OpenESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

OpenESB and WSO2 are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. OpenESB is ranked #13, while WSO2 is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenESB holds a 2.7% mindshare in E, compared to WSO2’s 6.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenESB users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 76% of WSO2 users who would recommend it.

OpenESB

Read 4 OpenESB reviews

462 Views
462 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Read 20 WSO2 Enterprise Integrator reviews

2,391 Views
837 Comparison Views

76% willing to recommend

OpenESB

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 3, 2025

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and OpenESB compete in the integration solutions domain. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator holds the upper hand with its advanced features and deployment support, while OpenESB offers a cost-effective solution due to its open-source nature.

Features: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator provides robust integration with multiple cloud-native instances, managed API support, and extensive capability for seamless integrations. OpenESB is valued for its simplicity, strong enterprise message processing, and significant integration functionalities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator offers comprehensive deployment flexibility across various environments, coupled with strong customer support. OpenESB provides straightforward deployment processes but has lower customer service responsiveness.

Pricing and ROI: WSO2 Enterprise Integrator involves a higher initial cost, justified by its extensive features and long-term benefits. OpenESB, being open-source, involves lower setup costs, making it attractive to budget-conscious users seeking reasonable return on investment.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,665 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenESB

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

13th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

7th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (31st)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of OpenESB is 2.7%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 6.3%, up from 4.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator	6.3%
OpenESB	2.7%
Other	91.0%

Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)

Featured Reviews

PaulPerez

Integration Architect at Pymma consulting

Easily define choreography and orchestration with this process-oriented solution

We provide contracted services for our customers that include coordinating with providers and implementing the solution. A current project includes using the solution to deploy 200 microservices. The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration. This feature…

Read full review

Andrea Cuccarini

Technical director at Cremete

Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality

Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The process-oriented solution allows you to define choreography and orchestration."

"OpenESB pushes the organization to clearly define service boundaries and interfaces. So it motives the business and the development teams to clearly define their business services and processes they want to implement. OpenESB supports fine and coarse-grain granularity for the services and supports top-down and bottom-up approaches for the services, processes definition, and composition."

"The core is very stable."

"One of the most valuable features is being able to implement business processes while keeping track of the design from BPMN to a BPEL Implementation."

"The learning curve for this solution is very good."

"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."

"Currently, I find the configuration part quite valuable, where you can easily configure things."

"The customer service executives are very responsive."

"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."

"It was mostly easy to set up the product."

"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."

"It's a very complete product. It allows us to network security and add more layers of security to the system."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator pros

Cons

"Regarding its management, a web console being able to synchronize distributed instances would be great."

"The documentation of the product must be improved. It could be tricky to find the right documentation on a topic since the documentation is spread in many places. I advise the new joiner to contact the community to get entry points and additional documentation. Tutorial and Video must be present to take up the product."

"The documentation needs to be better."

"Cloud deployment is weak and needs to be improved."

"I would like to see them bring back a feature, from earlier versions, that was very useful in debugging and finding issues."

"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."

"The setup can be difficult for those not familiar with the solution."

"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."

"The integration capabilities need to be improved."

"The server is very specific and it is very difficult to get experience with it."

"One of the reasons that we are looking for a replacement is their way of defining integration. The language of the XML structures that I use to describe the integrations are not that standard, and it's not easy to find people who are familiar with this approach."

"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The Community Edition is a full product you can use in production, it does not have limitations like other alternatives."

"The cost for the prediction instrument is high because it is charged per instances based on prediction, but the rest of the solution is free."

"There are two versions. The first is the community version, which is free and contains the last part of the feature, but if you want to get the Enterprise version, you'll have to pay €60,000 which covers support and two instances on production."

"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."

"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."

"It is a low-cost solution."

"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."

"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Financial Services Firm

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

WSO2's analytics capability is good, considering the ELC support they provide.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

The product has reasonable and competitive pricing for enterprise customers. It is expensive for small businesses especially. They are using the open-source solution, and they find it expensive sin...

See all answers

What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?

See all answers

Comparisons

Mule ESB vs OpenESB

Compared 23% of the time

IBM WebSphere Message Broker vs OpenESB

Compared 18% of the time

Aurea CX Messenger vs OpenESB

Compared 15% of the time

Oracle Service Bus vs OpenESB

Compared 13% of the time

TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus vs OpenESB

Compared 13% of the time

More OpenESB Competitors

IBM Integration Bus vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 10% of the time

Mule ESB vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 9% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 5% of the time

Red Hat Fuse vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Compared 5% of the time

More WSO2 Enterprise Integrator Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenESB

January 2026

Download OpenESB product report

Buyer's Guide

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

January 2026

Download WSO2 Enterprise Integrator product report

Overview

OpenESB is a Java-based open-source enterprise service bus. It can be used as a platform for both enterprise application integration and service-oriented architecture. OpenESB allows you to integrate legacy systems, external and internal partners and new development in your Business Process.

OpenESB

WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, core to the WSO2 Integration Agile Platform, is an open source Integration product for cloud native and container-native projects. It enables enterprise integration experts to build, scale, and secure sophisticated integration solutions to achieve digital agility. Unlike other integration products, WSO2 Enterprise Integrator already contains integration runtimes, message brokering, business process modeling, analytics and visual tooling capabilities.

WSO2

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

West

Buyer's Guide

OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

February 2026

Free Report: OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,665 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenESB vs. WSO2 Enterprise Integrator report.

See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.