OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

OpenText and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #40 with an average rating of 7.5, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.2. OpenText holds a 0.4% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 3.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

666 Views
653 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 259 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

13,654 Views
10,377 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Splunk AppDynamics compete in business process monitoring and application performance management. While OpenText is advantageous in pricing and support, Splunk AppDynamics offers a broader range of features, making it a compelling choice for those needing extensive functionalities despite the cost.

Features: OpenText Business Process Monitoring delivers end-to-end visibility, anomaly detection, and proactive alerts to optimize business processes. On the other hand, Splunk AppDynamics offers deep-dive analytics, real-time performance metrics, and comprehensive application monitoring, seamlessly correlating app behavior across multiple levels.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its scalability and ease of integration with newer technologies. Increasing analysis speed and refining user interface options might also benefit OpenText users. Splunk AppDynamics, while feature-rich, may benefit from more intuitive configuration settings and streamlined initial deployment procedures, and it could manage costs more effectively by providing flexible licensing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is praised for straightforward deployment and effective customer support, facilitating easy integration with existing systems. Splunk AppDynamics presents comprehensive deployment options with extensive integration capabilities but often requires an extended setup period. Its responsive customer service is an asset in navigating complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers competitive pricing, attractive for projects sensitive to costs, complemented by a solid ROI. Splunk AppDynamics, though more expensive, delivers a high ROI through its advanced features, justifying the higher setup costs for enterprises requiring wide-ranging functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

40th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

259

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 3.6%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	3.6%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.4%
Other	96.0%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

DevendraKumar1

Technology lead at Infosys

Has enabled us to detect issues instantly through alerts and monitor every service from a single dashboard

Splunk requires significantly more improvements compared to Splunk AppDynamics, specifically regarding the licensing aspect. Splunk renews licenses every six months, which is inconvenient. It would be better to have a one-year license to avoid needing to update keys constantly, which can only occur on weekends, making it a burdensome task. Although Splunk is better for certain use cases, Splunk AppDynamics is broader in functionality. Specifically, I want enhancements related to creating dashboards not only for logs or minor services but also for configuration levels, allowing us to check configurations immediately without manually opening the entire code when exceptions arise—a feature I wish to see improved in Splunk, although it may not be necessary for Splunk AppDynamics.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"In my experience, it's easy to use. There's nothing complex to learn or fear. You can quickly adapt to it without the need for extensive training."

"This solution not only provides answers but also provides sensor data. This allows us to quickly resolve issues that developers may take a long time to solve."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I don't see any problems in the solution...The solution's technical support was good."

"The initial setup is simple."

"Knowing which tables on the database were working the most was valuable. It helped the client understand where they need to focus. They streamlined a lot of their queries and brought the resource usage down. It helped them to find long-running queries. They rewrote them completely so that they don't take as long and the application performs better."

"Application Analytics' most valuable features are the real-user monitoring and the agents installed in the software stack on the application server."

"All the metrics are baselines in networks, infrastructure, application, and user experience. AppDynamics offers its own query language. It is called ADQL. You can write code of any kind to do queries and analysis and you can use those within the reporting or within other research."

"The most valuable feature is the flow map."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"I would like to be able to monitor both cloud an on-prem infrastructures, displayed in one dashboard."

"The initial setup is a bit complex."

"The initial setup could be easier."

"I would like to see more artificial intelligence and machine learning brought in to monitor the statement and payment sum issues we have."

"The resolution time takes longer than expected."

"The one thing that I find it difficult in using AppDynamics is, for any new user, it's not easy for him or her to configure the transactions in AppDynamics because the UI is pretty complex. The configuration is pretty complex for a new, fresh user. They can make the UI simpler, that'll be very helpful for anyone to configure their website in AppDynamics."

"Product-wise, everything is good, but the main concern is the extensions and their documentation, particularly for the installation of Azure app services."

"I’d like to see better out-of-the-box visual reporting so that we can roll this up to management."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"The licensing scheme is very complex. They need to make it easier."

"In terms of pricing, I feel that when you compare the benefits that we get to the price that we paid, it is reasonable."

"There is an annual cost to use this solution. The licensing model could be improved by making it more cost-effective."

"As a technical person, and as an application development team, they all understand that this is the right tool for us. But when it comes to budget and financial matters, it takes days and weeks to convince upper management to buy this tool. So they should do something more on licensing costs."

"The product’s licencing policy is competitive. However, properly identify and size your needs to get the best rate."

"The tool is expensive."

"My understanding is that the price of this solution is quite high, compared to other products."

"I would like more flexible pricing: A pay-per-use model, rather than just a fixed-price model."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

13%

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

26%

Computer Software Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	194

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics?

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten. The solution is highly expensive. Our company pays for the solution on a yearly basis, if we don't add new modules or features to the license, we need ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 31% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 23% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 21% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 14% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 11% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 7% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 6% of the time

SolarWinds Server and Application Monitor vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

January 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

January 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?

Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.

How does AppDynamics benefit users?

Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

December 2025

Free Report: OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.