Palo Alto Networks WildFire vs Stormshield Network Security comparison

The compared Palo Alto Networks and Stormshield solutions aren't in the same category. Palo Alto Networks is ranked #1 in ATP , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 7.0% mindshare in the category. Stormshield is ranked #14 in UTMU , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Palo Alto Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of Stormshield users who would recommend it.

Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Read 72 Palo Alto Networks WildFire reviews

11,292 Views
4,743 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Stormshield Network Security

Read 18 Stormshield Network Security reviews

3,755 Views
1,727 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Stormshield Network Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Palo Alto Networks WildFire and Stormshield Network Security based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, Microsoft and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP).

To learn more, read our detailed Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 908,834 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (1st)

Stormshield Network Security

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Unified Threat Management (UTM) (14th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. Palo Alto Networks WildFire is designed for Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) and holds a mindshare of 7.0%, down 10.8% compared to last year.
Stormshield Network Security, on the other hand, focuses on Unified Threat Management (UTM), holds 3.7% mindshare, up 3.7% since last year.

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Palo Alto Networks WildFire	7.0%
Microsoft Defender for Office 365	6.4%
Microsoft Defender for Endpoint	5.8%
Other	80.8%

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

Unified Threat Management (UTM) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Stormshield Network Security	3.7%
Fortinet FortiGate	22.8%
Sophos UTM	10.0%
Other	63.5%

Unified Threat Management (UTM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2695164

IT Security Specialist at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Advanced threat detection has protected critical document workflows and checks suspicious files

I would say the setup and putting together the hierarchy within the devices was not straightforward. There were many reboots and reconfigurations while the optimal setup was established. However, we were happy with the device. The setup process could be easier to establish the cluster. It should be easier to establish the Palo Alto Networks WildFire cluster between the devices. We had some difficulty with it, but it was not catastrophic. The operation and usability itself is what I was happy with.

Read full review

Zsolt Jónás

System Administrator at NaxoNet

Advanced GUI and layered security have supported compliance and simplified intrusion prevention

I haven't had a task that I couldn't solve with Stormshield Network Security. The active-active high availability solution would be beneficial because currently, if you build a high availability solution with Stormshield Network Security, you have a main device and another one is a backup device. The HA can switch between them, but it would be good to have a master-master solution, not just a master-slave one. I could set a URL that I can call to update the DNS record. Currently, Stormshield Network Security devices support DynDNS, which is not a usual feature request from a server environment. I have my own solution instead of DynDNS because I don't prefer it, so I have my own service for that. However, the GUI does not support using a custom service instead of DynDNS. I had to solve it in the console on Stormshield Network Security device, but it would be much better if it was reachable on the GUI. I had to figure out a trick for the IPsec configuration. In the IPsec config, we have to provide the remote side's IP address, but it's always changing. This means that an office, for example a company that has an office but without a fixed IP address, cannot be used with IPsec VPN.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In this case, the Palo Alto Networks WildFire capability is very important and I would say very impressive."

"The reporting feature helps our performance."

"There are multiple features like management, intrusion prevention (IPS), URL filtering, anti-spam, and antivirus."

"Being an application-based firewall, this is one of the critical focus factors along with the threat prevention services it provides."

"It is stable and pretty much scalable."

"The platform's most valuable feature is its seamless automation within the broader Palo Alto ecosystem."

"The product is the best."

"Installing this product as a datacenter firewall for segregation and segmentation, and also configuring policies between zones has improved my organization."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire pros

"The StormShield solution has enabled us to fully implement best practices from Microsoft in the cloud : the hub and spoke architecture."

"Stormshield is pretty robust, compared to other products like Fortinet, as you get more security with Stormshield and spend less money."

"The most valuable features are the IPS, the firewall function, and the price."

"The solution has improved my organization because I can see what traffic is happening and I can use it to block and prevent attacks."

"Ease of use is the best feature of the product."

"Easily manageable in a variety of environments."

"The performance of this solution is good."

"I feel we have more options with the Stormshield firewall and new features that we haven't previously had."

More Stormshield Network Security pros

Cons

"As a firewall and 360 degrees of security, there needs to be more maturity."

"The VPN and decryption need improvement."

"The system performance degrades after the solution has been deployed for some time. The data that it gives us becomes a little bit slow. When you try to get some data for troubleshooting, it seems like it's working hard to extract that data."

"The price could be better."

"The price of WildFire should be reduced in order to make it more affordable for our customers."

"When you contact support, there is no guarantee that they will be available to help you tackle the issue that you are facing."

"In terms of what I'd like to see in the next release of Palo Alto Networks WildFire, each release is based on malware that has been identified. The key problem is an average of six months from the time malware is written to the time it's discovered and a signature is created for it. The only advice that I can give is for them to shorten that timeframe. I don't know how they would do it, but if they shorten that, for example, cut it in half, they'll make themselves more famous."

"Palo Alto limits the files submitted per day."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire cons

"The pricing is increasing, and I would say it is a bit expensive."

"Support is always an issue because they're constantly busy."

"An application firewall like other next generation firewalls have."

"The filtering configuration could be better. We have some difficulties with the filtering configuration and the filter extension."

"Stormshield Network Security is quite expensive."

"The main area of this product that has room for improvement is pricing. Stormshield Network Security is quite expensive."

"This solution has a big problem with web filtering and it needs to be improved."

"Being more cost effective. I went with a pair of Watchguard M300 recently when buying a new firewall cluster for our own use because it was way cheaper than NetASQ/Stormshield N700 while being faster, and it offers true multi-master firewall clustering if needed."

More Stormshield Network Security cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is a bit expensive. You pay for security."

"Setup costs and licensing for WildFire are comparable to other enterprise solutions."

"It's not particularly cheap, but it is absolutely worth it."

"It's pretty expensive but with respect to value for money, it's okay."

"It is a reasonable price compared to other solutions on the market."

"This solution is very pricey and it depends on the package that you implement."

"The physical appliance is around €3,000 or €4,000, and then, you have the licensing for a year for around €3,000."

"The licensing fees are on an annual basis, and there are no costs in addition to the standard fees."

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire pricing and cost advice

"The pricing could be better."

"For mid-sized companies, they sell their appliances for good prices."

"The price of this solution and the price of support are ok."

"I think the price is good."

"We chose Stormshield for its price, as the Azure firewall was too expensive."

"We bought a three-year license, and we renew it whenever it expires. The price could be better. It's always very expensive."

"The SN200 series costs between $500 USD and $600 USD per year, whereas the SN700 series costs approximately $1,000 annually."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user206346

Security Consultant at Webernetz.net - Network Security Consulting

Mar 11, 2015

Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto Networks

Cisco ASA vs. Palo Alto: Management Goodies You often have comparisons of both firewalls concerning security components. Of course, a firewall must block attacks, scan for viruses, build VPNs, etc. However, in this post I am discussing the advantages and disadvantages from both vendors concerning…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

11%

Comms Service Provider

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

Comms Service Provider

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	38
Midsize Enterprise	15
Large Enterprise	29

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	11
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

Questions from the Community

How does Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall compare with Palo Alto Networks Wildfire?

The Cisco Firepower NGFW Firewall is a very powerful and very complex piece of anti-viral software. When one considers that fact, it is all the more impressive that the setup is a fairly straightf...

See all answers

Which is better - Wildfire or FortiGate?

FortiGate has a lot going for it and I consider it to be the best, most user-friendly firewall out there. What I like the most about it is that it has an attractive web dashboard with very easy nav...

See all answers

How does Cisco ASA Firewall compare with Palo Alto's WildFire?

When looking to change our ASA Firewall, we looked into Palo Alto’s WildFire. It works especially in preventing advanced malware and zero-day exploits with real-time intelligence. The sandbox featu...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Stormshield Network Security?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Stormshield Network Security?

I already use Stormshield Network Security, and I am now looking for a new solution. I am already working with Stormshield Network Security, and the official reseller of Stormshield.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Stormshield Network Security?

The pricing is increasing, and I would say it is a bit expensive. Palo Alto and others are much more expensive, but Stormshield Network Security is also not inexpensive. My overall review rating fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

Cisco Secure Firewall vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 29% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiSandbox vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 5% of the time

Check Point SandBlast Network vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 5% of the time

NetWitness Platform vs Palo Alto Networks WildFire

Compared 3% of the time

More Palo Alto Networks WildFire Competitors

Fortinet FortiGate vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 17% of the time

Netgate pfSense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 11% of the time

Sophos UTM vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 9% of the time

OPNsense vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 5% of the time

Cisco Meraki MX vs Stormshield Network Security

Compared 2% of the time

More Stormshield Network Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Palo Alto Networks WildFire

July 2026

Download Palo Alto Networks WildFire product report

Buyer's Guide

Stormshield Network Security

July 2026

Download Stormshield Network Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

NETASQ Firewalls

Overview

Palo Alto Networks WildFire provides robust threat prevention with emphasis on automated malware detection and real-time security updates. Seamless integration and intuitive deployment enhance its ability to protect environments effectively, addressing advanced threat scenarios.

Palo Alto Networks WildFire is recognized for its threat detection capabilities, offering automated analysis of emails and effective malware response. The integration with Palo Alto's ecosystem ensures users benefit from seamless operations while safeguarding on-premise and cloud infrastructures. It supports VPN, URL filtering, and user identification with a focus on reducing manual intervention. Users note its complexity and high pricing but appreciate the efficient deployment once configured. Integration with third-party systems requires attention, but it remains vital for those requiring advanced network security measures.

What are the key features of Palo Alto Networks WildFire?

Threat Prevention: Detects and mitigates malware threats in real-time.
Automated Analysis: Analyzes potential threats in emails swiftly and accurately.
Sandboxing: Provides a controlled environment to test unknown files safely.
Seamless Integration: Integrates smoothly within the Palo Alto ecosystem.
Real-Time Updates: Delivers effective threat intelligence continuously.

What benefits should users consider for ROI?

Ease of Deployment: Simplifies setup processes, minimizing time spent on installation.
Network Security: Enhances protection and reduces vulnerabilities effectively.
Operational Efficiency: Limits manual processes, allowing for focus on critical tasks.
Comprehensive Intelligence: Offers detailed insights into threat activities swiftly.

Industries like banking leverage Palo Alto Networks WildFire for securing infrastructure against zero-day threats and cyber-attacks. It is widely used for scanning files and emails, ensuring malicious activity is prevented. Integrated with firewalls, WildFire strengthens cybersecurity frameworks, protecting organizations from evolving security challenges.

Palo Alto Networks

Stormshield Network Security offers comprehensive protection with features like backup inspection, scalable interface, and load balancing, suitable for network security management.

Stormshield Network Security is designed for organizations requiring reliable IT infrastructure protection, providing firewall capabilities, intrusion detection, and application control. Users find VPN support, URL filtering, and UTM functions beneficial for network management. Models like SN200 and SN910 are used globally in clustered configurations, addressing different demands. Challenges include pricing, interface friendliness, filtering configurations, and technical support.

What are the key features of Stormshield Network Security?

Backup Inspection: Enhances reliability and recovery options.
Antivirus Controls: Provides robust virus protection.
Intrusion Detection: Alerts on potential threats.
Load Balancing: Distributes network traffic efficiently.
URL Filtering: Blocks malicious websites for safe browsing.

What benefits should users seek in reviews?

Scalability: Adapts to each organization's growing needs.
Reliability: Supports clustered configurations for uptime.
Management Ease: Intuitive dashboard aids network oversight.
Performance: High throughput with efficient clustering.

Stormshield Network Security is widely implemented in industries needing IT infrastructure protection, like finance or healthcare. Organizations deploy it in data centers or branch offices, benefiting from features ensuring safety and performance. The tool supports environments that demand high security levels and robust network monitoring.

Stormshield

Sample Customers

Novamedia, Nexon Asia Pacific, Lenovo, Samsonite, IOOF, Sinogrid, SanDisk Corporation

ACESUR group, Ministry of Education Oman, Anios Laboratories, Zain, DLM Location

Buyer's Guide

Advanced Threat Protection (ATP)

July 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Palo Alto Networks, Proofpoint, Microsoft and others in Advanced Threat Protection (ATP). Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

908,834 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.