ReadyAPI Test and Postman compete in API testing, providing distinct advantages in their own right. ReadyAPI Test appears to have an upper hand in professional-grade environments, while Postman is favored for its ease of use and collaboration.
Features: ReadyAPI Test is praised for its robust professional-grade testing tools, advanced data-driven testing, and seamless integration with CI/CD pipelines. Postman is appreciated for its intuitive workflow, powerful teamwork capabilities, and a wide range of easy-to-use testing options. These features make Postman more accessible for users looking for team collaboration and simple functionality.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest ReadyAPI Test could benefit from a more streamlined setup process and improved documentation. It also needs enhancements to make the user experience smoother. Postman requires better support for complex testing scenarios, enhanced performance with large collections, and improved customer service. These improvements would help both tools address specific user concerns.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ReadyAPI Test has a complex deployment process but is valued for its thorough customer support and detailed documentation. Postman has straightforward deployment and minimal setup requirements, but its customer service is an area for enhancement. ReadyAPI Test excels in support, while Postman offers simplicity in deployment.
Pricing and ROI: ReadyAPI Test has a higher setup cost, justified by comprehensive features and professional support, positively impacting ROI. Postman’s pricing is accessible and provides good value, with a free version for smaller teams. ReadyAPI Test's investment is higher but justified by its features and support, whereas Postman offers excellent ROI for budget-conscious teams.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
The tool is generally stable.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
It has helped significantly since it is easy; the development team and QA team all use it, enabling us to automate almost 70% of our APIs using Postman.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It is easy to install, as well as to learn, particularly for new users, even if they are not developers.
Postman's Tools Support Every Stage of the API Lifecycle. Through design, testing and full production, Postman is there for faster, easier API development - without the chaos.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.