated solution: full remote monitoring and management (RMM), PSA, remote access, patch management, billing, reports, and so much more! Atera’s disruptive pricing model also helps managed IT service providers scale their business while providing continued best-in-class service. All plans include unlimited devices, meaning you only pay per technician.Everything you need, in one easy-to-use platform

Download Atera vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
Atera happened to have the best pricing model.
With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be.
View comparison
Pricing
Atera happened to have the best pricing model.
With Atera, the more you add, the cheaper the cost of the additional endpoints will be.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Kentik
4.6 out of 5
PRTG offers rapid deployment and scalability with a broad range of sensors and cost-effectiveness. In comparison, Kentik excels in traffic flow analysis with advanced data visualization. A tech buyer might choose PRTG for simplicity and cost, while Kentik suits complex environments needing detailed insights.
Download Kentik vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves a straightforward setup with a clear cost, whereas Kentik may present higher initial setup costs due to its advanced network traffic analysis features.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves a straightforward setup with a clear cost, whereas Kentik may present higher initial setup costs due to its advanced network traffic analysis features.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers comprehensive monitoring with flexibility and ease of deployment. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor provides rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness for smaller environments. DX prioritizes automation, while PRTG emphasizes scalability and affordability in its licensing model.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor's lower initial expense.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management has a higher setup cost compared to PRTG Network Monitor's lower initial expense.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
OpenNMS
1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for businesses seeking ease of setup and affordability. In comparison, OpenNMS offers expansive features and flexibility, appealing to larger enterprises requiring scalability and customization. PRTG is known for rapid deployment, while OpenNMS suits technically adept teams managing complex networks.
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while OpenNMS may involve a more complex pricing structure due to its open-source nature, highlighting a key distinction in their initial investment implications.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup cost, while OpenNMS may involve a more complex pricing structure due to its open-source nature, highlighting a key distinction in their initial investment implications.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance
4.4 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for small to medium-sized enterprises due to its affordability and ease of setup. In comparison, Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance offers comprehensive features suitable for complex environments, justifying its higher cost with detailed network assurance and monitoring capabilities.
Download Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor often incurs low setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance generally involves higher initial expenses aligned with its comprehensive functionality.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor often incurs low setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Provider Connectivity Assurance generally involves higher initial expenses aligned with its comprehensive functionality.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
LiveNX
3.6 out of 5
LiveNX excels in data visualization and real-time analytics, ideal for comprehensive network analysis. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers diverse sensors for varied environments. LiveNX ensures long-term ROI through analytics, while PRTG’s flexible pricing and quick setup appeal to budget-conscious tech buyers.
Download LiveNX vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
LiveNX requires a significant setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a stark difference in financial commitment needed for deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
LiveNX requires a significant setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor offers a more budget-friendly initial investment, highlighting a stark difference in financial commitment needed for deployment.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
ControlUp
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers flexibility and real-time monitoring, appealing to those needing customization. In comparison, ControlUp excels in granular endpoint monitoring and automation. Tech buyers might choose PRTG for diverse needs, while ControlUp suits environments requiring deep analytical capabilities and hybrid integration.
Download ControlUp vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while ControlUp's setup cost is higher but includes additional support services. These differences highlight the distinct pricing strategies between PRTG Network Monitor and ControlUp.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a straightforward setup cost, while ControlUp's setup cost is higher but includes additional support services. These differences highlight the distinct pricing strategies between PRTG Network Monitor and ControlUp.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud provides scalability and flexibility, ideal for dynamic networks. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor offers a wide feature set for comprehensive monitoring. Zenoss Cloud's easy deployment appeals to growing organizations, while PRTG's extensive features and support attract those seeking detailed insights.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud offers a flexible setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor provides an upfront investment with no hidden fees.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud offers a flexible setup cost, whereas PRTG Network Monitor provides an upfront investment with no hidden fees.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
HPE OneView
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
HPE OneView
4.0 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and supports diverse infrastructures with flexible pricing and scalability. In comparison, HPE OneView focuses on centralized hardware management and integration for large-scale HPE deployments, justifying costs for enterprises reliant on HPE systems.
Download HPE OneView vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor has a free version and scales based on sensors while HPE OneView requires a license and tailored setup costing. PRTG offers flexible cost options compared to HPE OneView's upfront investment for comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor has a free version and scales based on sensors while HPE OneView requires a license and tailored setup costing. PRTG offers flexible cost options compared to HPE OneView's upfront investment for comprehensive features.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Meraki Dashboard
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor appeals to those valuing rapid deployment, scalability, and broad sensor management. In comparison, Meraki Dashboard integrates wireless and network monitoring seamlessly. A tech buyer may choose PRTG for cost-effectiveness and ease of use, while Meraki offers cloud-based simplicity.
Download Meraki Dashboard vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves a one-time setup cost with no recurring fees, whereas Meraki Dashboard may require higher initial investment but benefits from ongoing support.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves a one-time setup cost with no recurring fees, whereas Meraki Dashboard may require higher initial investment but benefits from ongoing support.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Huawei eSight
3.7 out of 5
PRTG offers scalability, cost-effectiveness, and ease of use with its wide compatibility and proactive alerts. In comparison, Huawei eSight provides seamless integration with Huawei devices, offering a streamlined user experience, but is less flexible in mixed-brand environments.
Download Huawei eSight vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with a transparent cost structure, while Huawei eSight may involve higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive features and requirements.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with a transparent cost structure, while Huawei eSight may involve higher initial setup costs due to its comprehensive features and requirements.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
eG Enterprise
4.1 out of 5
eG Enterprise offers extensive features like unified monitoring and AI automation for complex environments. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor is ideal for rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness. Technical buyers would choose eG for deep insights or PRTG for ease of use and scalability.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. eG Enterprise Report
eG Enterprise requires significant setup investment, whereas PRTG Network Monitor boasts a lower initial cost, setting them apart in terms of entry pricing.
View comparison
Pricing
eG Enterprise requires significant setup investment, whereas PRTG Network Monitor boasts a lower initial cost, setting them apart in terms of entry pricing.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Spiceworks
3.9 out of 5
Spiceworks caters to SMBs with free, easy-to-use IT management and community support. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor is preferred for advanced monitoring in larger environments, offering scalability and comprehensive metrics with licensing costs reflecting its extensive features.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. Spiceworks Report
Spiceworks offers a no-cost setup, whereas PRTG Network Monitor involves a setup cost.
View comparison
Pricing
Spiceworks offers a no-cost setup, whereas PRTG Network Monitor involves a setup cost.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco UCS Manager
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
Cisco UCS Manager
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor excels in rapid deployment, suitable for user-friendly monitoring needs. In comparison, Cisco UCS Manager provides extensive integration and management capabilities ideal for enterprises. PRTG is cost-effective, while Cisco delivers long-term value for large-scale operations.
Download Cisco UCS Manager vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco UCS Manager's setup can be more complex and costly. Users may find PRTG more accessible due to its simplicity, contrasting with Cisco's extensive setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with minimal costs, while Cisco UCS Manager's setup can be more complex and costly. Users may find PRTG more accessible due to its simplicity, contrasting with Cisco's extensive setup process.
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
PRTG Network Monitor Logo
vRealize Network Insight
4.3 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers ease of deployment and basic reporting, making it budget-friendly for smaller businesses. In comparison, vRealize Network Insight provides extensive analytics and micro-segmentation, ideal for enterprises needing detailed insights, despite its higher cost and complex deployment.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. vRealize Network Insight Report
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while vRealize Network Insight involves a more complex setup with higher setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while vRealize Network Insight involves a more complex setup with higher setup expenses.

Related categories

Network Monitoring Software
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Cloud Monitoring Software