Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

O'Reilly vs QA Cloud Training & Certification comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

O'Reilly
Ranking in eLearning
8th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
QA Cloud Training & Certifi...
Ranking in eLearning
11th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
3.3
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the eLearning category, the mindshare of O'Reilly is 7.2%, down from 8.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of QA Cloud Training & Certification is 3.0%, up from 2.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
eLearning Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
O'Reilly7.2%
QA Cloud Training & Certification3.0%
Other89.8%
eLearning
 

Featured Reviews

Use O'Reilly?
Leave a review
reviewer2789682 - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Developer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees
Structured testing mindset has improved early bug detection and automated cloud-based reviews
QA Cloud Training & Certification reduces manual debugging and manual QA testing. Developers can catch errors first. Once I learned these techniques, I shared best practices with my teammates and showed the juniors cloud testing tools, strategies, and automation flows that they can use while reviewing pull requests with the QA cloud mindset. Every developer should go through this course. It's not only for Quality Assurance engineers. Every developer should take it to have the skills of both QA and developer combined. I took this course outside of my organization as a personal initiative. It helped me build scalable testing automation frameworks to run tests in cloud environments. I can write test cases and do other coding instead of manually testing. Testing APIs, UI, and microservices has become much more effective. After learning from this course, I know that I can rely on faster and safer releases. It has reduced regression risks, including code-breaking fixes. It has better helped me test the coverage of builds in distributed systems. Before, I learned about bugs manually, and now my frameworks are working effectively for this.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which eLearning solutions are best for your needs.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
7%
Healthcare Company
7%
Educational Organization
6%
Financial Services Firm
25%
Computer Software Company
14%
Performing Arts
8%
Healthcare Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Also Known As

No data available
Cloud Academy
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Google 2. Microsoft 3. Amazon 4. IBM 5. Facebook 6. Apple 7. Netflix 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Salesforce 13. Adobe 14. Intel 15. Cisco Systems 16. Oracle 17. HP Inc. 18. Dell Technologies 19. Samsung Electronics 20. Sony 21. General Electric 22. Siemens 23. Volkswagen Group 24. Toyota 25. BMW 26. Ford Motor Company 27. General Motors 28. Coca-Cola 29. PepsiCo 30. Procter & Gamble 31. Unilever 32. Nestlé
1. Accenture 2. Adobe 3. Amazon Web Services (AWS) 4. Cisco 5. Dell 6. Deloitte 7. Dropbox 8. Ericsson 9. General Electric (GE) 10. Google Cloud Platform (GCP) 11. Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) 12. IBM 13. Intel 14. Microsoft Azure 15. Netflix 16. Oracle 17. Salesforce 18. SAP 19. Siemens 20. Slack 21. Spotify 22. Symantec 23. T-Mobile 24. Twitter 25. Uber 26. Verizon 27. VMware 28. Walmart 29. Workday 30. Yahoo 31. Zillow 32. Zoom
Find out what your peers are saying about Pluralsight, LinkedIn, Udemy and others in eLearning. Updated: December 2025.
881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.