Parasoft Development Testing Platform and OpenText Application Quality Management compete in software quality management and testing. OpenText has a stronger feature set and integration, while Parasoft is more affordable with better customer support.
Features: Parasoft Development Testing Platform includes static code analysis, peer code review, and unit testing for early defect detection. OpenText Application Quality Management offers robust test management, real-time analytics, and supports numerous platforms, fostering cross-functional collaboration.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft could enhance integration with third-party tools and improve real-time analytics. OpenText might work on simplifying its deployment process and reducing costs. Both can enhance user interface design.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft is noted for straightforward deployment and strong customer support, making it quicker to operationalize. OpenText involves a complex deployment but benefits from comprehensive training and support, suiting larger organizations.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft offers cost-effective initial setup, yielding quicker ROI for budget-conscious organizations. OpenText's higher initial cost is offset by its extensive features and analytics, providing strong long-term ROI for enterprises seeking detailed insights.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
I am mostly happy with the technical support from OpenText ALM _ Quality Center.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
The user-friendly nature could be enhanced as the interface isn’t intuitive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
OpenText Application Quality Management | 4.9% |
Parasoft Development Testing Platform | 0.7% |
Other | 94.4% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 39 |
Midsize Enterprise | 32 |
Large Enterprise | 161 |
OpenText Application Quality Management offers centralized data management, traceability, and integration capabilities. It aids in handling requirements, test planning, and defect tracking while supporting both manual and automated testing. Challenges exist in deployment and browser compatibility.
Known for its robust reporting and flexibility, OpenText Application Quality Management is tailored for large organizations requiring a comprehensive solution supporting lifecycle coverage and seamless tool integration. Users can consolidate testing processes, manage requirements, and centralize reporting across manual and automated testing. While some face issues with project tracking, outdated interfaces, and limited browser compatibility beyond Internet Explorer, it remains widely used for regression and performance testing. Integration with tools like JIRA and support for tools such as UFT and ALM PC underscore its utility.
What are the key features of OpenText Application Quality Management?In industries such as finance and healthcare, OpenText Application Quality Management is implemented to ensure rigorous testing standards. It supports test case creation and execution, defect tracking, and requirements management. Integration with JIRA and performance testing tools make it suitable for organizations needing synchronized testing environments.
Parasoft DTP aggregates the results from across testing practices, providing intelligent and continuous monitoring of the testing outcomes for greater visibility into what is working — and what isn’t. Includes:
- Comprehensive Reports & Dashboards
- Preconfigured compliance reporting
- Customized Advanced Analytics
- Interactive Navigation of Results
- Traceability
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.