OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

OpenText and Splunk are both solutions in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category. OpenText is ranked #42 with an average rating of 7.5, while Splunk is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.1. OpenText holds a 0.5% mindshare in APM, compared to Splunk’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.

OpenText Business Process M...

Read 6 OpenText Business Process Monitoring reviews

778 Views
762 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Splunk AppDynamics

Read 260 Splunk AppDynamics reviews

15,142 Views
11,357 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

OpenText Business Process M...

Splunk AppDynamics

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 23, 2025

OpenText Business Process Monitoring and Splunk AppDynamics compete in business process monitoring and application performance management. While OpenText is advantageous in pricing and support, Splunk AppDynamics offers a broader range of features, making it a compelling choice for those needing extensive functionalities despite the cost.

Features: OpenText Business Process Monitoring delivers end-to-end visibility, anomaly detection, and proactive alerts to optimize business processes. On the other hand, Splunk AppDynamics offers deep-dive analytics, real-time performance metrics, and comprehensive application monitoring, seamlessly correlating app behavior across multiple levels.

Room for Improvement: OpenText could enhance its scalability and ease of integration with newer technologies. Increasing analysis speed and refining user interface options might also benefit OpenText users. Splunk AppDynamics, while feature-rich, may benefit from more intuitive configuration settings and streamlined initial deployment procedures, and it could manage costs more effectively by providing flexible licensing options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText is praised for straightforward deployment and effective customer support, facilitating easy integration with existing systems. Splunk AppDynamics presents comprehensive deployment options with extensive integration capabilities but often requires an extended setup period. Its responsive customer service is an asset in navigating complex deployments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Business Process Monitoring offers competitive pricing, attractive for projects sensitive to costs, complemented by a solid ROI. Splunk AppDynamics, though more expensive, delivers a high ROI through its advanced features, justifying the higher setup costs for enterprises requiring wide-ranging functionalities.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 881,757 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Process M...

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

42nd

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Splunk AppDynamics

Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

260

Ranking in other categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring (6th), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (1st), Container Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is 0.5%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 3.7%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Splunk AppDynamics	3.7%
OpenText Business Process Monitoring	0.5%
Other	95.8%

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

Featured Reviews

Aphiwat Leetavorn.

CTO at Marco Technology

Proactive monitoring boosts system reliability but requires improved protocol support and script customization

Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations. Creating a proactive request requires a specific skill set, so a template for scripts that work across various protocols should be recommended. The dashboard of OpenText Business Process Monitoring is good enough, but in my operational environment, it is not sufficient. Therefore, I have had to customize everything beyond the package, utilizing Prometheus and Grafana to render more dashboards.

Read full review

DevendraKumar1

Technology lead at Infosys

Has enabled us to detect issues instantly through alerts and monitor every service from a single dashboard

Splunk requires significantly more improvements compared to Splunk AppDynamics, specifically regarding the licensing aspect. Splunk renews licenses every six months, which is inconvenient. It would be better to have a one-year license to avoid needing to update keys constantly, which can only occur on weekends, making it a burdensome task. Although Splunk is better for certain use cases, Splunk AppDynamics is broader in functionality. Specifically, I want enhancements related to creating dashboards not only for logs or minor services but also for configuration levels, allowing us to check configurations immediately without manually opening the entire code when exceptions arise—a feature I wish to see improved in Splunk, although it may not be necessary for Splunk AppDynamics.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The main benefits of using OpenText Business Process Monitoring for my company include anomaly detection and proactive analysis, which enhance our monitoring capabilities."

"Automates processes and allows reports and statistics to improve the speed at which changes and assets are managed."

"The stability has been very good over the years."

"The tool team was sort of aware of those tools to deal with. And, that helped us to deliver the project on time."

"I have found the main feature of the solution to be its ability to analyze an application's code to see where there are issues. Additionally, it is easy to use and configure."

"AppDynamics is a good tool that offers excellent out-of-the-box dashboards and application topology."

"The most valuable feature is the flow map."

"This solution not only provides answers but also provides sensor data. This allows us to quickly resolve issues that developers may take a long time to solve."

"Has helped us to increase customer acquisitions and reduce revenue leakage."

"AppDynamics is scalable. They can monitor billions of transactions because they're not monitoring all transactions. They're monitoring samples. So, they can offer good monitoring for the huge sites."

"We have been able to monitor our applications more accurately."

"We're a large organization, so we appreciate AppDynamics' wide coverage. It may not work in all areas, but it has broad coverage. We can use the same dataset for different use case aspects. That is the beauty of AppDynamics. You can coordinate APM, EUM, and infrastructure through one dataset."

More Splunk AppDynamics pros

Cons

"The solution should offer better integration with other tools from a service management perspective."

"Improvements can be made to OpenText Business Process Monitoring, especially since we have faced issues with protocol support and creating scripts in past implementations."

"Product documentation is lacking, and sometimes, incorrect. Having better documentation will allow business analysts and data center personnel to rely on the Micro Focus help desk less."

"It doesn't have SNMP, the standard communication protocol for sending alerts."

"The application monitoring needs improvement. It needs to be easier for someone who isn't a proficient developer."

"I have found it sometimes a bit difficult to trace the transaction all the way through to the application. I'm not sure if that problem is on the database side or on the application side, but that would be something that I would like to be improved. The traceability from the application to the database, sometimes, is a bit of a challenge. If you're using AppDynamics, with the Java agent, for instance, you need to be able to trace it through."

"The documentation and training material have room for improvement."

"There could log management features included in the product."

"I am not very impressed with support. The service could be better."

"The solution needs to support IBM products."

"The network diagnostics that they are adding will be really useful. They could add more detail into what is going on in the network."

"I would like to see accommodation for millisecond granularity, as we only have one-second granularity now."

More Splunk AppDynamics cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"On a three-year license package, it was a good deal."

"The product is a bit expensive compared to other tools."

"The solution has a high cost."

"Purchasing the product through the AWS Marketplace was good."

"It is not a cheap tool, but you also save in manpower to setup because it is easy and fast. At the end of the day, I think the revenue is much better. BUT, they have an awful co-term mode of licensing."

"You are required to purchase licenses whether you use it or not. It is not pay-as-you-use."

"Our purchasing experience through the AWS Marketplace has been pretty painless."

"We have two different licensing models for this solution. One of them is the agent based model, which requires payment per agent. The other is an infrastructure based model, where the price is based on the CPU core. For the infrastructure model wholesale level pricing applies. All of the up to date licensing prices for this product are available on the manufacturers website."

"The pricing for AppDynamics is expensive, but it is possible to negotiate special pricing through bids."

More Splunk AppDynamics pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Performing Arts

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	55
Midsize Enterprise	36
Large Enterprise	195

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

I find OpenText Business Process Monitoring quite expensive, and while it feels expensive, I see it as an affordable investment overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Business Process Monitor?

The idea behind OpenText Business Process Monitoring since the beginning is very good, as it is proactive. We do not wait until the system crashes or misbehaves; we put the application request into...

See all answers

Any advice about APM solutions?

There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...

See all answers

What do you like most about AppDynamics?

The solution saves time and cost.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for AppDynamics?

I would rate the pricing an eight out of ten. The solution is highly expensive. Our company pays for the solution on a yearly basis, if we don't add new modules or features to the license, we need ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dynatrace vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 22% of the time

Knoa EPM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 18% of the time

Broadcom DX Application Performance Management vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 17% of the time

Instana Dynamic APM vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 12% of the time

IDERA Precise vs OpenText Business Process Monitoring

Compared 11% of the time

More OpenText Business Process Monitoring Competitors

Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 10% of the time

New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 7% of the time

Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 5% of the time

PRTG Network Monitor vs Splunk AppDynamics

Compared 3% of the time

More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability

February 2026

OpenText Business Process Monitoring report

Download OpenText Business Process Monitoring product report

Buyer's Guide

Splunk AppDynamics

January 2026

Download Splunk AppDynamics product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Monitor, HPE Business Process Monitor

No data available

Overview

OpenText Business Process Monitoring is an Application monitoring software.

Proactively and consistently monitor business processes to identify performance issues before they affect users.

Review affected service level agreements.

BPM provides consistent, predictable measurements that help you associate the business impact with its root cause.

OpenText

Splunk AppDynamics is a comprehensive performance monitoring tool providing end-to-end transaction tracking, real-time monitoring, and a user-friendly interface. With AI-powered features, it enhances operational efficiency and resilience by offering insights into user interactions and infrastructure issues.

Splunk AppDynamics excels in monitoring applications and infrastructure performance, offering extensive support across environments like AWS and cloud. It aids in application performance monitoring, end-user experience, database analysis, and proactive incident detection. Supporting Java, .NET, and other technologies, it provides real-time insights into application health, resource utilization, and transaction tracking, ensuring reliable user experiences. Challenges remain in UI complexity, agent-based architecture, integration with diverse environments, and documentation clarity. Its licensing model is costly, and customer support may be slow. Performance concerns exist in historical data granularity and network visibility.

What features make Splunk AppDynamics stand out?

End-to-End Transaction Tracking: Monitors entire user transactions for comprehensive visibility.
Real-Time Monitoring: Provides instant insights into system performance.
AI-Powered Anomaly Detection: Identifies anomalies with advanced machine learning techniques.
Code-Level Troubleshooting: Diagnoses issues at the code level for precise fixes.
Business Transaction Visibility: Offers detailed views into transaction flow across all system layers.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Splunk AppDynamics?

Improved Application Performance: Enhances system efficiency and reliability.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines monitoring and issue resolution processes.
Enhanced Business Resilience: Strengthens the ability to adapt to performance challenges.
Seamless User Experiences: Ensures uninterrupted service and user satisfaction.

Organizations in industries like finance and healthcare implement Splunk AppDynamics to monitor critical applications and infrastructure. Its capabilities in transaction tracking and AI-driven insights are crucial for maintaining system reliability, supporting technologies such as Java and .NET, and ensuring optimal resource utilization.

Splunk

Sample Customers

United Airlines, Vodafone Ireland, TEB, The Australian Red Cross Blood Service

Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

February 2026

Free Report: OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,757 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Business Process Monitoring vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.