Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.
The pricing is very clean and transparent. You can start small and pay only for what you use. There are no upfront licensing costs or contracts you are bound to.
Monitoring Architect at Az IdomSoft Informatikai Zrt
Real User
Top 10
Oct 18, 2024
Logic Apps is free to use, though there may be costs associated with additional data storage or overuse of emails, which could require additional services.
In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution. A few of my projects got delayed because of the charges. The pricing depends on whether an organization can handle all the costs because the tool has a pay-as-you-go policy. Whatever you use and the complex integration you create should be chargeable based on their iteration.
The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a consumption-based pricing model, but now Microsoft offers a standard tier. Microsoft encourages users to migrate from the consumption model to the standard one by 2025. The pricing is a monthly fixed cost, depending on your usage needs.
Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where ten points mean a very expensive solution.
The product is quite cheap. However, when the use cases get bigger, it gets more costly. We would need to have our own server in the background at some point, which would be very costly. It’s cheap if the use cases are low.
The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range. It's not like Oracle, where there's a separate application. When you purchase Azure, you get all the features included. Most of the time, you get a good rate. It's not cheap, but it's also not costly. I would rate it seven out of ten.
Owner & Senior Azure Developer at a tech services company with 1-10 employees
Real User
Jan 20, 2023
The solution is serverless, so you only pay for what you use. It could be the case that the first 10,000 or so instances are free, so you only pay if you use it a lot. Then, if you do use it a lot, yeah, well, it depends on your use. If you're processing large files, and you're doing a million a day, you are going to pay quite a lot. If you are processing a hundred emails a month, you are paying nothing.
It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use.
Pricing is relative. If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side.
Solution Architect at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
Jan 6, 2021
The licensing structure is not complex. The cost of the solution could be cheaper. For example, if you're doing a cost savings of $30,000 per year, but you are implementing a service, which is going to cost close to that range, then there might be better options. What is the point in implementing a solution which is going to costs you that much? I would rather invest in something that is going to give a broader gain.
Regarding the cost, I find Microsoft Azure Logic Apps to be reasonable; it is not expensive.
Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others. Pricing is dynamic, based on scalability and usage. It is comparable to IBM MQ in cost.
The pricing is very clean and transparent. You can start small and pay only for what you use. There are no upfront licensing costs or contracts you are bound to.
Logic Apps is free to use, though there may be costs associated with additional data storage or overuse of emails, which could require additional services.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is a little bit expensive, and that is why you use it only for certain types of scenarios.
Compared to the prices of Mulesoft, the price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is low.
The product pricing aligns well with the value and capabilities offered by Azure services.
I would rate the pricing a six out of ten.
In my experience, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is not a cheap solution. A few of my projects got delayed because of the charges. The pricing depends on whether an organization can handle all the costs because the tool has a pay-as-you-go policy. Whatever you use and the complex integration you create should be chargeable based on their iteration.
The tool's cost can vary depending on your specific use case. Generally, it's considered cheaper, but the price depends on how much you use it and which features you need. Initially, there was a consumption-based pricing model, but now Microsoft offers a standard tier. Microsoft encourages users to migrate from the consumption model to the standard one by 2025. The pricing is a monthly fixed cost, depending on your usage needs.
If we have P1 and P2 subscriptions, Microsoft will not charge us for creating applications on the Azure portal.
Logic Apps is cheap with its pay-as-you-go model. We only pay for usage time, no license fees. So Logic Apps is good in that aspect. I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where ten points mean a very expensive solution.
The product is expensive. It has a pay-as-go model. If the consumption is high, it will cost more. The billing depends on consumption.
The product is quite cheap. However, when the use cases get bigger, it gets more costly. We would need to have our own server in the background at some point, which would be very costly. It’s cheap if the use cases are low.
I rate Microsoft Azure Logic Apps's pricing a seven out of ten.
We used this solution for one or two projects, but it cost a lot. Very expensive.
The pricing is not expensive. I would say it's quite reasonable and average. It's on a yearly basis. Our client has a yearly licensing.
The pricing is okay. It's not highly priced. It's in the medium range. It's not like Oracle, where there's a separate application. When you purchase Azure, you get all the features included. Most of the time, you get a good rate. It's not cheap, but it's also not costly. I would rate it seven out of ten.
The product is not cheap. I would rate the product's pricing a five out of ten.
Licensing costs are paid monthly or annually and I believe they are reasonable. The cost is dependent on the connectors.
The solution is serverless, so you only pay for what you use. It could be the case that the first 10,000 or so instances are free, so you only pay if you use it a lot. Then, if you do use it a lot, yeah, well, it depends on your use. If you're processing large files, and you're doing a million a day, you are going to pay quite a lot. If you are processing a hundred emails a month, you are paying nothing.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps could be costly if a user isn't careful. The costs associated with the solution could still be improved.
The price of Microsoft Azure Logic Apps is inexpensive.
It's very cheap, but it comes with pluses and minuses. The positive thing is that it's very cheap, but on the other hand, it's extremely hard to tell how much it will cost. At the start of the project, it's almost impossible to tell how many times you will be calling some kind of Logic App function. You cannot state how much of the internet transfer you will use or how much data your will use.
Pricing is relative. If we are comparing to other public cloud vendors, such as Amazon or Google Cloud platform, I wouldn't say that it's expensive. However, when we're comparing between a host such as GoDaddy or Digital Ocean, then it's a bit on the expensive side.
The licensing structure is not complex. The cost of the solution could be cheaper. For example, if you're doing a cost savings of $30,000 per year, but you are implementing a service, which is going to cost close to that range, then there might be better options. What is the point in implementing a solution which is going to costs you that much? I would rather invest in something that is going to give a broader gain.