Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs Oracle Integration Cloud Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 17, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure Logic Apps
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
8.1
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Integration Cloud Se...
Ranking in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
4th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
37
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is 15.7%, up from 13.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is 7.9%, down from 10.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)
 

Featured Reviews

Ritu-Raj - PeerSpot reviewer
Influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent
I have worked on multiple platforms in this space, like MuleSoft, Oracle, Intel, Microsoft, and Dell Boomi. However, Azure Logic Apps is the easiest and most transparent in terms of its operations, licensing cost, and scaling. Being in Azure, the use of the Azure ecosystem becomes quite native with Logic Apps.
Divya Prakash - PeerSpot reviewer
An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain
Dealing with the large file sizes has occasionally been a challenge, though we have found workarounds. But dealing with large file sizes could be easy in integrations. I have also come across schema files where headers, footers, and bodies are there, but it's not a valid schema. None of the MSCAs are defined properly. In such cases, we have to think of multiple workarounds, such as splitting or merging. But this is a standard requirement for organizations, so custom solutions should be provided. There are cases when the systems don't expect additional MSCAs, or they expect headers, footers, or tags with different values. But this is not a proper XML. So if we are dealing with XML conversions, mapping, and integrations, we have to do some custom work. These are solutions that Oracle can provide.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The tool’s biggest benefit is the access we have to other Azure products."
"Connectors are very useful for streamlining data integration tasks."
"It's easy to use, and it's stable."
"We can write external features and transfer the data using JPIMs securely which has been most valuable."
"What I found most valuable in Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is that you can run a workflow or do a high-level process orchestration, then you can call the other function and fulfill the process. For example, if you want to update a customer, you first need to get the customer's phone number and simulate the steps of the process, then Microsoft Azure Logic Apps can orchestrate that process."
"Azure Logic Apps has influenced cost savings by approximately seventy to eighty percent in many cases and is generally 30% to 40% cheaper than any comparable services in this space."
"Its integration capabilities are great, allowing connectivity with various applications and services."
"The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is the many available connectors that make automation easy. Additionally, the security of the solution is good."
"Provides various ways to secure services as well as providing extensive support."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The solution is scalable."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors."
"There are many functionalities. Fundamentally, it provides all the ready-to-use services for consumption between SaaS and other applications."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"Technical support responds quickly."
 

Cons

"There could be custom code for the product's components."
"I find the current interface useful, but I could see how others would want the UI bits that are used for creating Logic Apps to be simplified."
"It can be a bit challenging to use."
"The product should integrate more APIs"
"The visual tool that is used to build integration is quite old."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB."
"The scalability could be improved."
"Pricing and handling asynchronous processes are the two main areas that need improvement."
"In designer mode, sometimes the browser closure or other unknown issues can cause strange behavior, which requires a restart."
"The error retrying mechanism could be improved. If an error occurs, it can be retried automatically, it would be helpful."
"Lacks features for more complex integrations."
"Configurable timeouts on each connection would be good."
"Sometimes, the tech support is slow to get back to us. We have had to wait up to two weeks for a response."
"The solution's customer service could be better."
"There are a few features that we noticed are not in the cloud. There are some improvements needed. One example is the graphical user interface that needs to improve, it could be easier to use."
"Now the platform is not built in a way that you can define."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is cheaper because, compared to other services, Azure services are much cheaper and affordable."
"The cost of the solution could be cheaper."
"If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side."
"The pricing is not expensive."
"In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution."
"It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use."
"Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved."
"The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range."
"Pricing is not on the economic side since it is a tool for enterprise-sized companies."
"The price is cheaper than all other cloud integration providers."
"The solution is less expensive than other products."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is reasonable to start with, but when you scale it becomes expensive."
"Oracle uses a universal credit model for OCI. Clients commit to an annual budget and can choose which products to use and build during their contract period. Billing is based on consumption - you're only billed for the products you use."
"The solution is cost-effective."
"The price of Oracle Integration Cloud Service is good. It is reasonable and is priced well for the market segment. The model they use is on a per-package unit and we have a two-year subscription."
"The price is fair."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions are best for your needs.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
27%
Computer Software Company
10%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Educational Organization
37%
Computer Software Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
The solution's most valuable feature is the no-code/low-code feature.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps?
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB. Additionally, I have concerns about disaster recovery ...
What's the difference between Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI)?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service has a fairly easy initial setup, and Oracle offers initial support and guidance for those who might find the setup to be challenging. There are complications that c...
What do you like most about Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
Oracle Integration Cloud Service offers a lot of adaptors.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Integration Cloud Service?
It is not really a high price for the value it gives. However, when you start doing the customization, it’s a bit expensive because I need to start provisioning other services before deployment. So...
 

Also Known As

Azure Logic Apps, MS Azure Logic Apps
Oracle ICS
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

nord lock, mission linen supply, esmart systems
Calix, Avaya, Land Lakes, Leader, PWC, Vale
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure Logic Apps vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
851,604 professionals have used our research since 2012.