PubSub+ Platform vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service comparison

Solace and TIBCO are both solutions in the Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) category. Solace is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.3, while TIBCO is ranked #3. Solace holds a 12.7% mindshare in MOM, compared to TIBCO’s 9.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Solace users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.

PubSub+ Platform

Read 18 PubSub+ Platform reviews

2,323 Views
743 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

TIBCO Enterprise Message Se...

Read 5 TIBCO Enterprise Message Service reviews

572 Views
538 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

PubSub+ Platform

TIBCO Enterprise Message Se...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between PubSub+ Platform and TIBCO Enterprise Message Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed PubSub+ Platform vs. TIBCO Enterprise Message Service Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform vs. TIBCO Enterprise Message Service

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,082 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

PubSub+ Platform

Ranking in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Message Queue (MQ) Software (8th), Event Monitoring (12th), Streaming Analytics (14th)

TIBCO Enterprise Message Se...

Ranking in Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

3rd

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Activity Monitoring (3rd)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) category, the mindshare of PubSub+ Platform is 12.7%, down from 18.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO Enterprise Message Service is 9.9%, down from 11.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
PubSub+ Platform	12.7%
TIBCO Enterprise Message Service	9.9%
Other	77.4%

Message Oriented Middleware (MOM)

Featured Reviews

reviewer2714190

freelancer at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Offers a seamless way to decouple applications, providing impressive performance and flexibility

Regarding improving the PubSub+ Platform, I'm not sure about the pricing aspect, but I heard that it is quite expensive compared to Kafka. That's the only concern I can mention; otherwise, it was as impressive as Kafka, better than Kafka based on my experience working on the Solace and Kafka white paper.

Read full review

Ray Ochieng

Integration Lead at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

A value-for-money solution with the requisite features to facilitate efficient communication within an organization

We have been struggling with the stability of TIBCO Enterprise Message Service (EMS), but now I don't know how to differentiate whether the issues are caused by the infrastructure or the product itself. So, I am hesitant to provide a rating because I suspect that it might be due to my setup or environment. I really don't know how to evaluate the product independently. We have faced challenges with EMS, but I am unsure if it is related to infrastructure or the product itself. Even if I reach out for support, I am uncertain if the issue will be resolved since it could be partly related to the product. It's a tough situation.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Going from something where we had outages and capacity issues constantly to a system that was able to scale with the massive market data and messaging spikes that happened during the initial stages of the COVID crisis in March, we were able to scale with 40 plus percent growth in our platform over the course of days."

"As of now, the most valuable aspects are the topic-based subscription and the fanout exchange that we are using."

"The valuable feature of PubSub+ Event Broker is the speed of processing, publishing, and consumption."

"Guaranteed Messaging allows for us to transport messages between on-prem and the cloud without any loss of data."

"The topic hierarchy is pretty flexible. Once you have the subject defined just about anybody who knows Java can come onboard. The APIs are all there."

"Some valuable features include reconnecting topics, placing queues, and direct connections to MongoDB. The platform provides a dashboard to monitor the status of messages, such as how many have been processed or delivered, which is helpful for tracking performance."

"The most useful features has been the WAN optimization and probably the HybridEdge, which requires some third-party adapters or plugins. The idea that we can position Solace as a protocol-agnostic message transport fabric is key to our company having all manners of asynchronous messaging protocols from MQ, Kafka, JMS, etc. I really like the WAN optimization: Send once over a WAN, then distribute locally as many times as there are subscribers."

"We like the seamless flexibility in protocol exchange offering without writing a code."

More PubSub+ Platform pros

"TIBCO Enterprise Message Service's most valuable features are rapid zero-code integration and its large number of adapters and plugins."

"It is very useful tool. It is also very easy to learn and implement."

"The initial setup is straightforward and the product documentation is very good."

"It allows us to achieve synchronous as well as asynchronous communication with the added advantage of making the communication reliable."

"The Enterprise Messaging Server will store the message and wait for other subscribers to come onto the network."

"I like TIBCO's ability to create versioned queues and persistent messages."

"We have implanted the core middleware solution for the organization using this product and it is responsible for communication between different applications."

"The setup was done by TIBCO. It has been stable and has a server."

Cons

"The section on observability pertains to understanding the functioning of an event crash. Instead of focusing on how the crash occurs, attention is given to the observable aspects, such as a memory pipeline where one person pushes messages and another reads them. However, this pipeline often encounters issues, such as the reader being unavailable, causing the system to become stuck and preventing the messages from moving forward. This can lead to the pipeline being permanently stalled."

"The integrations could improve in PubSub+ Event Broker."

"For improvements, I would suggest increasing the max payload size to a limit of 100MB or more. The current max payload size is limited to 5MB."

"The deployment process is complex."

"We have requested to be able to get into the payload to do dynamic topic hierarchy building. A current workaround is using the message's header, where the business data can be put into this header and be used for a dynamic topic lookup. I want to see this in action when there are a couple of hundred cases live. E.g., how does it perform? From an administration perspective, is the ease of use there?"

"One of the areas of improvement would be if we could tell the story a bit better about what an event mesh does or why an event mesh is foundational to a large enterprise that has a wide diversity of applications that are homegrown and a small number off the shelf."

"It could be cheaper. It could also have easier usage. It is a brilliant product, but it is quite complex to use."

"I would like them to design topic and queue schemas, mapping them to the enterprise data structure."

More PubSub+ Platform cons

"Since all the communications goes through this product, it acts as a single point of failure."

"I would like to see better integration with Java and Apache Kafka."

"An area for improvement would be integration with the API layer."

"TIBCO also has its proprietary line of cloud-based applications, but specifically, these two products are not cloud compatible."

"Overall, my experience with the support team has been disappointing."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"Having a free version is critical for our technology operations use case. This is primarily because our technology operations team is a cost center in our company. They are not profit drivers and having a free version for installation will probably meet our needs. Even for production, it'll support up to a 100,000 messages per second. I don't think in technology operations that we have that many events and alerts from our detection tools. Even if I have 20 or 30 event detection products out there, they're only going to publish the things which are critical or warnings. I don't think we'll ever reach a 100,000 messages per second."

"There are different tiers where you can choose what would work for you. As a customer, you need to know roughly how many messages a month you will use."

"Having a free version of the solution was a big, important part of our decision to go with it. This was the big driver for us to evaluate Solace. We started using it as the free version. When we felt comfortable with the free version, that is when we bought the enterprise version."

"The price of PubSub+ Event Broker is reasonable for the capability it offers. However, when compared to others solutions on the market it is expensive."

"The pricing and licensing were very transparent and well-communicated by our account manager."

"The licensing is dependent on the volume that is flowing. If you go for their support services, it will cost some more money, but I think it is worth it, especially if you are just starting your journey."

"It could be cheaper. Its licensing is on a yearly basis."

More PubSub+ Platform pricing and cost advice

"In our case, we didn't pay for each product separately. We simply paid for all those companies that provided the components."

"The cost of licensing is very high. One should go for the product only if they need to ensure message reliability and they cannot afford to lose messages."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

26%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Retailer

10%

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

39%

Computer Software Company

University

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	14

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PubSub+ Event Broker?

I do not know about the pricing of PubSub+ Platform because I did not manage the instance.

See all answers

What needs improvement with PubSub+ Event Broker?

Additional in-line information about certain things on PubSub+ Platform could be more beneficial for new users who are just starting to use this technology. The analytics tools integrated within Pu...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for PubSub+ Event Broker?

I describe the main use cases for PubSub+ Platform as wanting to use it as a messaging queue pipeline for managing the data stream events in our IoT platform while I was working at an IoT-based com...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache Kafka vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 13% of the time

IBM MQ vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 9% of the time

Software AG Universal Messaging vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Confluent vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Apache Flink vs PubSub+ Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More PubSub+ Platform Competitors

IBM MQ vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service

Compared 27% of the time

TIBCO FTL vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service

Compared 17% of the time

TIBCO Rendezvous vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon SNS vs TIBCO Enterprise Message Service

Compared 9% of the time

More TIBCO Enterprise Message Service Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform

January 2026

Download PubSub+ Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Activity Monitoring

December 2025

Download TIBCO Enterprise Message Service product report

Also Known As

PubSub+ Event Broker, PubSub+ Event Portal

Enterprise Message Service

Overview

PubSub+ Platform is designed for real-time message publishing and outstanding interoperability. With features like intuitive administration and topic filtering, it offers both stability and high performance for scalable deployments across diverse scenarios.

PubSub+ Platform enhances data integration with its event mesh and seamless protocol compatibility, providing a comprehensive solution for organizations tracking shipments, generating reports, and managing transactions. Its granular topic filtering and WAN optimization ensure high utility in event-driven applications and cloud deployments. Users highlight the platform's intuitive administration and ease of management, though some seek improved integration with third-party tools and enhanced observability. Concerns include scalability for large payloads and training resource availability. Despite its interface complexity, PubSub+ remains valuable for trading and market data distribution.

What are the key features of PubSub+ Platform?

Real-time messaging: Facilitates seamless communication across platforms.
Flexible topic hierarchy: Supports dynamic topic taxonomy for efficient data management.
Event mesh: Enhances integration and interoperability with diverse protocols.
Intuitive administration: Simplifies system management and configuration.
WAN optimization: Ensures efficient connectivity for global deployment.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Messaging stability: Offers consistent performance in dynamic environments.
Scalability: Provides seamless expansion to accommodate growing data volumes.
Security: Maintains robust protection for sensitive information.
Support and configuration: Accessible, reliable support, and UI-driven setup streamline the management.

PubSub+ Platform is widely implemented for asynchronous messaging in industries like finance for trading and market data, logistics for shipment tracking, and tech operations management. It enables companies to modernize applications while ensuring data accuracy and efficiency across global systems.

Solace

TIBCO Enterprise Message Service is a standards-based messaging solution that can serve as the backbone of an SOA by providing Java Message Service (JMS) compliant communications across a wide range of platforms and application technologies.

TIBCO

Sample Customers

FxPro, TP ICAP, Barclays, Airtel, American Express, Cobalt, Legal & General, LSE Group, Akuna Capital, Azure Information Technology, Brand.net, Canadian Securities Exchange, Core Transport Technologies, Crédit Agricole, Fluent Trade Technologies, Harris Corporation, Korea Exchange, Live E!, Mercuria Energy, Myspace, NYSE Technologies, Pico, RBC Capital Markets, Standard Chartered Bank, Unibet

BNL, SunGard, TUI Group, UTi Worldwide, Yellow Pages Group

Buyer's Guide

PubSub+ Platform vs. TIBCO Enterprise Message Service

December 2025

Free Report: PubSub+ Platform vs. TIBCO Enterprise Message Service

Find out what your peers are saying about PubSub+ Platform vs. TIBCO Enterprise Message Service and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,082 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our PubSub+ Platform vs. TIBCO Enterprise Message Service report.

See our list of best Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) vendors.

We monitor all Message Oriented Middleware (MOM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.