New Relic vs SolarWinds Pingdom comparison

New Relic and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. New Relic is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2, while SolarWinds is ranked #62. New Relic holds a 4.0% mindshare in APM, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of New Relic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 75% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

New Relic

Read 172 New Relic reviews

13,480 Views
9,975 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Pingdom

Read 4 SolarWinds Pingdom reviews

932 Views
848 Comparison Views

75% willing to recommend

New Relic

SolarWinds Pingdom

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jul 24, 2024

New Relic and SolarWinds Pingdom both provide monitoring solutions. New Relic stands out for its advanced data analysis and real-time monitoring, while SolarWinds Pingdom is known for its simplicity and effective website performance monitoring. New Relic generally receives better reviews for support services, but SolarWinds Pingdom is recognized for its intuitive setup and lower costs.

Features: New Relic offers extensive data monitoring, real-time analytics, and deep performance insights. SolarWinds Pingdom provides straightforward web performance monitoring, user experience tracking, and effective web performance features.

Room for Improvement: New Relic could benefit from more straightforward configuration options, improved user-friendliness, and simplification of certain aspects. SolarWinds Pingdom could enhance its comprehensive analytics capabilities, advanced reporting features, and overall analytical depth.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: New Relic's deployment process is comprehensive but sometimes complex, supported by strong customer service. SolarWinds Pingdom is commended for its easy and quick deployment process along with effective customer service.

Pricing and ROI: New Relic has higher setup costs but offers substantial returns on investment due to its powerful monitoring tools. SolarWinds Pingdom has lower setup costs and provides good value for standard monitoring needs. Users find New Relic worth the investment for advanced capabilities, while SolarWinds Pingdom is cost-effective for simpler use.

To learn more, read our detailed New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,733 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

New Relic

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

4th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

172

Ranking in other categories

Network Monitoring Software (8th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (9th), IT Operations Analytics (3rd), Mobile APM (3rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (5th), AIOps (4th)

SolarWinds Pingdom

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

62nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of New Relic is 4.0%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Pingdom is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
New Relic	4.0%
SolarWinds Pingdom	0.5%
Other	95.5%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

BasilJiji

System Engineer at a retailer with 10,001+ employees

Real-time alerts have reduced server outage impact and support fast incident response

In the dashboard, if they could show a little more metrics regarding the application and related things, that would be how New Relic could be improved. Currently, there are things showing from the server level and application level, but it can be improved. That is what I felt. Regarding user interface, I do not feel much concern, but for some kind of issues when we are trying to get support from the New Relic team, their SLA seems to be long. They are taking seven to ten working days for resolving some kind of scenario or issue. That is a bit difficult for us. If they could improve the customer support by reducing their SLA within three to five days, if they could remediate everything, that will be so much helpful. When it comes to the customer support part, I felt they need to be a little more improved on that part. The support overall is good, but they can improve. That is the reason I have given it eight out of ten.

Read full review

Jay Vekaria

Linux System Administrator at Ergode

High performance, quick setup, but lacking ease of use

Some of the functions could improve by making them easier. There is room for improvement when it comes to the graphs provided by the software. Additionally, there seems to be an issue with the ping status, as it sometimes indicates that a website is down even when it is functioning properly. It appears that there are certain aspects related to cache management or other backend functionalities that are unclear. The time range graph and overall user interface could be more user-friendly. For example, when selecting a custom graph for a specific time period, clicking on it should open the corresponding website in a new tab, but instead, it displays the current graph. This lack of consistency can be frustrating when trying to navigate the interface. Furthermore, the reports shared on a weekly basis arrive one week late, reducing their usefulness. Overall, some extra efforts are required to make the user experience smoother and more efficient.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We like the performance of the product."

"It has a simple initial setup."

"New Relic helped with the mean time to detection, the MTDD metric tracked for applications, where the detection capability enabled a reduction from around 20 to 30 minutes down to three minutes, which has been really helpful in terms of detecting issues as well as helping to triage and troubleshoot issues faster, creating a positive impact on the organization."

"The APM feature is highly valuable as it can record session hosts, usage, and diagnose customer behaviors."

"New Relic is highly scalable and its build quality is very easy for handling to startup, enterprise, scale up, and workloads."

"The initial setup is straightforward. It is easy to track and easy to follow."

"Monitoring is a crucial thing for every work, and New Relic is doing a very good job in this part."

"It offers helpful user metrics so we can learn more about the user experience."

More New Relic pros

"There are alerting mechanisms in place to let us know, for example, if a device is not responding to a ping test and is probably not going to work."

"The most valuable features are monitoring and reporting."

"One notable feature of this software is its page speed setup, which is highly commendable. Additionally, the metrics it provides are also impressive."

"Once you set the threshold on your environment, it feels very real-time"

Cons

"The initial setup can be made easier. Like Mixpanel, New Relic can also have a step-by-step guide for the setup process."

"I would like a feature where I can turn off alerting at a policy level. Thus, when a policy is inactive, I can shut down all of my alerts within the policy."

"One of the things that our enterprise actually had a challenge with was the licensing structure for New Relic."

"There were some settings we had issues with."

"They should bring the pricing down to be more competitive."

"New Relic can be improved in a few areas. I noticed that some things can be easily done through Splunk but not through New Relic."

"I would like to have storage monitoring. E.g., being able to monitor SANS, specifically protocols, like NFS and CIFS metrics."

"I would like an infrastructure network that provides real-time views, showing the issues."

More New Relic cons

"Some of the functions could improve by making them easier."

"Pingdom is always improving everything in its product. So, they should work on the GUI."

"Technical support could use some improvement."

"I would like to see better integration with other products."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It would be nice if we could buy it annually instead of monthly."

"The price of New Relic could improve. It is expensive."

"The monthly cost os $1000 per server per month, but it could be even more. We pay about $250 for the server, and then New Relic wants over $1000 to give us statistics on those servers."

"The price of the solution could be less expensive. You have to pay a lot for each user. There is an additional cost for extra features."

"This is an expensive tool."

"The pricing could be better. We did not purchase the full version. Maybe if we applied all the other features of the full version of New Relic, we could get all the features that we feel are missing."

"The price was one of the reasons we chose this solution."

"We feel it's a little bit pricey."

More New Relic pricing and cost advice

"This price of this solution is reasonable."

"While I wouldn't describe it as excessively expensive, if you require specific and reliable monitoring, SolarWinds can be a suitable option. The advantage is that SolarWinds offers a free version as well. If you don't heavily rely on its monitoring capabilities and are content with its basic features, the free version could suffice for your needs."

"The license was paid yearly and included technical support."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	65
Midsize Enterprise	50
Large Enterprise	76

No data available

Questions from the Community

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about New Relic Insights?

The product's initial setup phase was very easy.

See all answers

What needs improvement with New Relic Insights?

For our end-to-end use case, New Relic is completely satisfactory, and we extensively rely on its features for our day-to-day life. I would like to have more AI and ML-based suggestions and algorit...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs New Relic

Compared 9% of the time

Datadog vs New Relic

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk AppDynamics vs New Relic

Compared 6% of the time

Elastic Observability vs New Relic

Compared 3% of the time

Azure Monitor vs New Relic

Compared 3% of the time

More New Relic Competitors

Solarwinds Web Performance Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 15% of the time

Azure Monitor vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 14% of the time

Prometheus-AI Platform vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 11% of the time

Zabbix vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 10% of the time

SigNoz vs SolarWinds Pingdom

Compared 8% of the time

More SolarWinds Pingdom Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

New Relic

January 2026

Download New Relic product report

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

Download SolarWinds Pingdom product report

Also Known As

New Relic Browser, New Relic Applied Intelligence, New Relic Insights, New Relic Synthetics, New Relic Servers, New Relic APM

No data available

Overview

New Relic offers real-time application monitoring and insight into performance bottlenecks. Its customizable dashboards and APM integration provide efficient operational support, while server performance alerts ensure quick issue detection.

New Relic provides comprehensive monitoring of application performance, tracking bottlenecks across databases and front-end components. Users employ it for server and infrastructure monitoring, as well as analyzing key metrics such as CPU and memory usage. The solution's ability to integrate with tools like PagerDuty enhances incident management capabilities. However, users have expressed a need for improvements in query language simplicity, more detailed historical insights, and better mobile app monitoring support.

What are New Relic's most important features?

Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant visibility into application performance.
Detailed Transaction Tracing: Identifies specific transaction issues quickly.
Error Rate Tracking: Monitors and reports on error occurrences efficiently.
Customizable Dashboards: Tailors dashboard views for specific needs.
APM Integration: Seamlessly integrates with application performance management tools.

What benefits and ROI should be considered?

Operational Efficiency: Quick issue detection reduces downtime.
Improved Debugging: Enhanced error analysis supports rapid problem resolution.
Comprehensive Monitoring: Offers a holistic view of application performance and user behavior.
Incident Management: Integration with incident tools helps streamline responses.
Efficient Alerts: Rapid alert systems ensure timely notifications of issues.

In industries like e-commerce and financial services, New Relic supports application performance monitoring to enhance user experience and system reliability. Organizations leverage its insights for optimizing performance, particularly in server operations and infrastructure management. Its ability to monitor API failures through synthetic monitoring is crucial for maintaining high service levels.

New Relic

SolarWinds® Pingdom® is a powerful and affordable SaaS-based web app performance monitoring solution. It’s one product providing comprehensive web app performance and user experience monitoring consisting of four major capabilities:

1. Uptime monitoring for webpages and other critical components like APIs, CDNs, DNS, networks, email, and more.

2. Page speed performance monitoring and page rankings.

3. Synthetic transaction monitoring from the simplest to the most complex transactions.

4. Real user monitoring (RUM), enabling a deeper and wider understanding of the user’s digital experience, and web application availability and performance.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

World Fuel Services, Verizon, FootLocker, McDonald's, Trainline, Mondia Media, Confused, Costa Coffee, Ryanair, Marks & Spencer, William Hill, Delivery Hero, Skyscanner, BASF, DAZN, Veygo, Virtuo, movingimage, talabat, Australia Post, Tokopedia, Seven Network, Virgin Australia, Zomato, BigBasket, Mercado Libre, Lending Club

Spotify, MailChimp, Slack, Twitter

Buyer's Guide

New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

February 2026

Free Report: New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom

Find out what your peers are saying about New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,733 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our New Relic vs. SolarWinds Pingdom report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.