Parasoft SOAtest vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,550 Views
2,130 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Testim compete in the software testing tool space. Parasoft SOAtest shines with its pricing and strong customer support, while Testim stands out with advanced features, making it a preferred choice despite a higher cost.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest excels in API and web service testing, supporting diverse protocols and allowing extensive customization without scripting. Its integration with tools like Jenkins is highly valued. Testim is known for its AI-driven automation and simple user interface, enabling easy creation of scalable tests. Its record and playback capabilities make it user-friendly for those with limited coding knowledge.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance cloud deployment options and reduce the initial setup time. Its scripting environment, although versatile, might be daunting for beginners. Testim could focus on expanding customer support and provide more customization options. It should also address occasional issues with test stability due to its reliance on AI-driven processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest offers an on-premises deployment model, which requires more time to set up, offset by excellent customer support. Testim's cloud-based model allows for quicker integration and frequent updates, although it has limited support options compared to Parasoft.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest demands higher initial costs but delivers ROI via its extensive capabilities. Testim might have higher ongoing costs due to the cloud model, promising ROI through efficiency and time savings. The difference lies in Parasoft's higher upfront cost compensated by capabilities, contrasted with Testim's operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim Report (Updated: April 2026).

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 893,221 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

14th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), API Testing Tools (9th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

13th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

11th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 2.5%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 2.3%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Testim	2.3%
Parasoft SOAtest	2.5%
Other	95.2%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Utilizing features that support Data Driven testing and E2E has increased efficiencies drastically."

"As a test consultant, I have been able to deliver high quality automated testing solutions to our clients using SOAtest in a quick manner."

"If you want something that’s not provided out of the box, then you can write it yourself and integrate it with SOAtest."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Automatic testing is the most valuable feature."

"Technical support is helpful."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"Parasoft is a bundle of tools like FTP, Database, Web services, and Java, and with just one click I can access any of these utilities, which is currently saving lots of my time."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The Testim technical support is very responsive and worked with a specific team member on the First Databank side to answer hard technical questions and took enhancement requests as needed."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The product is easy to use."

"It enabled us to cover our app in end-to-end tests very quickly with quality results."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

More Testim pros

Cons

"During the process of working with SOAtest and building test cases, the .TST files will grow. A negative side effect is that saving your changes takes more time."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"From an automation point of view, it should have better clarity and be more user friendly."

"Sadly, almost everything needs improving."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

"Yes, there were few issues, that caused the Memory out, but was resolved."

"Enabling/disabling an optional element of an XML request is only possible if a data source (e.g., Excel sheet) is connected to the test. Otherwise, the option is not available at all in the drop-down menu."

"We have good support of our solution architect of Parasoft, but sometimes they don’t know all the answers and then it’s harder to find more knowledge in technical support from US teams, which slows things down."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,221 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Computer Software Company

University

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

What is your primary use case for Testim?

As a Quality Engineering leader, I'm responsible for testing our 20-25 applications. Manual testing is becoming increasingly challenging due to their growing scope and complexity. We've been automa...

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Comparisons

Compared 7% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 6% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI Test vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 5% of the time

ReadyAPI vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 4% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 12% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 9% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 5% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs Testim

Compared 2% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Parasoft SOAtest

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest is a robust tool for automating test scenarios, supporting a range of interfaces and protocols, making it ideal for comprehensive service testing. Its adaptability in complex environments provides extensive testing capabilities for UI and API automation.

Parasoft SOAtest offers a comprehensive suite of features designed for the efficient setup of functional tests, emphasizing ease in data-driven scenarios and thorough automation. Supporting key protocols like SOAP and REST, alongside UI recording, it integrates seamlessly with Jenkins and GitHub, adding service virtualization for enhanced end-to-end testing. Users benefit from its extensibility through custom scripts, allowing broad API and web service testing. However, there are challenges in user-friendliness, with the graphical interface requiring improvements. Reporting features need enhanced clarity and customization options. Limited cryptography support and documentation necessitate improvement. Performance issues and high pricing are noted drawbacks, but its use in banking and quality enhancement demonstrates significant potential.

What are the key features of Parasoft SOAtest?

Rapid functional test setup: Streamlines the creation of test scenarios efficiently.
Data-driven testing: Enables easy configuration with different datasets.
Extensive automation: Facilitates comprehensive testing for APIs and UIs.
Protocol support: Integrates SOAP, REST, JSON, SAP RFC functionalities.
Service virtualization: Enhances testing across complex system architectures.

What benefits and ROI should users expect?

Improved testing efficiency: Reduces manual testing efforts significantly.
Enhanced quality assurance: Elevates application reliability and performance.
Integration capabilities: Coordinates well with Jenkins and GitHub for streamlined processes.
Comprehensive testing: Provides thorough coverage for APIs and web services.

Implementing Parasoft SOAtest in industries like banking allows automation of regression tests for web services in SOA architectures, supporting protocols such as ISO 8583. Companies use it to transition from manual testing to automation, integrating JSON and XML, facilitating improved application quality.

Parasoft

Testim offers a comprehensive automation testing toolkit with features like smart locators and AI functionality. It supports developers and QA teams in managing testing across environments efficiently, even with UI changes.

Testim is designed for automation testing with robust features such as record and playback capabilities, a smart locator system, and a reliable algorithm to maintain stability during UI modifications. Its pre-defined tests, customizable JS testing, and accessibility features improve usability. Organizations benefit from its REST API, CLI, and shared steps, alongside AI advancements that simplify test storage and accelerate delivery times. Despite its strengths, users seek improvements in pricing, visual testing, and element selection tools, with calls for enhanced mobile app support and better report features. Multiple test runs may cause stability issues, leaving room for enhanced API integrations and more detailed documentation.

What are Testim's most important features?

Record and Playback: Simplifies test creation with easy-to-use recording tools
Smart Locator: Maintains test accuracy despite UI changes
Accessible Pre-defined Tests: Offers templates for quicker setup
AI Functionality: Enhances test case management and delivery
REST API and CLI: Facilitates integration into development workflows

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Efficiency: Speeds up testing processes and script automation
Usability: Intuitive interface supports both technical and non-technical users
Flexibility: Adapts to diverse web platforms and applications
Collaboration: Enhances teamwork by sharing steps across projects

Industries primarily employ Testim for automating business end-to-end tests, integrating it within complicated applications. It serves both developers and QA teams by supporting web app testing, API calls, accessibility checks, and JavaScript-focused test data. This low-code platform suits team members with varying technical expertise, adding efficiency to QA and development processes.

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim