Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Oracle GoldenGate vs Oracle Integration Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.9
Oracle GoldenGate enhances ROI by reducing development time, minimizing downtime, supporting disaster recovery, and saving costs for budget-conscious entities.
Sentiment score
8.3
Oracle Integration Cloud boosts ROI by shortening development cycles and reducing operational and administrative efforts through automation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle GoldenGate's customer service varies, with swift P1 issue handling but inconsistent communication and responsiveness across different regions.
Sentiment score
6.0
Oracle Integration Cloud Service support is generally knowledgeable but experiences vary, with users noting improvement needs in response times.
I find the technical support from Oracle to be good.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Oracle GoldenGate is highly scalable but faces challenges with monitoring, configuration, and high-availability deployment complexity in large enterprises.
Sentiment score
7.8
Oracle Integration Cloud scales well for medium implementations but faces constraints with large data, impacting performance and licensing cost.
It effectively manages larger databases, such as those of 15 terabytes and above.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Oracle GoldenGate is stable and reliable, with setup challenges, occasional bugs, and valued real-time replication capabilities.
Sentiment score
8.1
Oracle Integration Cloud Service is stable, with infrequent issues, and users rate its stability highly from seven to ten.
Oracle GoldenGate is quite stable.
The solution is stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Oracle GoldenGate needs enhancements in DDL replication, usability, non-Oracle integration, pricing, support, intuitive GUI, and data transformation.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service requires enhanced error analysis, documentation, B2B integration, adapters, and JSON support, while addressing file handling limits.
The configuration process could be made simpler.
The mapping is a bit complex, so configuration is not very easy for a new user.
 

Setup Cost

Oracle GoldenGate pricing is high due to core-based model, but term licenses and negotiations may reduce costs.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers flexible, scalable pricing with competitive models and discounts, appealing for enterprise integration despite higher costs.
 

Valuable Features

Oracle GoldenGate excels in data replication, real-time transformation, cross-platform support, scalability, and seamless integration with Oracle products.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service simplifies enterprise connectivity with intuitive tools, numerous adapters, and serverless setup for seamless integration.
The most valuable feature of Oracle GoldenGate is its ability to sync data in real-time, which is crucial for me.
Additionally, it provides a wide variety of built-in adapters for many cloud providers, such as Azure Blob and AWS S3.
 

Categories and Ranking

Oracle GoldenGate
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
Data Integration (8th)
Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

Oracle GoldenGate and Oracle Integration Cloud Service aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Oracle GoldenGate is designed for Data Integration and holds a mindshare of 3.6%, down 3.7% compared to last year.
Oracle Integration Cloud Service, on the other hand, focuses on Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS), holds 8.3% mindshare, down 10.5% since last year.
Data Integration
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

ShahidNadeem - PeerSpot reviewer
Handles migrations well and has reduced our downtime
For small databases that are less than a terabyte, GoldenGate handles the migration well. You don't need much input so long as the processes don't upend. As soon as there's a problem, then, obviously, you need to diagnose it. It all depends on the scenario, on the size of the databases, whether you're doing schema replication, or table replication. We normally do the whole database, taking everything across. Finally, because this is an Oracle product, there is support available 24/7.
Divya Prakash - PeerSpot reviewer
An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain
Dealing with the large file sizes has occasionally been a challenge, though we have found workarounds. But dealing with large file sizes could be easy in integrations. I have also come across schema files where headers, footers, and bodies are there, but it's not a valid schema. None of the MSCAs are defined properly. In such cases, we have to think of multiple workarounds, such as splitting or merging. But this is a standard requirement for organizations, so custom solutions should be provided. There are cases when the systems don't expect additional MSCAs, or they expect headers, footers, or tags with different values. But this is not a proper XML. So if we are dealing with XML conversions, mapping, and integrations, we have to do some custom work. These are solutions that Oracle can provide.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Comparison Review

it_user99375 - PeerSpot reviewer
Mar 31, 2014
Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Active Dataguard
As an Oracle DBA, while working upon high availability of your database you may stumble upon various Oracle strategic capabilities that fall into categories of Oracle Replication. Oracle provides various technologies for replication like GoldenGate, streams, and Active Dataguard. Replication…
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
22%
Computer Software Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Educational Organization
44%
Computer Software Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Oracle GoldenGate?
The product is reliable for data integrity.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle GoldenGate?
The pricing of Oracle GoldenGate is quite high. However, its cost-effectiveness stems from its unique features that are not commonly available in other products. Still, it is not cheap, and I would...
What needs improvement with Oracle GoldenGate?
There is room for improvement in Oracle GoldenGate's pricing, which is a bit high. Additionally, the configuration process could be made simpler. Although it serves well, these aspects could be imp...
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
It is not really a high price for the value it gives. However, when you start doing the customization, it’s a bit expensive because I need to start provisioning other services before deployment. So...
 

Also Known As

GoldenGate
Oracle ICS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Japan Exchange Group, Daewoo E&C, Herbalife, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, Canon, Turk Telekom
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Find out what your peers are saying about Oracle GoldenGate vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: May 2023.
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.