Parasoft SOAtest vs Testim comparison

Read 10 Testim reviews

2,827 Views
1,555 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Parasoft SOAtest

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Parasoft SOAtest and Testim compete in the software testing tool space. Parasoft SOAtest shines with its pricing and strong customer support, while Testim stands out with advanced features, making it a preferred choice despite a higher cost.

Features: Parasoft SOAtest excels in API and web service testing, supporting diverse protocols and allowing extensive customization without scripting. Its integration with tools like Jenkins is highly valued. Testim is known for its AI-driven automation and simple user interface, enabling easy creation of scalable tests. Its record and playback capabilities make it user-friendly for those with limited coding knowledge.

Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest could enhance cloud deployment options and reduce the initial setup time. Its scripting environment, although versatile, might be daunting for beginners. Testim could focus on expanding customer support and provide more customization options. It should also address occasional issues with test stability due to its reliance on AI-driven processes.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest offers an on-premises deployment model, which requires more time to set up, offset by excellent customer support. Testim's cloud-based model allows for quicker integration and frequent updates, although it has limited support options compared to Parasoft.

Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest demands higher initial costs but delivers ROI via its extensive capabilities. Testim might have higher ongoing costs due to the cloud model, promising ROI through efficiency and time savings. The difference lies in Parasoft's higher upfront cost compensated by capabilities, contrasted with Testim's operational efficiency.

To learn more, read our detailed Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim Report (Updated: January 2026).

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Parasoft SOAtest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

16th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

15th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (20th), API Testing Tools (10th)

Testim

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

11th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Parasoft SOAtest is 1.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Testim is 3.0%, up from 2.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Testim	3.0%
Parasoft SOAtest	1.7%
Other	95.3%

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

reviewer2772063

Quality Specialist 2A at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Has reduced manual testing effort with customization options but occasionally crashes during complex executions

One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it. We can add more customized tools, and reporting can be enhanced. Currently, the reporting part is at a step level, and it does not give details for a particular test case, so improvements in those areas would be beneficial. There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes. I have encountered stability and performance issues with it.

Read full review

Jyoti Mittal

Director - Quality Engineering at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees

Smart locators and small learning curve streamline test automation, minimizing maintenance and boosting efficiency.

Testim has a specific feature called a smart locator. Anyone experienced in test automation knows this is one of the most complex parts of developing automated scripts. The Testim feature automatically finds the locators, which helps us build stable test scripts. Stable scripts are crucial for receiving faster and more reliable feedback. I have also seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We can automate our scenarios in a data driven format, which shows there is no rework on scripts. We only need to update the test data and run for a number of scenarios."

"Good write and read files which save execution inputs and outputs and can be stored locally."

"We have seen a return on investment."

"The testing time is shortened because we generate test data automatically with SOAtest."

"The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts, integrate with different languages, and customize as per our needs, which helps in a very positive way where things are not available beforehand; we can test with service virtualization."

"Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool."

"Since the solution has both command line and automation options, it generates good reports."

"We do a lot of web services testing and REST services testing. That is the focus of this product."

More Parasoft SOAtest pros

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"The REST API features allowed integrated testing for select products to quickly make calls and test the UIs with API calls while the CLI allows us to matrix the grid function across browsers."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

"The product is easy to use."

"We added Testim to our CI flow. It allows us to test only tasks that already passed sanity tests."

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

More Testim pros

Cons

"The performance could be a bit better."

"There are performance issues where the tool crashes sometimes. In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes."

"One area that could use improvement is the cryptography capabilities in Parasoft SOAtest. It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions."

"Reporting facilities can be better."

"In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices."

"Tuning the tool takes time because it gives quite a long list of warnings."

"The feedback that we received from the DevOps of our organization was that the tool was a little heavy from the transformation perspective."

"Compatibility with HTTP 1.1 and TLS 1.2 needs to be improved."

More Parasoft SOAtest cons

"Testim sometimes fails due to stability issues. It doesn't always work consistently, especially after running multiple tests."

"The product's areas of improvement include pricing considerations and additional features related to visual testing and PDF handling."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now."

More Testim cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I think it would be a great step to decrease the price of the licenses."

"The cost of Parasoft seems to have gotten higher with a projection that wasn't really stipulated for our company. They've done a tremendous job at negotiating those deals."

"The price is around $5,000 USD."

"From what I understand, Parasoft SOAtest isn't the cheapest option. But it has a lot to offer."

"We are completed satisfied with Parasoft SOAtest. The ROI is more than 95%."

"The license price is a little expensive, but it provides a better outcome in terms of the end-to-end automation process."

"They do have a confusing licensing structure."

"It is an expensive product, so think carefully about whether it fits your purposes and is the right tool for you."

"The solution is not expensive."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

20%

Manufacturing Company

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

University

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

Educational Organization

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	9
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	23

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	3
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Parasoft SOAtest?

I am not involved in the pricing aspect, setup cost, or licensing cost of Parasoft SOAtest. Our dedicated tools and support teams handle those aspects.

What needs improvement with Parasoft SOAtest?

What is your primary use case for Parasoft SOAtest?

We use Parasoft SOAtest for API testing and service virtualization with responder setup. Service virtualization is very helpful in our testing. When any downstream system is not available or we are...

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

What needs improvement with Testim?

More advanced AI-based features and features on the API side would help us create better end-to-end test suites.

SonarQube vs Parasoft SOAtest

Comparisons

Compared 13% of the time

Postman Enterprise vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 12% of the time

Coverity Static vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 8% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 7% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Parasoft SOAtest

Compared 3% of the time

More Parasoft SOAtest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 27% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 17% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 12% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Qt Squish vs Testim

Compared 2% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Product Reports

Parasoft SOAtest

Download Parasoft SOAtest product report

Download Testim product report

Also Known As

SOAtest

No data available

Overview

Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).

SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.

Parasoft

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Sample Customers

Charter Communications, Sabre, Caesars Entertainment, Charles Schwab, ING, Intel, Northbridge Financial, Capital Services, WoodmenLife

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Parasoft SOAtest vs. Testim