Oracle Coherence vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Oracle and Broadcom are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. Oracle is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.9. Oracle holds a 3.5% mindshare in DDM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Oracle Coherence

Read 31 Oracle Coherence reviews

4,307 Views
3,144 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 89 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

9,944 Views
2,486 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle Coherence

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Oracle Coherence are competitive in data management and analytics. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions tends to be favored for its customer satisfaction due to easy integration and robust support, while Oracle Coherence is preferred for its advanced data processing and scalability, ideal for large infrastructures.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is known for its scalability, multi-cloud environment support, and ease of integration, while Oracle Coherence offers distributed caching, data grid functionalities, and real-time data analytics through in-memory processing.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions could enhance its data processing capabilities, improve its real-time analytics, and refine multi-cloud support. Oracle Coherence may benefit from easier deployment, enhanced simplicity in data operations, and better support networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides seamless and flexible deployment with its comprehensive support network. Oracle Coherence offers reliable deployments that may be complex but suit high performance and consistency needs.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers competitive initial costs with strong ROI through adaptable cost modules. Oracle Coherence may require higher upfront investment but provides robust long-term ROI due to its high-performance advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Coherence

Ranking in Database Development and Management

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

In-Memory Data Store Services (3rd)

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Database Development and Management

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (12th), Data Warehouse (6th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Coherence is 3.5%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.8%, down from 3.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	2.8%
Oracle Coherence	3.5%
Other	93.7%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

Srinivasa Singireddy

Data Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Facilitating real-time business insights with enhanced data querying

Coherence is beneficial due to its multi-indexing to the same object and filtering based on data attributes within the object, followed by aggregation. These features facilitate querying data with multiple keys rather than just a single key. Its real-time data processing capabilities provide insights for business decisions with up-to-date information.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Introducing a data grid, we moved from a vertically scalable solution to full scalability."

"Oracle Coherence is a very good product which helps to create internet-scale applications using a high-performance grid."

"It helped us to cache the data in memory and improved performance by 10x."

"Oracle Coherence improved site performance and the customer experience."

"The Customer Facing Application response time has been improved 95%."

"The biggest improvement is in speed - everything is faster from record retrieval to workflow processing."

"We are storing information from one of our applications; this allows us to answer requests in milliseconds, while the application would take seconds to answer requests from clients."

"Basically reducing response times to extremely small latencies in their apps."

More Oracle Coherence pros

"In summary, this is a good product that I will continue to use, and I recommend it."

"Very fast for query processing."

"The previous data warehouse was built in Oracle, and one of the things which has improved in GreenPlum is that we can query millions of rows at speed, without creating lags."

"The product's reliability is the most valuable feature."

"VMware Tanzu Data Solutions has quite significant data transformation capabilities, particularly in managing large databases and performing ETL processes."

"The security is great."

"Great management UI: The best in its class of messaging products Very sophisticated routing control and priority messaging capabilities"

"I prefer an open-source solution but Pivotal Greenplum is cheap and has many functionalities."

Cons

"Initial setup was complex. We wrote a lot of wrapper code around the Coherence libraries in order to make it easier for the developer."

"The initial setup is complex and time-consuming."

"Product is too expensive and support is poor. There are better products."

"Cluster management tools that are independent of WebLogic. Dynamic cluster config rollout and rollback."

"In my experience, I did find it challenging to use this product when namespace prefixes on the resulting XML object was a requirement."

"Customer service: Five out of 10."

"Price is very high - as for any Oracle product."

"It has become very heavy along with the price for Oracle's integrated product as a fusion middleware."

More Oracle Coherence cons

"Some integration with other platforms like design tools, and ETL development tools, that will enable some advanced functionality (like fully down processing, etc.) would be helpful in future releases."

"It should support more feature that do exist on Postgres – like JSON datatype."

"RabbitMQ is clearly better supported on Linux than it is on Windows. There are idiosyncrasies in the Windows version that are not there on Linux."

"We found some issues with larger tables that have daily data appended, where after a while this seems to create lag in the query speed."

"The Greenplum appliance itself has had some reliability issues, so it would be great if that could be improved in the next version."

"It doesn't work as efficiently as we'd like because it requires more segment node capacity (size, RAM, CPU) than we currently have."

"Their implementation is quite tricky. It's not that easy to implement RabbitMQ as a cluster."

"Maintenance is time-consuming."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"The pricing is okay."

"The solution's pricing is cost-effective as it does not involve significant expenses. Licensing is required only for the server, while clients do not need any licensing. Therefore, it proves to be a cost-efficient option."

"The price is pretty good."

"The pricing for RabbitMQ is reasonable. It is worth the cost."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"It’s an open-source solution."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"It is an open-source product."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Construction Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Outsourcing Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	32
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	52

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Coherence?

The WebLogic Management is quite cumbersome. The initial setup is complex and time-consuming.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Coherence?

I utilize Coherence for data solutions in the financial industry. Its primary use case includes plain lookup, indexing, filtering, and aggregation.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Coherence?

I recommend Coherence, as I don't have any product issues. The main concerns are high pricing and a complex initial setup. Overall, I would rate Coherence as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu GemFire?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is that it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu GemFire?

In terms of weak points in VMware Tanzu Data Solutions, pricing is always the root cause of people not wanting to renew licenses or do any upgrades.

See all answers

Comparisons

Redis vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 13% of the time

GigaSpaces Smart DIH vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 8% of the time

Terracotta vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 7% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 6% of the time

GridGain vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Coherence Competitors

Teradata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Snowflake vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence

July 2026

Download Oracle Coherence product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

July 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Coherence

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Oracle Coherence is a distributed cache solution designed for high-performance computing environments, providing scalability, reliability, and real-time data processing to enhance complex applications.

Oracle Coherence facilitates dynamic data management by offering extensive scalability and fault tolerance, crucial for enterprise-level applications that demand consistent real-time data access. Its architecture ensures data consistency and efficient scaling across distributed networks, making it ideal for businesses requiring seamless data integration and analytics to drive operations efficiently.

What are the key features of Oracle Coherence?

Data Grid: Ensures distributed data scalability and availability across clusters.
Real-Time Data Processing: Provides instantaneous data updates for critical tasks.
Fault Tolerance: Offers automatic data redundancy to prevent data loss.
Scalability: Facilitates horizontal scaling to accommodate growing data needs.
In-Memory Caching: Speeds up data retrieval and processing by storing data in memory.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Performance: Significant enhancement in data processing speeds.
Cost Efficiency: Reduction in infrastructure costs due to optimized caching.
Seamless Integration: Compatibility with existing enterprise systems.
Enhanced Reliability: Ensures consistent uptime and data integrity.
Reduced Latency: Minimizes delays in data retrieval and usage.

Oracle Coherence is widely implemented in industries such as finance and telecommunications, where real-time data access and processing are crucial for operations. For financial services, it enables quick transaction processing and risk management, while telecommunications companies utilize it for managing large-scale subscriber data and call records efficiently.

Oracle

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Industrial Bank of Korea, Hotelbeds, Canon Inc., Verizon, Securitas Direct Espa_a, S.A.U., CetelemEspa_aGrupo BNP Paribas, Telus

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

August 2026

Free Report: Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.