OpenText Core Application Security vs ReversingLabs comparison

Why PeerSpot?

OpenText and ReversingLabs are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. OpenText is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.8, while ReversingLabs is ranked #41. OpenText holds a 3.5% mindshare in AS, compared to ReversingLabs’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of ReversingLabs users who would recommend it.

OpenText Core Application S...

Read 64 OpenText Core Application Security reviews

13,745 Views
10,309 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

ReversingLabs

Read 4 ReversingLabs reviews

6,559 Views
1,640 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText Core Application S...

ReversingLabs

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 29, 2026

OpenText Core Application Security and ReversingLabs compete in the application security category. OpenText Core Application Security holds an advantage in cost-effectiveness and customer support, whereas ReversingLabs has advanced features, making it appealing for robust functionality needs.

Features: OpenText Core Application Security includes vulnerability assessment capabilities, seamless workflow integration, and strong customer support. ReversingLabs provides advanced threat intelligence, detailed malware analysis, and comprehensive security solutions, which are suitable for organizations needing in-depth insights.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Core Application Security could improve in analytics depth, advanced threat detection tools, and more expansive integration capabilities. ReversingLabs could enhance pricing flexibility, simplify user interface elements, and broaden their customer support accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Core Application Security is praised for straightforward deployment and superior customer service. ReversingLabs also offers a smooth deployment process with specialized support for complex threat scenarios, making it ideal for technically demanding environments.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Core Application Security is favored for competitive setup costs and strong ROI, which appeals to budget-conscious buyers. ReversingLabs, while more costly, delivers significant long-term security benefits through its rich features, justifying higher initial costs for enhanced security returns.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Core Application Security vs. ReversingLabs Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security vs. ReversingLabs

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 920,929 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Core Application S...

Ranking in Application Security Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (7th)

ReversingLabs

Ranking in Application Security Tools

41st

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Anti-Malware Tools (41st), Container Security (47th), Software Composition Analysis (SCA) (26th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (TIP) (25th), Software Supply Chain Security (19th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Application Security Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Core Application Security is 3.5%, down from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of ReversingLabs is 0.9%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Application Security Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
OpenText Core Application Security	3.5%
ReversingLabs	0.9%
Other	95.6%

Application Security Tools

Featured Reviews

Himanshu_Tyagi

Lead Cybersecurity at TBO

Supports secure development pipelines and improves issue detection but limits internal visibility and needs broader dashboard integration

If you have an internal team and you want your internal team to validate false positives, basically to determine whether it's a valid issue or an invalid issue, then I wouldn't recommend it much. That was the only reason we migrated from Fortify on Demand to another solution. Fortify has another tool which is Fortify WebInspect. On Demand is the outsourcing solution, and WebInspect you can use with your in-house team, which is basically the product developed by the Fortify team. For automated scanning, Fortify helps a lot. Regarding the visibility for the internal team, everyone is moving toward the DevSecOps side, and Fortify team has made good progress that you can integrate into your CICD pipeline. One thing I would highlight is if Fortify can focus more on the centralized dashboard of the tools because nowadays, tools such as SentinelOne also exist for identifying security issues, but they have a centralized dashboard that merges their cloud solution and application security side solution together. If you have one tool that works for different solutions, it helps a lot. They are doing good, but they should invest more on the AI side as well because AI security is evolving these days. On the cloud side, they have already made good progress, but I believe they should explore the new area related to AI security as well.

Read full review

Jesse Harris

Principal Solutions Architect at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

Comes with a large sample size and helps t stay on top of emerging threats

The solution helps to stay on top of emerging threats with easy integration with other products. ReversingLabs has a large sample size. The solution needs to improve integrations. I have been using the solution for four to five years. ReversingLabs' stability is excellent. I rate the…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The static code analyzers are the most valuable features of this solution."

"It is a very easy tool for developers to use in parallel while they're doing the coding. It does auto scanning as we are progressing with the CI/CD pipeline. It has got very simple and efficient API support."

"The most valuable features are the detailed reporting and the ability to set up deep scanning of the software, both of which are in the same place."

"Fortify on Demand is easy to use and the reporting is good."

"It is an extremely robust, scalable, and stable solution."

"The quality of application security testing reduces risk and gives very few false positives."

"It enforces source-code scanning, finding vulnerabilities in source code."

"Provides good depth of scanning and we get good results."

More OpenText Core Application Security pros

"As far as the availability of the content is generally concerned and the number of malicious programs that can be looked up in the repository, these are very extensive."

"We have complete faith that it can do that for us, and can do it at scale."

"The automated static analysis of malware is the most valuable feature. Its detection abilities are very good. It hits all of the different platforms out there, platforms that see the items in the wild."

"As far as static analysis information is concerned, we use most of the information that is available in order to determine whether or not we might be dealing with a malware variant. This includes information that is related to Java rules. This is also related to malware families indicated or specific malicious software variants that are labeled by name."

"ReversingLabs has a large sample size."

"It offers reports on a great many more file types than the other analysis solutions we have. It can give us a more in-depth analysis and better reporting on a larger number of file types. It also gives us a more comprehensive score on a number of things as well, and that's why we're using it as a front-end filter. It gives us more information... It's valuable because of its depth of information, as well as the breadth it gives us. There aren't a lot of tools that cover all of the different file types."

"As far as the malware repository is concerned, it's extensive. It's a good source for finding samples, where we are unable to find them on other channels or by leveraging other sources."

"We had nothing in the environment to do such analysis, so it's been a savior in many ways."

Cons

"The product has a lot of false positives."

"There were some regulated compliances, which were not there, but these were the factors because of which we had to use some instances of other tools as well."

"Takes up a lot of resources which can slow things down."

"There is room for improvement in the integration process."

"Reporting could be improved. It would nice to export to an Excel sheet or another spreadsheet."

"I would say OpenText Core Application Security is not very user-friendly in terms of price; it is quite high."

"If you have a continuous integration in place, for example, and you want it to run along with your build and you want it to be fast, you're not going to get it. It adds to your development time."

"I would like to see improvement in CI integration and integration with GitLab or Jenkins. It needs to be more simple."

More OpenText Core Application Security cons

"The solution needs to improve integrations."

"The product support could be better at times. Sometimes, the resources that they provide could be of higher quality."

"We would really like further integration with our threat intelligence platform, which is called ThreatConnect. We would also really like further integrations with an endpoint protection product we use called Tanium. The reason I mentioned both of these is that ReversingLabs claims to have extensive integrations with both of them, but they did not work for us."

"I would like to see if we could do a little bit more of bulk uploading of hash sets. Right now, I can only do them individually."

"While the company is very helpful, it would be very much appreciated to have extensive proof of concept scripts for the different APIs available, though not for all the APIs that we have purchased. Respective scripts are available, but those scripts which are available are typically not of very high quality."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is a little expensive."

"If I exceed one million lines of code, there might be an extra cost or a change in the pricing bracket."

"We are still using the trial version at this point but I can already see from the trial version alone that it is a good product. For others, I would say that Fortify on Demand might look expensive at the beginning, but it is very powerful and so you shouldn't be put off by the price."

"Buying a license would be feasible for regular use. For intermittent use, the cloud-based option can be used (Fortify on Demand)."

"The licensing was good because the licenses have the heavy centralized server."

"It is cost-effective."

"The pricing model it's based on how many applications you wish to scan."

"It's a yearly contract, but I don't remember the dollar amount."

More OpenText Core Application Security pricing and cost advice

"Currently, the license number of lookups that we purchased has not been reached yet, because the integration has only recently been completed. However, our usage is expected and planned to increase over the next couple of months."

"We have a yearly contract based on the number of queries and malicious programs which can be processed."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Comms Service Provider

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	18
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	46

No data available

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

Areas for improvement should be contextualized post the OpenText acquisition, but back when I was working with Micro Focus, they focused heavily on enterprise-centric solutions. Now, after the acqu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

For OpenText Core Application Security, I currently support a couple of my clients who are using Fortify on Demand for their web application, CRM, and sales platform. Many good features of Fortify ...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Micro Focus Fortify on Demand?

I use Fortify on Demand for monitoring up to a certain extent; it provides monitoring and helps analyze and identify issues that could propagate in the application. When used in conjunction with Ar...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

SonarQube vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 29% of the time

Checkmarx One vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 5% of the time

GitHub vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

Veracode vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

HCL AppScan vs OpenText Core Application Security

Compared 4% of the time

More OpenText Core Application Security Competitors

JFrog Xray vs ReversingLabs

Compared 7% of the time

MetaDefender vs ReversingLabs

Compared 6% of the time

VirusTotal vs ReversingLabs

Compared 6% of the time

Black Duck SCA vs ReversingLabs

Compared 4% of the time

Wiz vs ReversingLabs

Compared 4% of the time

More ReversingLabs Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security

October 2026

OpenText Core Application Security report

Download OpenText Core Application Security product report

Buyer's Guide

ReversingLabs

October 2026

Download ReversingLabs product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus Fortify on Demand

ReversingLabs Titanium, ReversingLabs secure.software

Overview

OpenText Core Application Security offers robust features like static and dynamic scanning, real-time vulnerability tracking, and seamless integration with development platforms, designed to enhance code security and reduce operational costs.

OpenText Core Application Security is a cloud-based, on-demand service providing accurate and deep scanning capabilities with detailed reporting. Its integrations with development platforms ensure an enhanced security layer in the development lifecycle, benefiting users by lowering operational costs and facilitating efficient remediation. The platform addresses needs for intuitive interfaces, API support, and comprehensive vulnerability assessments, helping improve code security and accelerate time-to-market. Despite its strengths, challenges exist around false positives, report clarity, and language support, alongside confusing pricing and package options. Enhancements are sought in areas like CI/CD pipeline configuration, report visualization, scan times, and integration with third-party tools such as GitLab, container scanning, and software composition analysis.

What features define OpenText Core Application Security?

Static and Dynamic Scanning: Offers thorough analysis to identify vulnerabilities during development.
Real-time Vulnerability Tracking: Continuously updates and monitors potential security threats.
Seamless Development Platform Integration: Enhances security processes without disrupting workflows.
Cloud-Based Service: Provides flexible, on-demand security capabilities with accurate results.
API Support: Allows smooth integration and automation within existing systems.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Operational Costs: Optimizes resources by lowering costs associated with security management.
Efficient Remediation: Speeds up the process of identifying and resolving vulnerabilities.
Enhanced Code Security: Strengthens overall application security during the development lifecycle.
Accelerated Time-to-Market: Streamlines development stages by integrating essential security tools.

Industries like mobile applications, e-commerce, and banking leverage OpenText Core Application Security for its ability to identify vulnerabilities such as SQL injections. Integrating seamlessly with DevSecOps and security auditing processes, this tool supports developers in writing safer code, ensuring secure application deployment and enhancing software assurance.

OpenText

ReversingLabs delivers a cutting-edge solution for cybersecurity experts, specializing in advanced threat detection and response. It is trusted by industries focused on maintaining high security standards with its innovative use of technology.

ReversingLabs provides comprehensive support for identifying and mitigating threats using a robust intelligence platform. Its unique approach integrates threat detection with automated analysis tools, enhancing organizations' security frameworks. The transparency and depth in tracking files and binaries ensure that users have a clear understanding of potential issues in software and files. With an emphasis on speed and accuracy, it ensures threats are managed before they escalate.

What are the key features of ReversingLabs?

Threat Intelligence Platform: Integrates detailed malware analysis for proactive security measures.
Automated Analysis Tools: Speeds up threat detection and provides in-depth insights.
Comprehensive Data Management: Simplifies complex datasets for enhanced threat recognition.
Open Integration: Smoothly integrates with existing security infrastructures.

What benefits or ROI can users find in ReversingLabs?

Enhanced Security Capabilities: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats before damage occurs.
Efficiency in Detection: Reduces response time through rapid analysis and identification.
Cost Reduction: Minimizes resource allocation by automating the threat management process.
Scalability: Easily expands with growing security needs without added complexity.

ReversingLabs is widely implemented in industries such as finance and healthcare, where data protection is critical. Financial institutions utilize its threat detection to safeguard against data breaches, while healthcare providers rely on it to maintain patient confidentiality and protect sensitive information from cyber threats.

ReversingLabs

Sample Customers

SAP, Aaron's, British Gas, FICO, Cox Automative, Callcredit Information Group, Vital and more.

Financial services, healthcare, government, manufacturing, oil & gas, telecommunications, information technology

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Core Application Security vs. ReversingLabs

November 2026

Free Report: OpenText Core Application Security vs. ReversingLabs

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Core Application Security vs. ReversingLabs and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

920,929 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Core Application Security vs. ReversingLabs report.

See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.