Spring MVC vs npm comparison

"The reversal build, gendered build, migrated PCA, and CT features are excellent."

"It's an open-source setting that's very scalable and easily approachable. I like that you can plug in many features to my product."

"The solution is scalable."

"The product's most valuable feature is dependency installation."

"The most valuable feature of NPM is to trigger APMs."

"The most valuable feature of Spring MVC is the configuration, such as WAF."

"Dependency Injection is one of the major features which makes our life easier using Spring. It is well documented and has active communities, which provide us enormous help."

"The solution is open-source and free to use."

"The most valuable feature is simplicity."

"We appreciate that this product is really easy to integrate with third-party UI services."

"It provides the best documentation for technical support."

"Spring has a speedy development process with a lightweight framework."

"The interface is the solution's most valuable aspect."

"NPM can improve the package manager. For the packages we download for our APM studio to trigger our APM driver, it would benefit if we could have the latest version of NuGet Package Manager within the package manager control. For example, Visual Studio would be good. Then it would be easy for us to get the package manager from there instead of Googling it out and matching it with the current version. It would be less time-consuming for us."

"The product should be compatible with various programming languages, including both native and upcoming languages."

"Some of the libraries that we try to use in npm have issues with security. Also, because it's an open-source solution, I think there are lots of challenges with security. So, the security layer could be improved."

"The library could be updated."

"I would like to see compatible versions, and what new features they will be providing. If it is a useful feature I can merge it. If it is not a usable feature, then I can ignore the newer version."

"We would like the deployment of this solution to be easier as, at present, it is quite complicated."

"It could provide faster performance."

"It can be difficult for a basic user to understand the concepts in this solution, such as inversion of control."

"Adding more modules takes about 10 to 15 minutes each. It would be nice if they could reduce that part. The deployment time is a little high."

"Spring IDE​ needs some work and improvement. We have faced many issues when adding third-party Eclipse plugins."

"Spring MVC could improve the integration with DevOps and other applications."

"The newer versions of Spring MVC have released a lot of features that we are not using right now because, in many cases, we are limited to running older versions. As such, it would be nice if Spring were to improve support for upgrading to newer versions, especially for legacy applications."

"I saw some error messages coming up when they were getting problems actually viewing all the reports."

"The licensing cost is around one hundred and fifty dollars on a quarterly basis."

"It's an open-source solution, and there are no hidden fees."

"NPM is an open-source solution."

"We use the open-source version, so it is free."

"The solution is free."

"Spring MVC is open source and free."

"It is an open-source solution."

"This is an open-source solution, so there are no license costs involved with using it."

"We are using the open-source version of the solution."