Pantheon vs Vercel comparison

"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."

"The product allows users to create multiple development environments."

"The solution's most valuable features are its response time and performance."

"I like Vercel because it is very easy to use and deploy. Unlike Firebase, which can be complex to understand, Vercel is straightforward. It also allows you to easily enable analytics, check page speed, and manage SEO meta tags. You can also share the deployment directly. The solution is also beginner-friendly."

"I think the speed of the tool is good."

"It is easy to learn. If you want to deploy your site, it's easy to do."

"It is pretty stable. I haven't found any bugs."

"It provides continuous integration and continuous deployment capabilities."

"The solution's most valuable features are its response time and performance."

"Vercel provides a better user experience and easier deployment than other platforms."

"The Multidev environment is very costly compared to other tools like AWS and GCP."

"Pantheon has the most valuable workflow model."

"The tool could have some built-in support for a wide variety of frameworks. I have seen that the tool is majorly biased towards Next.js because it is one of Vercel's products."

"Due to RBI guidelines, we're facing issues with billing in India. Credit card payments often get declined even when we try to pay from the backend. Another problem is paying 20 dollars for each new project, even under one account. This seems odd since we already pay for one project with multiple hosts."

"If I could add a feature to Vercel to make my life easier, I would add a user journey feature for new users. This would guide them with tips on exploring the platform, showing them the routes for deployment and functions they can use. This way, users can understand all the features without upgrading to premium to see their benefits."

"Vercel cannot handle big projects like shopping applications."

"Vercel fails to provide a database to its users, making it in an area where improvements are required."

"Initially, Vercel was great for hosting projects built with frameworks like Next.js or React.js, with NPM or Node.js as the backend. Now, they seem to be expanding into offering templates and ready-made front-end and back-end setups, making it possible to host a website without writing any code. Personally, I don't like this shift because it reduces scalability and the ability to create unique, customized experiences. Code is essential, and moving towards more user-friendly, code-free tools might limit deeper development possibilities."

"I've been using the solution for a while now, and while I haven't encountered major issues, there is room for improvement. The main problem I've noticed is with the error logs. They often lack information and only indicate that a file is missing without specifying the actual cause of the error. This makes troubleshooting difficult, as running the app locally might show the error in the console, but on Vercel, it just crashes without providing useful details."

"What I could feel is that it should have some work for when we commit some type of error."

"The platform has reasonable pricing compared to other systems."

"Vercel is a bit costlier than other solutions like AWS."

"For most use cases requiring a small amount of storage, Vercel has a storage cap. Once you exceed that, they charge a nominal amount. I don’t think the storage is insufficient; you can use it for a long time."

"If I cross the free version, I have heard from some people that the billing can be expensive."

"I use the solution's free version."

"The tool's billing allows 200 deployments per day, but if you want to do more work with the solution, you can opt for the pro plan offered by the tool."

"Vercel is basically free. It's free of cost for new developers."

"The solution is expensive for React projects."

"It's quite expensive for enterprise use, but it's worth the price."