Splunk Enterprise Security and OpenText Behavioral Signals compete in the cybersecurity and data analytics space. Splunk holds the advantage with its comprehensive security analytics capabilities, while OpenText excels in behavior analysis.
Features: Splunk provides robust threat detection, incident response, and advanced analytics with machine learning. It excels in security analytics, offering customized dashboards and integration with various tools. OpenText focuses on analyzing human interactions, enabling behavior-based insights and niche capabilities.
Room for Improvement: Splunk could simplify its complex setup and require less expertise for deployment. It can also enhance user experience by streamlining integration processes. OpenText can expand its analytics capabilities beyond behavioral insights and enhance integration options with third-party tools. Additionally, it could benefit from offering more advanced threat detection features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Splunk's deployment involves complex configuration but offers dedicated customer support. Its integration with multiple data sources can be challenging for inexperienced teams. OpenText, however, provides a straightforward deployment process that benefits smaller teams, although its support may not be as comprehensive as Splunk's.
Pricing and ROI: Splunk requires a significant initial investment but promises high returns with its extended capabilities. Despite its higher cost, it provides comprehensive functionality that can justify the setup expenses. OpenText offers an attractive pricing structure focused on maximizing ROI through its specialized behavioral analytics, making it an affordable option for smaller teams.
The documentation for Splunk Enterprise Security is outstanding. It is well-organized and easy to access.
We couldn't calculate what would have been the cost if they had actually gotten compromised; however, they were in the process, so every investment was returned immediately.
On average, my SecOps team takes probably at least a quarter of the time, if not more, to remediate security incidents with Splunk Enterprise Security compared to our previous solution.
We have paid for Splunk support, and we’re not on the free tier hoping for assistance; we are a significant customer and invest a lot in this service.
I have had nothing but good experiences with Splunk support, receiving timely and helpful replies.
We've had great customer success managers who have helped us navigate scaling from 600 gigs to 30 terabytes.
We currently rely on disaster recovery and backup recovery, which takes time to recover, during which you're basically blind, so I'm pushing my leadership team to switch over to a clustering environment for constant availability.
It is one of the things that separates it from other tooling, and if not, it is the most scalable solution out there.
They struggle a bit with pure virtual environments, but in terms of how much they can handle, it is pretty good.
They test it very thoroughly before release, and our customers have Splunk running for months without issues.
Splunk has been very reliable and very consistent.
We need more SMEs, and there is no mechanism to tell us about indexer or search head issues.
Improving the infrastructure behind Splunk Enterprise Security is vital—enhanced cores, CPUs, and memory should be prioritized to support better processing power.
Splunk Enterprise Security is not something that automatically picks things; you have to set up use cases, update data models, and link the right use cases to the right data models for those detections to happen.
For any future enhancements or features, such as MLTK and SOAR platform integration, we need more visibility, training, and certification for the skilled professionals who are working.
I saw clients spend two million dollars a year just feeding data into the Splunk solution.
The platform requires significant financial investment and resources, making it expensive despite its comprehensive features.
I find it to be affordable, which is why every industry uses it.
This capability is useful for performance monitoring and issue identification.
I assess Splunk Enterprise Security's insider threat detection capabilities for helping to find unknown threats and anomalous user behavior as great.
Splunk Enterprise Security provides the foundation for unified threat detection, investigation, and response, enabling fast identification of critical issues.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Splunk Enterprise Security | 7.4% |
| OpenText Behavioral Signals | 0.7% |
| Other | 91.9% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 109 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 50 |
| Large Enterprise | 264 |
OpenText Behavioral Signals enhances organizational security monitoring with its robust correlation engine and streamlined dashboard, offering customization to suit different environments like airports or banks.
OpenText Behavioral Signals effectively integrates device logs through its strong correlation engine. The platform's customization options enable tailored alerts to match specific use cases, such as airports or banks. Although it needs more frequent updates to stay aligned with global incidents, it provides a centralized dashboard that ensures comprehensive visibility across networks. Users find the interface intuitive, making rule writing and report access easy, aiding in a comprehensive understanding of the network environment.
What are the key features of OpenText Behavioral Signals?In industries like banking and airports, OpenText Behavioral Signals is implemented for gathering global intelligence from the cloud. It notifies organizations about global attacks and updates its correlation engines. These industries utilize the platform for monitoring and analyzing logs from network devices, security log management, and addressing network challenges like link failures and unauthorized login attempts, ensuring better security posture with behavioral analytics and log integration using Unix and Microsoft-based connectors.
Splunk Enterprise Security delivers powerful log management, rapid searches, and intuitive dashboards, enhancing real-time analytics and security measures. Its advanced machine learning and wide system compatibility streamline threat detection and incident response across diverse IT environments.
Splunk Enterprise Security stands out in security operations with robust features like comprehensive threat intelligence and seamless data integration. Its real-time analytics and customizable queries enable proactive threat analysis and efficient incident response. Integration with multiple third-party feeds allows detailed threat correlation and streamlined data visualization. Users find the intuitive UI and broad compatibility support efficient threat detection while reducing false positives. Despite its strengths, areas such as visualization capabilities and integration processes with cloud environments need enhancement. Users face a high learning curve, and improvements in automation, AI, documentation, and training are desired to maximize its potential.
What Are the Key Features of Splunk Enterprise Security?In specific industries like finance and healthcare, Splunk Enterprise Security is instrumental for log aggregation, SIEM functionalities, and compliance monitoring. Companies leverage its capabilities for proactive threat analysis and response, ensuring comprehensive security monitoring and integration with various tools for heightened operational intelligence.
We monitor all Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
