Oracle Coherence vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions comparison

Oracle and Broadcom are both solutions in the Database Development and Management category. Oracle is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Broadcom is ranked #8 with an average rating of 8.3. Oracle holds a 3.2% mindshare in DDM, compared to Broadcom’s 2.8% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of Broadcom users who would recommend it.

Oracle Coherence

Read 31 Oracle Coherence reviews

3,568 Views
2,498 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Read 85 VMware Tanzu Data Solutions reviews

8,267 Views
2,067 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

Oracle Coherence

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 23, 2025

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and Oracle Coherence are competitive in data management and analytics. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions tends to be favored for its customer satisfaction due to easy integration and robust support, while Oracle Coherence is preferred for its advanced data processing and scalability, ideal for large infrastructures.

Features: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is known for its scalability, multi-cloud environment support, and ease of integration, while Oracle Coherence offers distributed caching, data grid functionalities, and real-time data analytics through in-memory processing.

Room for Improvement: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions could enhance its data processing capabilities, improve its real-time analytics, and refine multi-cloud support. Oracle Coherence may benefit from easier deployment, enhanced simplicity in data operations, and better support networks.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions provides seamless and flexible deployment with its comprehensive support network. Oracle Coherence offers reliable deployments that may be complex but suit high performance and consistency needs.

Pricing and ROI: VMware Tanzu Data Solutions offers competitive initial costs with strong ROI through adaptable cost modules. Oracle Coherence may require higher upfront investment but provides robust long-term ROI due to its high-performance advantages.

To learn more, read our detailed Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 900,644 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Oracle Coherence

Ranking in Database Development and Management

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

In-Memory Data Store Services (4th)

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Ranking in Database Development and Management

8th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Relational Databases Tools (23rd), Data Warehouse (10th), Message Queue (MQ) Software (6th)

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Database Development and Management category, the mindshare of Oracle Coherence is 3.2%, up from 2.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is 2.8%, down from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Database Development and Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
VMware Tanzu Data Solutions	2.8%
Oracle Coherence	3.2%
Other	94.0%

Database Development and Management

Featured Reviews

Srinivasa Singireddy

Data Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Facilitating real-time business insights with enhanced data querying

Coherence is beneficial due to its multi-indexing to the same object and filtering based on data attributes within the object, followed by aggregation. These features facilitate querying data with multiple keys rather than just a single key. Its real-time data processing capabilities provide insights for business decisions with up-to-date information.

Read full review

Karthik Shivaram

Sr. Manager at STI INFOTECH PVT LTD

Improved multi-cloud data management has simplified operations and supports seamless Kubernetes

From my perspective, the biggest challenge with VMware right now is the pricing. To be very honest, in many cases I find myself recommending alternative solutions instead of VMware. Even if those alternatives come with a bit more complexity, customers are often more willing to accept that than the current VMware pricing model. In the past, VMware used a socket-based licensing model, which was easier for customers to understand and budget for. Now the shift to a core-based licensing model has significantly increased costs for many environments, especially for organizations running modern high-core CPUs. One positive aspect of the new model is that VMware has bundled several components together. For example, earlier when deploying vSphere, customers also had to purchase vCenter separately for management. Now multiple components are packaged into a single SKU, which simplifies some aspects of procurement and deployment. While this consolidation has its benefits, the overall licensing and commercial costs remain very high. Pricing is not the only issue. I believe Broadcom also needs to reconsider its strategy in light of the current market conditions. The approach they are taking may be strategic from a business perspective, but from what I see in the field, it is leading to lost opportunities. Many customers who previously relied on VMware are now actively exploring alternative virtualization platforms. I’m not sure where this direction will ultimately lead, but based on my experience, it is already affecting adoption. Since you’ve been trying to reach me for some time—and we also had a discussion a couple of years ago—I hope this feedback helps Broadcom understand the current sentiment in the market and potentially make adjustments. Another important concern is the way features are bundled. In many cases, customers only need basic virtualization and high availability capabilities. However, the current packaging often includes additional features that they may not need. A good analogy is that if a customer only needs an entry-level car, we shouldn’t be forced to sell them a Rolls-Royce. VMware could benefit from adopting a more modular or à la carte licensing model, where customers can choose only the components they truly require. For example, if a customer only needs core virtualization functionality, they should be able to purchase just that. This would allow partners and solution providers to better align solutions with customer requirements and position VMware more competitively in the market. Another challenge I want to highlight is the pricing model based on U.S. dollars and the way multi-year licensing is handled. In many enterprise and government projects, customers prefer to commit to three-year or five-year licenses and pay the full amount upfront. However, in approximately 20% of the deals I work on, we lose opportunities because VMware only provides dollar-based pricing for the first year. When it comes to the following years, the contract requires renewals annually rather than allowing a fixed multi-year upfront payment. This approach is particularly problematic for government and public sector customers. Many of them are ready and willing to pay for three or five years in advance, but the current VMware model does not support that structure effectively. Because pricing is tied to the U.S. dollar and subject to yearly adjustments, VMware does not lock in pricing for the full term. From a customer’s perspective, this introduces uncertainty and makes procurement more complicated. Ideally, if a price is quoted—for example, $100 per year—it should remain consistent across a multi-year agreement. Customers would be comfortable committing to a five-year term if the price were fixed and predictable. Unfortunately, that flexibility is currently not available across VMware products, whether it is vSphere, VMware Tanzu solutions, or other offerings. For large enterprise environments, one-year commitments are usually not practical. Many enterprise customers prefer longer-term agreements for budgeting and procurement reasons. Even when they are willing to accept the higher cost associated with the core-based licensing model, the lack of a clear multi-year upfront option often becomes a deal-breaker.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Portable object format (POF serialization) allows objects to be serialized and deserialized between Java and .NET so the two platforms can exchange data seamlessly."

"It was suited for stock exchange marketing software, improved performance."

"In my experience, while working on customers’ solutions where performance is a key requirement, along with robustness and stability needs, I have always found Oracle Coherence as the best solution for integrating with different Oracle products and caching data for application-specific needs."

"Oracle Coherence improved site performance and the customer experience."

"Coherence has improved response times for queries of sizeable data sets, and by allowing for data distribution and replication through clustering, it improves the reliability of information systems."

"Other technologies don’t allow the same level of scale and compute capability, while providing rigorous resilience and security underpinnings."

"A single logical cache scattered across various geographies ensured we had only one cache to look against (location transparency) at the same time, ensuring high availability."

"This product helped our organization to focus on implementing business logic without worrying about scalability on user loads of huge data queries."

More Oracle Coherence pros

"Scalability is simple because it's an MPP database; if you need more processing power or you need more storage, you just add a few more nodes in the cluster, and it works on common commodity hardware, so you can use any type of server without needing proprietary hardware, making it fairly flexible."

"The stability of this solution was very good."

"I like the high throughput of 20K messages/sec, and that it supports multiple protocols."

"We evaluated a variety of message products and found that for the feature set RabbitMQ was the best."

"It stands out because it's opensource and cost effective, and it does everything pretty well."

"The solution improved our site reliability."

"The most valuable feature is asynchronous calls, which are easy to configure."

"We have been able to set up a messaging system that facilitates data integration between the software modules that we sell."

Cons

"We have nodes failing all the time, especially because of timeouts caused by node synchronization, but occasionally there are also memory-related errors."

"Price is very high - as for any Oracle product."

"Initial setup was complex. We wrote a lot of wrapper code around the Coherence libraries in order to make it easier for the developer."

"Customer service: Five out of 10."

"This platform has issues with stability and performance."

"Due to the licensing prices, we are looking for other solutions as an alternative to Coherence."

"It is very expensive. It might not work well for small business people."

"The cross-site or cross-data center replication seems slow. This can be improved."

More Oracle Coherence cons

"The product needs to focus on offering more use case documentation because browsing the internet to find it can be a process filled with struggles."

"There are a lot of areas that can be improved. The bug fixes come as many patches like a start up instead of having scheduled release with proper improvements."

"We had several de-clustering problems."

"When they are full, we might lose everything."

"If messages pile up until the space of the memory is full, then basically, the cluster goes down, and someone has to log in through the backend and purge all messages."

"I would like to see better documentation on how to set up complex webs of RabbitMQ servers — master/slave, multi-master, etc."

"I saw some limitation with respect to the column store, and removing this would be an improvement."

"It doesn't work as efficiently as we'd like because it requires more segment node capacity (size, RAM, CPU) than we currently have."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"It’s an open-source solution."

"It is an open-source product."

"are using the open-source version, which can be used free of cost."

"This is an open source solution."

"It is an open-source platform. Although, we have to pay for additional features."

"Since the tool is an open-source product, there is no need to pay anything."

"It is the best product with best fit for price/performance customer objectives."

"On a scale of one to five, with five being the most competitive pricing, I would rate this solution as a four."

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Database Development and Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

29%

Computer Software Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

15%

Construction Company

12%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	30
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	50

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Oracle Coherence?

The WebLogic Management is quite cumbersome. The initial setup is complex and time-consuming.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Oracle Coherence?

I utilize Coherence for data solutions in the financial industry. Its primary use case includes plain lookup, indexing, filtering, and aggregation.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Oracle Coherence?

I recommend Coherence, as I don't have any product issues. The main concerns are high pricing and a complex initial setup. Overall, I would rate Coherence as an eight out of ten.

See all answers

How does IBM MQ compare with VMware RabbitMQ?

IBM MQ has a great reputation behind it, and this solution is very robust with great stability. It is easy to use, simple to configure and integrates well with our enterprise ecosystem and protocol...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VMware Tanzu GemFire?

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for VMware Tanzu Data Solutions is that it is a bit expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with VMware Tanzu GemFire?

See all answers

Comparisons

Redis vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 15% of the time

GigaSpaces Smart DIH vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 10% of the time

Terracotta vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 8% of the time

IDERA ER/Studio vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 7% of the time

GridGain vs Oracle Coherence

Compared 6% of the time

More Oracle Coherence Competitors

ActiveMQ vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Exadata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Teradata vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Nutanix Database Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 4% of the time

Oracle Essbase Cloud Service vs VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Compared 3% of the time

More VMware Tanzu Data Solutions Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence

June 2026

Download Oracle Coherence product report

Buyer's Guide

VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

May 2026

Download VMware Tanzu Data Solutions product report

Also Known As

Coherence

Greenplum, Pivotal Greenplum, VMware RabbitMQ, VMware Tanzu GemFire, VMware Postgres

Overview

Oracle Coherence is a distributed cache solution designed for high-performance computing environments, providing scalability, reliability, and real-time data processing to enhance complex applications.

Oracle Coherence facilitates dynamic data management by offering extensive scalability and fault tolerance, crucial for enterprise-level applications that demand consistent real-time data access. Its architecture ensures data consistency and efficient scaling across distributed networks, making it ideal for businesses requiring seamless data integration and analytics to drive operations efficiently.

What are the key features of Oracle Coherence?

Data Grid: Ensures distributed data scalability and availability across clusters.
Real-Time Data Processing: Provides instantaneous data updates for critical tasks.
Fault Tolerance: Offers automatic data redundancy to prevent data loss.
Scalability: Facilitates horizontal scaling to accommodate growing data needs.
In-Memory Caching: Speeds up data retrieval and processing by storing data in memory.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Improved Performance: Significant enhancement in data processing speeds.
Cost Efficiency: Reduction in infrastructure costs due to optimized caching.
Seamless Integration: Compatibility with existing enterprise systems.
Enhanced Reliability: Ensures consistent uptime and data integrity.
Reduced Latency: Minimizes delays in data retrieval and usage.

Oracle Coherence is widely implemented in industries such as finance and telecommunications, where real-time data access and processing are crucial for operations. For financial services, it enables quick transaction processing and risk management, while telecommunications companies utilize it for managing large-scale subscriber data and call records efficiently.

Oracle

VMware Tanzu is a robust platform tailored for data warehousing, complex analytics, BI applications, and predictive analytics. It excels in scalability, performance, and parallel processing, enhancing data handling efficiency. Users report significant productivity improvements and streamlined operations, making it ideal for comprehensive data solutions.

Broadcom

Sample Customers

Industrial Bank of Korea, Hotelbeds, Canon Inc., Verizon, Securitas Direct Espa_a, S.A.U., CetelemEspa_aGrupo BNP Paribas, Telus

General Electric, Conversant, China CITIC Bank, Aridhia, Purdue University

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

June 2026

Free Report: Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions

Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

900,644 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Oracle Coherence vs. VMware Tanzu Data Solutions report.

See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.

We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.