PTC Creo vs Siemens NX comparison

PTC and Siemens are both solutions in the CAD category. PTC is ranked #3, while Siemens is ranked #1 with an average rating of 7.5. PTC holds a 17.4% mindshare in CAD, compared to Siemens’s 18.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of PTC users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Siemens users who would recommend it.

PTC Creo

Read 1 PTC Creo review

951 Views
951 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Siemens NX

Read 2 Siemens NX reviews

1,364 Views
1,078 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PTC Creo

Siemens NX

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PTC Creo

Ranking in CAD

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Siemens NX

Ranking in CAD

1st

Average Rating

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

CAM (1st)

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the CAD category, the mindshare of PTC Creo is 17.4%, down from 24.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Siemens NX is 18.4%, down from 28.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

CAD Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Siemens NX	18.4%
PTC Creo	17.4%
Other	64.2%

CAD

Featured Reviews

Santhosh Tm

Works

User-friendly interface with helpful Map Keys and Part Family features

The most valuable features are the Map keys and Part Family features. Map keys make the usage very smooth and easy, whereas the Part Family creation is very easy with simple variable definition and table creation for the variant parts. The user interface is very simple and user-friendly when compared to other CAD tools in the market.

Read full review

Özkan Tekin

Powertrain Design Engineer at Bugatti Rimac

Has handled complex assemblies efficiently but has struggled with user guidance and feature accessibility

I struggle to follow all the updates when the product was updated because, for example, in CATIA, when you right-click and select a feature, only one click is needed to see exactly where this feature or geometry is coming from as a command from the product tree. Making this in Siemens NX is more difficult because I should do more clicks, and it is hard to understand for the shading and graphical property, which is not very user-friendly. Modeling itself is easy, and it is quite fast to generate quick models, but when it comes to making changes or following up what I have done and making modifications to the model, it becomes tricky. I do not understand what integrated design validation in Siemens NX exactly is, so I have not used it. I use synchronous technology in Siemens NX, and I find it helps me make design decisions easier because it is more user-friendly in terms of generative design. I am able to see where the modeling will go, and I can successfully perform some DMU checks between the parts or the clearance distances or DFAs or DFM. This kind of feature is quite user-friendly. I do not tailor Siemens NX to my industry-specific requirements. I have heard that some OEMs are using macros or particular tools inside of Siemens NX, but unfortunately, I have not used such macros or auxiliary tools. Siemens NX's support for hybrid modeling impacts my design process, and I struggle with hybrid modeling because I struggle to find out the links and how to proceed or make sure that links are updated or still connected to each other. We try to use some hybrid modeling and Boolean operations, trying to integrate particular bodies or design features, references from a master part into the other slave parts. However, we struggle to follow up the links and their validity, which leads us to switch from hybrid design. If I were still using Siemens NX, I would want the hybrid modeling to be more optimized and more user-friendly for future updates. When Siemens switched from versions NX 10, 11, 12 to these 1950s versioning, every toolbar and command changed. I find myself always using the search button to find the corresponding command, which is not very user-friendly. When considering improvements to Siemens NX beyond what I already mentioned, I would say that when a tool is used for designing activities, there are many design approaches and manufacturing methods. This kind of tool, CAD systems, should perfectly combine designability and manufacturability on the same platform. For example, when I work on a part design, I commonly use commands that should be placed where I can reach them directly. Although there are ways to access them through tabs or shortcuts, a new engineer unfamiliar with the software may not find or understand these shortcuts. It would be better to place the most used commands in visible areas, such as the right upper side, so users can see them directly and start modeling right away. When switching to the sheet metal design, I create a sketch and then make a wall command. However, in the sheet metal module, the features are mixed up, making it hard to connect commands according to our workflow and manufacturing type.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is very simple and user-friendly when compared to other CAD tools in the market."

"I would recommend Siemens NX to other organizations because it's good compared to other software, especially for plant design."

"Siemens NX has achieved a trade-off to provide its users with the ability to handle large assemblies with lower GPU loads while maintaining good graphical quality."

Cons

"Sometimes, while working on highly complex assembly files, finding out the small missing parts is difficult and takes a lot of time."

"The most important thing I want to see improved in Siemens NX, compared to other software, is the basic sketch functionality."

"When Siemens switched from versions NX 10, 11, 12 to these 1950s versioning, every toolbar and command changed, and I find myself always using the search button to find the corresponding command, which is not very user-friendly."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which CAD solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

893,244 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

27%

Computer Software Company

14%

University

10%

Outsourcing Company

Manufacturing Company

20%

Computer Software Company

11%

Outsourcing Company

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What needs improvement with Siemens NX?

The most important thing I want to see improved in Siemens NX, compared to other software, is the basic sketch functionality. When you draw sketches, the constraints are more challenging; you have ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Siemens NX?

My company is a German company, and we are doing bulk material handling system and cement industries; we're using Siemens NX for plant design and product modeling. We are using Siemens NX for plant...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Siemens NX?

I have not used the NX integrated Design Validation feature so far. I am not using Synchronous Technology in Siemens NX. I would recommend Siemens NX to other organizations because it's good compar...

See all answers

Comparisons

Dassault Catia vs PTC Creo

Compared 24% of the time

Dassault SolidWorks vs PTC Creo

Compared 8% of the time

OnShape vs PTC Creo

Compared 7% of the time

Autodesk Revit vs PTC Creo

Compared 6% of the time

Autodesk AutoCAD vs PTC Creo

Compared 5% of the time

More PTC Creo Competitors

CNC Software MasterCAM vs Siemens NX

Compared 24% of the time

Dassault Catia vs Siemens NX

Compared 19% of the time

Dassault SolidWorks vs Siemens NX

Compared 8% of the time

Actify SpinFire vs Siemens NX

Compared 8% of the time

OnShape vs Siemens NX

Compared 5% of the time

More Siemens NX Competitors

Also Known As

Creo, PTC Computer Aided Design

PLM NX

Overview

PTC Creo is a comprehensive CAD software offering precision engineering tools for product design and development, serving industries like automotive, aerospace, and consumer products.

PTC Creo stands out for its robust suite of tools that support 3D CAD, allowing engineers to design efficiently and effectively. With seamless integration capabilities, it caters to diverse manufacturing processes, ensuring a streamlined workflow from design to production. Its parametric modeling, real-time simulation, and concurrent engineering features make it an asset for professionals seeking innovative design solutions.

What are the important features of PTC Creo?

Parametric Modeling: Enables detailed and customizable designs.
Real-time Simulation: Provides immediate feedback on design performance.
Concurrent Engineering: Facilitates collaborative design efforts.
Augmented Reality: Offers immersive visualization of design concepts.
Multi-CAD Data Handling: Simplifies the integration of external data.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Improved Design Efficiency: Reduces time spent on repeated tasks.
Enhanced Collaboration: Streamlines teamwork and project completion.
Cost Savings: Minimizes prototyping costs through simulation tools.
Increased Innovation: Encourages creative solutions with advanced capabilities.

PTC Creo is implemented widely in industries like automotive and aerospace, offering solutions tailored to their complex design and manufacturing processes. Its ability to handle intricate models and simulation helps companies enhance product quality and accelerate time to market.

PTC

Siemens NX is a comprehensive design and engineering software widely used for product development, providing advanced tools for modeling, simulation, and manufacturing.

Siemens NX offers a robust platform for product lifecycle management, enabling teams to efficiently collaborate and innovate. Its capabilities extend from conceptual design to manufacturing, integrating CAD, CAM, and CAE features. Known for its powerful modeling and flexible design solutions, Siemens NX supports complex engineering projects and is adaptable to specific business requirements. Its application across industries demonstrates its effectiveness in streamlining processes and enhancing product quality.

What key features does Siemens NX offer?

CAD Integration: Seamlessly integrates design and engineering workflows
Advanced Simulation: Provides robust testing and simulation tools
CAM Solutions: Includes comprehensive manufacturing automation tools
Product Lifecycle Management: Facilitates efficient management throughout the product lifecycle

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

High Efficiency: Increases productivity with streamlined operations
Innovation: Enhances creativity and innovation in design
Cost Reduction: Saves costs through efficient resource management
Quality Improvement: Elevates product quality and precision

Industries such as automotive, aerospace, and consumer electronics leverage Siemens NX to address specific challenges, benefiting from tailored features that improve their project outcomes. Its adaptability makes it a critical tool for competitive edge in manufacturing and design.

Siemens

Sample Customers

KTM, College Park, University of Tokyo, Aston Martin, Aristides Guitars

Sumitomo Heavy Industries Marine & Engineering, Manthorpe Engineering, Avcon Controls, American Axle & Manufacturing, Jyothy Laboratories, Compuplast

See our list of best CAD vendors.

We monitor all CAD reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.