webMethods.io and Microsoft Azure Logic Apps are both prominent players in the integration platform as a service (iPaaS) market. webMethods.io seems to have the upper hand in affordability and ease of deployment, while Microsoft Azure Logic Apps excels in feature richness and scalability.
Features: webMethods.io is praised for its extensive connector libraries, ease of integration, and user-friendly configurations. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps stands out for its seamless integration with other Microsoft services, robust workflow automation features, and a broader suite of tools.
Room for Improvement: webMethods.io could enhance its debugging capabilities, offer more detailed documentation, and improve technical support. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs improvements in support response times, simplification of certain features, and reducing the complexity of its deployment process.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: webMethods.io is highlighted for its straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps provides a more complex deployment experience but benefits from robust customer support due to Microsoft's extensive resources.
Pricing and ROI: webMethods.io users report positive experiences with affordability and clear ROI, appreciating its value for money. Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, while more expensive, is deemed worthwhile for its extensive functionality and integrations.
You can't generalize it because it depends on how many connectors you use, how many workflows you build, what scalability is required, and the amount of data to be ingested.
It is easy to reach out to Microsoft for support if needed.
The support is good, with multiple options like developer support and 24x7 support.
It's just clicks away, and you can also set it up as auto-scaling.
Whenever more resources are needed, they become available automatically without any human interference.
Vertically, scalability is fine, however, I have not expanded horizontally with the product yet.
I have never seen it misperforming.
We have had it implemented for two years without issues.
We provide support to our clients, and the minimum calls I receive are for webMethods.io; it's very stable.
There are some issues like the tool hanging or the need for additional jars when exposing web services.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps needs further development in consistency and durability, particularly for handling larger data volumes beyond 1 MB.
The business rules engine is still not fully developed, and it would be very helpful to see improvements here.
Another enhancement would be in OCR; currently, there is a huge demand for OCR capabilities. It would be perfect if webMethods.io had a built-in component for OCR, as this would be tested and allow customers to use it better than a third-party OCR application.
A special discount of at least 50% for old customers would allow us to expand our services and request more resources.
There are no upfront licensing costs or contracts you are bound to.
Microsoft provides a reliable solution, but it is considered expensive compared to others.
Regarding the pricing and licensing of webMethods.io, I don't think it's expensive when compared with the features.
The workflow in Logic Apps enables integrating multiple applications.
Microsoft Azure Logic Apps has many features that are beneficial for workflow automation, such as running automation tasks and facilitating communication between different interfaces.
It facilitates the exposure of around 235 services through our platform to feed various government entities across the entire country.
I believe data transformation is exceptional in webMethods.io because they have an online database that can cache the database online.
Connect your business-critical apps and services with Azure Logic Apps, automating your workflows without writing a single line of code.
webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
