Azure Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor comparison

Microsoft and Paessler GmbH are both solutions in the Cloud Monitoring Software category. Microsoft is ranked #3 with an average rating of 7.7, while Paessler GmbH is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.4. Microsoft holds a 3.6% mindshare in CMS, compared to Paessler GmbH’s 4.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of Paessler GmbH users who would recommend it.

Azure Monitor

Read 56 Azure Monitor reviews

10,028 Views
4,011 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

PRTG Network Monitor

Read 112 PRTG Network Monitor reviews

9,185 Views
3,950 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Azure Monitor

PRTG Network Monitor

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 28, 2025

PRTG Network Monitor and Azure Monitor are prominent contenders in the network and application monitoring software category. PRTG stands out due to its ease of deployment and user-friendly interface, making it an attractive choice for those seeking streamlined network monitoring solutions. On the other hand, Azure Monitor offers superior integration with Azure services, providing robust application insights and telemetry, which can be particularly beneficial for businesses deeply invested in the Azure ecosystem.

Features: PRTG Network Monitor is known for rapid deployment, scalability, and cost-effectiveness. It provides comprehensive network monitoring with sensors that track network traffic and device status. PRTG's alerting system offers flexibility in sensor deployment for critical network insights. Azure Monitor provides excellent application insights and telemetry integration across Azure services, delivering real-time monitoring and customizable alerts. It integrates with Azure DevOps for a comprehensive cloud resource overview.

Room for Improvement: PRTG could enhance template management, graphical interface customization, and network maps. Licenses might be expensive for smaller businesses and its application monitoring could use improvements. There's a need for better third-party service integration and advanced remote functionalities. Azure Monitor could improve non-Azure integration, automation capabilities, visualization tools, and support for more third-party clouds. The pricing model is complex, fluctuating based on log data consumption.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: PRTG Network Monitor is appreciated for its intuitive setup and strong support, though email-based support can be limiting. Users enjoy proactive support but desire faster response times and improved remote capabilities. Azure Monitor excels in Microsoft integration, yet non-Azure configurations can be complex. Its community support is responsive but would benefit from direct interaction and faster solutions for complex issues.

Pricing and ROI: PRTG's straightforward licensing model charges by sensor count, enabling scaling and bundling comprehensive features, resulting in reduced downtime and better operational efficiency. Azure Monitor's pricing, linked to Azure services, is based on data ingestion and storage, potentially becoming costly with large data volumes. However, it offers competitive pricing for existing Azure users who benefit from seamless integration and insightful operations, with ROI varying by data usage and configurations.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.4

Azure Monitor's ROI is mixed: some value its cost-effectiveness and insights, while others question its expense.

Sentiment score

6.6

PRTG Network Monitor provides cost-effective returns by enhancing efficiency, reducing downtime, and minimizing staffing needs through proactive monitoring.

Azure Monitor helps prevent impacts on their system.

Karthic Mohan

Cloud Solution Architect at Cloudzant

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report

It provides accurate data for utilization, allowing us to monitor and optimize our investments in WAN connection capacity.

Mahmoud Abd El-Rasol

Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

After introducing PRTG Network Monitor, we have saved time, and it's easy for everybody to monitor everything.

reviewer2759802

Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

The implementation reduced our employee resources from 20-25 to 5-6 employees.

Madhan Cs

Senior consultant at Cambridge Institute of Technology

For more quotes and insights, download the PRTG Network Monitor report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.1

Azure Monitor's customer service is praised for responsiveness, especially with premium support, but can improve on general knowledge and speed.

Sentiment score

6.7

PRTG Network Monitor support is generally effective, but time zone issues and complex queries can delay responses.

However, the second-line support is good.

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Users end up getting no resolution from their team because they're outsourced vendors, and they don't have deeper expertise over any of the products they are referring to.

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

I would rate the support for Azure Monitor as a seven.

Karthic Mohan

Cloud Solution Architect at Cloudzant

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report

They resolve our queries 24/7.

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

The setup process is well-documented, making it easy to deploy.

Tochukwu Uzomba

Solutions Architect at Boch Systems Company Limited

Tutorials are available so I can manage any issue with PRTG Network Monitor easily.

SikanderAli

IT Infrastructure Engineer at Atlas

For more quotes and insights, download the PRTG Network Monitor report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

7.8

Azure Monitor provides scalable solutions for businesses, supports auto-scaling, integrates with tools, but requires careful cost management.

Sentiment score

7.4

PRTG Network Monitor is scalable and flexible for varying deployments but requires extra licenses and hardware for growth.

With APM, you can go heavy or you can go light. It just depends on what you want, what your use case is, and how reactive you want to be to system load or resilient to failure.

Andy Rabern

Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Azure Monitor is very scalable; there are no issues with scalability for different kinds of businesses.

Karthic Mohan

Cloud Solution Architect at Cloudzant

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report

On a scale of one to ten, scalability is rated as 9.5.

Tochukwu Uzomba

Solutions Architect at Boch Systems Company Limited

PRTG Network Monitor has the ability to scale and add new devices.

SikanderAli

IT Infrastructure Engineer at Atlas

You can install them in each network, even if they are not connected, and it works.

Petr Pouzar

IT Consultant at M-COM s.r.o

For more quotes and insights, download the PRTG Network Monitor report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

8.3

Azure Monitor is highly stable and reliable, though less agile, with high user ratings and potential cost concerns.

Sentiment score

7.9

PRTG Network Monitor is highly stable with reliable performance, minimal downtime, and robust updates, despite minor external issues.

Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report

We haven't needed vendor support for the last three years, which demonstrates the product's stability.

Mahmoud Abd El-Rasol

Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

PRTG Network Monitor is stable in my experience, and I have not encountered issues with crashes or downtime.

Megha Pawar

Associates at Mphasis

PRTG Network Monitor is very stable and requires low maintenance.

ShubhamBharti

Software Engineer at Asahi Beverages

For more quotes and insights, download the PRTG Network Monitor report

Room For Improvement

Azure Monitor struggles with user-friendliness, integration, complexity, multi-cloud support, proactive monitoring, and requires enhanced usability and cost transparency.

PRTG Network Monitor needs improvements in customization, performance, support, integration, analytics, and cost-efficiency for enhanced usability and flexibility.

If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

The cost skyrockets once you start using it, and there are complaints that the actual cost of the Kubernetes cluster was less than the cost they were incurring for Azure Monitor.

Muhammad Usman Khawar

Software Engineer (DevOps/ SRE) at Sensys LLC

The challenges with Azure Monitor are that it's initially complex to set up because you need multiple components.

Karthic Mohan

Cloud Solution Architect at Cloudzant

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report

The initial auto-discovery added too many unnecessary sensors, so auto-discovery should only take the necessary sensors into consideration.

Madhan Cs

Senior consultant at Cambridge Institute of Technology

They need to improve application performance monitoring, error tracing mechanisms, and log management.

Tochukwu Uzomba

Solutions Architect at Boch Systems Company Limited

PRTG Network Monitor should provide syslog monitoring since it is not available at this time.

SikanderAli

IT Infrastructure Engineer at Atlas

For more quotes and insights, download the PRTG Network Monitor report

Setup Cost

Azure Monitor offers cost-effective variable pricing, but careful management is essential to avoid high expenses for enterprise users.

PRTG Network Monitor is cost-effective for enterprises, but costs may rise; offers flexible licensing with annual support.

When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report

The licensing part is a recurring license for every year, which is very affordable, making PRTG Network Monitor budget-friendly.

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

Pricing is by the number of devices, not by sensor.

Tochukwu Uzomba

Solutions Architect at Boch Systems Company Limited

The prices are very high for PRTG Network Monitor.

SikanderAli

IT Infrastructure Engineer at Atlas

For more quotes and insights, download the PRTG Network Monitor report

Valuable Features

Azure Monitor provides comprehensive real-time monitoring, alerting, and analytics, enhancing security and scalability for seamless infrastructure management.

PRTG Network Monitor is valued for its rapid deployment, intuitive interface, scalability, reliability, and comprehensive monitoring features.

The alerting features definitely help in reducing operational downtime for my customers by allowing us to get notifications in advance and take active actions.

Karthic Mohan

Cloud Solution Architect at Cloudzant

I also appreciate the ability to measure feature activity, see what types of devices they are on, follow specific use cases, and measure the amount of traffic going to a particular application.

Andy Rabern

Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Resource monitoring is essential.

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

For more quotes and insights, download the Azure Monitor report

PRTG Network Monitor already provided me with 100 free sensors, which is enough for my network monitoring.

SikanderAli

IT Infrastructure Engineer at Atlas

PRTG Network Monitor has a good dashboard that shows each and every piece of information, so we can easily find out what is happening with the systems.

reviewer2759802

Architect at a consultancy with 1-10 employees

These reports help me in my day-to-day work, and I rely on them because they provide proof during escalation, with exact downtime logs and related information.

Chandhan P

Software engineer at Bosch

For more quotes and insights, download the PRTG Network Monitor report

Categories and Ranking

Azure Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

3rd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (7th)

PRTG Network Monitor

Ranking in Cloud Monitoring Software

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

112

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (5th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of Azure Monitor is 3.6%, down from 7.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of PRTG Network Monitor is 4.8%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Monitoring Software Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Azure Monitor	3.6%
PRTG Network Monitor	4.8%
Other	91.6%

Cloud Monitoring Software

Q&A Highlights

SanjeetKumar2

Platform and Cloud Architect at Department of Finance (ServiceNet)

Dec 16, 2021

Choosing a monitoring solution for cloud services: Azure Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor

So a couple of questions and considerations to help you make a good decision. By "cloud services" do you mean multiple services running on one cloud (presumably Azure), or multiple services running on multiple clouds (perhaps Azure/AWS/GCP)? If there is any chance that you are, or are going to be a multi-cloud environment, you should not choose a monitoring solution from a cloud platform vendor. What exactly do you need to monitor? Just the cloud platform itself and its services, the layer of software on top of the cloud (Spring, Kafka, OpenShift, Databases) that the applications rely upon, or all of this and the applications and microservices themselves? If you need to monitor the entire stack (and you should) then you should go with a vendor who has first class cloud infrastructure monitoring AND the ability to monitor your actual applications. Those vendors are Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic, and IBM (Instana).

See all answers

Featured Reviews

Andy Rabern

Consultant at a outsourcing company with 201-500 employees

Telemetry insights have improved how I track user behavior and application performance daily

I feel Azure Monitor does a fair job. I do feel it is not a streaming service in my opinion. There are advantages to having stream messaging and logging on that level. But for what it is, I feel it does well. My perspective is more based on an Application Insights agent running on a service or an app service and sending the telemetry via the agent, and also doing the filtering of telemetry at the agent level so you are not having a ton of telemetry. I believe Azure Monitor does pretty much the same thing. I have also used tools such as New Relic, and New Relic is a much more robust tool, but that is a different product and you are going to pay for that. It is a different offering altogether. The subscription that we had at the time allowed for a couple gigabytes of telemetry during the month, and I believe that telemetry only lives for about two months. You have to experiment with it to see how much you want to pay. I was not really involved in the pricing. It was more along the lines of we were running up against our limits in terms of the amount of free telemetry or telemetry that we get with our subscription, and so we either needed to scale back or turn specific telemetry types off or do some more sampling. It is nice that those capabilities are there so that you can reduce the amount of telemetry. I cannot really speak to pricing but I do believe that it is somewhat reasonable for Azure Monitor. New Relic is pretty expensive, I believe.

Read full review

madhan kumar hs

software engineer at Capgemini

Alerting precision has reduced incident response times and improved department-level network visibility

The auto-pause sensor during the maintenance window is good without any false alerts, and it prevents me from getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance, helping department heads understand their own network usage better. It has reduced incident response time by giving clearer ownership of each alert, ensuring alerts go to the proper recipient. SNMP testers and auto-pause are among the best features of PRTG Network Monitor, which is particularly useful for different departments such as HR and finance, where alerts can be filtered accordingly. The alerting features and dashboard of PRTG Network Monitor are very helpful, especially in our industry. However, the dashboard can look cluttered on smaller screens, which is one negative aspect. PRTG Network Monitor has impacted us positively; we have stopped getting flooded with alerts during planned maintenance or unplanned outages. Compared to others, this gives specific alerts very quickly and helps department heads understand their own network usage better, thus reducing incident response time so that each alert has clear ownership.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Answers from the Community

SanjeetKumar2

Platform and Cloud Architect at Department of Finance (ServiceNet)

Dec 16, 2021

Choosing a monitoring solution for cloud services: Azure Monitor vs PRTG Network Monitor

2 out of 5 answers

Evgeny Belenky

Director of Community at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)

May 24, 2021

Hi @ATHANASSIOS FAMELIARIS , @William Scheuernstuhl , @John Goutbeck , @JulianRodriguez , @Jose Robles. Can you please assist @SanjeetKumar2 with your advice?

Read full answer

Sergiy Ustenko

Marketing Manager at Idealsoft

May 25, 2021

Hi to all. On my view, the PRTG would be the better decisionт as external independent solution. In addition, based on my own experience, PRTG is a more flexible tool that can be quickly configured for any task

Read full answer

See all 5 answers

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	7
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	59
Midsize Enterprise	19
Large Enterprise	47

Questions from the Community

How does Splunk compare with Azure Monitor?

Splunk handles a high amount of data very well. We use Splunk to capture information and as an aggregator for monitoring information from different sources. Splunk is very good at alerting us if we...

See all answers

What do you like most about Azure Monitor?

Azure Monitor is a very easy-to-use product in the cloud environment.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Monitor?

See all answers

What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?

PRTG network monitor is one of the best tool i have ever used for the monitoring. It have auto discovery option. it avoid the configuring the device in PRTG. It automatically discover the device an...

See all answers

What do you like most about PRTG Network Monitor?

The tool is integrated with our email for the alerts.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PRTG Network Monitor?

The pricing was higher at the beginning, but the recurring licensing cost is affordable and reasonable. Overall, the pricing, setup cost, and licensing is fair for our industry. They have quoted us...

See all answers

Comparisons

Datadog vs Azure Monitor

Compared 15% of the time

Sentry vs Azure Monitor

Compared 11% of the time

Dynatrace vs Azure Monitor

Compared 10% of the time

Grafana vs Azure Monitor

Compared 7% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs Azure Monitor

Compared 3% of the time

More Azure Monitor Competitors

Zabbix vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 6% of the time

Centreon vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 5% of the time

SolarWinds NPM vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

Checkmk vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 4% of the time

eG Enterprise vs PRTG Network Monitor

Compared 2% of the time

More PRTG Network Monitor Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor

January 2026

Download Azure Monitor product report

Buyer's Guide

PRTG Network Monitor

January 2026

Download PRTG Network Monitor product report

Overview

Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.

With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.

Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.

Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.

Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.

Microsoft

PRTG Network Monitor runs on a Windows machine within your network, collecting various statistics from the machines, software, and devices which you designate. PRTG comes with an easy-to-use web interface with point-and-click configuration. You can easily share data from it with non-technical colleagues and customers, including via live graphs and custom reports. This will let you plan for network expansion, see what applications are using most of your connection, and make sure that no one is hogging the entire network just to torrent videos.

To monitor a large IT environment, it's important to be able to scale PRTG up. Paessler PRTG Enterprise Monitor includes all the proven capabilities of PRTG Network Monitor, which are enhanced by exclusive ITOps Board for a service-oriented, central overview of multiple PRTG servers.

Paessler GmbH

Sample Customers

Rackspace, First Gas, Allscripts, ABB Group

Jameson Bank, Sidnix, RungeICT, MedicalAnimal, Truck-lite, GamingGrids, The Covell Group, Forsythn County Schools, NetMass, Musgrove Park Hospital, Lanes Health, Columbia Southern University, Vodafone, Intrust Bank

Buyer's Guide

Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor

December 2025

Free Report: Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor

Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Azure Monitor vs. PRTG Network Monitor report.

See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.