

Parasoft SOAtest and Postman Enterprise compete in the API testing solutions category. Parasoft seems to have the upper hand in comprehensive functionality and complex scenario support, while Postman leads in simplicity and ease of integration.
Features: Parasoft SOAtest offers a robust toolset for detailed customization, strong scripting capabilities, and supports protocols like REST and JSON. It provides automated API and UI testing and service virtualization. Postman Enterprise facilitates easy API testing with collection management, collaboration features, and simplified test execution.
Room for Improvement: Parasoft SOAtest requires better performance, UI improvements, and streamlined tool integration. Postman Enterprise could enhance its features for web service testing, improve SOAP API support, and offer a more streamlined interface.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Parasoft SOAtest is mainly deployed on-premises and known for its fast customer service and technical support, despite occasional delays. Postman Enterprise offers cloud and hybrid deployments and is praised for its flexible support, although its documentation needs improvement.
Pricing and ROI: Parasoft SOAtest is seen as expensive with a complex pricing model but promises high ROI for large organizations. Postman Enterprise is more affordable, providing a free version for smaller teams and appealing pricing for straightforward API testing needs.
We found Parasoft SOAtest to be quick in building up test patterns, allowing us to create complex tests efficiently.
Tasks that previously took four or five minutes can now be completed in 20 to 30 seconds with the help of the tool.
A minimum of 50% time is saved when comparing manual to automation.
I appreciate the ease of using Postman, especially its desktop version, due to the features it offers such as cookie management and environment synchronization.
There is a lot of support available through forums and user groups, which has been sufficient for me.
Postman does not have database validation available, which affects its scalability.
This solution is scalable.
In particular use cases with numerous steps, it experiences crashes.
I rate it ten out of ten for stability.
I have not experienced any issues or downtimes.
During the development phase, you will face issues, but once it goes to production, you won't face such issues.
It did not support enough of the protocols or cryptography formats we needed, which led us to create our own solutions.
One improvement would be to integrate it with modern technologies such as AI, so we can generate test cases by providing the details so that it can generate the structure, and later the person working can modify and enhance it.
In terms of improvements for Parasoft SOAtest, some features could be added or perhaps existing areas could be improved, such as lowering prices.
One of the primary challenges with Postman is handling authentication issues, especially relating to tokens and passwords.
If they can enhance it to have a database kind of validation like we have in ReadyAPI, it would be better.
Maybe Postman can be a good contender and replicate some features such as more scripting and control over API calls.
Parasoft SOAtest is expensive, but it was acquired because the company was dissatisfied with Quick Test Pro.
Postman's pricing model includes a basic free version, which is favorable given the Professional enterprise options offered.
Postman is open-source, so the cost is minimal compared to commercial platforms.
Postman is much cheaper than the other tools.
Parasoft SOAtest is very good at ensuring tests don't pass or fail until they genuinely pass or fail.
Parasoft SOAtest improves the quality of the application, increases security and security compliance, and it is a cost-effective tool.
The best feature of Parasoft SOAtest is the extension tool where we can write our custom scripts.
The desktop version's features like cookie management, environment compatibility, security settings, proxy integration, and data synchronization add significant value.
It's easy to navigate because tons of documentation and examples are available.
Postman's collaboration tools, such as version control and team workspaces, are particularly useful when working with teams of three to four people.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Postman Enterprise | 9.7% |
| Parasoft SOAtest | 3.7% |
| Other | 86.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 9 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Large Enterprise | 23 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 9 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
Parasoft SOAtest delivers fully integrated API and web service testing capabilities that automate end-to-end functional API testing. Streamline automated testing with advanced codeless test creation for applications with multiple interfaces (REST & SOAP APIs, microservices, databases, and more).
SOAtest reduces the risk of security breaches and performance outages by transforming functional testing artifacts into security and load equivalents. Such reuse, along with continuous monitoring of APIs for change, allows faster and more efficient testing.
Postman Enterprise provides API testing capabilities with features like automation, integration, and shared environments, enhancing efficiency for REST and SOAP APIs. Teams benefit from its intuitive interface and support for automation and scripting.
Postman Enterprise is designed for API testing, supporting REST and SOAP APIs to enhance manual and automated testing. It offers endpoint validation, unit and integration testing, and data-driven testing. This platform is valued for its easy setup, flexibility in automation, and scripting, enabling collaborations through shared collections and generating reports. However, users find room for improvement in automation, integration with platforms, SOAP API testing, and collection management.
What are the key features of Postman Enterprise?In industries relying on API development, Postman Enterprise aids in creating robust testing environments. Whether technology, finance, or healthcare, teams leverage its data-driven testing capability and collaboration features for comprehensive and accurate testing outcomes.
We monitor all API Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.