ScienceLogic and PRTG Network Monitor compete in IT infrastructure monitoring with different scopes and target markets. ScienceLogic holds the advantage by offering deep customization and integration for large-scale environments.
Features: ScienceLogic provides a customizable platform with event correlation, predictive analytics, and flexible dashboards. Its multi-tenant capabilities support various integrations. PRTG Network Monitor is appreciated for rapid deployment and cost-effectiveness, offering diverse sensors and a straightforward interface for smaller setups, although it lacks some advanced functionalities.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could improve its user interface and reporting features, enhance application monitoring, and streamline integration processes. PRTG Network Monitor needs better scalability, improved sensor management, and a more intuitive dashboard for larger, complex environments requiring customization.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is available on-premises and private cloud, known for exceptional customer and technical support. PRTG Network Monitor is mainly deployed on-premises, offering an easy setup for straightforward environments, with reliable but less acclaimed customer service than ScienceLogic.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic is favored by large enterprises for its comprehensive feature set, justifying higher costs with significant ROI through proactive issue management. PRTG Network Monitor provides value with inclusive pricing, suitable for smaller businesses, though costs can rise with usage in larger environments.
It provides accurate data for utilization, allowing us to monitor and optimize our investments in WAN connection capacity.
After introducing PRTG Network Monitor, we have saved time, and it's easy for everybody to monitor everything.
I have seen a return on investment with PRTG Network Monitor as it has saved a lot of time, and its monitoring has reduced manpower requirements, which has been helpful.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
The setup process is well-documented, making it easy to deploy.
Tutorials are available so I can manage any issue with PRTG Network Monitor easily.
We are getting solutions on time, and they are very helpful.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
We have a lab environment to test solutions before offering them to customers, ensuring everything works correctly.
On a scale of one to ten, scalability is rated as 9.5.
PRTG Network Monitor has the ability to scale and add new devices.
You can install them in each network, even if they are not connected, and it works.
We haven't needed vendor support for the last three years, which demonstrates the product's stability.
Stability should relate to whether the platform fails, stops working, or breaks.
They need to improve application performance monitoring, error tracing mechanisms, and log management.
PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time.
PRTG Network Monitor can sometimes be too detailed and cluttered at the beginning, making it heavy to use.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
Pricing is by the number of devices, not by sensor.
The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor.
It's not too high, nor too low, but it's reasonable.
It could be cheaper.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
PRTG Network Monitor already provided me with 100 free sensors, which is enough for my network monitoring.
PRTG Network Monitor has a good dashboard that shows each and every piece of information, so we can easily find out what is happening with the systems.
These reports help me in my day-to-day work, and I rely on them because they provide proof during escalation, with exact downtime logs and related information.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| PRTG Network Monitor | 4.4% |
| ScienceLogic | 1.7% |
| Other | 93.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 18 |
| Large Enterprise | 40 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 13 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 24 |
PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.
To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.
ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.
ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
