Qlik Compose vs SSIS comparison

Qlik and Microsoft are both solutions in the Data Integration category. Qlik is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.9, while Microsoft is ranked #4 with an average rating of 7.8. Qlik holds a 1.1% mindshare in DI, compared to Microsoft’s 7.9% mindshare. Additionally, 81% of Qlik users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 79% of Microsoft users who would recommend it.

Qlik Compose

Read 12 Qlik Compose reviews

1,451 Views
1,107 Comparison Views

81% willing to recommend

SSIS

Read 73 SSIS reviews

12,026 Views
8,992 Comparison Views

79% willing to recommend

Qlik Compose

SSIS

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 19, 2024

SSIS and Qlik Compose compete in the data integration and transformation domain. Qlik Compose appears to have an edge due to its superior automation capabilities, particularly beneficial for complex data transformation tasks.

Features: SSIS offers seamless integration with SQL Server and Azure, robust data cleaning, and transformation capabilities, as well as a user-friendly interface with drag-and-drop features. It excels in parallel processing for high data transfer efficiency. Qlik Compose provides advanced automation, real-time data integration, and the ability to create data marts without writing code, which differentiates it significantly. Its drag-and-drop interface and automatic data modeling are key benefits.

Room for Improvement: SSIS could enhance its initial setup process and expand its capabilities for complex transformation tasks. More robust real-time data processing and an improved user interface could be potential improvements. Qlik Compose could benefit from broader ETL functionalities, a more intuitive user interface for detailed custom configurations, and better integration options for non-SAP platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Qlik Compose offers a straightforward deployment process and responsive customer service, ideal for organizations with limited technical resources. SSIS, while requiring more extensive setup, integrates smoothly within Microsoft environments leveraging its familiarity and support within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Pricing and ROI: SSIS typically presents lower initial setup costs for those already in the Microsoft ecosystem, making it a cost-effective choice with its affordable licensing. Qlik Compose might require a higher upfront investment, but its advanced automation can deliver a favorable ROI in complex environments. The efficiency in data transformation tasks makes Qlik Compose a valuable long-term investment despite the initial costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Qlik Compose vs. SSIS Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SSIS

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Qlik Compose

Ranking in Data Integration

23rd

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SSIS

Ranking in Data Integration

4th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Qlik Compose is 1.1%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SSIS is 7.9%, down from 8.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Data Integration

Featured Reviews

Sahil Taneja

Principal Consultant/Manager at Tenzing

Easy matching and reconciliation of data

The initial setup was easy for the data warehousing concept. But for a person who is new to ETL and warehousing concepts, it may take some time. If someone is familiar with these concepts, they could understand and learn the tool quickly. However, compared to other tools, the UI is complex. It would be helpful to have a better UI and documentation for new users. As of now, there is a challenge in learning the Compose tool for new users altogether. Qlik Compose was deployed on-premises. But the servers, like the SQL servers were maintained on the cloud—the managed instances.

Read full review

Sakiru Dosumu

Head, Development Chapter (DevOps) at First Bank of Nigeria Ltd.

Its ability to transform and transport data is extremely valuable

he ability of SSIS to transform and transport data is extremely valuable to me. It allows for intelligent extraction and manipulation of data during the process. Improved error handling would enhance ETL processes further. I haven't directly utilized the data flow components but they seem capable of supporting complex data integration needs.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The technical support is very good. I rate the technical support a ten out of ten."

"It's a stable solution."

"There were many valuable features, such as extracting any data to put in the cloud. For example, Qlik was able to gather data from SAP and extract SAP data from the platforms."

"One of the most valuable features of this tool is its automation capabilities, allowing us to design the warehouse in an automated manner. Additionally, we can generate Data Lifecycle Policies (DLP) reports and efficiently implement updates and best practices based on proven design patterns."

"Qlik Compose is good enough. It is user-friendly and intuitive."

"The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities."

"As long as you pick the solution that best fits with your requirements, you won't find that performance is a problem. It's good."

"It is a scalable solution."

More Qlik Compose pros

"I have used most of the standard SQL features, but the ones that stand out are the Data Flows and Bulk Import."

"I like that this solution is very scalable, accommodating large datasets and various types of servers. It integrates with most common database servers and allows for customization through coding, including complex scripts. Compared to Alteryx Designer, SSIS offers more customization. Its data cleaning capabilities are highly accurate because we can run tests as data is loaded, ensuring it meets all requirements before reaching the final destination. The ability to write custom SQL and C# code within SSIS packages is its greatest feature."

"It is easy to set up the product."

"You can get data from any data source with SSIS and dump it to any outside source. It is helpful. Getting, extracting, converting, and dumping data doesn't require much effort because we can do everything in the user interface. You drag and drop, then give the required input. It's intuitive."

"Its compatibility with Microsoft products has been very valuable to our company. It fits well within the architecture."

"Like most Microsoft products, SSIS is user-friendly and easy to use."

"Data Flows are the main component we use. These can range from a simple source to sink ETL, to many source to many sink dataflows."

"The most valuable feature of SSIS is that you can take data from other servers which are not MS SQL Server or Oracle."

More SSIS pros

Cons

"There could be more customization options."

"It would be better if the first level of technical support were a bit more technically knowledgeable to solve the problem. I think they could also improve the injection of custom scripts. It is pretty difficult to add additional scripts. If the modeling doesn't give you what you want, and you want to change the script generated by the modeling, it is a bit more challenging than in most other products. It is very good with standard form type systems, but if you get a more complicated data paradigm, it tends to struggle with transforming that into a model."

"It could enhance its capabilities in the realm of self-service options as currently, it is more suited for individuals with technical proficiency who can create pages using it."

"The solution has room for improvement in the ETL. They have an ETL, but when it comes to the monitoring portion, Qlik Compose doesn't provide a feature for monitoring."

"For more complex work, we are not using Qlik Compose because it cannot handle very high volumes at the moment. It needs the same batching capabilities that other ETL tools have. We can't batch the data into small chunks when transforming large amounts of data. It tries to do everything in one shot and that's where it fails."

"I believe that visual data flow management and the transformation function should be improved."

"I'd like to have access to more developer training materials."

"When processing data from certain tables with a large volume of data, we encounter significant delays. For instance, when dealing with around one million records, it typically takes three to four hours. To address this, I aim to implement performance improvements across all tables, ensuring swift processing similar to those that are currently complete within seconds. The performance issue primarily arises when we analyze the inserts and updates from the source, subsequently dropping the table. While new insertions are handled promptly, updates are processed slowly, leading to performance issues. Despite consulting our Qlik vendors, they were unable to pinpoint the exact cause of this occurrence. Consequently, I am seeking ways to optimize performance within Qlik Compose, specifically concerning updates."

More Qlik Compose cons

"Microsoft should offer an on-premises support warranty for those using that deployment. They seem to be withdrawing from on-premises options."

"Generic processes should be used instead of custom code for each table."

"I would like to see better technical documentation because many times information is missing."

"SSIS is not stable."

"SSIS has room for improvement, mainly because the overall package can be buggy. It often locks up, requiring a restart, which is annoying. However, since it's free, we tolerate these performance issues. I'd like to see better debugging tools in future releases and improvements in API calls; It would be helpful if SSIS had a built-in API engine so we wouldn't have to rely solely on database connections."

"It needs more integration tools, so you can connect to different sources."

"There is connectivity with other databases, however, this is the most significant issue that has to be addressed."

"The solution could improve on integrating with other types of data sources."

More SSIS cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us."

"The price of the solution is expensive."

"On a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is very expensive, I rate the solution a six."

"We purchased the standard edition of SQL Server and SSIS came with it free of charge."

"SSIS' licensing is a little high, but it gives good value for money."

"SSIS is fairly well-priced - I would rate it at four out of five."

"I'm not involved in licensing details, but SSIS provides value to our organization by simplifying data management tasks."

"All of my clients have this product included as part of their Microsoft license."

"Depending on the arrangement that a certain company has with Microsoft, it may supply the permanent license that is included in the SQL server license, or it may be a time-bound license if it is a partner license or other enterprise license."

"The solution is economical. You don't have to worry about the pricing as long as you're installing both services on the same server."

"People have to opt for a perpetual-based licensing model."

More SSIS pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user90069

BI Expert at a healthcare company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Feb 20, 2014

Informatica PowerCenter vs. Microsoft SSIS - each technology has its advantages but also have similarities

Technology has made it easier for businesses to organize and manipulate data to get a clearer picture of what’s going on with their business. Notably, ETL tools have made managing huge amounts of data significantly easier and faster, boosting many organizations’ business intelligence operations…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

19%

Computer Software Company

12%

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Which ETL tool would you recommend to populate data from OLTP to OLAP?

There are two products I know about * TimeXtender : Microsoft based, Transformation logic is quiet good and can easily be extended with T-SQL , Has a semantic layer that generates metat data for cu...

See all answers

What do you like most about Qlik Compose?

The most valuable is its excellence as a graphical data representation tool and the versatility it offers, especially with drill-down capabilities.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Qlik Compose?

While they outperform Tableau, there's room for improvement in Qlik's pricing structures, especially for corporate clients like us.

See all answers

Which is better - SSIS or Informatica PowerCenter?

SSIS PowerPack is a group of drag and drop connectors for Microsoft SQL Server Integration Services, commonly called SSIS. The collection helps organizations boost productivity with code-free compo...

See all answers

What do you like most about SSIS?

The product's deployment phase is easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SSIS?

Utilizing SSIS involves no extra charges beyond the SQL Server license. It's an economical choice for my clients.

See all answers

Comparisons

Qlik Replicate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 60% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs Qlik Compose

Compared 16% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Qlik Compose

Compared 11% of the time

Palantir Foundry vs Qlik Compose

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle GoldenGate vs Qlik Compose

Compared 5% of the time

More Qlik Compose Competitors

Informatica PowerCenter vs SSIS

Compared 20% of the time

Talend Open Studio vs SSIS

Compared 12% of the time

Oracle Data Integrator (ODI) vs SSIS

Compared 8% of the time

IBM InfoSphere DataStage vs SSIS

Compared 7% of the time

AWS Glue vs SSIS

Compared 5% of the time

More SSIS Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose

March 2025

Download Qlik Compose product report

Buyer's Guide

SSIS

March 2025

Download SSIS product report

Also Known As

Compose, Attunity Compose

SQL Server Integration Services

Overview

Qlik Sense is a powerful business intelligence tool that offers a range of features to help organizations make faster and more informed decisions. Its primary use cases include operational and financial dashboards, self-service reporting, and centralized access to cross-functional reports. The solution is praised for its mobile platform, ease of use, data-sharing capabilities, and extensibility.

Qlik Sense has helped organizations improve data literacy, reduce time consumed in complex reports, and provide widely available MI to senior stakeholders. It also enables self-service analytics, improves data quality and governance, enhances collaboration, and reduces costs.

Qlik

SSIS is a versatile tool for data integration tasks like ETL processes, data migration, and real-time data processing. Users appreciate its ease of use, data transformation tools, scheduling capabilities, and extensive connectivity options. It enhances productivity and efficiency within organizations by streamlining data-related processes and improving data quality and consistency.

Microsoft

Sample Customers

Poly-Wood

1. Amazon.com 2. Bank of America 3. Capital One 4. Coca-Cola 5. Dell 6. E*TRADE 7. FedEx 8. Ford Motor Company 9. Google 10. Home Depot 11. IBM 12. Intel 13. JPMorgan Chase 14. Kraft Foods 15. Lockheed Martin 16. McDonald's 17. Microsoft 18. Morgan Stanley 19. Nike 20. Oracle 21. PepsiCo 22. Procter & Gamble 23. Prudential Financial 24. RBC Capital Markets 25. SAP 26. Siemens 27. Sony 28. Toyota 29. UnitedHealth Group 30. Visa 31. Walmart 32. Wells Fargo

Buyer's Guide

Qlik Compose vs. SSIS

February 2025

Free Report: Qlik Compose vs. SSIS

Find out what your peers are saying about Qlik Compose vs. SSIS and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Qlik Compose vs. SSIS report.

See our list of best Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.